Geography of Diet in the UK Women’s Cohort Study: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/EPOJ-1-104Keywords:
Dietary pattern, Diet, Geodemographic classification, Geography, Region, UK women’s cohort study, Public healthAbstract
Diet can influence health outcomes and chronic disease risk, therefore a better understanding of factors influencing diet is important in promotion of healthier dietary choices. Many factors influence food choice, including the environment in which we live. This study aims to explore differences in dietary pattern consumption by two spatial measures: Government Office Region (a large regional unit of geography) and Output Area Classification (a small area geography combined with demographic characteristics). A cross-sectional analysis using data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study was carried out. This cohort included ~35000 middle aged women recruited between 1995 and 1999. Dietary patterns were derived using a k-means cluster analysis from diet data collected using a validated 217 item Food Frequency Questionnaire. Multinomial logit regression was used to test whether the area in which the women live, predicts their dietary pattern consumption. Results show that dietary patterns vary significantly by both spatial measures. The Government Office Region, the North West of England has the highest proportion of individuals consuming the least healthy, monotonous diets, while Greater London has the highest proportion of vegetarian diets. Individuals living in Super groups ‘Countryside’ and ‘Prospering Suburbs’ consume healthier, more diverse diets. Those in ‘Constrained by Circumstance’ and ‘Blue Collar Communities’ consume monotonous, less healthy diets. Using a combination of spatial scales such as Government Office Region and Output Area Classification Supergroup could have a beneficial impact on targeting of public health dietary interventions and subsequent health.
References
Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981; 66: 1191-1308. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192
Key T, Allen N, Spencer E, Travis R. The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet. 2002; 360: 861-868. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(02)09958-0
The National Archives. Department of Health. Foresight -Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Project report. Obesity: Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives. Web site. http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publichealth/ Healthimprovement/Obesity/DH_079713. Updated October 19, 2007. Accessed January 5, 2016.
Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Hypertension and blood pressure among meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and veg-ans in EPIC-Oxford. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 5: 645-654. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002332
Sofi F, Cesari F, Abbate R, Gensini G, Casini A. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1344
Trichopoulou A, Vasilopoulou E. Mediterranean diet and lon-gevity. Br J Nutr. 2000; 84 Suppl 2: S205-S209.
Greenwood DC, Cade JE, Draper A, Barrett JH, Calvert C, Greenhalgh A. Seven unique food consumption patterns identi-fied among women in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000; 54(4): 314-320.
Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, et al. The global obesity pan-demic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011; 378: 804-814. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60813-1
Monsivais P, McLain J, Drewnowski A. The rising disparity in the price of healthful foods: 2004–2008. Food Policy. 2010; 35: 514-520. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.06.004
Drewnowski A, Monsivais P, Maillot M, Darmon N. Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1028-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.013
Cummins S. Food environments and obesity--neighbourhood or nation? Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 35: 100-104. doi: 10.1093/ije/ dyi276
Wrigley N, Warm D, Margetts B, Whelan A. Assessing the Impact of Improved Retail Access on Diet in a ‘Food Desert’: A Preliminary Report. Urban Stud. 2002; 39: 2061-2082. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000011362
Olsen JA, ed. Principles in Health Economics and Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an Experimental Ecology of Hu-man Development. American Psychologist. 1977; 32: 513-531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
Gibney MJ, Margetts BM, Kearney JM, eds. Public Health Nutrition. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004.
Cade JE, Burley VJ, Alwan N, et al. Cohort profile: the UK Women’s Cohort Study (UKWCS). Int J Epidemiol. 2015; pii: dyv173. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv173
Cade JE, Burley VJ, Greenwood DC, Group UKWsCSS: The UK Women’s Cohort Study: comparison of vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters. Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7: 871- 878.
Woodhouse A, Calvert C, Cade J. The UK Women’s Cohort Study: background and obtaining local ethical approval. Proc Nutr Soc. 1997; 56: 64A.
Morris MA, Hulme C, Clarke GP, Edwards KL, Cade JE. What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014; 68: 1043-1049. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204039
Vickers D, Rees P, Birkin M. Creating the national classifi-cation of census output areas: data, methods and results. http:// eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/5003/1/05-2.pdf. Working Paper 05/2; School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Pub-lished December 22, 2008. Updated June 4, 2014. Accessed January 5, 2016.
UK Data Service Census Support. GeoConvert. Web site. http://geoconvert.mimas.ac.uk/. Accessed January 5, 2016.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET in-tensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9 Suppl): S498-S504.
STATA IC 12.1. (for Windows) [computer program]. Version 2.1. College Station TSL ed.: Statacorp; 2012.
Maillot M, Darmon N, Vieux F, Drewnowski A. Low en-ergy density and high nutritional quality are each associated with higher diet costs in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 86: 690-696. http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/86/3/690.full.pdf. Ac-cessed January 4, 2016.
Office for National Statistics. Family Spending - A report on the 2009 Living Costs and Food Survey. The National Archives. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/ http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/family-spending/family-spending/2010-edition/index.html. Published November 30, 2010. Updated November 29, 2011. Accessed January 4, 2016.
Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook AJ, Drewnowski A. Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011; 65: 1059-1066. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.72
Fraser LK, Edwards KL. The association between the geog-raphy of fast food outlets and childhood obesity rates in Leeds, UK. Health Place. 2010; 16: 1124-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.health-place.2010.07.003
Food Standards Agency, Department of Health. National Diet & Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years. The Na-tional Archives. 2002; 1. Web site. http://tna.europarchive. org/20110116113217/http://www.food.gov.uk/science/dietary-surveys/ndnsdocuments/ndnsprevioussurveyreports. Accessed January 4, 2016.
Callcredit Information Group. Customer segmentation & analysis for the UK & key global markets. Web site. http://www.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Epidemiology (EOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
