The Prescribers’ Dilemma: Treatment of Hepatitis C Infection for Medicaid Insured Patients in United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/lroj-1-105Keywords:
Chronic hepatitis C infection, Direct antiviral medications, Medicaid insurance, Affordable Care Act (ACA)Abstract
Introduction of Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA) to Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment armamentarium has offered a great boost to the providers’ confidence to safely and effectively treat HCV infection in the majority of patients. However, the cost of these medications is high and thus access is poor. Medicaid insurance providers have devised stringent eligibility criteria to approve the cost of DAA for its members. We reviewed the criteria among various Medicaid agencies from States of Ohio and Pennsylvania and noticed similarities and differences among them. The prerequisite process demanding clinical, laboratory, radiologic or histologic documentation is quite cumbersome and sometimes confusing. In certain aspects the eligibility requirements for DAA are not in concordance with the clinical evidence provided by the recently updated guidelines. We have addressed the dilemma most of the providers face while planning HCV treatment for the Medicaid insured patients in regards to the needed testing, clinical documentation and liver fibrosis assessment, along with the clinical implications of such requirements. While HCV remains a major public health issue, variable State Medicaid policies may lead to disparity in access to the emerging DAA with subsequent healthcare outcomes. These gaps may compromise long term efforts of the public health HCV initiatives.
References
Yehia BR, Schranz AJ, Umscheid CA,Lo Re V. The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; e101554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101554
Moyer VA, Force USPST. Screening for hepatitis C virus in-fection in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recom-mendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 159: 349-357. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00672
AA ftSoL. DaID. So America. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. 2014. http://www.hcvguide-lines.org/full-report- view. Accessed February 8, 2015.
Levy J. US Uninsured Rate Drops to 13.4%, Gallup.
Denniston MM, Jiles RB, Drobeniuc J, et al. Chronic hepa-titis C virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160: 293-300. doi: 10.7326/M13-1133
Leidner AJ, Chesson HW, Xu F, Ward JW, Spradling PR, Holmberg SD. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment for patients in early stages of liver disease. Hepatology. 2015; 61(6): 1860-1869. doi: 10.1002/hep.27736
Younossi ZM, Park H, Saab S, Ahmed A, Dieterich D, Gordon SC. Cost-effectiveness of all-oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regi-mens in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infec-tion. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 41: 544-563. doi: 10.1111/ apt.13081
Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. Sampling error and in-traobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 2614-2618.
Siddique I, El-Naga HA, Madda JP, Memon A, Hasan F. Sam-pling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Scand J Gastroentero. 2003; 38: 427-432.
Boursier J, de Ledinghen V, Zarski JP, et al. Comparison of eight diagnostic algorithms for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C: new algorithms are more precise and entirely noninvasive. Hepatol-ogy. 2012; 55: 58-67. doi: 10.1002/hep.24654
Morgan RL, Baack B, Smith BD, Yartel A, Pitasi M, Falck-Ytter Y. Eradication of hepatitis C virus infection and the de-velopment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of ob-servational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 329-337. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00005
van der Meer AJ, Veldt BJ, Feld JJ, et al. Association be-tween sustained virological response and all-cause mortal-ity among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced he-patic fibrosis. JAMA. 2012; 308: 2584-2593. doi: 10.1001/ jama.2012.144878.
Landau DA, Scerra S, Sene D, Resche-Rigon M, Saadoun D, Cacoub P. Causes and predictive factors of mortality in a co-hort of patients with hepatitis C virus-related cryoglobulinemic vasculitis treated with antiviral therapy. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37: 615-621. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090790
Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P. Antiviral therapy of symptom-atic HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia: meta-analysis of clinical studies. J Med Virol. 2013; 85: 1019-1027. doi: 10.1002/ jmv.23562
Benova L, Mohamoud YA, Calvert C, Abu-Raddad LJ. Ver-tical transmission of hepatitis C virus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 765-773. doi: 10.1093/ cid/ciu447
Martin NK, Vickerman P, Grebely J, et al. Hepatitis C virus treatment for prevention among people who inject drugs: Mod-eling treatment scale-up in the age of direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology. 2013; 58: 1598-1609. doi: 10.1002/hep.26431
Lindenburg CE, Lambers FA, Urbanus AT, et al. Hepatitis C testing and treatment among active drug users in Amsterdam: re-sults from the DUTCH-C project. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 23: 23-31. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328340c451
Norden L, van Veen M, Lidman C, et al. Hepatitis C among injecting drug users is two times higher in Stockholm, Sweden than in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Subst Use Misuse. 2013; 48: 1469-1474. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.793356
McDonald SA, Innes HA, Hayes PC, et al. What is the im-pact of a country-wide scale-up in antiviral therapy on the char-acteristics and sustained viral response rates of patients treated for hepatitis C? J Hepatol. 2015; 62; 262-268. doi: 10.1016/j. jhep.2014.08.046
Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, et al. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2199-2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009370
Fathauer L, Meek J. Initial implementation and evaluation of a Hepatitis C treatment clinical decision support system (CDSS): a nurse practitioner-driven quality improvement initiative. Appl Clin Inform. 2012; 3: 337-348. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-04-RA-0012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Liver Research (LROJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.