Induced Boredom Constrains Mindfulness: An Online Demonstration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-1-101Keywords:
Boredom, Mindfulness, Online boredom inductionAbstract
Background: Boredom and mindfulness have long been considered to be incompatible psychological states. The latter state has been associated with a variety of psychological benefits, whereas the former has tended to be associated with far less positive outcomes and conditions, such as substance abuse and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Method: In an effort to empirically validate the presumed inverse relationship between state boredom and state mindfulness, an online sample (n=95) was recruited via Amazon’s Mechanical Turk web-based service and randomly assigned to either an online Vowel Cancellation task condition or an online Reading Task condition (control). An online assessment of state mindfulness was conducted immediately following the assigned task.
Results: As predicted, the boredom-induced individuals were found to report significantly lower levels of mindfulness than participants in the control group. Moreover, even though the entire study was conducted over the internet and involved no face-to-face contact with the study personnel, the online boredom induction procedure appeared to perform as intended. This was confirmed by the results on the standard manipulation check, the significantly higher scores of the boredom-induced individuals on the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS);1 and the significantly higher dropout rate in the boredom induction condition.
Conclusions: This is the first study that the authors are aware of that has been able to provide empirical evidence of a dynamic, inverse relationship between the psychological states of boredom and mindfulness. It is also the first study to report the successful induction of boredom using an online methodology. The clinical and methodological implications are discussed.
References
Fahlman SA, Mercer-Lynn KB, Flora DB, Eastwood JD. Development and validation of the multidimension-al state boredom scale. Assessment. 2013; 20: 68-85. doi: 10.1177/1073191111421303
Bohdi B. A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma: The AbhidhammatthaSangaha (Vipassana Meditation and the Bud-dha’s Teachings) Sri Lanka: Pariyatti Publishing; Buddhist Pub-lication Society. 2012; 86.
Lazar SW. Mindfulness and Psychotherapy. In: Germer Ck, Siegel RD, Fulton PR. Mindfulness Research. 1st ed. Newyork, NY, USA: Guilford Press; 2005; 220.
Brown KW, Ryan RM. Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2004; 11(3): 242-248.
Kabat-Zinn J, Hanh TN. Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Random House LLC. 2009.
Mikulas WL, Vodanovich SJ. The essence of boredom. The Psychological Record. 1993.
Todman M. Boredom in Schizoaffective Disorder and other Psychotic Conditions. In: Yip K. Schizoaffective Disordesr: In-ternational Perspectives on Understanding, Intervention and Re-habilitation. New York: Nova Science Publications; 2003.
Todman M. Psychopathology and Boredom: A Neglected As-sociation. In: Fanti KA. Psychological Science: Research, Theo-ry and Future Directions. Athens: ATINER press; 2007.
Todman M. The dimensions of state boredom: Frequency, duration, unpleasantness, consequences and causal attributions. Educational Research International. 2013; 1(1): 32-40.
Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness--the develop-ment and correlates of a new scale. Journal of personality assess-ment. 1986; 50(1): 4-17. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2
Rupp DE, Vodanovich SJ. The role of boredom proneness in self-reported anger and aggression. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality. 1997; 12(4): 925-936.
Gordon A, Wilkinson R, McGown, A, Jovanoska S. The psy-chometric properties of the Boredom Proneness Scale: An exam-ination of its validity. Psychological Studies. 1997; 42: 85-97.
Sommers J, Vodanovich SJ. Boredom proneness: Its rela-tionship to psychological-and physical-health symptoms. Jour-nal of clinical psychology. 2000; 56(1): 149-155. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4679(200001)56:1<149::AID-JCLP14>3.0.CO;2-Y
Watt JD, Ewing JE. Toward the development and validation of a measure of sexual boredom. The Journal of Sex Research. 1996; 33: 57-66.
Watt JD, Vodanovich SJ. Boredom proneness and psycho-social development. The Journal of psychology. 1999; 133(3): 303-314.
Watt JD, Vodanovich SJ. Relationship between boredom proneness and impulsivity. Psychological reports. 1992; 70(3): 688-690. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3.688
Lehr E, Todman M. Boredom and Boredom Proneness in Children: Implications for Academic and Social Adjustment. In: Todman M. Self-Regulation and Social Competence: Psycho-logical Studies in Identity, Achievement and Work-Family Dy-namics. Athens: ATNIER Press; 2009; 79-90.
Maroldo GK. Shyness, boredom, and grade point average among college students. Psychological Reports. 1986; 59(2): 395-398. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1986.59.2.395
Paulson MJ, Coombs RH, Richardson MA. School perfor-mance, academic aspirations, and drug use among children and adolescents. Journal of drug education. 1990; 20(4): 289-303.
Robinson WP. Boredom at school. British Journal of Educa-tional Psychology. 1975; 45(2): 141-152.
Fisher CD. Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations. 1993; 46(3): 395-417.
O’Hanlon JF. Boredom: Practical consequences and a theory. Actapsychologica. 1981; 49(1): 53-82. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918- (81)90033-0
Krotava I, Todman M. Boredom Severity, Depression and Alcohol Consumption in Belarus. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science. 2014; 2(1): 73-83.
Patrick ME, Schulenberg JE. How trajectories of reasons for alcohol use relate to trajectories of binge drinking: National pan-el data spanning late adolescence to early adulthood. Develop-mental psychology. 2011; 47(2): 311. doi: 10.1037/a0021939
Wilson GD. Eating style, obesity and health. Personality and Individual Differences. 1986; 7(2): 215-224. doi: 10.1016/0191- 8869(86)90058-9
Blaszczynski A, McConaghy N, Frankova A. Boredom proneness in pathological gambling. Psychological Reports. 1990; 67(1): 35-42. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.1.35
Vodanovich SJ. Psychometric measures of boredom: A re-view of the literature. The Journal of psychology. 2003; 137(6): 569-595. doi: 10.1080/00223980309600636
Eastwood JD, Frischen A, Fenske MJ, Smilek D. The Unen-gaged Mind Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention. Perspec-tives on Psychological Science. 2012; 7(5): 482-495.
Fisher CD. Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations. 1993; 46(3): 395-417.
Hamilton JA. Attention, personality, and the self-regulation of mood: Absorbing interest and boredom. Progress in experi-mental personality research. 1981; 10(28): 1-315.
Harris MB. Correlates and Characteristics of Boredom Prone-ness and Boredom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2000; 30(3): 576-598. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02497.x
Critcher CR, Gilovich T. Inferring attitudes from mind wan-dering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010; 36(9): 1255-1266. doi: 10.1177/0146167210375434
Martin M, Sadlo G, Stew G. The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(3): 193-211. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qrp066oa
Baer RA, Fischer S, Huss DB. Mindfulness and acceptance in the treatment of disordered eating. Journal of rational-emo-tive and cognitive-behavior therapy. 2005; 23(4): 281-300. doi: 10.1007/s10942-005-0015-9
Trunnell EP,White F, Cederquist J, Braza J. Optimizing an Out-door Experience for Experiential Learning by Decreasing Bore-dom through Mindfulness Training. Journal of Experiential Edu-cation. 1996; 19(1): 43-49. doi: 10.1177/105382599601900109
Russell D, McAuley E. Causal attributions, causal dimen-sions, and affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986; 50: 1174-1185.
Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness--the develop-ment and correlates of a new scale. Journal of personality assess-ment. 1986; 50(1): 4-17. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2
LePera N. The relationships between boredom proneness, mindfulness, anxiety, depression, and substance use. The New School Psychology Bulletin. 2011; 8(2).
Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechani-cal Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011; 6(1): 3-5.
Tanay G, Bernstein A. State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): De-velopment and initial validation. Psychological assessment. 2013; 25(4): 1286. doi: 10.1037/a0034044
Edel M, Holter, T, Wassink K, Juckel G. A comparision of mindfulness-based group training and skills group training in adults. Journal of Attention Disorders (online pre-publication edition). 2014. doi: 10.1177/1087054714551635
Zylowska L, Ackerman D, Yang M, et al. Mindfulness medi-tation training in adults and adolescents with ADHD: A feasibil-ity study. Journal of Attention Disorders. 2007; 11(6): 737-774. doi: 10.1177/1087054707308502
Thomson DR, Besner D, Smilek D. A Resource-Control Ac-count of Sustained Attention Evidence From Mind-Wandering and Vigilance Paradigms. Perspectives on Psychological Sci-ence. 2015; 10(1): 82-96. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556681
Semple RJ. Does mindfulness meditation enhance attention? A randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness. 2010; 1(2): 121- 130. doi: 10.1007/s12671-010-0017-2
Lau MA, Bishop SR, Segal ZV, et al. The Toronto mindful-ness scale: Development and validation. Journal of clinical psy-chology. 2006; 62(12): 1445-1467. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20326
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
