Otolaryngology · Vol. 3, No. 3 · 2017 · pp. 54–58 · e-ISSN 2470-4059

Importance of Keros Classification in Surgery

Hüseyin Sarı, Güven Yıldırım, Suzan Deniz Önol, Erdi Ozdemır, Ahmet Arslanoglu, Berk Gurpınar, Tolgar Lütfi Kumral, Yavuz Uyar, Ziya Salturk

Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital ENT Clinic, Istanbul, TurkeyTurkey
Department of Otolaryngology, Giresun University ENT Clinic, Giresun, TurkeyTurkey
Department of Otolaryngology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital Radiology Clinic, Istanbul, TurkeyTurkey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/otloj-3-143 · Published 2017-11-01 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2017 The Author(s)

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between the cribriform plate and the uncinate process may be elaborated with the help of the Keros classification. The observations were analysed using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Additionally, the relationship between the superior attachment of the uncinate process, the existence of concha bullosa, and the different types of ethmoid roofs were examined. Methods: Five-hundred and sixteen subjects complaining of sinonasal disorders between 2015 and 2016 were enrolled retrospectively at the Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology. HRCT scans of 1-mm sections were obtained. Keros classification was used for the measurement of the depth of the olfactory fossa as follows: Keros I: 1-3 mm, Keros II: 3-7 mm, and Keros III: 7-16 mm. Results: Fifty-one point nine percentage of cases were of Keros type II, 27.7% of type III, and 20.3% of type I. In 82.4% of the reported cases, the uncinate process was attached to the lamina papyraceae, in 11% of the cases it was attached to the middle nasal turbinate, and in 6.4% cases to the skull base. A concha bullosa was observed in the right nasal cavity in 13.8% of the cases, in the left nasal cavity in 11% of the cases, and bilaterally in 16.3% of the cases. Variances observed in the Keros types were not statistically significant with respect to sex (p>0.05). Concha bullosa was significantly more frequently seen in females (53.1%) relative to males (p=0.001). Conclusion: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is the primary mode of treatment for chronic sinus diseases. In this procedure, a proper assessment of the vital structures is very important to avoid further complications. In the present study, it has been suggested that determining the depth of the ethmoid roof is necessary to avoid injuring the bony lamella, which can lead to cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Keywords: Keros classification; Ethmoid roof; Paranasal Sinus; Cribriform plate

Introduction

Chronic sinonasal diseases are among the most common diseases demanding surgical attention

2,3 plemented approach for treatment at present. Thorough anatomical knowledge is considered mandatory, especially with respect to the skull base, to prevent serious surgical complications.

of the nasal roof and should be assessed pre-operatively; which may otherwise lead to many life-threatening complications.

The uncinate process and the attachment of the middle turbinate can be associated with several anatomical regions. Rarely, those structures may attach directly to the nasal roof. Interfering with this anatomical location can cause serious clinical complications including cerebrospinal rhinorrhea, meningitis, etc. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard for diagnosis in the paranasal sinuses and neighboring structures and is a vital tool for pre-operative assessment to prevent related medical complications.4

In this study, the relationship between the cribriform plate and the uncinate process was investigated using the Keros classification. The relationship between the superior attachment of the uncinate process, the existence of concha bullosa, and the different types of ethmoid roofs were also examined carefully.

Materials And Methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained from the Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital Ethical Committee. HRCT of the paranasal sinuses of 516 subjects who had sinonasal disorders in 2015-2016 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were a previous history of nasal surgery, maxillofacial trauma, benign or malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract, and cases with asymmetrical morphology of the olfactory fossa. The pediatric population was not included in the study.

HRCT (Philipps 128 slice, Holland) scans of 1-mm sections were obtained. The Keros classification is used for measuring the depth of the olfactory fossa and defined as follows: Keros I: 1-3 mm, Keros II: 3-7 mm, and Keros III: 7-16 mm (Figures 1 and 2).5 In all the scans, the attachment of the uncinate process was also observed and grouped as: type 1 attached to the lamina papyracea, type 2 to the skull base, and type 3 to the middle turbinate. Concha bullosa cases were also identified. Concordance between the Keros types and the other groups was observed.

Figure 2. Computerized Tomography Images of Keros Types.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A Schematic Representation of Keros Types.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 22 (IBM, USA). Continuous data has been reported as mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance was accepted when p<0.05. The chi-squared test was used to determine the statistically significant variances.

Results

The average age of the participants in the study was 34.37±12.03 years (Table 1). Fifty-one point nine percentage of cases were associated with Keros type II, 27.7% with type III, and 20.3% with type I. In 82.4% of cases, the uncinate process was attached to the lamina papyraceae, in 11% cases to the middle nasal turbinate, and in 6.4% cases to the skull base. Concha bullosa was in the right nasal cavity in 13.8% of cases, in the left nasal cavity in 11% of the cases, and bilateral in 16.3% of cases (Table 2, Figure 3). On the basis of the Chi-square test, differences in Keros types were not statistically significant as was observed with respect to sex (p>0.05) and Concha bullosa (53.1%) was significantly higher in females relative to males (p=0.001).

Table 2
Table 2. Keros Types and Concha Bullosa According to Sex. Keros type Keros 2 181 (%50.8) 87 (%54.4) 0.759

Concha Bullosa

Chi-Square test *p<0.05

Table 1. Patient Demographics.

n %

14-29 213 41.3 Age 30-39 130 25.2 40 and above 173 33.5 Male 356 69

Sex

Female 160 31 Keros 1 105 20.3 Keros type Keros 2 268 51.9 Keros 3 143 27.7 L.Papyracea 425 82.4

Unsinat process attachment Middle Turbinate 57 11

Skull Base 33 6.4 None 304 58.9 Right 71 13.8

Concha Bullosa

Left 57 11.0 Bilateral 84 16.3

Sex Male Female p n (%) n (%)

Keros 1 74 (%20.8) 31 (%19.4)

Keros 3 101 (%28.4) 42 (%26.3) None 229 (%64.3) 75 (%46.9) Right 39 (%11.0) 32 (%20.0)

0.001*

Left 32 (%9.0) 25 (%15.6) Bilateral 56 (%15.7) 28 (%17.5)

Figure 3. Attachment Points of Uncinate Process. Blue: Lamina paprycea, Red: Middle chonca, Green: Skull base Tablo 3: Keros Types, Uncinate Process Attachments and Concha Bullosa.

Unsinate process attachment Middle Turb. (Type 2)

Concha bullosa

Among the Keros types, having performed chi-square analysis, there was no significant relationship between the attachment of the uncinate process to the concha bullosa (p>0.05). However, among the Keros types with the uncinate process attached to the skull base, statistical significance was observed (p=0.001). There were significant differences in the ratio of the skull base attachment between Keros types 1 and 2 (p=0.038), and between types 2 and 3 (p=0.001) (Table 3) The ratio of the skull base attachment in Keros type 2 (2.6%) was significantly lower than that of types 1 (7.6%) and 3 (12.6%). There was no significant difference between the Keros types and the prevalence of concha bullosa (p>0.05). The analysis of the recorded data was performed using Chi-square test.

Discussion

Our data revealed that Keros type 2 was the most commonly observed type in medical conditions and lamina paprycea was the most common site of insertion of uncinate process but the variations were not rare. Especially, Keros type 3 with skull base attachment was a potential dangerous clinical variation. The sinonasal tract can be visualized with the naked eye or by using nasal endoscopy. If clinically suspected, diseases or variations can be examined using the HRCT evaluation, which showed the anatomical structures and their relationships to each other, anatomical variations, and pathologies.6-8

Although, anatomical knowledge and experience reduces the chances of arising complications, ESS has been associated with some problematic symptoms; minor complications including bleeding, infection, crusting, synechiae, ostial stenosis, and recurrence of the disease;9 and major complications including extraocular muscle damage, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, intracranial damage, and orbital emphysema.10

Pre-operative assessment may help to prevent cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. If the olfactory fossa is deep, as in Keros III, the surgeon must take care not to approach medially during the surgery, as a thin bony lamella constitutes most of the roof and the frontal support is missing. These patients are prone to complications associated with the ethmoid roof. However, in Keros I, surgery may be safer to perform.5-11

Keros Type Keros 1 Keros 2 Keros 3 p n (%) n (%) n (%)

L. Papyraceae (Type 1) 83 (%79) 230 (%85.8) 112 (%78.3) 0.100 14 (%13.3) 32 (%11.9) 11 (%7.7) 0.299 Skull base (Type 3) 8 (%7.6) 7 (%2.6) 18 (%12.6) 0.001* None 57 (%54.3) 150 (%56) 97 (%67.8) Right 17 (%16.2) 39 (%14.6) 15 (%10.5)

0.297

Left 14 (%13.3) 32 (%11.9) 11 (%7.7) Bilateral 17 (%16.2) 47 (%17.5) 20 (%14)

Uncinectomy is the primary step of ESS. The attachment of the uncinate process can vary and should be analyzed before surgery. Stamberger et al12 reported three different types of attachments. The uncinate process was attached to the middle turbinate in the first type, to the frontal roof in the second, and to the lamina papyraceae in the third. These variations of the uncinate process alter surgery in terms of finding the frontal recess. If not examined properly, damage to the skull base and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea may possibly result.13

Pneumatized middle concha is another frequently observed variation in the sinonasal region, with a rate of incidence 14-15 of 13-73%, subsequently exerting pressure on the middle 16,17 concha and ethmoid labyrinth. An uncinate process may also come in contact with a pneumatized middle concha, which may require surgical intervention.

Our data revealed that Keros type 2 was the most common type, followed by type 1, which was consistent with the 18 19 results of Guldner et al.18 However, Elwany et al19 reported that Keros type 3 was the most common one to be observed. Our study indicated that gender was not a significant factor for influencing variations, which was consistent with the conclusions of Elwany et al.19

6-8 Studies examining the point of attachment of the unci- 20-22 nate process were consistent with the recorded results. The only exception was that Keros type 3 were observed to be more common than type 2, which may have been so, on account of the limited number of participants in the study.

ESS is a delicate surgery that is associated with major complications. The only approach to avoid those complications is to conduct a meticulous assessment of each patient before surgery. This evaluation is only possible with HRCT, and there are some key points to differentiate the danger areas of the sinonasal tract prior to ESS.

Conclusion

Our study suggested the determination of the depth of the eth- 5-11 moid roof to avoid injuring the bony lamella and thus reduced

the risks of developing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Acknowledgment

The authors report nothing to declare.

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. ZacharekMAHanJKAllenR. Sagital and coronal dimensions of the ethmoid roof: A radioanatomic study. Am J Rhinol. 2005; 19: 348-352
  2. LuongAMarpleBF. Sinus surgery: Indications and techniques. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006; 30: 217-222
  3. OhnishiTTachibanaTKanekoYEsakiS. High-risk areas in endoscopic sinus surgery and prevention of complications. Laryngoscope. 1993; 103: 1181-1185. doi: 10.1288/00005537- 199310000-0002010.1288/00005537-199310000-00020 https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199310000-00020
  4. LeunigABetzCSSommerBSommerF. Anatomic variations of the sinuses; multiplanar CT-analysis in 641 patients. Laryngorhinootologie. 2008; 87: 482-489. doi: 10.1055/s-2007- 99557210.1055/s-2007-995572 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-995572
  5. KerosP. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962; 41: 809-813
  6. ZeinreichSJ. Paranasal sinus imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 103: 868-869. doi: 10.1177/01945998901030S50510.1177/01945998901030s505 https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998901030s505
  7. MesserklingerW. On the drainage of the frontal sinus of man. Acta Otolaryngol. 1967; 63: 176-181. doi: 10.3109/00016 48670912874810.3109/00016 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016
  8. StammbergerH. Endoscopic endonasal surgery-concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part 1. Anatomik and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 94(2): 143-147. doi: 10.1177/01945998860940020210.1177/019459988609400202 https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988609400202
  9. McMainsKC. Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 247-251. doi: 10.1097/ MOO.0b013e3282fdccad
  10. UlualpSO. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: Appropriate management of complications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 252-259. doi: 10.1097/ MOO.0b013e3282fdc3b2
  11. ErdoganSKeskinGTopdagMOzturkMSariFMutluF. Ethmoid roof radiology; analysis of lateral lamella of cribriform plate. Otolaryngol Pol. 2015; 69: 53-57. doi: 10.5604/00306657.118454310.5604/00306657.1184543 https://doi.org/10.5604/00306657.1184543
  12. StammbergerHPosawetzW. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 19990: 247(2): 63-76
  13. ShengYCChihJYChiaoHL. The association of superior attachment of uncinate process with pneumatization of middle turbinate: A computed tomographic analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274: 1905-1910. doi: 10.1007/s00405- 016-4441-310.1007/s00405-016-4441-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4441-3
  14. BolgerWEButzinCAParsonsDS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991; 101: 56-64. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199101000-0001010.1288/00005537-199101000-00010 https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010
  15. Perez-PiñasISabatéJCarmonaACatalina-HerreraCJJiménez-CastellanosJ. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat. 2000; 197: 221-227. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720221.x10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720221.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720221.x
  16. UnluHHAkyarSCaylanRNalçaY. Concha bullosa. J Otolaryngol. 1994; 23: 23-27
  17. MaruYKGuptaY. Concha bullosa: Frequency and appearances on sinonasal CT. Indian. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 52: 40-44. doi: 10.1007/BF0299643110.1007/bf02996431 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02996431
  18. GuldnerCZimmermannAPDiogoJWernerJATeymoortashA. Age-dependent differences of the anterior skull base. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 76(6): 822-828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.05010.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.050
  19. ElwanySMedanniAEidMAlyAEl-DalyAAmmarSR. Radiological observations on the olfactory fossa and ethmoid roof. J Laryngol Otol. 2010; 124: 1251-1256. doi: 10.1017/ S0022215110001313
  20. ErcanICakirBOSayinIBaşakMTurgutS. Relationship between the superior attachment type of uncinate process and presence of agger nasi cell: A computer-assisted anatomic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134: 1010-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.02110.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.021
  21. SrivastavaMTyagM. Role of Anatomic variations of uncinate process in frontal sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68(4): 441-444. doi: 10.1007/s12070-015- 0932-610.1007/s12070-015-0932-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0932-6
  22. TuliIPSenguptaSMunjalSKesariSPChakrabortyS. Anatomical variations of uncinate process observed in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(2): 157-161. doi: 10.1007/s12070-012-0612-810.1007/s12070-012-0612-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0612-8