Dentistry · Vol. 2, No. 1 · 2015 · pp. 32–37 · e-ISSN 2377-1623

Endodontic Sealers”: Current Concepts and Comparative Analysis

Harpreet Singh, Sheenam Markan, Mandeep Kaur, Gaurav Gupta

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hos- pital, Patiala, IndiaIndia
Department of Prosthodontics, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College, Sunam, IndiaIndia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/doj-2-107 · Published 2015-02-03 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2015 The Author(s)

Abstract

The main aim of root canal therapy is the removal of microbial contaminants in conjunction with the total closure of the root canal system. Root canal sealers along with solid core material plays a major role in achieving the three dimensional sealing of the root canal system. These sealers are binding agents which are used to adapt the rigid gutta-percha to canal walls and to fill up the voids, accessory canals and irregularities within the canal. Root canal sealers, although used only as adjunctive materials in the obturation of root canals, have been shown to influence the outcome of endodontic treatment. A perfect combination of sealing ability and biocompatibility is what an ideal root canal sealer should possess. This article discusses the current concepts in the usage of different sealers in endodontic therapy and their comparison in order to draw some clinical inferences.

Keywords: Endodontics; Root canal treatment; Sealers

Introduction

Root canal therapy depends on integrally related root canal treatment phases: microbial control, cleaning and shaping, and effective sealing of the root canal system. The success of each depends on the execution of the final phase.1 Endodontic filling materials may be considered true implants as they touch and are based in vital tissues of the body.2 The main components of a root filling are: a solid core material and a sealer. The most commonly used core material is Gutta-percha, which occupies bulk of the canal space while the root canal sealer fills the interface between the core material and the dentin wall, the voids inside the core material and the accessory canals and also serves as a lubricant, thus helping to obtain a fluid tight seal.3

Ideally, the root canal sealer should be capable of creating an effective bond between the core material and the dentine of the root canal thus preventing leakage. It should also be non-toxic and preferably have a positive effect on the healing of periapical lesions.4

A great variety of endodontic sealers are available commercially and they are divided into different groups according to their chemical composition. It is a well known fact that three dimensional impervious obturation of the root canal system is of prime clinical importance for the long-term success of endodontic treatment.

At present epoxy resins based sealers possess very good physical properties, exceladequate biological performance. However, the creation of most

dontic sealer.

bonding root canal sealers, there has been a continuous quest for alternative sealers or techniques that bond simultaneously to canal wall dentin as well as filling materials. These bondable root canal sealers are getting popular these days because of their property of creating monoblocks within the root canal space.5

The term monoblock refers to the scenario wherein the canal space becomes perfectly filled with a gap-free, solid mass that consists of different materials and interfaces, which improves the seal and increases the fracture resistance of the filled canals. The most recently introduced self-adhesive type bondable root canal sealers are also associated with the additional benefits of reduced application steps and being user friendly.5

This review article attempts to compile information on various new generation root canal sealers which are advocated to be superior to their contemporary counterparts and also compare their properties.

Classification Of Sealers

Before we discuss the new generation of sealers, let us have an overview of the ones available to us for clinical use. Endodontic sealers have been historically classified in various ways such as: according to eugenol content; usage; absorbance, 6-12 etc.6-12A comprehensive categorization of the endodontic sealers has been provided in table 1 according to their composition.

Root Canal Sealers Brand Name

1. Zinc Oxide Eugenol Kerr PCS based sealers Procoseal

2. Epoxy resin based AH 26 sealers Top Seal

3. Silicon based sealers

4. MTA based sealers

5. Calcium-silicate-Phos- Endosequence/iRoot SP phate based biocer- iRoot BP amic sealers Bioaggregate

6. Methaacrylate resin based sealer Fourth generation- Realseal SE,

7. Calcium-phosphate Capseal I based sealers Capseal II

Table 1. Categorisation of Endodontic sealers according to their composition.

Recent Endodontic Sealers

ProRoot Endo Sealer

It is an experimental calcium silicate-based root canal sealer that is designed to be used in conjunction with a root filling material in either the cold lateral, warm vertical or carrier-based filling techniques. The major components of the powder component are tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate, with the inclusion of calcium sulphate as a setting retardant, bismuth oxide as a radiopacifier and a small amount of tricalcium aluminate. The liquid component consists of a viscous aqueous solution of a water soluble polymer. Similar to other tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate-containing biomaterials, the sealer produces calcium hydroxide on reaction with water.13

Herbal Sealer (Biosealer)

It is an experimental root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin. Trees belonging to the genus Copaifera are distributed around northern South America, mainly in the Amazon Rainforest. It is one of the most popular and promising phytomedicines used in Brazil. The powder is composed of zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, bismuth subcarbonate, natural resin (rosin) and borax, and the liquid is purified Copaifera multijuga oil-resin.

Nanoseal plus root canal sealer

A common cause of failure of root canal treatment is Roth sealer due to the inability to seal the accessory canal in most cases. One of the newest update in endodontics is the development of the Endomethasone first endodontic sealer based on nanotechnology which actively AH Plus seals the tiny gaps thereby reducing the infection. It is made up of calcium phosphate hydroxyapitite nanoparticles range from 40-60 nm. The rod shaped active nanoparticles can penetrate the 2- Seal dentinal tubules & enter accessory canals to ensure that all the RoekoSeal 15 spaces are effectively sealed.

Gutta flow Endo-CPM-Sealer

Hybrid root seal

MTA Obtura ProRoot Endo Sealer MTA fillapex It is a commercially available fourth generation selfadhesive dual-cure sealer, available in the powder-liquid form. It is an insoluble, radiopaque material that can be used either with resilon or Gutta-percha. The liquid comprises of 4-META, First generation- Hydron monofunctional methacrylate monomers and photo-initiators, Second generation- EndoREZ, while the powder consists of a mixture of zirconia oxide filler, Realseal silicon dioxide filler and polymerization initiators. 4-META is Third generation- Epiphany, Fibrefill able to promote monomer diffusion into the acid-conditioned and underlying intact dentin and produces functional hybridized Metaseal SE, Smartseal 16,17 dentin with polymerization. The formation of the hybrid dentin is the major mechanism of bonding and also the high quality hybridized dentin resists acidic challenges. However, polymerization shrinkage is inherent to methacrlyate resin-based sealers

Gutta flow 2 sealer

This is a modification of the original Gutta flow sealer which was available in the cartridge form. The excellent flow of this material made it the sealer of choice. However, the larger armamentarium required was a drawback. Of late, Gutta Flow 2 has been introduced which is available in the syringe form and has an excellent property of slight expansion after mixing which helps in better sealing.

iRoot SP/EndoSequence BC sealer

The manufactures of these sealers claim the ability to form hydroxyappetite during the setting process and ultimately create a chemical bond between dentinal wall and the sealer. These are convenient, premixed, ready-to-use, injectable white cement paste developed for permanent root canal filling and sealing applications. These are insoluble, radio opaque and aluminium free material based on a calciumsilicate composition, which requires the presence of water to set and harden. Dentin is composed of approximately 20% (by volume) of water and “iRoot SP” uses this water to initiate and complete its setting reaction.21 It exhibits potent antimicrobial action, excellent biocompatibility, and significant stimulation of periodontal regeneration and is osteoconductive. These sealers are also termed as Bioceramic sealers in general.

The Concept Of Monoblock

The term monoblock literally means a single unit.

Franklin R. Tay first described the concept of monoblock in endodontics.22

Primary monoblock

It has only one interface that extends circumferentially between the material and the root canal wall. A classic example of primary monoblock would be obturating the root canals with gutta percha, without using the sealer. Use of Hydron sealer alone is another example of this concept. The lack of sufficient strength and stiffness is the major drawback and this led to the development of Secondary monoblocks.

Secondary monoblock

Secondary monoblocks are the ones having two circumferential interfaces, such as one between the cement and dentin and the other between the cement and the core material.A classic example would be the use of sealer for obturation, wherein one interface is between Gutta Percha point and sealer and the the second one between the sealer and root canal wall.

Interest in utilizing the monoblock concept for reinforcing the root canal space was got resurfaced in around 2004 with the advent of bondable root filling materials that were launched

rials.

Resilon, a bondable root filling material which falls into this category, may be used for either lateral or warm vertical compaction techniques. As Resilon is applied using a methacrylate-based sealer to self-etching primer treated root dentin, it contains two interfaces, one between the sealer and primed dentin and the other between the sealer and Resilon, and hence may be classified as a type of secondary monoblock.

Tertiary monoblock

Tertiary monoblocks are the ones having an additional third circumferential interface between the bonding substrate 19,20 and the abutment material. Fiber posts that contain either an external silicate coating or those that contain unpolymerized resin composite for relining root canals that are too wide or not perfectly round for the fitting of conventional fiber posts may be considered as tertiary monoblocks. Tenax Fibre post (Coltene) have a specific resin coating on its surface, which when cured with dual cure resin ParaCore (Coltene) forms a typical Teriary monoblock: with one interface between the fibre post and the resin coating; the second one between the resin coating and the luting cement; and the third one between the luting cement and the root canal wall.

Another product that falls into this category is the EndoRez system (Ultradent), in which the conventional gutta-percha cones are coated with a proprietary resin coating.

Evaluation And Comparison Of Various Endodontic Sealers

Orstavik has listed the various evaluation parameters for testing endodontic sealers. They include technologic tests standardized by the ADA/ANSI in United States, and the ISO internationally. These technological tests include flow, working time, setting time, radio opacity, solubility and dimensional change following setting.2

Leakage

Leakage continues to be a major reason for failure in root canal therapy. Ideally, a root canal filling material should provide a barrier that prevents bacterial ingress from the oral cavity.23 Compared with zinc oxide-eugenol sealers, methacrylate based resin sealers were found to be more effective in sealing.24 Using a fluid-transport method, Tunga and Bodrumlu concluded that Epiphany and Resilon leaked significantly less than gutta-percha and AH-26.25 In bacterial leakage tests Epiphany and Resilon were superior to gutta percha and various other sealers.26 The Resilon/Epiphany system is reported to establish an immediate coronal seal after light curing of the dual-cured sealer at the canal orifices.27 An immediate coronal seal is clinically advantageous because there are situations in which filled root

bacterial recontamination.

Weller et al suggested that the newly introduced calcium silicate based Pro Root Endo Sealer is comparable in sealing quality to the epoxy resin-based sealer and seals better than the ZOE-based sealer after immersion in phosphate containing fluid. Moreover, Pro Root Endo Sealer exhibits amorphous calcium phosphate-like phases that spontaneously transform into apatite-like phases after immersion in the phosphate- containing stimulated body fluid. This phenomenon probably accounts for the in vitro bioactivity of this calcium silicate-based sealer (Huffman et al).

Biocompatability

One of the principal requirements of an endodontic root canal sealer is that it should be non-cytotoxic and immunologically compatible with peripheral tissue.

The biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity of a specific root canal sealer remains one of the principal considerations for selecting an appropriate sealer for a dental restoration.29 It has been demonstrated that sealer material based on zinc oxide-eugenol release potentially cytotoxic concentrations of eugenol. Calcium hydroxide-based sealers promote calcification but tend to dissolve overtime and compromise the endodontic seal. A new calcium hydroxide-based sealer, Acroseal appears to have lower solubility than other calcium hydroxide sealers, probably because of its epoxy resin component. Glass ionomer sealers may bond tooth structure but also may activate the release of prostaglandins in periapical tissues.

Spangberget et al noted that the AH26 releases formaldehyde following component mixing that reaches a maximum rate two days after mixing. Formaldehyde release from curing endodontic material has been recognized for many years, formaldehyde being reputed to act as a disinfectant.31 The disinfective agent in AH26 is methenamine, which is hydrolyzed to ammonia and formaldehyde.32 The efficacy of long-term disinfection of canal by formaldehyde released from a root canal sealer has previously been shown to be low.33 There have been case reports of adverse reactions such as paraesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve attributed to the formaldehyde released from root canal sealers.34

Scarparo et al found that Methacrylate resin-based sealers brought about greater quantities of macrophages.35 Studies have shown that the Epiphany root canal sealer was the only material that presented intraosseous biocompatibility among the resin based sealers.36

Newer generation of sealers such as iRoot SP have shown a promising biocompatibility owing to their composi-

Flow

It has been found that the flow depends on particle size, temperature, on the internal diameter of the tubes and the rate of insertion of materials.2 Orstavik rated the flow of Tubliseal to be better than that of Kerr sealer, which was better than Diaket and Kloroperka NO. He also stated that flow properties may be affected by changes in the powder to liquid ratio.2 Studies have shown that Tubliseal EWT had a thinner film thickness among the conventional zinc oxide eugenol sealers. Increased strain rate gave a significant increase in the flow rate of all sealers. Other studies concluded that among the medicated sealers Endomethasone did not confirm to ISO specification.37

Sealers such as Gutta flow 2 have an excellent flow which helps in better sealing. On the other hand improvements are still going on to make the flow of Bioceramic sealers better for clinical usage.

Bond strength

Root filled immature roots or roots that are otherwise weakened internally run a greater risk of fracture. With the introduction of adhesive filling techniques, attempts have been made to strengthen such teeth through reinforcement of the coronal part of the root by composite cements and fillings. More recently, this concept has been taken further by attempting to reinforce the whole root canal system via an adhesive filling and integrated resin core (Resilon).

30 Souza SFC et al concluded that Epiphany had higher flow, polymerization stress and lower bond strength values to dentine than AH Plus.39 Other study concluded that the 980 nm diode laser irradiation of root canal dentin increased the bond strength of AH Plus sealer, but did not affect the adhesion of Epiphany sealer. Among the methacrylate based sealers the self adhesive sealers exhibited higher push out bond as compare to the non-etching sealer.

Newer Bioceramic sealers such as Endosequence possess very high bond strength with the dentin walls. This, to begin with, seems highly advantageous but can serve to be a limitation in the long run as retreatment in such cases would be highly difficult.

Antibacterial activity

Current concepts of root canal sealer functions do not emphasize on its antimicrobial activity as its primary function, but it is well recognized that most sealers in current use exhibit some such properties. With increased emphasis on improving procedures for disinfecting the root canal system, this particular property may be more appreciated in the future. Studies have concluded that among the resin based sealers EndoRez did not

Plus and Grossman’s sealer were effective in reducing the number of cultivable cells of E. faecalis while Calcium hydroxidebased sealers, Sealapex and Apexit were ineffective.40

The new generation sealers are also claiming their antimicrobial efficacy of a broader spectrum. However, higher levels of research are required to evaluate the long term antibacterial activity of these sealers, in vivo, before any final conclusions can be drawn.

Conclusion

The degree of endodontic success is directly proportional to a clinician’s knowledge of the root canal anatomy and the techniques selected while performing treatment. Properly performed endodontic therapy is the cornerstone of restorative and reconstructive dentistry. Three-dimensional sealing of the root canal is one of the main goals of endodontic treatment to prevent the reinfection of the canal and for preserving the health of the periapical tissues, thereby ensuring the success of root canal treatment. Thus, several types of endodontic sealers have been recommended to achieve this goal. It is important to note that not only the apical seal of the root canal but the coronal seal is of equal importance for the success of endodontic treatment. Ideally, further directions should focus on materials that penetrate the patent dentinal tubules, bind intimately to both organic and inorganic phases of dentin, neutralize or destroy microorganisms and their products, predictably induce a cemental regenerative response and strengthen the root system.

References

  1. ChivianN. Resilon-the missing link in sealing the root canal. Compendium. 2004; 25(10A)
  2. DagO. Endodontic topics. 2005; 12: 25-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1601- 1546.2005.00199.x10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00199.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00199.x
  3. SalzUPoppeDSbicegoSRouletJF. Sealing properties of a new root canal sealer. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42:1084-1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01635.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01635.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01635.x
  4. KumarSAShivannaVNaianMTShivamurthyGB. Comparative evaluation of the apical sealing ability and adaptation to dentine of three resin-based sealers: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2011; 14(1): 16-20. doi: 10.4103/0972- 0707.8072410.4103/0972-0707.80724 https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.80724
  5. KimYKGrandiniSAmesJM. Critical review on methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2010; 36: 383- 399. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.02310.1016/j.joen.2009.10.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.023
  6. CohenSHargreavesK. Pathways of Pulp. 9th ed. Missouri
  7. ChandraBSKrishnaVG. Grossman Endodontic Practice. th 12th ed. New Delhi, India: Wolters kluwer; 2010: 301-304. th
  8. WeineFS. Endodontic Practice. 6th ed: Missouri, USA: Mosby; 2004: 306-312
  9. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner. Textbook of endodontics. th 6th ed. Ontario, USA: BC Decker; 2008: 1030
  10. TorabinejadMWaltonR. Endodontics Principles and Practh tice. 4th ed. Missouri, USA: Elsiever; 2009: 305-307
  11. ManogueMPatelSWalkerR. The Principles of Endodontics. New Delhi, India: Oxford; 2005: 74. th
  12. Harty FJ, Pitt Ford TR. Endodontics in Clinical Practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsiever; 2004: 115-117
  13. HuffmanBPMaiSPinnaL. Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 34-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01490.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01490.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01490.x
  14. GarridoADBLiaRCFrançaSCda SilvaJFAstolfi-FilhoSSousa-NetoMD. Laboratory evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 283-291. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2591.2009.01678.x
  15. Prezi.com/Nanotechnology-in-endodontics
  16. AriHBelliSGunesB. Sealing ability of Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) in conjunction with different obturation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109: e113-e116. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.01610.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.016
  17. AkmanMAkmanSDerinbayOBelliS. Evaluation of gaps or voids occurring in roots filled with three different sealers. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 101-109
  18. Marin-BauzaGARached-JuniorFJSouza-GabrielAESousa-NetoMDMirandaCESilva-SousaYT. Physiochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.00210.1016/j.joen.2010.05.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.002
  19. CandeiroGTCorreiaFCDuarteMARibeiro-SiqueriaDCGaviniG. Evaluation of radioopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealears. J Endod. 2012; 38: 842-845. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.02910.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029
  20. Chen CC, Ho CC, David chen CH, Ding SJ. Physiochemical properties of calcium silicate cements for endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2009; 35: 1288-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.036 th https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.036
  21. CamilleriJ. Hydration characteristics of calcium silicates cements with alternatives radiopacifers used as root-end fillings materials. J Endod. 2010; 36: 508-518. doi: 10.1016/j. joen.2009.10.01810.1016/j.joen.2009.10.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.018
  22. TayFRPashleyDH. Monoblocks in root canals-a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007; 33: 391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.00910.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009
  23. SwansonKMadisonS. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod. 1987; 13: 56-59. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80155-310.1016/s0099-2399(87)80155-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(87)80155-3
  24. MadisonSSwansonKChilesSA. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types. J Endod. 1987; 13: 109-112. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399- (87)80175-910.1016/s0099-2399- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399-
  25. TorabinejadMUngBKetteringJD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1990; 16: 566-569. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80198-110.1016/s0099-2399(07)80198-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80198-1
  26. De BruyneMAADe MoorRJ. Long-term sealing ability of Resilon apical root-end fillings. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42: 884-892. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x
  27. Paque´ F, Sirtes G. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta- percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40: 722-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01298.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01298.x
  28. WellerRNTayKCGarrettLV. Microscopic appearance and apical seal of root canals filled with gutta-percha and ProRoot Endo Sealer after immersion in a phosphate-containing fluid. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 977-986. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2008.01462.x10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2008.01462.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2008.01462.x
  29. HuangTHYangJJLiHKaoCT. The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002: 77-83. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00081-310.1016/s0142-9612(01)00081-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00081-3
  30. KhashabaRMChutkanNBBorkeJL. Comparative study of biocompatibility of newly developed calcium phosphatebased root canal sealers on fibroblasts derived from primary human gingiva and a mouse L929 cell line. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42: 711-718. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01572.x10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01572.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01572.x
  31. SpångbergLSBarbosaSVLavigneGD. AH26 release formaldehyde. J Endodon. 1993; 19: 596-598. doi: 10.1016/ S0099-2399(06)80272-4
  32. TronstadLYangZPTropeMBarnettFHammondB. Controlled release of medicaments in endodontic therapy. Endodon Dent Trauma. 1985; 1: 130-134. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.198510.1111/j.1600-9657.1985 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985
  33. KochMJ. Formaldehyde release from root-canal sealers: influence of method. International Endodontic Journal. 1999; 32: 10-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00173.x10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00173.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00173.x
  34. Leonardo MR, Bezerra da Silva LA, Filho MT, Santana da Silva R. Release of formaldehyde by 4 endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 88: 221- 225. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70119-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70119-8
  35. ScarparoRKGreccaFSFachinEV. Analysis of Tissue Reactions to Methacrylate Resin-based, Epoxy Resin-based, and Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Endodontic Sealers. J Endod. 2009; 35: 229-232. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.02510.1016/j.joen.2008.10.025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.025
  36. SousaCJAMontesCRPasconEALoyolaAMVersianiMA. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of ah plus, endorez, and epiphany root canal sealers. J Endod. 2006; 32: 656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.00310.1016/j.joen.2005.12.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.003
  37. McMichenFRSPearsonGRahbaranSGulabivalaK. A Comparative study of selected physical properties of five root canal sealers. International endodontic journal. 2003; 36: 629- 635. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x
  38. De BruyneMAADe MoorRJ. Long-term sealing ability of Resilon apical root-end fillings. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42: 884-892. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x
  39. SouzaSFBombanaACFrancciCGonçalvesFCastellanCBragaRR. Polymerization stress, flow and dentine bond strength of two resin-based root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42: 867-873. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01581.x10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01581.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591-.2009.01581.x
  40. Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Alaçam T, Ørstavik D. Short term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38: 483-488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x