Advances in Food Technology and Nutritional Sciences · Vol. 3, No. 1 · 2017 · pp. 33–41 · e-ISSN 2377-8350

Low-Protein Rice (LPR) Product: Processing Method and Product Safety

Norihiro Takei, Naoki Watanabe, Masanori Nakajo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/aftnsoj-3-142 · Published 2017-09-07 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2017 The Author(s)

Abstract

Background: Dietary therapy through a low-protein diet (LPD) has long been used for preserv-ing the renal function of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Reducing the amount of protein ingested from rice would make it possible to allocate the difference to side dishes, thereby improving the quality of meals and facilitating adherence to LPD. Methods: Forica Foods Co., Ltd., Uonuma City, Niigata, Japan developed exclusive technology in 1994 for obtaining low-protein rice (LPR), using proteolytic enzymes to digest and remove the protein in white rice. In 2004, we developed processing technology to enhance the palat-ability of said LPR. By combining these technologies, we established a manufacturing method for producing delicious, high quality processed rice products which can serve as a daily staple. Results: For more than two decades since being launched in 1995, nearly 100 million Protein Low Content (PLC) rice products have been sold, and to date, there have been zero complaints of health problems attributable to them. This demonstrates their high safety even when eaten repeatedly over a long period. Discussion: The PLC Rice series of products, which compare favorably with, and can be sub-stituted for, regular rice, are delicious (high quality) enough to be eaten everyday. They enhance the quality of mealtimes for CKD patients by increasing their range of food choices. Conclusion: PLC Rice product offers high added value, as they not only facilitate adhesion to LPD but also add satisfaction and contentment to daily meals, helping to enhance the quality of life (QoL) of patients with CKD.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease (CKD); Low-protein diet (LPD); Low-protein rice (LPR); Dietary therapy

Background

Dietary therapy through a low-protein diet (LPD) has long been used to preserve the renal func-

1-3 tion of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).1-3 LPD restricts the amount of protein in

the total dietary intake and it lowers the production of urea nitrogen, an end product of protein

metabolism.4 It is considered that the level of protein intake modulates the filtration load on

5,6 the kidneys and tempers the decline of renal function.5,6 Over the past 50 years, LPD have been

successfully used to treat chronic renal failure in Japan. Since the easiest course of action is to

cut down on foods which are high in protein, the main dishes, such as meat and fish, are usually

reduced to smaller servings. However, such frugality compromises the quality of meal times.

Removing protein from rice would minimize the need to cut down on main dishes.

Mealtime quality would be maintained, making it easier for pa-

tients to follow the LPD.

To address this issue, in 1992 the Niigata Agricultural

Research Institute Food Research Center developed a technol-

ogy (JP2706888B) using lactobacillus fermentation to reduce

the protein, phosphate, and potassium contained in white rice

(WR).8 However, their method posed technical challenges such

as extremely long processing times and the difficulty of mi-

croorganism control hampering reliable production. In 1994,

Forica Foods Co., Ltd., Uonuma City, Niigata, Japan built on

this technology to develop an exclusive proteolysis technology

(JP3156902B) utilizing an enzyme product which can break

down protein in WR more quickly and reliably than lactobacilli

fermentation.9 The following year, the manufacture and sales of

“Cooked PLC Rice 1/3 (PLC: Protein Low Content)” began.

PLC Rice is processed, protein reduced WR. The palat-

ability (quality) of this low-protein rice (LPR) is such that it can

be eaten day after day. The PLC Rice products were developed

to facilitate adhesion to the LPD, thereby improving the quality

of life (QoL) of patients with CKD. In this article, the manufac-

turing process for the PLC Rice series will be described.

Methods

Raw Materials and Protein Digestion

Raw materials are WR, pH adjuster, and protease.

There is no particular restriction on the type of WR. For

example, either Japonica rice (short grain) or Indica rice (long

grain) can be used. Highly clean raw material is used to reduce

the risk of microbiological contamination.

In the protein digesting step, the temperature and pH

must be maintained for a certain amount of time at levels con-

ducive to enzyme activity. To prevent in-process microbiologi-

cal proliferation and consequent product contamination, it is

desirable to keep the reaction solution pH acidic and at or above

50 °C. To control pH, a suitable quantity of organic acid is add-

ed. Suitable organic acids include citric acid, lactic acid, fumaric

acid, gluconic acid, and glucono delta-lactone (GDL). Out of

these, citric acid is chosen because of its high buffering property,

ability to maintain pH within the enzyme solution stably over a

long period, and for having the smallest negative effect on the

taste and aroma of cooked rice.

As proteolytic enzyme, acidic protease approved by the

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) as a food ad-

ditive and available on the market is used. In our method, we

use an enzyme mix (EM) consisting of an exclusive formula-

tion of at least 3 kinds of enzyme products, comprising at least

1 each derived from Aspergillus oryzae, Rhizopus niveus, and

Aspergillus niger respectively. Each enzyme product is a crude

enzyme product extracted from the source microorganisms, and

the main component is protease in the aspartic protease family

(EC 3.4.23).

Protein Digesting Process

The protein digesting process is broadly divided into enzyme

digestion and washing. In the first step, surface bran residue

and germs were washed away with water. The washed WR is

placed in a reaction solution containing dissolved EM and citric

acid, and allowed to soak for a certain period of time (up to 24

hours) in a temperature and pH conducive to enzyme activity.

This breaks down the protein in the WR. Subsequently, thorough

washing removes any unnecessary matter: rice protein decom-

position product, EM, and excess citric acid. These steps yield

LPR (Raw LPR), which is raw, protein reduced WR.

Figure 1 shows the time lapsed changes of protein mass

in rice treated with enzyme with a single protease derived from

Figure 1. The Effect of Processing Time and Enzyme Concentration on Protein Removal. ) 7

si

s as b

y r dr ,

%(

t n et net

o c

c 2

m o et

oet r P

P 0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36

Processing time (hrs)

0.01% (w/v) 0.05% (w/v) 0.1% (w/v)

Aspergillus oryzae. Protein mass in rice is highly dependent on

enzyme concentration and reaction time. By adjusting these fac-

tors, the rice protein mass can easily be reduced to target levels.

In the actual process of protein enzyme treatment, EM is used

instead of a single enzyme, resulting in better removal rates and

production efficiency compared to a single enzyme. This is like-

ly to be because the combination of multiple enzymes each with

different protein cleavage sites reduces the molecular weight of

the decomposition product. The smaller the molecular weight of

rice protein, the easier it is to elute from the rice grain.

Manufacturing Method

The manufacturing flow of these products is outlined in Figure

2. Regardless of product form, low protein rice products need to

have their rice protein content broken down and removed. The

method employed by Forica Foods is based on the invention by

Nakajo et al (JP3156902B), and consists of utilizing protease to

process protein.9 The very simple production process is shared

across product forms.

Cooking Process

The Raw LPR obtained by said protein digestion process re-

quires special techniques and know-how to produce rice grains

which maintain their shape while offering palatability. This is

because Raw LPR grains are extremely fragile, and when sub-

jected to steaming or cooking like ordinary WR, they dissolve

into a gruel-like mass which is far from delicious. In order to

solve this problem, we developed a method (WO 2017037799

A1) for processing LPR into a palatable, high quality product.10

Characteristics of the Manufacturing Method for “Cooked PLC

Rice”

The manufacturing method for “Cooked PLC Rice” can be

Figure 2. Production Flow Chart of PLC Rice.

broadly categorized into cooking, hot water injection, sealing,

and cooling. In the first step, each serving of the Raw LPR is

filled into heat resistant containers. Without adding water, the

containers are transported to our exclusive rice steamers in-

stalled in clean rooms. The rice steamer chamber is sealed and

the interior de-aired to create a vacuum. Immediately, steam is

injected powerfully to instantly raise the temperature within the

chamber to 130 °C to 140 °C. This state maintained for 30 to 120

seconds during which the rice is steamed rapidly. Immediately

after steaming the rice, sterile hot water of at least 90 °C is added.

The steamed LPR is promptly sealed by heat resistant film with

oxygen absorber affixed to it. The temperature is maintained for

an additional 5 to 10 minutes to ensure thorough steaming of the

content. Subsequently, the packaged rice is allowed to air cool

gradually for 20 to 30 minutes until its temperature reaches 30

to 35 °C, then subjected to X-ray inspection to check for foreign

matter and weighed. Articles which pass the inspections become

product.

Using the steaming method described above, in which

rice is steamed by elevating the temperature in the chamber in-

stantaneously without adding water, the starch can be prevented

from eluting from the Raw LPR, thereby avoiding loss of the

flavor of white rice and making it possible to obtain low protein

rice with appropriate viscosity and elasticity that is suited to Jap-

anese preferences. In addition, the hot water injection process

makes it possible to change the amount of added water at will.

Thus, the moisture content of the product can be adjusted easily

to obtain the desired hardness/softness of the cooked rice. As has

been described, this technique is an extremely unique method of

cooking rice which offers both practicality and flexibility.

Characteristics of the Manufacturing Method for “Semi-Cooked

PLC Rice”

The manufacturing method for “Semi-Cooked PLC Rice” can be

broadly categorized into steaming, drying, and flaking to sepa-

rate into individual grains. The most basic manufacturing meth-

od consists of spreading out Raw LPR into a uniform thickness,

steaming with steam, then loosely separating the grains, drying

uniformly overall, then flaking to separate the rice grains into

individual grains. By gelatinizing and then drying the raw starch

contained in Raw LPR, it is possible to obtain “Semi-Cooked

LPR” whose rice grains are strong enough for long-term storage

and which can be cooked similarly to WR.

However, simply steaming the rice with saturated steam

results in highly viscous starch eluting from the surface of the

LPR grains. This causes the LPR grains to stick strongly to each

other, making it extremely difficult to separate the grains into

uniform size. Variations in the size of LPR clusters can cause

uneven drying. Trying to separate unevenly dried LPR clusters

generates large quantities of cracked and crushed rice, resulting

in significant loss of productivity. Furthermore, when LPR thus

obtained is cooked, it is stickier than necessary, compromising

the quality of the product.

To solve the issues of productivity and reliable product

quality, we invented the 2 processing methods shown below.

Refrigeration to retrograde the starch: Raw LPR is spread out

evenly into a thickness of 30 to 50 mm, then steamed for 5 to 10

minutes with saturated steam. This is transferred to a refrigerator

and kept at 0 to 5 °C for 24 to 72 hours. This causes the starch,

gelatinized by steaming, to retrograde, resulting in weakened ad-

hesion between rice grains, thereby facilitating the flaking pro-

cess. After the grains are separated, the rice is uniformly dried

to bring the moisture content of the grains to 15 to 26%. The

separated LPR grains are screened for grain shape and color, and

the grains with uniform shape and color are weighed and sealed

in packaging material together with oxygen absorber to obtain

product.

Superheated steam: Raw LPR is spread out evenly into a thick-

Table 1. Nutrient Content in 100 Grams of “Cooked PLC Rice” Products.

Content Unit WR

Calories kcal 168 160 (3.1)

Moisture % 60.0 60.4 (0.7) 60.1 (1.7) 60.1 (0.8) 60.5 (1.6) 60.6 (0.5)

Total Protein % 2.5 0.87 (0.1) 0.44 (0.0) 0.24 (0.1) 0.13 (0.0) 0.10 (0.0)

Total Fat % 0.3 0.5 (0.1)

Total Carbohydrate % 37.1 38.1 (0.7) 38.9 (1.7) 39.0 (0.7) 39.1 (1.4) 38.8 (0.7)

Ash % 0.1 0.1 (0.0)

Sodium mg 1 2 (0.3)

Potassium mg 29 0.6 (0.3)

Calcium mg 3 5 (0.0)

Phosphorus mg 34 15 (1.0)

ness of 30 to 50 mm, then steamed for 4 to 10 minutes using

superheated steam of at least 105 °C. The superheated steam,

obtained by heating saturated steam, makes it possible to heat

efficiently using higher temperatures than saturated steam.

Furthermore, superheated steam is drier than saturated steam,

thereby keeping down excess moisture in the rice during steam-

ing. Therefore, the steamed rice is less viscous and more easily

separated.

The subsequent steps are similar to method described

above. Immediately after steaming, the Steamed LPR is sepa-

rated loosely and dried by warm air so that the moisture level is

uniform throughout, at 16% to 20%. The rice is then separated

into individual grains using a cracking device, etc. The separated

LPR grains are screened for grain shape and color, and the grains

with uniform shape and color are weighed and sealed in packag-

ing material together with oxygen absorber to obtain product.

Compared to method using retrogradation, in which the

process is interrupted for the refrigeration step, this method con-

sists of fewer steps and is amenable to continuous production

conveyor-style. Therefore, it is possible to manufacture “Semi-

Cooked PLC Rice” efficiently.

Results

Nutrition

Nutrition information on PLC Rice products is shown in Table

1. Test samples were taken from at least 3 separate production

days. As shown in the Table 2, there is minimal interlot vari-

ability of nutritional values, indicating extremely high repro-

ducibility. Particularly noteworthy is the protein content, which

demonstrates reliability in meeting the respective target values.

Product Overview

PLC Rice is LPR which is processed, protein reduced WR (Fig-

Mean (+SD)

“1/3” “1/5” “1/10” “1/20” “1/25”

162 (6.8) 162 (2.6) 160 (7.1) 160 (1.7)

0.5 (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 0.3 (0.1) 0.5 (0.2)

0.1 (0.1) 0.1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0.1)

2 (0.0) 2 (0.2) 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1)

0.5 (0.2) 0.9 (0.2) 0.6 (0.1) 0.7 (0.2)

5 (0.3) 5 (1.2) 5 (0.7) 5 (0.6)

15 (1.5) 14 (1.0) 13 (0.7) 13 (1.2)

Figure 3
Figure 3. The List of PLC Rice Products.

ure 3). Some of the products in the series have been approved

as “Food for special uses” by the Ministry of Health, Labour

and Welfare, and for bearing claims on the label that they are

suitable foods for kidney disease patients. In 1995, when we

launched the first product, it contained 1/3 of the protein in WR,

that is, 2/3 of the WR protein had been removed. With continued

technological development, we achieved a reduction rate of 1/25

by 2007. As of 2017, 22 years from its development in 1994,

the PLC Rice series consists of 10 products to accommodate

consumer needs in terms of product form, reduction rate (1/3 to

1/25), and serving size (140 to 180 grams).

PLC Rice comes in 2 product forms: “Cooked PLC

Rice” which can be microwaved or boiled in the pouch, and

“Semi-Cooked PLC Rice” which requires cooking in a rice

cooker. In “Cooked PLC Rice,” LPR is aseptically packaged. In

“Semi-Cooked PLC Rice,” LPR is steamed, dried, flaked, and

sieved, and requires a finishing step of cooking such as boil-

ing, steaming, or microwaving before serving. Both types of

products can be stored and distributed at room temperature. The

best-before date of “Cooked PLC Rice” is 7 months and “Semi-

Table 2. The Effect of Processing Time and Enzyme Concentration on Protein Removal.

Protein content (%, dry basis)

Processing Enzyme concentration (%, w/v)

time (hrs) 0.01 0.05 0.1

0 7.4 7.4 7.4

5 6.9 5.9 5.5

24 6.3 4.1 2.9 Cooked PLC Rice” is 12 months.

Residual Enzyme in Product

Figure 4 shows the SDS-PAGE profile (CBB stain) of Raw LPR

extract. Compared to extract from non-treated WR (L1), Raw

LPR extract (L2) no longer shows any protein-derived bands ex-

cept for some in the low molecular weight side. There were no

bands common to Raw LPR (L2) and EM (L3), indicating that

enzyme derived protein is absent (or under the CPB stain detec-

tion limit). These results show that rice protein decomposition

product and EM are washed away from Raw LPR, leaving no

residue in the product.

Microbiological Safety of Product

To store the packaged “Cooked PCR Rice” safely in room tem-

perature, the contents must be sufficiently sterilized and sealed

in the sterile state. Raw LPR is steamed with high temperature,

high pressure steam in a steaming device installed in a clean

room. At the same time, it undergoes thorough sterilization under conditions which are equivalent to the 120 °C for 4 minutes

(F0=3.1) stipulated in the Japanese Food Sanitation Act for re-

tort pouch food. Subsequently, the contents are kept sterile while

sealing together with oxygen absorber, thereby securing sterility

of the product. In fact, since its adoption in 2004, there have

been no incidents of product spoilage or deterioration attribut-

able to insufficient sterilization, proving the efficacy and safety

of this technique.

According to our findings relating to “Pre-Cooked

PLC Rice,” drying steamed LPR to a moisture content of 15 to

26% yields desirable quality (particularly mouthfeel) when it

is cooked. By sealing this together with oxygen absorber and

maintaining an anaerobic state inside the package, it becomes

Figure 5. The Production Amount of PLC Rice.

Figure 4. CBB-Stained SDS-PAGE Patterns of the Raw LPR Extract. M; Marker (AE-1440, ATTO, USA), L1; 5-times concen- trated extract from non-treated rice, L2; 5-times concen- trated extract from Raw LPR, L3; EM, L4; Thermo-treated EM (50 °C, 24 hrs).

possible to store it safely at room temperature. However, once

the package is opened, new oxygen flows into the package. The

anaerobic state cannot be maintained and there is risk of mold

and other microbiological growth. A product with moisture level

higher than 20% requires refrigeration or freezing. However, a

product dried to a moisture level of 16% to 20% can be stored

safely at room temperature. This is due to the reduced water ac-

tivity of the product, which prevents mold etc. from proliferating

after the package is opened.

Product Safety and Quantities Manufactured

Quantities of PLC Rice produced from launch to the present day

are shown in Figure 5. In more than 20 years since its launch,

)s la e m Cooked "1/3" no illi m( tc

ud 5

or pf

o

re 4

b Cooked "1/5" m

un de ta

mi ts Cooked "1/10"

E 2

Cooked "1/25"

Cooked "1/20"

Semi-cooked "1/20"

Semi-cooked "1/10"

1996 1997 1998 1999200020012002200320042005 2006 2007 2008 2009201020112012201320142015 2016

Year

nearly 100 million PLC Rice products have been provided to

CKD patients through many hospitals throughout Japan. Al-

though sales have declined since the peak of 7.5 million servings

in 2000, the quantities have been growing gradually since 2004

when the above-mentioned high temperature steaming method

was adopted. As of 2016, we are producing the equivalent of 4.7

million servings annually.

In the 22 years of producing and selling “Cooked PLC

Rice” and the 7 years of “Semi-Cooked PLC Rice,” there have

been zero reports of health problems attributable to these prod-

ucts. Given the high frequency of LPD Rice ingestion by CKD

patients who eat it every day as part of their LPD, and the fact

that PLC Rice products are composed almost entirely of natural

ingredients derived from WR, it is reasonable to say that PLC

Rice, regardless of product form, is safe to eat and has no nega-

tive health effects, even for CKD patients who ingest them re-

peatedly over the long-term.

Discussion

From clinical findings, the recommended protein intake for Jap-

anese CKD patients is under 0.5 g/kg body weight (BW)/day.11

The cooked rice that is the staple for Japanese people contains

2.5% protein. If a person eats a bowl (approximately 165 g) of

cooked rice 3 times a day, he or she will ingest 12.5 g of protein

from the rice. A patient weighing 60 kg should ideally ingest

less than 30 g of protein per day. If the patient eats regular rice,

Figure 6. Relationship between Total Protein Allowance and Protein Intake from Staple Out of Total Protein Allowance.

)

y a d /d g (

e k a t

ni ni

n i eni

t

o r

P fP

o

t

nu

o

m A

Bars with solid outline: Protein intake when ingesting 165 g (1 serving) of regular rice or LPR 3 times a

day

Bars with dotted outline: Daily protein allowance (30 g/day)

White circle and solid line: Difference and percentage - Total protein allowance and protein intake from

staple out of total protein allowance

WR; White Rice, “1/3”; PLC Rice 1/3 (0.83 % protein), “1/5”; PLC Rice 1/5 (0.5 % protein), “1/10”; PLC

Rice 1/10 (0.25% protein), “1/20”; PLC Rice 1/20 (0.125% protein), “1/25”; PLC Rice 1/25 (0.1% protein)

it would account for 40% of the protein allowance. To keep with

the allowance, the entire meal plan needs to be adjusted.

Figure 6 shows the how different proportions of a hy-

pothetical patient’s daily protein allowance of 30 g is taken up

by eating the same 165 g (1 serving) of WR or PLC as the staple

food 3 times a day. Unprocessed WR translates to roughly 40%

of the daily protein allowance, thereby leaving only about 60%

to be allocated to side dishes (Figure 2). By contrast, LPR, even

at the reduction rate of 1/3, only accounts for 8.4% of the dai-

ly allowance, leaving more than 90% to be occupied by other

dishes. The smaller the reduction rate, the less protein from the

staple, thereby permitting the rest of the allowance to be filled by

other foods. This greatly expands the patient’s food choices.

Another dietary consideration for CKD patients is the

desirability of reducing phosphorus and potassium intake in ad-

dition to protein. At the same time, there is a need to ensure the

patient takes in enough nutrients, particularly energy. With PLC

Rice products, not only can protein intake be reduced to the de-

sired level, but the products contain 50% less phosphorus and

95% less potassium compared to regular cooked rice while of-

fering the same energy as WR. They meet all of the requirements

as a staple food for CKD patients (Figure 7).

We developed exclusive technology for digesting and

removing protein from WR using microorganism-derived en-

zyme product, and technology for processing the Raw LPR thus

)

% (

h

30 100

sih

d

e d i s

m

o r for y

c n

a a pu

cc

occ

n i ei t

o r

P

0 0

WR "1/3" "1/5" "1/10""1/20""1/25"

Figure 7
Figure 7. Nutrient Content in “Cooked PLC Rice” Series. )t c udor 150 p g

/l ack 100 ( yg re n E

)t 40 c

udor p 29 g 30

001/ g m( t nn 20 et

noc m ui 10 ss at o P 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.7

obtained into a palatable food product. By combining these tech-

nologies, we can reliably manufacture delicious, high quality,

low protein rice product, which can be eaten repeatedly as sta-

ple. In the 20 years from its launch, nearly 100 million PLC Rice

products have been sold, with zero complaints relating to health

problems arising from their consumption to date. This demon-

strates their safety even when eaten repeatedly over a long pe-

riod.

The PLC Rice series of products, which compare favor-

ably with, and can be substituted for, regular rice, are delicious

(high quality) enough to be eaten everyday.

Conclusion

LPR enhances the quality of mealtimes for CKD patients by in-

creasing their range of food choices. It is therefore, reasonable

to say that PLC Rice products offer high added value, as it not

only facilitates adhesion to LPD but also add satisfaction and

contentment to daily meals, helping to enhance the QoL of pa-

tients with CKD.

Conflicts Of Interest

All authors are employee of Forica Foods Co., Ltd., Uonuma

City, Niigata, Japan. All of this study and work has been per-

formed at the Forica Food Co., Ltd., Uonuma City, Niigata, Ja-

pan.

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate to Dr. Shaw Watanabe (Life Science

)t 168 160 162 162 160 160 c 2.5

udor p g

001/ g( t ne t noc 0.87

ni et or 0.44 P 0.24 0.13 0.10

WR 1/3 1/5 1/10 1/20 1/25 WR 1/3 1/5 1/10 1/20 1/25

)t 40 c udo 34 r p g 30

001/ g m( tn et 20 15 15 noc 14 13 13 s ur

ohps

oh P

WR 1/3 1/5 1/10 1/20 1/25 WR 1/3 1/5 1/10 1/20 1/25

Promoting Association, Tokyo, Japan) for his great advices on

this study. The authors would also like to tahnk all the staff of

Institute of Food Research and Product Development Kasetsart

University (bangkok, Thailand), especially ms. Ngamjit Lowit-

hun and Mrs. patcharee Tungtrakul, for their helpful advice and

support to our research.. A part of this study was supported by

Grant from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

References

  1. BealeLS. Kidney Diseases, Urinary Deposits and Calculous Disorders, Their Nature and Treatment. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lindsay and Blakiston; 1869
  2. GiordanoC. Use of exogenous and endogenous urea for protein synthesis in normal and uremic subjects. J Lab Clin Med. 1963; 62: 545-577
  3. GiovannettiSMaggioreQ. A low-nitrogen diet with proteins of high biological value for severe chronic uremia. Lancet. 1964; 1(7341): 1000-1003
  4. MaroniBJSteinmanTIMitchWE. A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1985; 27(1): 58-65. doi: 10.1038/ki.1985.1010.1038/ki.1985.10 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1985.10
  5. KingAJLeveyAS. Dietary protein and renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993; 3(11): 1723-1737
  6. WatanabeS. Low-protein diet for the prevention of renal failure. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B. 2017; 93: 1-9. doi: 10.2183/ pjab.93.001
  7. WalserMMitchWEMaroniBJKoppleJD. Should protein intake be restricted in predialysis patients? Kidney Int. 1999; 55(3): 771-777. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.055003771.x10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.055003771.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.055003771.x
  8. EgawaKShishidoK. Japan Patent JP2706888B (1994.10.17)
  9. TakaharaJNakajoM. Japan Patent JP3156902B (2001.2.9)
  10. TakeiNWatanabeNNakajoM. WO2017037799A1 (2015.8.28)
  11. IdeuraTShimazuiMMoritaHYoshimuraA. Protein intake of more than 0.5 g/kg BW/day is not effective in suppressing the progression of chronic renal failure. Contrib Nephrol. 2007; 155: 45-49. doi: 10.1159/00010099510.1159/000100995 https://doi.org/10.1159/000100995