Epidemiology · Vol. 2, No. 1 · 2016 · pp. 1–6 · e-ISSN 2473-4780

Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Associated With Increased Odds of Depression

Chad Burleson, Kendall Anderson, Zachary Copeland, Cassandra Karcs, Kelly L. Sullivan

Department of Epidemiology, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USAUnited States

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/epoj-2-107 · Published 2016-07-12 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2016 The Author(s)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between depression and sugary drink intake using participant data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS). Design: Cross-sectional data from the 2012 and 2013 BRFSS were examined (N=44,603). Depression was based on self-report of symptoms within the past 30 days. Covariates included age, sex, race, employment status, body mass index (BMI), education level, and exercise in the past 30 days. Setting: Data from a national telephone survey (BRFSS) were used to assess risk factors associated with health of the participants. Subjects: Participants in the 2012 and 2013 BRFSS were included in this analysis (N=44,603). Results: Adjusting for confounders, the odds of depression increased by 5% for every sugary drink consumed (odds ratio (OR)=1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-1.10). Depression was also associated with race, with non-Hispanic blacks being 60% more likely to be depressed than non-Hispanic whites. Unemployment and having a high school or less education were independently associated with depression. The association of depression and consumption of sugar sweetened beverages was stronger among women than men. Conclusion: This study indicates that consuming sugary drinks are associated with an increased odds of depression. These findings support advocacy efforts for an overall healthy lifestyle. In addition, future research should evaluate this association using a cohort design in order to establish the temporality of this association.

Keywords: Mental health; Epidemiology; Diet; Soda

Introduction

Increased sugar intake has become a major concern in the United States over the past few de-

cades, with particular concern related to sugar sweetened beverages. Between 1977 and 1996

all age groups in the United States (US) more than doubled their consumption of sugary bever-

ages.1 In 2000, the average American citizen consumed 260 grams of sugar per day, although

of Agriculture (USDA) recommends no more than 40 grams per

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), 15.7 million adults reported having at

having an anxiety disorder, with 4% of these being classified as “severe”. The increased levels

of sugar intake and increased reporting of mental illness are both major public health concerns

in the US.

Overwhelming evidence suggests that added dietary

sugar has a negative impact on an individual’s mental health.

Research has provided many examples of sugar consumed ex-

cessively leading to altered mental health, however the associa-

tion between the concentrated sugar contents in manufactured

sugary beverages and depressive symptoms has not been exam-

ined. With the current increase in both sugary beverage intake as

well as reported depression in the US, the objective of this study

was to evaluate the possible association between sugary bever-

age intake and reported depression symptoms using data from

the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Methods

The BRFSS is a national telephone survey used to assess risk

factors associated with health of the participants.4 It is conducted

on an annual basis throughout the US. Response data for the

years 2012 and 2013 were included in this analysis.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

For participants to be included in this analysis, answers for both

the outcome and exposure variables (described below) must

have been valid. Any missing responses to the aforementioned

variables excluded the participant from the analysis.

Outcome

BRFSS participants were asked how often during the past month

they felt “so depressed that nothing could cheer (them) up?”.4,5

Participants who self-reported depression in this manner were

categorized as depressed.

Exposure

The primary exposure for this analysis was intake of sugar

sweetened beverages. Two questions in the BRFSS provide

these data, asking participants to report their consumption in the

past 30 days:

1. “About how often do you drink regular soda or pop that con- 4,5 tains sugar?.”4,5

2. How often did you drink sugar-sweetened fruit drinks (such

as Kool-aid and lemonade), sweet tea, and sports or energy

drinks (such as Gatorade and Red Bull)?”.4,5

Participants were asked to not include 100 percent fruit

juice, diet drinks, or artificially sweetened drinks such as diet

soda or diet pop. Responses to these questions were standardized

to the number of drinks consumed per day and this variable was

considered continuous.

Covariates

employment status, body mass index (BMI), education level,

and exercise in the past 30 days. Age was categorized as 18-

24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 65+ years. Race was clas-

sified as Non-Hispanic white (reference group), Non-Hispanic

black, or other; employment status was categorized as employed

(employed for pay or self-employed) or not employed (retired,

student, homemaker or looking for work); education was coded

as high school or less or more than high school, and exercise

was dichotomized to indicate if the participant exercised at all

outside of their employment during the past month. BMI was

treated as a continuous variable and was calculated by BRFSS

based on participants’ self-reported weight and height. These co-

variates were considered as possible confounders.

Analysis

The bivariate association between each covariate and

depression and sugar sweetened beverages (separately) was

evaluated using t-tests and Chi-square tests, as appropriate.

Means and standard errors (SE) were calculated for continuous

variables and frequencies were obtained for categorical vari-

ables. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate

the association between sugar sweetened beverages and depres-

sion, controlling for confounders. In addition to the model for the

entire sample, separate models were evaluated stratified by sex

in order to assess possible effect modification. Survey weights

were used throughout the analysis, which was performed using

SAS version 9.4.6 Survey procedures were used for mean, fre-

quency and logistic procedures.

Results

4,5

Table 1 shows the unadjusted demographic distribution by de-

pression status. Among those depressed, more than 60% of the

study population was 44 years of age or older, income level was

fairly evenly distributed among the participants, education was

also fairly even for those obtaining a high school degree and

higher, some college or technical school and finishing college.

Those not participating in exercise reported depression more

frequently than those who did exercise (32.8% crude fibre (cf.)

20.1%, respectively), although the majority of both groups did

not exercise. There was also a lower percentage of employed and

retired individuals in the depressed group (43.5% of depressed

participants were employed and 18.7% were retired cf. 56.8%

employment and 28.0% retirement among non-depressed par-

ticipants); however in the depressed group there was also a large 4,5 percentage (18%) of individuals classified as “unable to work”.

After adjusting for confounders using logistic regres-

sion, it was found that drinking one sugary beverage per day

increases the likelihood of depression by 6% (OR=1.06, 95%

CI=1.02-1.10) (Table 2). Among other covariates, race was

most strongly associated with depression, with black non-His-

panics being approximately 60% more likely to be depressed

(OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.19-2.20) and other races being more than

twice as likely to be depressed (OR=2.16, 95% CI 1.79-2.62)

Sex

Male Female

Age (years)

18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 and Older

Employment Status

Employed for Wages Self-employed Out of work for more than 1 year Out of work for less than a year A homemaker A student Retired Unable to work Missing=129

Income Level (Household, $/year)

Less than 10,000 Less than 15,000 Less than 20,000 Less than 25,000 Less than 35,000 Less than 50,000 Less than 75,000 75,000 or more Missing=5,115

Education

Never attended school or only kindergarten Grades 1 through 8 (elementary) Grades 9 through 11 (some high school) Grade 12 or GED (high school graduate) College 1 to 3 years College 4 years or more years Missing=95

Race

White non-Hispanic Black non-Hispanic Asian non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native Hispanic Other race non-Hispanic

Exercise

Yes No Missing=66

Bmi

Sugary-drink consumption (#/day)

SE: Standard Error.

Table 1. Demographics.

ing a high school education or less were also associated with

depression status (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.80-2.51; OR=1.89, 95%

CI=1.62-2.18, respectively).

Consistent with prior research, there also was a protec-

tive factor associated with exercise, as those who did not partake

in regular exercise, outside of their profession, were 71% more

likely to be depressed in comparison with their counterparts who

did exercise. This protective factor was also seen in individuals

of “retirement age” in the 65 years and older category, which is

Depressed Non-Depressed p-Value Variables (N=5,439) (N=39,164) (crude)

N (%) N (%)

2,119 (39.0%) 16,498 (42.1%) <0.0001 3,320 (61.0%) 22,666 (57.9%)

377 (6.9%) 1,829 (4.7%) 659 (12.1%) 3,869 (9.9%) 794 (14.6%) 5,068 (12.9%) <0.0001 1,236 (22.7%) 6,991 (17.6%) 1,246 (22.9%) 9,020 (23.0%) 1,127 (20.1%) 12,387 (31.6%)

1,988 (36.6%) 18,439 (47.1%) 373 (6.9%) 3,805 (9.7%) 354 (6.5%) 756 (1.9%) 269 (4.9%) 778 (2.0%) <0.0001 273 (5.0%) 2,101 (5.4%) 170 (3.1%) 857 (2.2%) 1,018 (18.7%) 10,980 (28.0%) 981 (18.0%) 1,332 (3.4%)

603 (11.1%) 1,114 (2.8%) 518 (9.5%) 1,451 (3.7%) 593 (10.9%) 2,229 (5.7%) 636 (11.7%) 3,086 (7.9%) <0.0001 607 (11.2%) 3,834 (9.8%) 616 (11.3%) 5,477 (14.0%) 557 (10.2%) 6,239 (15.9%) 729 (13.4%) 11,199 (28.6%)

16 (0.3%) 33 (0%) 209 (3.8%) 538 (1.4%) 466 (8.6%) 1,321 (3.4%) <0.0001 1,722 (31.7%) 10,211 (26.1%) 1,608 (29.6%) 11,494 (29.3%) 1,408 (25.9%) 15,482 (39.5%)

4,186 (80.0%) 34,561 (88.2%) 308 (5.7%) 1,142 (2.9%) 95 (1.7%) 530 (1.4%) <0.0001 182 (3.3%) 631 (1.6%) 473 (8.7%) 1,444 (3.7%) 195 (3.9%) 856 (2.2%)

1,783 (32.8%) 7,864 (20.1%) <0.0001 3,642 (67.2%) 31,248 (79.9%)

Continuous Variables Mean±SE Mean±SE p-value

27.87±0.19 27.16±0.07 0.0004

1.12±0.13 0.62±0.02 <0.0001

also consistent with a greater percentage of non-depressed retir-

ees seen (Table 1).

It should also be noted that there was a greater percent-

age of women that self-reported depression with women having

a 17% greater chance of depressive symptoms. In the sex-strat-

ified analysis, the odds of depression was higher among women

than men, although the confidence intervals overlapped (Table

3). Contrary to the whole-group findings, age was not indepen-

dently associated with depression among women.

Sugary Beverages (#per day) 1.05 (1.02-1.08) 1.11 (1.01-1.22)

Age

Race

BMI 1.00 (0.97-1.02) 1.02 (1.01-1.04)

Employment

Education

Exercise

*Each measure is adjusted for other variables in table. CI: Confidence Interval; Ref: Reference group.

Table 3:

Odds Ratio 95% CI

Sugary Beverages (#per day) 1.06 1.02-1.10

Sex

Male Ref

Female 1.17 1.01-1.36

Age

18-24 years Ref

25-34 years 1.50 1.10-2.02

35-44 years 1.18 0.88-1.58

45-54 years 1.25 0.94-1.65

55-64 years 0.99 0.74-1.33

65+ years 0.43 0.31-0.59

Race

White, non-Hispanic Ref

Black, non-Hispanic 1.61 1.18-2.19

Other 2.06 1.70-2.50

BMI 1.01 1.00-1.03

Employment

Employed for pay Ref

Not employed 2.12 1.79-2.51

Education

More than high school Ref

High school graduate or less 1.78 1.53-2.02

Exercise 1.71 1.45-2.02

Yes Ref

No 1.71 1.45-2.02 *Each measure is adjusted for other variables in table. CI: Confidence Interval; Ref: Reference group.

Odds of depression (adjusted*) (n=44,243).

Table 2:

Men Women

Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)

18-24 years Ref

25-34 years 2.19 (1.34-3.57) 1.09 (0.75-1.58)

35-44 years 1.47 (0.92-2.35) 1.03 (0.70-1.50)

45-54 years 1.75 (1.12-2.73) 0.97 (0.68-1.39)

55-64 years 1.64 (1.05-2.57) 0.66 (0.46-0.96)

65+ years 0.65 (0.40-1.05) 0.32 (0.21-0.49)

White, non-Hispanic Ref

Black, non-Hispanic 1.28 (0.78-2.12) 1.85 (1.24-2.76)

Other 1.96 (1.47-2.61) 2.03 (1.58-2.60)

Employed for pay Ref

Not employed 2.19 (1.66-2.88) 2.11 (1.71-2.60)

More than high school Ref

High school graduate or less 2.05 (1.66-2.53) 1.59 (1.28-1.97)

Yes Ref

No 1.30 (1.02-1.65) 2.05 (1.63-2.57)

Sex-specific Odds of Depression (adjusted*).

Discussion

We found that sugary drink consumption was positively associ-

ated with depression, controlling for age, sex, and measures of

socio-economic status. For every sugary drink consumed daily,

the odds of depression increased by 5%. Depression was also

independently associated with younger age as well as race, with

non-Hispanic blacks being 60% more likely to be depressed than

non-Hispanic whites. There also appeared to be an effect modifi-

cation showing sugary sweetened beverages may have a greater

effect on women than men (OR=1.17).

This study is one of the few to compare men and wom-

en of all adult age groups, as well as to examine the direct as-

sociation between sugary drinks and depression. Previous stud-

ies have typically focused solely on youth or women, as well 7-14 as specific diets.7-14 An ecologic study evaluated the association

between major depression and national sugar consumption in

Korea, the US, France, Germany, Canada, and New Zealand and

found a positive correlation (p=0.004).7 Whitaker et al8 found a

significant association between depressive symptoms and satu-

rated fat and sugar intake (<0.05) and, although not statistically

significant, a positive association between depressive symptoms

and sweetened beverage consumption (p=0.06).

The association between sugar and depression is espe-

cially concerning in children and adolescents, as rates for both

are dramatically increasing in this age group. An Australian

study reported that individuals who consumed more than a half

litre of soft drinks per day had approximately a 60% greater risk

of having depression, stress, suicidal ideation, and psychological

distress than those who did not consume soft drinks.9 A cross-

sectional study in China of 12-19 year old students found an

association between soda intake and suicidal plans or attempts.

Individuals who consumed at least three soft drinks per day were

80% more likely to attempt suicide than non-consumers. Ad-

ditionally, a survey in 2005 in California reported 40% of 2-11

year old children consumed at least one soda per day. A sig-

nificant association between soda consumption and withdrawn

behavior, attention, and aggressive behaviors (p<0.05) has been

reported among urban 5-year olds, which may influence the oc-

currence of mental disorders as the children grow.12

High consumption of sugar may also affect women

differently than men. Women who consumed a traditional diet

based on vegetables, meats, fish, fruits, and whole grains were

shown to have a lower risk of having depression while those

who consumed a Western diet consisting of processed or fried

foods, refined grains, sugary products, and beer were more likely

to have depression (OR=1.52). An examination of BMI, spe-

cific food intake, and severity of depression reported that great-

er consumption of high-calorie sweet food, such as chocolate,

soda, and sweetened fruit drinks, were associated with depres-

sive symptoms (p<0.01) but not BMI. The opposite was true for high-calorie non-sweet food, such as fried foods, hamburgers,

and whole-milk, where there was an association between BMI

not caloric surplus plays a more significant role in depression.14

The large, nationally representative sample included in

the BRFSS is the primary strength of this study. However, there

were limitations in the methodology. Importantly, the survey

did not clearly define an amount for what constituted one drink.

Variables such as the particular sugar sweetened beverage, the

volume of beverage or sugar content contained in the beverage

can vary widely, leading to information bias. The results are fur-

ther limited by participants’ self-report of depressive symptoms

in lieu of a validated measure of depression. The BRFSS is a

national survey in which questions are categorized in modules and many modules are only offered semi-annually. Additionally,

variables included in the survey are generally limited to specific

options for response. Expanding these options would enhance

analytic options in future research. Due to the cross-sectional

nature of the data, the temporal relation between consumption of

sugary drinks and depression cannot be established and should

be further investigated.

7 8

Another limitation is that the BRFSS does not account

for the effects of caffeine. Caffeine can be found in many sugar

sweetened beverages, especially sodas and pops. The association

between sugar consumption and depression may be confounded

by caffeine intake. In 2011, Lucas et al15 investigated this issue,

surveying 50,739 US women with a mean age of 63 years who

were free from depressive symptoms at baseline. They prospec-

tively assessed caffeine and coffee consumption and depressive

symptoms. During the 10 year follow-up 2,607 incident cases of

depression were observed.

Consistent with established risk factors for depression,

we found employment status (OR=2.12), race (non-Hispanic

blacks (OR=1.61), and races other than non-Hispanic white

10 (OR=2.06)) accounted for the highest odds for development

of depression. Further analysis of these sub-populations could

11 establish more demographically deterministic information on

sugar and depression. Furthermore, because women were shown

to be an effect modifier, in the future it might be advantageous to

look at gender specifically when doing research on the topic.

Conclusions

The association among consumption of sugary sweetened bever-

ages and depression adds to the volume of evidence negatively

linking health and sugar. As policymakers look to advocate

against high sugar contents in both foods and beverages, this

data can provide additional support for their recommendations.

Lowering the allowable sizes of sugar sweetened beverages

available for purchase or informing consumers of the health

consequences of their beverage choices is important to begin to

reduce the prevalence and incidence of preventable morbidities.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board

(IRB) of Georgia Southern University.

References

  1. NielsenSJPopkinBM. Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3): 205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.00510.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.005
  2. USDA, United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Web site. http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome. Accessed June 1, 2016
  3. NIH, National Institutes of Health. Turning Discovery into Health. 2015. Web site. https://www.nih.gov/. Accessed June 1, 2016
  4. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012, 2013
  5. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2015. Web site. http://www. cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed June 1, 2016
  6. SAS. Analytics, Business Intelligence and Data Management. 2015. Web site. https://www.sas.com/en_us/home.html. Accessed June 1, 2016
  7. WestoverANMarangellLB. A cross-national relationship between sugar consumption and major depression? Depression and Anxiety. 2002; 16(3): 118-120. doi: 10.1002/da.1005410.1002/da.10054 https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10054
  8. WhitakerKMSharpePAWilcoxSHuttoBE. Depressive symptoms are associated with dietary intake but not physical activity among overweight and obese women from disadvantaged neighborhoods. Nutr Res. 2014; 34(4): 294-301. doi: 10.1016/j. nutres.2014.01.00710.1016/j.nutres.2014.01.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2014.01.007
  9. ShiZTaylorAWWittertG. Soft drink consumption and mental health problems among adults in Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(7): 1073-1079. doi: 10.1017/ S1368980009993132
  10. PanXZhangCShiZ. Soft drink and sweet food consumption and suicidal behaviours among Chinese adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100(11): e215-e222. doi: 10.1111/j.1651- 2227.2011.02369.x10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02369.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02369.x
  11. BabeySHJonesMYuH. Bubbling over: Soda consumption and its link to obesity in California. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2009; (PB2009-5): 1-8. Web site. https:// escholarship.org/uc/item/1fj3h5cj. Accessed June 1, 2016
  12. Suglia SF, SolnickS, Hemenway D. Soft drinks consumption is associated with behavior problems in 5-year-olds. J Pediatr. 2013; 163(5): 1323-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.023
  13. JackaFPascoJMykletunA. Association of western and traditional diets with depression and anxiety in women. Am J Psychiatry. 2009; 167(3): 305-311. doi: 10.1176/appi. ajp.2009.0906088110.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060881 https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060881
  14. JefferyRWLindeJASimonGE. Reported food choices in older women in relation to body mass index and depressive symptoms. Appetite. 2009; 52: 238-240. doi: 10.1016/j. appet.2008.08.00810.1016/j.appet.2008.08.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.08.008
  15. LucasMMirzaeiFPanA. Coffee, caffeine, and risk of depression among women. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(17): 1571-1578. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.39310.1001/archinternmed.2011.393 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.393