Osteology and Rheumatology · Vol. 4, No. 1 · 2025 · pp. 3–7 · e-ISSN 2996-5918

High and Rapid Effectiveness of Manipulation in the Symptomatic Subluxation of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint in a Child: A Case Report

Olena Plotkina, Andrei Bourdeinyi

Division of Clinical Sciences, Life University, Marietta, GA, USAUnited States
Division of Basic Sciences, Life University, Marietta, GA, USAUnited States

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/orhoj-4-117 · Published 2025-09-11 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2025 The Author(s)

Abstract

In this article, a case of the lower leg and feet pain and cramps in a 5-year-old girl disturbing the child for two-years was described. These symptoms had been occurring just during the nights and lasted sometimes for 2-3-hours. There were no visible causes of this disorder. Previous examinations in a pediatric office and by a podiatrist did not reveal any pathology. In our office, both fibular heads were found to be subluxated postero-medially. We hypothesized that a causative factor of the pain and cramps was the involvement of the common peroneal nerve due to this subluxation. Manipulation of the fibular heads (a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust) eliminated these symptoms after just two visits. In the future, these symptoms in the child occurred just a couple of times during the next eight-years of follow-up observations. Various types of treatment of the proximal tibiofibular joint pathology, the common peroneal nerve involvement, and the significance of manipulative therapy in this type of involvement that resulted in rapid and high effectiveness, are discussed in the article.

Keywords: Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ); Symptomatic subluxation; Manipulative therapy; Joint dislocation; Postero-medial subluxation; Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ); Symptomatic subluxation; Manipulative therapy; Joint dislocation; Postero-medial subluxation

Introduction

anipulative therapy is becoming a more and more popular

type of treatment and is actively used not only in the man- M 1,2 agement of spinal painful syndromes. This treatment approach

can also effectively suppress the pain occurred in other parts of

3,4 the musculoskeletal system.3,4 The musculoskeletal pain where ma-

nipulative therapy is really effective and more preferred than other

types of pain management is usually associated with minor dis-

placement of the articular surfaces in relation to each other, known

as subluxation (partial dislocation).5

Although subluxations could potentially develop in all

bone articulations, the reports about the effectiveness of manip-

ulation in the treatment of peripheral joints mostly describe the

ones affecting large or medium-sized joints.6 There is relatively less

information in the literature regarding subluxation in smaller pe-

ripheral joints of the body. The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ)

is one of these small articular structures. Less common attention

cc cc Copyright 2022 by Plotkina O. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which paid to this joint subluxation, could be associated with its low fre-

7,8 quency,7,8 or with uncommon misrecognition of this clinical pa-

9-11 thology and therefore, with untimely assistance.9-11

In this article, we present a case report about a relatively

rare happening of PTFJ subluxation in a child that was found to

cause lower leg pain and cramps in fact for at least two-years, and

in whom we were able to successfully eliminate these symptoms

and their cause by manipulation on these joints.

Case Description

Patient R., 5-years old, female, was brought by her mother to the

doctor’s office with complaints of moderate to severe pain and

cramps in her lower legs and feet. These symptoms occurred al-

most every night, often making her to cry and even scream be-

cause of the pain. The mother explained that these symptoms

had begun two-years ago without any visible cause: no falls, vis-

ible traumas, peripheral nerve disorders, etc. Usually, these clini-

cal manifestations developed 3-4 times a week during the nights,

when after 1-2-hours of sleeping they suddenly awoke her up.

The duration of attacks at the beginning was 30-40-minutes, in-

creasing later sometimes up to 2-3-hours. During the daytime the

girl was physically active, having no complaints.

The mother stated that she attempted the conservative

care of changing shoes, padding, use of analgesics (Advil or Ty-

lenol), and limitation of physical activity. However, none of these

approaches helped. The girl was examined by a pediatrician who

found her healthy. A podiatrist did not establish any specific di-

agnosis, although noticed the pronation type of both feet, with

decreased arches. He suggested she might need foot surgery in

the future.

In our office, a thorough examination was performed.

The musculoskeletal system was also examined using the specific

evaluation system, activator protocol.12 The examination revealed

no neurological dysfunctions, muscle weakness, or restrictions of

range of motion. Posterior subluxation of both proximal fibular

heads was the only finding.

Manipulation was used as a treatment. For this, the cor-

rections of subluxation of both proximal tibiofibular joints by

applying a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust to both fibular

heads were carried out each visit.

After the first visit (three-days later), the mother in-

formed that the duration of pain and cramps attacks during the

nights was reduced to 5-10-minutes instead of 30-40-minutes be-

rd fore the treatment. By 3rd visit (five-days later) the patient’s moth-

er stated that these symptoms were completely absent during the

night. The subluxation of the right proximal tibiofibular joint was

eliminated after four visits, but on the left one only by the 9

visit (three-weeks later). During this time the pain and cramps

occurred just once in the left leg, which could be associated with

the longer presence of left tibiofibular joint subluxation (Figure

1). After that, the aforementioned attacks, accompanied by only

mild pain, occurred in the patient just a couple of times during

the next eight-years of follow-up observations.

Figure 1. Duration of Night Pain in Lower Legs and Feet Before Each Visit

Discussion

Thus, in the present case, the pain and cramps in the lower legs

and feet seem to have been associated with the subluxation of

both proximal tibiofibular joints. This was confirmed by the re-

sults of our examination and the rapid and high effectiveness of

the performed manipulations.

The PTFJ is a small, plane-type synovial joint with mini-

9,10,13,14 mal movement. This joint is quite stable articulation due

9,11 to bony congruency and ligamentous and muscle support.9,11

7,13,15 Pathology of PTFJ is relatively rare, potentially it could be

16,17 associated with a number of diseases such as osteoarthritis,

18 19 16 neoplasms, ganglion, pigmented villonodular synovitis, etc.

However, despite the relative stability of PTFJ, its damage most

frequently results from injury, and is often accompanied by its dis-

13,14,20 14 location, fibula fractures, rupture of ligaments around the

12 21 joints and muscle tendons.21 This kind of problems occurs more

frequently in young males, and usually is the result of sports ac-

11,13,22 tivity, but also was described in ballet dancers, soccer players,

7 15 equestrian jumpers,7 parachutists.15 The clinical experience shows

also that in the case of just PTFJ subluxations without visible

14,20,23 joint dislocation, these damages often are less recognized,

remain undiagnosed due to difficulties with radiographic identi-

14,24 16 fication, lack of emphasis in the literature and textbooks, in

10 20,25 polytrauma scenario, or in children.

In the classification of the PTFJ injury in the modifica-

tion of Ogden made in 1974,14 the traumatic damage of these

joints is divided into four types: type I–subluxation, usually atrau-

matic, without visible dislocation; type II–antero-lateral disloca-

tion; type III–postero-medial dislocation (usually as a result of

direct knee trauma); IV–superior dislocation. The majority of

th 10,13,14 PTFJ trauma (up to 85%) is type II injury. It is often associ-

ated with common peroneal nerve palsy, ligamentous injury, and

bone fracture, which certainly requires surgical intervention.8

Quite frequently PTFJ trauma, as shown above, involves

the common peroneal nerve with various degrees of damage.18

Depending on the nature and degree of involvement, this dam-

age could be manifested by some sensory or minimal motor dis-

turbances, or more serious peroneal nerve palsy8,26 whose hall-

mark clinical manifestation is foot drop.27 Sarma10 stated that in

any knee injury accompanied by common peroneal involvement,

occult PTFJ dislocation or subluxation should be clinically sus-

pected and ruled out.

The case presented demonstrates the pathology of both

proximal tibiofibular joints. Neither the child nor the mother

could recall any visible trauma, and the examination found no

neurological dysfunctions, muscle weakness, or restrictions of

range of motion. Only the use of the special evaluation system,

however, made it possible to identify postero-medial subluxation

of both PTFJ. Based on Ogden’s classification,14 this pathology

corresponds to Type I of PTFJ injury and fits the definition of

this joint subluxation as “excessive, symptomatic motion without frank

28 20 dislocation”,28 or as symptomatic hypermobility of the PTFJ.20

Evidence of the relationship between the symptoms

and subluxation, as mentioned above, is suggested by the rapid

and high effectiveness of the treatment. The restoration of the

congruency of both joints in our patient just through the me-

chanical correction (posterior-to-anterior push of the proximal

fibular heads) made it possible to eliminate the night pain and

cramps in both lower legs and feet in fact permanently within a

very short time of only two-visits. This is essential because the

complete stabilization of PTFJ subluxations usually requires a

13,29 longer time.

It is interesting to analyze the nature of pain and cramps

in the present case. Potentially, any subluxation could result in

pain due to the involvement of the enthesis. In this situa-

tion, the pain would have been localized just in or around the

involved PTFJ. However, the patient complained of pain in the

areas which are at a certain distance from the involved joints. We

assumed that the common peroneal nerve can be involved in the

pathological process because a part of it is located exactly behind

the proximal fibular head.

The common peroneal (common fibular) nerve is a

branch of the sciatic nerve. It is well-known that the nerve passes

over the posterior aspects of the proximal fibular head, where it

10,25,32 is susceptible to injury. Just inferior and lateral to the fibular

head at the fibular neck, it divides into two nerves – the superficial

16,33 and deep fibular nerves. In addition to innervating the muscles

that compose the anterior and lateral muscular compartments of

the lower extremity, the common peroneal nerve carries afferent

cutaneous sensory fibers. They are responsible for sensation in

the anterolateral aspect of the lower extremity that extends from

midway down the leg to the majority of the dorsal aspect of the

foot and toes.33

The distribution of pain in our patient exactly corre-

sponds to the areas innervated by the sensory fibers of this nerve.

We assume also that with a high degree of probability the cramps

can be caused by the irritation of the motor fibers of the com-

mon peroneal nerve. The causative factors of the nerve involve-

ment, in this case, are posteriorly subluxated proximal fibular

heads which can compress or stretch the common peroneal nerve

8,26 before it divides into superficial and deep fibular branches. This

27 10 irritation of both sensory and motor fibers, in our opinion, can

be the plausible explanation for why the child experienced night

attacks of both pain and cramps in the legs in this case. Although

during the day examination no objective neurological signs were

revealed, the disappearance of these symptoms after elimination

of the subluxation represents the good evidence and confirma-

tion of our assumption about common peroneal nerve involve-

ment.

Therefore, this compression could compromise both

sensory and motor functions of the nerve. We found the possible

confirmation of our concept in the article of Hardin and Deven-

dra.33 These authors noted that incorrect or too tight placement

of a splint or cast under the knees, across the fibular head after a

trauma or burn, can result in compression of the common pero-

neal nerve. We believe that one of the likely mechanisms of the

nerve compression in these cases could be the posterior proximal

fibular head subluxation caused by this tightness.

In our present case, the treatment of both PTFJ sub-

luxations turned out to be correct and highly effective. Lower leg

pain and cramps ceased to bother the child already after the sec-

ond visit, which occurred quite soon after the beginning of the

care. The previous treatment (use of analgesics, changing shoes,

padding) was ineffective.

In general, the treatment of PTFJ injury depends on

many factors. In the case of tibiofibular instability, some clinicians

recommend surgical treatment, even if the injury is not associ-

30,31 25 ated with trauma. Other specialists, however, prefer to use the

14,23 surgery only when the conservative treatment is ineffective, or

only when chronic problems or neurological symptoms exist, and

surgery is generally considered a last resort.30 After analyzing 44

publications, Kruckeberg34 found that such surgical approaches

as fixation and fibular head resection are not safe and are associ-

ated with high complication rates.

Based on the data of other clinicians, the character and

duration of the treatment should depend on the type of PTFJ

15,23 injury and its severity. In the case of PTFJ subluxation (tak-

ing into account Ogden’s classification) the conservative treat-

ment is usually the first choice,35 but with varying degrees of effi-

ciency and therapy duration: immobilization, anti-inflammatory

15 29 drugs,15 physical therapy,29 wearing a supportive strap around the

20 15,36 21,24,37 involve PTFJ, mobilization, manipulation. Although

20,23 subluxation of this joint is less recognized than its dislocation,

the use of manipulation in this type of injury can be quite suc-

21,37 38 cessful. For example, De Franca reported immediate and

dramatic relief of knee and thigh pain after the manipulation of

the PTFJ. Beazell37 used the PTFJ manipulation in a young run-

ner with three months of knee pain, and this patient was able

to resume running without pain in just one week after the initial

intervention.

Taking into consideration the objective finding (poste-

rior subluxation), we have chosen the most logical and easiest

treatment approach which resulted in the alignment of the PTFJ

articular surfaces. It was the manipulation. And this approach has

led to a rapid and stable clinical effect.

Conclusion

1. Lower leg pain and cramps could be associated with PTFJ sub-

luxation.

2. In the case of posterior PTFJ subluxation, the subluxated

proximal fibular heads can compress and/or stretch the common

peroneal nerve.

3. The common peroneal nerve involvement can be the most

likely causative factor of lower leg pain and cramps in the case

of PTFJ subluxation.

4. The high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation could be

the primary and optimal treatment in the case of PTFJ injury if

its damage is limited just by subluxations of these joints.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Professor Brent Russell from Life University

for his help and recommendations in the process of preparation of

this article.

Conflict Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. ChildsJDFritzJMFlynnTW. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 920-928. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-0000810.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008
  2. Scholten-PeetersGGMThoomesEKoningsS. Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chiro and Manual Ther. 2013; 41: 34. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-3410.1186/2045-709x-21-34 https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-709x-21-34
  3. BialoskyJEBishopMDPriceDD. The mechanisms of manual therapying the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009; 14: 531-538. doi: 10.1016/j. math.2008.09.00110.1016/j.math.2008.09.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001
  4. PlotkinaOBourdeinyiA. Alternative effective management of the musculoskeletal pain. Osteol Rheumatol Open J. 2019; 1(1): e3-e5. doi: 10.17140/ORHOJ-1-e00210.17140/orhoj-1-e002 https://doi.org/10.17140/orhoj-1-e002
  5. BrantinghamJW. A critical look at subluxation hypothesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1988; 11(2): 130-132
  6. PerleSPollardH. Manipulative therapy for lower extremity conditions: Update of a literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012; 35(2): 127-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.00110.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.001
  7. HarveyGPWoodsGW. Anterolateral dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint: Case report and literature review. Todays OR Nurse. 1992; 14(3): 23-27
  8. Herzog GA, Serrano-Riera R, Claude Sagi H. Traumatic proximal tibiofibular dislocation: A marker of severely traumatized extremities. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(10): 456-459. doi: 10.1097/ BOT.0000000000000348
  9. ResnickDNewellJDGuerraJ. Proximal tibiofibular joint: Anatomic-pathologic-radiographic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 1978; 131: 133-138. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.1.13310.2214/ajr.131.1.133 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.131.1.133
  10. SarmaABorgohainBSaikiaB. Proximal tibiofibular joint: Rendezvous with a forgotten articulation. Indian J Orthop. 2015; 49(5): 489-495. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.16404110.4103/0019-5413.164041 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164041
  11. NunesJDireito-SantosBCostaA. Acute proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation: a sports related injury? – two different cases. Ann Joint. 2019; 4: 11. doi: 10.21037/aoj.2019.01.0710.21037/aoj.2019.01.07 https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj.2019.01.07
  12. FuhrAWCollocaCJGreenJRKellerTS. Activator methods chiropractic technique. Missouri, USA: Mosby; 1997
  13. Nieume Weme RA, Somford MP, Schepers T. Proximal tibiofibular dislocation: A case report and review of literature. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014; 9: 185-189. doi: 10.1007/s11751-014- 0209-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-014-0209-8
  14. OgdenJA. Subluxation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974; (101): 192-197
  15. RadakovichMMaloneTR. The superior tibiofibular joint: the forgotten joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1982; 3(3): 129-132. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1982.3.3.12910.2519/jospt.1982.3.3.129 https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1982.3.3.129
  16. ForsterBBLeeJSKellyS. Proximal tibiofibular joint: an often-forgotten cause of lateral knee pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: W359-W366. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.062710.2214/ajr.06.0627 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.0627
  17. OzlunaVYildizAOzerC. Involvement of the proximal tibiofibular joint in osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2003; 10(4): 347-349. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0160(03)00004-810.1016/s0968-0160(03)00004-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0160(03)00004-8
  18. TomainoMDayCPapageorgiouC. Peroneal nerve palsy following knee dislocation: Pathoanatomy and implications for treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrocsc. 2000; 8: 163-165. doi: 10.1007/s00167005020810.1007/s001670050208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050208
  19. PecinaNIBoricIPecinaTC. Double synovial cyst of the proximal tibiofibular joint confirmed by MRI as a cause of the peroneal tunnel syndrome. Acta Chir Opthop Traumatol Cech. 2008; 75(4): 301-305
  20. SemonianRHDenlingerPMDuganRJ. Proximal tibiofibular subluxation relationship to lateral knee pain: A review of proximal tibiofibular pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995; 21(5): 248- 257. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.5.24810.2519/jospt.1995.21.5.248 https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1995.21.5.248
  21. BozkurtMYilmazEAksekiD. The evaluation of the proximal tibiofibular joint for patient with lateral knee pain. Knee. 2004; 11(4): 307-312. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.08.00610.1016/j.knee.2003.08.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2003.08.006
  22. HorstPKLaPradeRF. Anatomic reconstruction of chronic symptomatic anterolateral proximal tibiofibular joint instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(11): 1452-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1049-910.1007/s00167-010-1049-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1049-9
  23. SijbrandijS. Instability of the proximal tibio-fibular joint. Arta Orthop Scand. 1978; 49: 521-526. doi: 10.3109/1745367780899325010.3109/17453677808993250 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677808993250
  24. LarsonRL. Dislocation and ligamentous injuries of the knee. In: Rockwood, CA Jr, Green DP, eds. Fractures. Philadelphia, Lippincott. 1975: 1214-1217
  25. KlaunickG. Recurrent idiopathic anterolateral dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint: Case report and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010; 19(5): 409-414. doi: 10.1097/ BPB.0b013e3283395f6f
  26. HauptSFrimaHSommerC. Proximal tibiofibular dislocation associated with tibial shaft fractures–7 cases. Injury. 2016; 47(4): 950-953. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.03710.1016/j.injury.2016.01.037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.037
  27. KihmCACamastaCA. Review of drop hallux: Assessment and surgical repair. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56(1): 103-107. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.08.00110.1053/j.jfas.2016.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.08.001
  28. OgdenJA. Subluxation and dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974; 56A(l): l45-154. van den Bekerom MPJ, Weir A, van der Flier RE. Anatomic reconstruction or temporary screw stabilization of chronic symptomatic anterolateral proximal tibiofibular joint instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 1406-1407. doi: 10.1007/ s00167-011-1439-7
  29. SlobodinGRozenbaumMBoulmanN. Varied presentations of enthesopathy. Semin Arthr Rheum. 2007; 37(2): 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.01.00410.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.01.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.01.004
  30. PalesyPD. Tendon and ligament insertions–a possible source of musculoskeletal pain. Cranio. 1997; 15(3): 194-202. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1997.11746012 th10.1080/08869634.1997.11746012 https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1997.11746012
  31. MooreKLDalleyAF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 4th ed. PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999: 572-573
  32. HardinJMDevendraS. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Calf Common Peroneal (Fibular) Nerve. Treasure Island (FL): Stat-Pearls Publishing; 2022
  33. KruckebergBMCinqueMEMoatsheG. Proximal tibiofibular joint instability and treatment approaches: A systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2017; 33(9): 1743-1751. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2017.03.02710.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.027
  34. MorrisonTDShaerJALittleJE. Bilateral, atraumatic, proximal tibiofibular joint instability. Orthopedics. 2011; 34(2): 133. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20101221-2810.3928/01477447-20101221-28 https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20101221-28
  35. TomsonCBourassaRJ. Case study: Superior tibiofibular joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1983; 5: 134-138. doi: 10.2519/ jospt.1983.5.3.134
  36. BeazellJBGrindsfaffTLMagrumEMWilderR. Treatment of lateral knee pain by addressing tibiofibular hypomobility in a recreational runner. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 4(1): 21-28
  37. De FrancaGG. Proximal tibiofibular dysfunction and chronic knee and low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15(6): 382-387