Gynecology and Obstetrics Research · Vol. 3, No. 1 · 2016 · pp. 16–18 · e-ISSN 2377-1542

Placental Retention with Accreta in a Uterine Anomaly

Solwayo Ngwenya

Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Head of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mpilo Central Hospital, Vera Road; Founder and Chief Executive Officer Royal Women’s Clinic, 52A Cecil Avenue, Hillside, Bulawayo, Matabeleland, ZimbabweZimbabwe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/goroj-3-130 · Published 2016-07-18 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2016 The Author(s)

Abstract

A 32 year-old P1G2 went into spontaneous labour at 37 weeks gestation. Precipitate labour progressed to a normal vaginal delivery (NVD) of a baby boy within 2 hours of onset. She had a retained placenta. The patient was taken to theatre for an examination under anaesthesia and manual removal of placenta. It was discovered that she had uterine anomaly. A calcified accretic placenta was manually removed. The patient was kept on an oxytocin infusion overnight and given intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics. She made a good recovery and was discharged home after 3 days on oral antibiotics.

Keywords: Retained placenta; Uterine anomalies; Life-threatening; Catastrophic haemorrhage; Reproductive outcomes; Maternal mortality

Discussion

Retained placenta poses great danger to maternal health as it can lead to catastrophic haemorrhage, the risk is even higher with an adherent placenta. Prenatal diagnosis of abnormal placentation allows anticipation of multidisciplinary team4 management that prevents adverse outcomes. It is important that it is recognized early and prompt steps taken to have it manually removed under anaesthesia. An association of a retained placenta and uterine anomaly has not been described in the literature hence this case is to highlight this association. Uterine morphology can be ascertained outside pregnancy by hysterosalpingography and

laparoscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be a useful tool to diagnosis. Some uterine anomalies may permit

normal obstetric outcomes.

Women with congenital uterine malformations usually have higher incidence of subfertility and complications during

pregnancy and delivery. The risks include preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes, small for gestational age babies and pre- 7,8 term delivery.7,8 There are also risks of malpresentation and caesarean section (C-section) delivery, and rupture of rudimentary uterine horn. The complication of a retained placenta in uterine horn is not described in the literature. Uterine anomalies are as-

sociated with both normal and adverse reproductive outcomes.

Conclusion

This case reminds clinicians of rare clinical associations that lurk underneath the surface undetected and yet pose significant danger to maternal health. When faced with unusual clinical findings, clinicians must explore other areas that may lead to the discovery of unexpected pathology. This can be life-saving.

References

  1. NahumGG. Uterine anomalies: How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med. 1998; 43(10): 877-887. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/9800671. Accessed June 12, 2016
  2. ZhangYZhaoYYQiaoJ. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(4): 418-422. Web site. http://124.205.33.103:81/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=201022059246370&flag=1. Accessed June 12, 2016
  3. WilsonTM. Retained placenta incarcerated in the rudimentary horn of a double uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955; 70(3): 669- 671. Web site. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13238517. Accessed June 12, 2016
  4. RaoKPBelogolovkinVYankowitzJSpinnatoJA. Abnormal placentation: Evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accrete, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67(8): 503-519. doi: 10. 1097/OGX. Ob013e3182685870
  5. RagaFBausetCRemohiJBonilla-MusolesFSimonCPellicerA. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(10): 2277-2281. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.227710.1093/humrep/12.10.2277 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.10.2277
  6. MaSBianXLangJ. Pregnancy and its outcome in women with malformed uterus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001; 81(7): 415-417. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/11798909. Accessed June 12, 2016
  7. HierschLYeoshouaEMirembergH. The association between mullerian anomalies and short-term pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(16): 2573-2578. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.109861310.3109/14767058.2015.1098613 https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1098613
  8. HuaMOdiboAOLongmanREMaconesGARoehlKACahillAG. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(6): 558.e1-558.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022 7 9. Pal K, Majumdar S, Mukhopadhyay S. Rupture of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy at 37 weeks geststion with fetal survival. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274(5): 325-326. doi: 10 10.1007/s00404-006-0170-y 10. Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19(3): 229-237. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b064910.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022