Compliance with Tobacco Control Policies and Global Youth Tobacco Survey: A Cross-Sectional Comparison between GYTS 2000 and 2015 in Maharashtra, India

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Mangesh S. Pednekar Healis, Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400701, India
  • Prachi P. Kerkar Healis, Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400701, India
  • Sameer S. Narake Healis, Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400701, India
  • Dhirendra N. Sinha Healis, Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400701, India
  • Surendra S. Shastri Department of Health Disparities Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 1400 Pressler St. Houston,TX 77030-3906, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/EPOJ-4-114

Keywords:

Tobacco use, Tobacco control, Policy compliance, Pocket money, Family and friends

Abstract

Background
Tobacco is the leading avertable cause of death in the world. Adolescents are the most vulnerable population to initiate the use of tobacco. Most adult users start tobacco use in their childhood or adolescence. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) was design to obtain information on tobacco use, exposure to tobacco smoke and other related indicators among adolescent. This study aims to compare the GYTS data between 2000 and 2015 for the state of Maharashtra in India.
Methods
The GYTS is a school-based two-stage cluster design survey of students aged 13-15 years. This was a self-administered cross sectional survey conducted in Maharashtra using standardized GYTS questionnaire. To record student survey responses, in 2000 optically readable answer sheets and in 2015 tablets were used. For statistical data analysis SPSS 20.0 was used.
Results
Between 2000 and 2015 the prevalence of tobacco use reduced from 17% to 11% among boys and 14.5% to 8.5% among girls. Age of tobacco initiation has shifted from 11 years or younger (~70%) in 2000 to older than 11 years (~70%) in 2015. Proportion of students who received pocket money increased from 20.2% to 42.7% for boys and 18.7% to 33.8% for girls in 2015. Discussions about harmful effects of tobacco in schools and at home had reduced from 2000 to 2015. Distribution of free tobacco products decreased over the years, however sale of tobacco products to minors and sale around educational institutions continued.
Conclusion
Prevalence of overall tobacco use has decreased. Strengthening the existing Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) laws and improving implementation and effective monitoring will not only reduce youth’s tobacco use but might restrict future initiation among youths. Continuous tobacco education at home and at school will further strengthen the tobacco control efforts.

References

Kaur J, Jain DC. Tobacco control policies in India: Implementa-tion and challenges. Indian J Public Health. 2011; 55: 220-227. doi: 10.4103/0019-557x.89941

World Health Organization Media Center. Tobacco Fact Sheet. Web site: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/to-bacco. 2018; Accessed August 29, 2018.

Reddy KS, Gupta PC. Report On Tobacco Control In India. New Delhi: Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Government Of India; New Delhi, India. 2004.

Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), India. Government of India. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2010.

Kumar S. New Delhi India steps up anti-tobacco measures. The Lancet. 2000; 356: 1089. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)74536-0

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. World Health Organization. Web site: http://www.who.int/fctc/text_ download/en/. Published 2018. Accessed August 29, 2018.

Rao V, Chaturvedi P. Tobacco and health in India. Indian J Can-cer. 2010;47(5):3. doi: 10.4103/0019-509x.64373

The Cigarettes And Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition Of Advertisement And Regulation Of Trade And Commerce, Pro-duction, Supply And Distribution) Act, 2003, Web site: https:// indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2053/1/200334.pdf. Gov-ernment of India; 2003.

Global Tobacco Surveillance System Collaborating Group. Global Tobacco Surveillance System (GTSS): Purpose, produc-tion, and potential. Journal of School Health. 2005; 75(1): 15-24. doi:

1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00004.x 10. Sinha DN, Gupta P, Pednekar M. Tobacco use among students in the eight North Eastern states of India. Indian J Cancer. 2003; 40(2).

Shah PB, Pednekar MS, Gupta PC, Sinha DN. The relationship between tobacco advertisements and smoking status of youth in India. Asian Pac J of Cancer Prev. 2008; 9: 637-642.

Chandrupatla SG, Tavares M, Natto ZS. Tobacco use and ef-fects of professional advice on smoking cessation among youth in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18 (7): 1861-1867. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1861

Tobacco use among students and teachers: Findings from the Original Research | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) and Global School Person-nel Survey (GSPS), India 2003- 2009. Ministry of Health and Fam-ily Welfare Government of India.

Sinha DN, Gupta P, Pednekar M. Tobacco use among students in Bihar (India). Indian J Public Health. 2004; 48(3): 111-117.

The GTSS Collaborative Group. A cross country comparison of exposure to secondhand smoke among youth. Tob Control. 2006; 15(suppl_2): ii4-ii19. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.015685

Raute LJ, Pednekar MS, Mistry R, Gupta PC, Pimple SA, Shas tri SS. Determinants of exposure to second-hand smoke at home and outside the home among students aged 11-17 years: Results from the Mumbai Student Tobacco Survey 2010. Indian J Cancer. 2012; 49(4): 419. doi: 10.4103/0019-509x.107750

Ray CS, Pednekar MS, Gupta PC, et al. Social influence on adult tobacco use: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Project India, Wave 1 Survey. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2016; 5(2): 123-132. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.206249

Das S, Ghosh M, Sarkar M. Adolescents speak: Why do we smoke?. J Trop Pediatr. 2011; 57: 476-480. doi: 10.1093/tropej/ fmr003

Mistry R, Pednekar MS, Mccarthy WJ, et al. Compliance with point-of-sale tobacco control policies and student tobacco use in Mumbai, India. Tob Control. 2018; 1-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocon-trol-2018-054290

Zhang L, Wang W, Zhao Q, Vartiainen E. Psychosocial pre-dictors of smoking among secondary school students in Henan, China. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15(4): 415-422. doi: 10.1093/ her/15.4.415

Yorifuji T, Tanihara S, Takao S, Kawachi I. Regional dispari-ties in compliance with tobacco control policy in Japan: An eco-logical analysis. Tob Control. 2011; 20(5): 374-379. doi: 10.1136/ tc.2010.041442

Friend KB, Lipperman-Kreda S, Grube JW. The impact of lo-cal U.S. tobacco policies on youth tobacco use: A critical review. Open J Prev Med.2011; 1(2): 34-43. doi: 10.4236/ojpm.2011.12006

Mistry R, Pednekar M, Pimple S et al. Banning tobacco sales and advertisements near educational institutions may reduce stu-dents’ tobacco use risk: Evidence from Mumbai, India. Tob Control. 2013; 24: e100-e107. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050819

Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Global Adult Tobacco Survey GATS 2 India 2016-17.

Oswal K C, Pednekar M S, Gupta P. Tobacco industry inter-ference for pictorial warnings. Indian J Cancer. 2010; 47, Suppl S1: Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Original Research | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Pednekar MS et al 101-104. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.65318

Raute LJ, Pednekar MS, Gupta PC. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs: A population based study findings from India. Tobacco Use Insights. 2009; 2: 11-16. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S2751

Oswal KC, Raute LJ, Pednekar MS, Gupta PC. Are current to-bacco pictorial warnings in India effective?. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011; 12: 121-124.

Gravely S, Fong GT, Driezen P, et al. An examination of the effectiveness of health warning labels on smokeless tobacco prod-ucts in four states in India: Findings from the TCP India cohort survey. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889- 016-3899-7

The Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection Of Children) Act. Vol 3. Delhi: The Gazette of India; 2016. Web site: http://cara.nic. in/PDF/JJ%20act%202015.pdf

The Food Safety and Standards Act. Gazette of Government of Maharashtra; 2012.

Pimple S, Gunjal S, Mishra GA, Pednekar MS, Majmudar P, Shastri SS. Compliance to gutka ban and other provisions of COT-PA in Mumbai. Indian J Cancer. 2014; 51(5). doi: 10.4103/0019- 509X.147475

Jayakrishnan R, Binukumar B, Lekshmi K, Sreekumar, Geetha S. Self-reported tobacco use, knowledge on tobacco legislation and tobacco hazards among adolescents in rural Kerala State. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 195. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84280

Kumar G, Pednekar MS, Narake S, Dhumal G, Gupta PC. Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India. Indian J Med Res. 2018; 148. 98-102. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18

Khubchandani J, Sharma M, Huston D, Tahiliani J. Tobacco use related attitudes and behaviors in Indian Adolescents: Associa-tion with school-based prevention education. Health Promot Perspect. 2017; 7: 128-133. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.24

Reid DJ, McNeill AD, Glynn TJ. Reducing the prevalence of smoking in youth in Western countries: An international review. Tob Control. 1995; 4: 266-277.

Mathur N, Pednekar MS, Sorensen G, et al. Adoption and implementation of tobacco control policies in schools in India: Results of the Bihar school teachers study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016. 17: 2821-2826. doi: 10.14456/apjcp.2016.11

Stanton WR, McClelland M, Elwood C, Ferry D, Silva PA. Prevalence, reliability and bias of adolescents' reports of smoking and quitting. Addiction. 1996; 91: 1705-1714. doi: 10.1046/j.1360- 0443.1996.9111170511.x

Downloads

Published

2019-01-29

How to Cite

Mangesh S. Pednekar, Prachi P. Kerkar, Sameer S. Narake, Dhirendra N. Sinha, & Surendra S. Shastri. (2019). Compliance with Tobacco Control Policies and Global Youth Tobacco Survey: A Cross-Sectional Comparison between GYTS 2000 and 2015 in Maharashtra, India. Epidemiology, 4(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.17140/EPOJ-4-114

Most read articles by the same author(s)