Otolaryngology · Vol. 2, No. 5 · 2016 · pp. 132–140 · e-ISSN 2470-4059

Adult Supraglottic Stenosis: Etiology and Management

Omar Ramadan

Independent Researcher, Paterson, NJ 07533, USAUnited States

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/otloj-2-129 · Published 2016-10-06 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2016 The Author(s)

Abstract

Supraglottic stenosis is a rare entity, which is more common in females, and trauma is the most common cause for it. Dysphagia, dysphonia, dyspnea and stridor are the common symptoms of supraglottic stenosis. Non-symptomatic cases can be managed by observation, and symp-tomatic cases with sever airway obstruction may need a tracheostomy; some cases may need nasogastric tube to relieve dysphagia. Endoscopic approach using carbon dioxide (CO2) laser is the most common procedure used to treat supraglottic stenosis, supraglottic laryngectomy is only indicated for severe supraglottic stenosis. Supraglottic stenosis has high rate of recurrence and may need multiple surgical procedures. Supraglottic stenosis has a better prognosis than glottis and subglottic stenosis with successful treatment rate up to 83%. This is a short discus-sion about supraglottic stenosis found in literatures; the objective of this study is to present a brief review about this disease.

Keywords: were used: suraglottic and stenosis; laryngeal and stenosis

Introduction

The supraglottic stenosis is a rare disease; it is usually difficult to be managed. The most com-

mon causes are iatrogenic injury from supraglottic surgery, prolonged intubation, trauma, ra-

diation therapy, caustic ingestion, and autoimmune diseases. Presenting symptoms may include

dysphagia, dysphonia, shortness of breath (SOB), stridor and potentially life-threatening air-

way obstruction. There is a controversy about the optimal treatment of supraglottic stenosis.

Historically, open supraglottic laryngectomy was the treatment of choice; however, this was as-

sociated by high morbidity connected to chronic aspiration and poor wound healing. Recently,

endoscopic approach is more favorable because it is more conservative and associated with

less morbidity.1

Material And Methods

Literature review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar for English

articles, the following keywords were used: suraglottic and stenosis; laryngeal and stenosis.

Inclusion Criteria

All adult patients diagnosed with supraglottic stenosis following any cause were included in

the study.

Exclusion Criteria

cases less than 12 years and burns of the neck.

Results

Case M/F Age Etiology Site

3 M

Yilmaz et al (Rhinosclerma)

3 F 2 patients had

Caustic ingestion

2 Supraglottic Zoghbi et al F 51 Radiation

Freitas et al F 78 Pemphigoid Supraglottic

4 Diffuse Amyloidosis Gilad et al Systemic F 64 suragloticpharynex

F 24 Caustic agent Glotic

Assanasen et al

M 39 Trauma Glotic

Kim et al M 65 Radiation Glotic

M Radiation

7 Supraglotic Nair et al F Caustic agent

M External trauma Glottic

Pegg et al M 83 Idiopathic Supraglotic

M Trauma Supraglotic

Lasisi et al

M Trauma Supraglotic

Krishna et al F 61 GERD Supraglotic

Saad et al F 70 TB Supraglottic

Oosthuizen et al F 13 Trauma Supraglottic

Rubino et al F 70 Radiation Posterior golttic

Surgery Trachestomy Treatment Outcome Number

Latrogenic

4 patients were 4 Patients had: Autoimmune decanulated 4 patients Microlaryngoscopy One (SLE) had Supraglottic CO2 Laser Infection Yes all Dilation had Mitomicin application Trachestomy

Irradiation One was Supraglottic 2 Patients had: decanulated Glottic Laryngeal construction Multiple One stayed Subglottic surgery with stent dependent

Trauma

Yes KTP Laser Multiple Decanulated glotic

Yes Medical treatment NO Dependent

Yes No NO Dependent Amyloidosis trachea

Supraglotic Laryngeal reconstruction Yes One Dependent surgery Sub glotic

Supraglotic Laryngeal Yes One Dependent reconstruction surgery Sub glotic

Supraglotic Laryngeal reconstruction Yes One Dependent surgery Subglotic

Supraglotic Microlaryngoscopy

Yes CO2 Laser Multiple Decanulated

Yes CO2 Laser Multiple Decanulated

Supraglottic Laryngeal reconstruction

Yes surgery Multiple Dependent

Subglottic No Multiple Improved Dilation

Scar excision with cold Yes Multiple Decanulated instruments

Steroid injection

Scar excision with cold Yes Multiple Decanulated instruments

Steroid injection

Transoral supraglottic Yes One Decanulated laryngectomy

Yes CO2 Laser Multiple Decanulated

No Dilation Mitomicin Multiple Improved

application

Supraglottic Microlaryngoscopy

No Scar excision with CO2 One Improved

Keel using

1 M Trauma

Sinacori et al

1 F Caustic agent

15 Epidermolysis Kiniwa et al F 37 Supraglottic

16 Supraglottic Lyons et al f 47 Caustic agent

17 Iatrogenic Davis et al F 48 Supraglottic

2F 18 1 Trauma Duncav Age et al Supraglottic

1M

Doyle et al F Caustic Supraglottic

F 62 Iatrogenic Supraglotic

20 M 58 Iatrogenic Supraglotic Minni et al

M 35 Trauma Supraglottic

21 Iatrogenic Canis et al M Supraglottic

22 3 M 4 cases of Grant et al All four cases Supra-

1 F cause

23 Iatrogenic Alon et al 1 F Supraglotic

24 Supraglottic F. Izadi et al F 12 Fraser syndrome

Moore et al2 M 48 Trauma Supraglottic

3 M 26 3 Trauma Kacker et al Supraglotic

2 F

Sunderr Ajan et Al M Intubation Supraglottic

4 M 28 Supraglotic Stevens et al 3 Autoimmune

4 F ( 2 wager,

Mistry et al M 54 Plasmacytosis Supraglotic

Rubinstein et al F 18 TB Supraglottic

Scar excision with CO2 Multiple

ballon dilation Decanulated Yes

Scar excision with CO2 Multiple

ballon dilation

Yes Medical treatment No Decanulated Bullosa Acquisita

yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Decanulated Glottic microdebrider Yes Mutiple Decanulated Scar excision with CO2

All three patients had:

Yes Microlaryngoscopy Mutiple Decanulated 2 Caustic agent Scar excision with CO2

Open surgery

Yes laryngofissure One Decanulated

Remove scar tissue

One Improved No Suprglottic laryngectomy

Yes Supraglottic Laryngectomy Multiple Decanulated

Supraglottic

Yes laryngectomy Multiple Decanulated

Yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Decanulated

All four All four patients had: patients Iatrogenic Yes Microlaryngoscopy 4 Decanulated glottic had: Scar excision with CO2 Multiple

Dead before Yes No treatment No treatment yes Multiple Dependent Glotic Scar excision

Yes KTP Laser One Decanulated

open surgical procedure

(excision of the stenosis All Yes with repair of the supra Multiple 2 Caustic agent 5 Decanulated glottis area via

laryngofissure)

Yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Decanulated 5 Radiation CO2 laser All patients

Scar excision have Yes 8 Decanulated 6 patient had additional Multiple

KTP laser in clinic procedures 1 Sarcoidosis)

Dilatation to relieve Yes One Decanulated supraglottic stenosis

Yes Scar excision Multiple Decanulated

Stent

topical mitomicin

Belloso et al M 64 Wagner Supraglottic

Bahamonde et al F 69 Pemphigoid Supraglottic

M 50 Sarcoidosis Supraglottic

F 50 Sarcoidosis Supraglottic

Sims et al

F 48 Sarcoidosis Supraglottic

M 43 Sarcoidosis Supraglottic

34 Supraglottis Ma et al M 36 Amyloidosis

F Wagner Supraglotic

35 F Wagner Supraglottic Kaneko et al

F Idiopathic Supraglottic

F 50 Radiation Supraglottic

M 58 Radiation Supraglottic

Vira et al

F 60 Sarcoidosis Supraglottic

F 66 Idiopathic Supraglottic

Table 1. Supraglottic stenosis reported cases.

Demographic And Etiology

There were 72 patients of age ranged from 12 to 83 with major-

ity of the patients over 50 year old. There were 33 males and 39

females in the study. Forty-six patients had stenosis secondary to

trauma, 15 patients had supraglottic stenosis secondary to auto-

immune diseases, 4 patients had supraglottic stenosis secondary

to infection, 7 patients had stenosis secondary to other diseases

(Table 2 Chart 1).

Sixty patients out of them had isolated supraglottic ste-

nosis, while the other 12 patients had multiple sites laryngeal

stenosis. Sixty-five patients of them had a tracheostomy, while

Medical treatment

Yes Microlaryngoscopy One Decanulated

No Medical treatment Improved

Yes Scar excision with CO2 One Decanulated

Steroid

Yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Decanulated

Steroid

Yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Dependent

Steroid

Yes Scar excision with CO2 One Dependent

Steroid

Yes Scar excision with CO2 Multiple Decanulated anterior commissure microdebrider

Medical treatment

Yes No Dependent

Medical Treatment

No Microlaryngoscopy One Improved

KTP Laser

Yes Medical treatment No Dependent

Palliative Yes Multiple Decanulated Multiple dilation

Mitomycin application Yes Mutiple Decanulated Multiple dilation

Mitomycin application Yes Multiple Decanulated Multiple dilation

Mitomycin application

Multiple dilation Yes Multiple Decanulated

Mitomycin application

the other 7 patients did not have tracheostomy.

Treatment

One was dead before the treatment, 2 patients had only medical

treatment (pemphigoid), 1 patient had only a tracheostomy as a

palliative therapy (systemic amyloidosis), 3 patients had trache-

astomy and medical treatment (2 patients of them had wagener

disease, the other patient had pemphigoid), 52 patients had en-

doscopic laryngeal surgery (one patient of them had endoscopic

supralaryngectomy, 3 patients of them had endoscopic approach

using cold instruments, while the other 48 patients had endo-

scopic approach using Laser), 9 patients had external laryngeal

Trauma 46 63.3% Caustic agent 10

Autoimmune 15 20.8%

Infection 4 5.5%

Others 7 9.7%

Table 2
Table 2. Etiology, successful rate whatever treatment (59/70) 84%.

Chart 1

approach (3 patients of them had supraglottic laryngectomy,

while the other 6 patients had open surgery using laryngofis-

sure approach), 4 patients had staged laryngeal reconstruction

surgery (Table 3 Chart 2).

Decanulation

Sixty patients had a surgery for decanulation, 49 patients of them

had only isolated supraglottic stenosis (47 patients of them were

decanulated, 2 patients stayed dependent on tracheostomy), the

other 11 patients with multiple sites laryngeal stenosis including

supraglottic stenosis had surgery for decanulation (4 patients of

them were decanulated, while the other 7 patients of them stayed

dependent on tracheostomy. Most patients need multiple surger-

ies for decanulation. (Table 4 Chart 3).

External trauma 13 • Three patients without tracheostomy had a surgery and all of them

improved

Radiation 12 • Forty-three patients had a surgery for decanulation, thirty eight patients

of them were decanulated after surgery, while the other 5 patients stayed

dependent on tracheostomy.

Iatrogenic 10 Successful management rate (41/46) 89%

Post intubation 1

Ssarcoidosis 6 • Two patients improved after medical treatment

• One patient without tracheostomy had surgery and his situation improved. Wagener 5

• Eight patients weredecanulated after surgery.

Pemphigoid 3 • Four patients stayed dependent on tracheostomy.

SLE 1 Successful management rate (11/15) 73%

TB 2

• 4 patients weredecanulated after surgery.

Sclerma 1

Successful management rate 100%

Plasmacytosis 1

Congenital 1 • One patient without tracheostomy had surgery and improved after it.

• Two patients had tracheostomy as palliative therapy

Amyloidosis 2 • Three patients had a surgery for decanultion,

• Two patients of them were decanulated while the other patient stayed GERD 1 dependent on tracheostomy.

Idiopathic 3 Successful management rate (3/7) 42%

Discussion

Surgery for supraglottic stenosis is usually approached as same

as stenosis elsewhere in the larynx.

Non-symptomatic cases may be managed by observa-

tion. Surgery is advised for symptomatic cases.

Endoscopic approaches are more favorable than open

approaches, but open procedures is usually recommend for diffi-

cult and complex cases. For open procedures, a laryngofissure is

used to approach and to respect the scar tissue. Partial supraglot-

tic laryngectomy which can be done endoscopically or by open

approach is used for severe cases in which the stenosis extends

to the glottis. Endoscopic approaches to supraglottic stenois are

Medical treatment

Tracheastomy

Medical treatment and

Tracheastomy

Endoscopic Laryngeal Surgery (laser, dilation or cold

instruments)

External approach (open supraglottic laryngectomy or

open surgery using laryngofissure) for sever supraglottic

stenosis

Staged laryngeal construction Surgery (for severe cases

associated with stenosis in another laryngeal areas).

Table 3
Table 3. Treatment modalities.

Patients had a Surgery for decanulation 49 11

Decanulated patients 47 4

Decanulation rate 95% 36%

Table 4
Table 4. Supraglottic stenosisdecanulation.

less invasive and often give good results same as open approach.

CO2 laser excision is commonly used because of its ability to

resect scar and give good hemostasis at the same time. If the scar

tissue extends to the glottis, then cold resection may be good op-

tion to protect vocal folds from thermal injury.25

Laryngeal caustic injury is associated with oral, pha-

ryngeal and esophagus injury, sopanendoscopy consisting of

Management Patients Patients improved Successful rate

2 2 100%

1 0 0%

3 0 0%

52 47 90%

9 9 100%

4 1 25%

Chart 2

Isolated Suprglottic Multiple sites laryngeal stenosis

stenosis including Supraglottic stenosis

Chart 3

rd copy is considered to be mandatory. Up to 3rd of patients with

caustic ingestion may complain of long-term complications such

as oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, and esophageal strictures. The

typical clinical course starts 2 weeks after caustic ingestion. The

clinical symptoms include upper airway obstruction, dysphagia,

and dysphonia/aphonia. The larynx scar is often located at su-

praglottic area without involvement of the vocal folds. The sur-

gical treatments of caustic pharyngolaryngeal stenosis include

st

sists of laryngofissure, permanent tracheostomy, and/or laryn-

gectomy. In selected cases, a complete resection of the stenosis

is performed and followed by optimal reconstruction. The 2nd

approach includes using of cold instrumentations or laser.26

Intubation usually cause stenosis in subglottic and pos-

terior glottis area, it is uncommon to induce stenosis insupraglot-

tic area.27

Laryngeal edema, chondronecrosis, necrosis of soft tis-

sue, necrosis of skin, stricture of pharynx and larynx, and carotid

stenosis occur infrequently during head and neck radiotherapy.

Treatment of laryngeal stricture caused by radiation is a trache-

ostomy for respiratory distressed patients, dilation and CO2 laser

to remove scar tissue.28

Balloon dilation for supraglottic stenosis is reported in

the literature to treat suraglottic stenosis caused by fungal infec-

tion.29

Laryngeal tuberculosis is rarely reported; it is more

common in middle-aged males, and appears with a negative

chest x-ray; hoarseness is the most common symptom. Some-

times tracheostomy is necessary to relieve severe laryngeal

obstruction. Endoscopic CO2 laser to remove scar tissue and to

insert a laryngeal stent is the treatment of choice for supraglottic

stenosis. We can also apply mitomycin-C locally.30

The therapy of laryngeal involvement of Wagner dis-

ease is based on two components; the 1st is the treatment of sys-

temic disease with steroid and immunosuppressant medications,

the second is the treatment of local symptoms with tracheos-

tomy, dilation, CO2 laser vaporization and finally resection of

the stenosis segment followed by reconstruction.31

Pemphogoid is treated with steroid, immunosuppres-

sant medications and dapsone. Tracheostomy is kept for nec-

essary cases, remission is essential so we avoid needing for

surgical intervention as well as regular assessment to prevent

recurrence.32

Laryngeal sarcoidosis more commonly involves supra-

glottic area. Laryngeal sarcoidosis usually presents with hoars-

ness, dry cough and dysphagia.

Treatment ranging from closes observing in stable as-

ymptomatic patients to emergent tracheostomy in patients with

acute respiratory distress. Systemic steroid therapy is the basic

therapy for a systemic disease. Localized laryngeal disease is

treated with resection using CO2 laser with local steroids or mi-

tomycin-C. Open surgical excision and external radiation thera-

py may be also used.33

Amyloidosis is usually localized in the head and neck

area, treatment with surgical excision is usually successful for

symptomatic cases. In the larynx, a conservative resection using

microlaryngeal surgical approach is recommended with preser-

vation of the surrounding tissue. Recent articles has advocated

nd CO2 laser as the treatment of choice, recurrence is usually rare

26 34 and can be treated with further conservative excision.34

No history of recent intubation, trauma, or autoimmune

diseases should be existed to diagnosis idiopathic supraglottic

stenosis which is more common in female.35

There are multiple articles reported that the application

of local mitomycin-C or corticosteroid during the surgery may

decrease the recurrence of the laryngeal stenosis.36

Conclusion

Suraglottic stenosis is more common in female, trauma is the

most common cause of supraglottic stenosis, suraglottic steno-

sis caused by infection has a better prognosis, while supraglot-

tic stenosis caused by autoimmune diseases has a lower rate of

decanulation (may be because there is no definite treatment for

autoimmune diseases and disease usually recur). Isolated su-

praglottic stenosis has a good prognosis with 95% successful

treatment rate. Endoscopic approach using laser was the most

common procedure used to treat supraglottic stenosis with 90%

successful rate.

References

  1. YılmazTJafarovSKuşçuOSözenTSüslüAE. Endoscopst ic Z-plasty for Treatment of supraglottic stenosis: A new technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 153(6): 1064-1066. doi: 10.1177/019459981560720110.1177/0194599815607201 https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815607201
  2. ZoghbiYHachemRAWoodJWRosowDE. Technical nuances for endoscopic management of complete supraglottic stenosis. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2016; 3(1): 1083. Web site. https://www.jscimedcentral.com/Otolaryngology/otolaryngology-3-1083.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2016
  3. FreitasVABeckerHMGuimarãesRE. Cicatricial pemphygoid in the upper aerodigestive tract: Report of two cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 74(6): 941-944. doi: 10.1590/S0034-7299200800060002010.1590/s0034-72992008000600020 https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-72992008000600020
  4. GiladRMililloPSomPM. Severe diffuse systemic amyloidosis with involvement of the pharynx, larynx, and trachea: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(8): 1557- 1578. Web site. http://www.ajnr.org/content/28/8/1557.long. Accessed September 28, 2016
  5. TantinikornWSinrachtanantCAssanasenP. How to overcome laryngotracheal stenosis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004; 87(7): 800-809
  6. KimIALongJ. Laryngotracheal stenosis as a complication of photodynamic therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124(6): 495-498. doi: 10.1177/000348941557093010.1177/0003489415570930 https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415570930
  7. NairSNilakantanASoodAGuptaAGuptaA. Challenges in the management of laryngeal stenosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68(3): 294-299. doi: 10.1007/s12070- 015-0936-210.1007/s12070-015-0936-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0936-2
  8. PeggDKanatasAMakuraZ. Idiopathic acquired supraglottic web: A case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2011; 90(10): 486-488. Web site. http://search.proquest.com/openview/af5c 1231ebc6497363d3cf5b72938c7e/1.pdf?pq-origsite= gscholar&cbl=47886. Accessed September 28, 2016
  9. LasisiAOAdeyemoA. Improvized laryngeal cautery forcep in microsurgical treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis- -experience in Nigeria, sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2007; 36(2): 163-167. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/19205580. Accessed September 28, 2016
  10. KrishnaPDMaloneJP. Isolated adult supraglottic stenosis: Surgical treatment and possible etiologies. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006; 27(5): 355-357. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.11.02110.1016/j.amjoto.2005.11.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.11.021
  11. SaadCMehtaA. Case report: Supraglottic stenosis. J Bronchology. 2003; 10(2):142-143
  12. OosthuizenJCBurnsPRussellJD. Endoscopic management of posttraumatic supraglottic stenosis in the pediatric population. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011; 32(5): 426-429. doi: 10.1016/j. amjoto.2010.07.02410.1016/j.amjoto.2010.07.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.07.024
  13. RubinoSMPitmanMJ. Endoscopic management of severe supraglottic and posterior glottic stenosis due to chemotherapy and radiation. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2014; 3: 133-136. doi: 10.4236/ ijohns.2014.33024
  14. SinacoriJTTaliercioSJDuongEBensonC. Modalities of treatment for laryngotracheal stenosis: The EVMS experience. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123(12): 3131-3136. doi: 10.1002/ lary.24237
  15. KiniwaYAshidaAOhashiA. A case of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita associated with laryngeal stenosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012; 92(1): 93-94. doi: 10.2340/00015555-116310.2340/00015555-1163 https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1163
  16. LyonsGDOwensRLousteauRJTrailML. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of laryngeal stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1980; 106(5): 255-256. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1980.0079029000700310.1001/archotol.1980.00790290007003 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1980.00790290007003
  17. Davis RK, Kriskovich MD, Galloway EB 3rd, Buntin CS, Jepsen MC. Endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy with postoperative irradiation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 113(2): 132-138. doi: 10.1177/000348940411300210 https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411300210
  18. DuncavageJAOssoffRHToohillRJ. Carbon dioxide laser management of laryngeal stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985; 94(6 Pt 1): 565-569. Web site. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/4073733. Accessed September 28, 2016
  19. DoylePJ. Repair of supraglottic laryngeal stenosis with postcricoid Involvement: A case report. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980; 89(6 Pt 1): 576-577. doi: 10.1177/00034894800890062010.1177/000348948008900620 https://doi.org/10.1177/000348948008900620
  20. MinniAGalloACroceAMorettiAVincentiisMD. Leroux-Robert-Huet’slaryngectomy for supraglottic stenosis. Laryngotracheal Reconstruction. 1992; 3(3): 194-198. doi: 10.10 16/S1043-1810(10)80179-4
  21. CanisMMartinAIhlerF. Results of transoral laser microsurgery for supraglottic carcinoma in 277 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 270(8): 2315-2326. doi: 10.1007/ s00405-012-2327-6
  22. GrantDGSalassaJRHinniMLPearsonBWHaydenREPerryWC. Transoral laser microsurgery for carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 136(6): 900-906. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.01510.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.015
  23. AlonEEKasperbauerJLOlsenKDMooreEJ. Feasibility of transoral robotic-assisted supraglottic laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2012; 34(2): 225-229. doi: 10.1002/hed.2171910.1002/hed.21719 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21719
  24. IzadiFAhmadiAZobairyHBakhtiSHirbodHSafdarianM. Fraser syndrome with laryngeal webs: Report of two cases and a review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79(11): 1959-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.04310.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.043 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.043
  25. MooreJECapoJHuASataloffRT. Management of supraglottic stenosis using a novel stent design. J Voice. 2014; 28(4): 515-517. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.01810.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.018
  26. KackerADekaRCChatterjeeTK. Surgical management of supraglottic stenosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993; 45: 128. doi: 10.1007/BF0305471210.1007/bf03054712 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03054712
  27. SunderrajanEVDavenportJ. The Guillain-Barré syndrome: Pulmonary-neurologic correlations. Medicine (Baltimore). 1985; 64(5): 333-341. Web site. http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/ Citation/1985/09000/The_Guillain_Barre_Syndrome__Pulmonary_Neurologic.5.aspx. Accessed September 28, 2016
  28. StevensMSChangASimpsonCB. Supraglottic stenosis: Etiology and treatment ofa rare condition. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013; 122(3): 205-209. doi: 10.1177/00034894131220031010.1177/000348941312200310 https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312200310
  29. MistrySGWatsonGJRotheraMP. Balloon dilatation to treat plasmacytosis of the supraglottic larynx. J Laryngol Otol. 2012; 126(10): 1077-1080. doi: 10.1017/S002221511200192210.1017/s0022215112001922 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215112001922
  30. Rubinstein M, Boyd JW, Wu EC, Fine EL, Wong, BJF, Crumley RL. Supraglottic stenosis caused by tuberculosis: A case report. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121: S178. doi: 10.1002/lary.22060 https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22060
  31. BellosoAEstrachCKeithAO. Supraglottic stenosis in localized Wegener granulomatosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008; 87(7): E11-E14. Web site. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract ?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jr nl=01455613&AN=48872765&h=pw5%2fb5nISuDsScisabYE qPit%2f%2fqAg5PkIeKRMNVb9MCAkUn1ZzpXXNrvJKfv% 2fle%2fE1QNySZmfYu5hu1DMhB%2fkQ%3d%3d&crl=c&re sultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhash url=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scop e%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d01455613%26A N%3d48872765. Accessed September 28, 2016
  32. HéctorBSDelanoRPHNicolásAAValdesPC. Constanza. Penfigoidecicatricial, causapococomún de estenosissupraglótica [In Spanish]. Rev Otorrinolaringo Cir Cabeza Cuello. 2008; 68(3): 288-294. doi: 10.4067/S0718-4816200800040001010.4067/s0718-48162008000400010 https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162008000400010
  33. SimsHSThakkarKH. Airway involvement and obstruction from granulomas in African-American patients with sarcoidosis. Respir Med. 2007; 101(11): 2279-2283
  34. MaLBandarchiBSasakiCLevineSChoiY. Primary localized laryngeal amyloidosis: Report of 3 cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005; 129(2): 215-218. Web site. http://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129%3C215:PLLARO %3E2.0.CO;2?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref. org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed. Accessed September 28, 201610.1043/1543-2165(2005)129%3c215:pllaro https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129%3c215:pllaro
  35. KanekoKKomazawaOTakahashiH. Idiopathic supraglotticstenosis: A report of three cases. jibi to rinsho-J-Stage. 2015; 61(5): 194-199. doi: 10.11334/jibi.61.5_19410.11334/jibi.61.5_194 https://doi.org/10.11334/jibi.61.5_194
  36. ViraDDeCondeAChhetriDK. Endoscopic management of supraglottic laryngopharyngeal stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 146(4): 611-613. doi: 10.1177/019459981143168410.1177/0194599811431684 https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811431684