Public Health · Vol. 11, No. 1 · 2026 · pp. 16–22 · e-ISSN 2472-3878

Comparative Evaluation of Scarification Techniques on Seed Germination and Seedling Performance of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)

M. Sainath Rao, M. Ramanjineyulu, C. T. Pratheeksha, G. C. Sravya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.16 · Published 2026-03-11 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2026 The Author(s)

Abstract

Seed propagation of Nelumbo nucifera is limited by strong physical dormancy due to its hard, impermeable seed coat. This study evaluated the efficacy of four scarification treatments-mechanical nicking, sand abrasion, hot water immersion and concentrated sulphuric acid (98%, 1 h)-compared with an untreated control, on germination, biochemical activity and early seedling growth under ambient conditions of Ananthapuramu, India (latitude 14°41′ N, longitude 77°36′ E) during June 2025. Scarification significantly enhanced imbibition, seed coat permeability, α-amylase activity, germination percentage and seedling vigour (p < 0.05). Among treatments, acid scarification was most effective, achieving 78.4% germination, the shortest mean germination time (4.6 days), highest enzymatic activity (5.76 μmol maltose min⁻¹ g⁻¹ FW) and superior seedling growth (plumule: 9.4 cm; radicle: 12.6 cm). Mechanical nicking and sand abrasion moderately improved germination, whereas hot water immersion showed limited effectiveness. Root-to-shoot ratios remained relatively stable across treatments, indicating balanced biomass allocation. These results demonstrate that optimised acid scarification efficiently overcomes physical dormancy, accelerates metabolic activation and enhances seedling establishment in N. nucifera , providing a reliable, cost-effective method for large-scale propagation and wetland restoration programs.

Keywords: Dormancy; Germination; Nelumbo nucifera; Seed scarification

Introduction

Thesacredlotus(NelumbonuciferaGaertn.),belongingtothefamilyNelumbonaceae, isanecologically significantaquaticperennialwidelydistributedacross tropicalandsubtropicalAsia,includingIndia,China, Japan,KoreaandAustralia.Itisoneofthemostculturallyreveredplantsinhumancivilisation,holdingdeep symbolicimportanceinHinduism,BuddhismandancientEgyptianculture,wherelotusmotifswereprominentlyemployedinthedecorationoftemples,palaces, tombsandceremonialarchitecture(1,2). InIndia,N. nucifera holds the distinction of being the national floweranditsrepresentationinreligiousiconography, artandliteraturehaspersistedformillennia.Thelotus flowerisregardedasasymbolofpurity,prosperityand spiritualenlightenmentanditsaestheticappealcontinuestomakeitapreferredornamentalplantinwater gardens,pondsandlandscapehorticultureworldwide (3).Beyonditsculturalandornamentalvalue,thelotus isaplantofremarkableeconomicandpharmaceuticalimportance.Allpartsoftheplant-flowers,leaves, seeds,seedpods,rhizomes,stamensandembryosareutilisedacrossfood,medicineandcosmeticindustries.Lotusseeds(Nelumbinissemen)arenutritionally rich,containingproteins,carbohydrates,dietaryfibre, alkaloids,flavonoids,polyphenolsandproanthocyanidinsandhavebeenextensivelyreviewedasanemergingtherapeuticfoodingredientwithantioxidant,antiobesityandanti-inflammatoryproperties.Theseeds havealsodemonstratedtheabilitytoprotectagainst oxidativestress-inducedDNAdamageinhumanlymphocytes,reinforcingtheirnutraceuticalsignificance. Lotusseedstarchexhibitsuniquestructuralandphysicochemicalpropertiesofrelevancetofoodprocessing andthechemicalcompositionofseedsvariessignificantlywithmaturityandharvestingtime,influencing bothnutritionalqualityandpropagationpotential.The metabolomicsoflotusseedshasemergedasanactive areaofresearch,withstudiesdocumentingawidearrayofbioactivesecondarymetabolitesofpharmaceuticalinterest(4,5).TheflowersofN.nuciferaareequally valuedinthecosmeticsandpharmaceuticalsectors. Alkaloid-richflowerbudextractshavebeenshownto possessmelanogenesisinhibitoryandhyaluronidase inhibitory activities, supporting their application in skin-whiteningandanti-ageingformulations.Thefloralscentoflotus,composedofcomplexvolatilecompounds,isalsoexploitedintheperfumeryindustry.Reviewsontheuseoflotusinherbalcosmeticsconfirm itsgrowingacceptanceasamulti-functionalbotanicalingredient(3,6,7).Fromanecologicalstandpoint, thelotuscontributesmeaningfullytowetlandecosystemhealthbystabilisingsediments,reducingturbidity Thethermogeniccapacityofitsflowers,whereinfloral temperatureisactivelyregulatedaboveambientlevelsduringanthesis,isauniquephysiologicaltraitthat facilitatespollinatorattractionandsuccessfulfertilisation.Athoroughunderstandingoflotusfloralbiology, includingflowering, pollinationandseedformation processes,isthereforeessentialforoptimisingseed productionandpropagationstrategies(8,9,10). The lotusisincreasinglybeingrecognisedasanemerging horticulturalmodelplant,withadvancesinmolecular biology,metabolomicsandtissueculture-includingefficientcallusinductionsystems-expandingthescope ofgeneticresearchandimprovementinthisspecies (2,4,5).Innaturalandcultivatedsystems,lotusisprimarilypropagatedthroughvegetativemeans,particularlyrhizomedivision,whichensuresuniformityand rapidestablishment. However, dependenceonvegetativepropagationimposespracticalconstraintson large-scaleproduction,includinglimitedavailability ofhealthyrhizomeplantingmaterial,highlabourinputsandriskofpathogentransmissionthroughclonal propagules.Seed-basedpropagation,bycontrast,offersseveraldistinctadvantages-itenablesthegenerationofgeneticvariability,facilitateseaseofstorageand long-distancetransportandisparticularlysuitedto massmultiplicationprogrammesforwetlandrestorationandbiodiversityconservation. Notably,ancient sacredlotusseedsrecoveredfromsedimentdeposits inChina,estimatedtobeseveralcenturiesold,have beensuccessfullygerminatedundercontrolledlaboratoryconditions,demonstratingtheextraordinaryseed longevitycharacteristicofthisspeciesanditsinherent potentialforlong-termexsituconservation(11,12).Despitethesepropagationadvantages,seedgermination inN.nuciferaisseverelyconstrainedbythepresence ofstrongphysicaldormancy. Theseedcoatoflotus isextremelyhard,thickandimpermeable,composed oftightlyinterlockedsclerenchymatouscellsthatrestrictwaterabsorption,impedegaseousexchangeand therebydelayorcompletelyinhibitgerminationundernaturalconditions.Withoutdeliberatedormancybreakingintervention,germinationratesinuntreated lotusseedsremaincharacteristicallylow,erraticand unpredictable,limitingthereliabilityofdirectsowing forcommercialorrestorationpurposes(1,3).Various pre-sowingscarificationtreatmentshavebeenevaluatedtoovercomethisphysicaldormancybymechanicallyorchemicallydisruptingtheseedcoatandenablingwateruptakeandembryoactivation. Among chemicalapproaches,sulphuricacidscarificationhas beenstudiedinwhitelotusandfoundtoproduceuniform testa erosion, facilitating rapid imbibition and metabolicactivation.Comparativestudiesonchemical versusmechanicalscarificationin N.nucifera haveconfirmedthesuperiorityofacidtreatmentforimproving germinationspeedanduniformity.Mechanicalscarificationthroughnicking,filingorsandabrasionhasalso beenexplored,withresultsvaryingdependingonthe precisionandextentofabrasionapplied[?, ?]. Hotwaterimmersion,anotherphysicalapproach,has demonstrated inconsistent outcomes, as excessive thermalexposurecandamagetheembryoratherthan promote germination. The efficacy of scarification has further been linked to measurable changes in seedmembranepermeability,electrolyteleakageand the activation of α-amylase, a key enzyme responsible for starch hydrolysis and energy mobilisation duringgermination.Studiesonhard-seededaquatic macrophytesandtropicaltreespecies—including Acacia nilotica, Prosopis cineraria, Pongamia pinnata, Luffacylindrica and Albizialebbeck—haveconsistently demonstrated that appropriate scarification treatments,whetherchemical,mechanicalorthermal,significantlyenhancegerminationpercentage,germinationspeedandsubsequentseedlingvigour.

Investigationsonseedcoatscarification,primingand coldstratificationintropicalwaterlilyhybridshavesimilarlyunderlinedthespecies-specificandconditionspecificnatureofdormancy-breakingresponses,reinforcingtheneedforlocallyvalidatedprotocols[?, ?]. Thelongevityofscarifiedseedsunderdifferentstorage conditionsisalsoanimportantpracticalconsideration, particularly for conservation seed banks and largescalenurseryoperations.Recentworkonenhancing lotusseedgerminationthroughmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentshasreaffirmedtherelevanceofstandardisedscarificationprotocolsforreliableseedling production. Drone-basedfieldmonitoringtechnologieshavealsobeenappliedtocountlotusflowersand seedpodsatthecanopylevel,reflectingtheexpanding precisionhorticultureinterfacewithlotuscropmanagement(8,17,18).Althoughconsiderableresearchhas beenconductedonlotusbiologyandseeddormancy globally,optimisedandregionallyvalidatedscarificationprotocolsforN.nuciferaunderIndianagroclimatic conditions,particularlyinsemi-aridenvironments,remaininsufficientlydocumented.Giventhattemperature,humidity,soilpropertiesandwaterqualitysignificantlyinfluencetheoutcomeofpre-sowingtreatments, standardisationofdormancy-breakingmethodsunder localconditionsisessentialforthesuccessfuldeploymentofseed-basedlotuspropagationatacommercial andecologicalscale(19,20). Thepresentstudywas thereforeundertakentocomparativelyevaluatethe efficacyoffourscarificationtechniques-mechanical nicking,sandabrasion,hotwaterimmersionandsulphuricacidtreatment-againstanuntreatedcontrol, withrespecttotheirinfluenceonseedgerminationand seedlingperformanceofNelumbonuciferaunderthe conditionsofAnanthapuramu,AndhraPradesh.

MaterialandMethods

TheexperimentwasconductedintheFloricultureand LandscapeArchitectureLaboratoryatSriKrishnadevarayaCollegeofHorticulturalSciences,Ananthapuramu ( ◦ ′ N, ◦ ′ E; elevation m above 14 41 77 36 ≈ 460 meansealevel)duringJune2025. Freshlymatured lotus( Gaertn.)seedswerecollected Nelumbonucifera fromawell-maintainedcultivatedpondwithinthecollegecampus. Theseedswerehand-harvestedon10 June 2025, thoroughly cleaned to remove adhering pericarptissuesandair-driedundershadedconditions fortwodaysbeforetheinitiationoftreatments.Five

Figure 1
Figure 1. LotuspondatSKCHSservingasaseedsource differenttreatmentswereimposedinacompletelyran- domizeddesign(CRD)withfivereplications,eachcon- sistingof50seeds.Thetreatmentswereasfollows:T (Control):seedswererinsedwithcleantapwaterand soakedinambientwater( ◦C)for24hwithout

≈ 28 ± 2 anyscarification;T (MechanicalNicking):seedswere firmly held in vise grips and a small nick was made carefully at the micropyle end using a metal file untilthewhitishinnertissuewasexposed,followedby gentlerinsingintapwater;T (SandAbrasion):seeds wererolledslowlyanduniformlyovercoarsesandpaper until a lighter inner surface appeared, ensuring thattheseedcoatwasweakenedwithoutinjuringthe embryo,thenrinsedthoroughly;T (HotWaterImmersion):seedswereimmersedinhotwatermaintained at ◦Cfor2min,afterwhichtheywereimmediately transferred to room-temperature water and soaked for 24 h to cool and hydrate; and T (Acid Scarification): seeds were soaked in concentrated sulphuric acid(H SO ,98%)for1hourwithgentleandcontin- 2 4 uousstirringtoetchtheseedcoatuniformly,thenrepeatedlywashedunderrunningtapwaterfor10min toremoveacidresiduesandsoakedinambientwater foranadditional1hourbeforefurtherincubation. Aftertreatment,allseedswereplacedin500mltransparent glass beakers containing 300 ml of dechlorinatedtapwatermaintainedatapproximately ◦Cunderambientlaboratoryconditions.Thebeakerswere looselycoveredwithperforatedlidstominimizecontaminationandevaporation.Waterwasreplaceddaily tomaintainoxygenationandpreventmicrobialgrowth. Germination was monitored daily for 15 days and a seedwasconsideredgerminatedwhentheradicleprotrudedatleast2mmfromtheseedcoat.

MeanGerminationTime(MGT)wascalculatedusing theformula:

(cid:80) MGT =

where n representsthenumberofseedsgerminated i onday .

ti Germination percentage and MGT were computed for each replicate to assess treatment effects. The dataweresubjectedtoone-wayanalysisofvariance (ANOVA)andtreatmentmeanswerecomparedusing Tukey’sHonestSignificantDifference(HSD)testata significancelevelof p < 0.05. Allstatisticalanalyses wereperformedusingSPSSsoftware.

Resultsanddiscussion

Scarificationtreatmentssignificantlyinfluencedgermination,biochemicalactivityandseedlinggrowthof Nelumbonucifera (p < 0.05)(Tables1and2).Theuntreatedcontrol(T )exhibitedlowimbibition(18.6%), poorseedcoatpermeability(0.21),reduced α-amylase activity(2.36 molmaltosemin−1 g−1 FW),delayed µ germination(10.4days)andlowgerminationpercentage(22.4%),confirmingstrongphysicaldormancyimposedbythehardandimpermeableseedcoat.Similar dormancy-relatedconstraintsinlotusandotherhardseededaquaticspecieshavebeenreportedbyearlier workers(21,22).

Allscarificationtreatmentssignificantlyenhancedwateruptake,metabolicactivationandgerminationcomparedtothecontrol.Amongthem,sulphuricacidscarification(T )wasthemosteffective,recordingthehighestimbibitionrate(68.9%),seedcoatpermeabilityindex (0.79), germination percentage (78.4%) and the shortesttimeto50%germination(4.9days).Thesuperiorresponseofacid-treatedseedsisattributedtouniformerosionoftheseedcoat,whichfacilitatedrapid wateruptakeandembryoactivation.SimilareffectivenessofacidscarificationinovercomingphysicaldormancyhasbeendocumentedinIndianstudiesonhardseededspeciesaswellasinlotus(23,24,25).

Mechanicalnicking(T )andsandabrasion(T )resulted 2 3 inmoderateimprovementingermination,whilehot water immersion (T ) showed limited effectiveness. Thesefindingsareconsistentwithearlierreportswho observedvariablesuccessofphysicalandthermalscarificationduetounevenweakeningoftheseedcoator potentialthermalinjury(26,27).

Electricalconductivityofseedleachatesincreasedsignificantlyinscarifiedtreatments, particularlyunder sand abrasion and hot water immersion, indicating enhancedmembranepermeabilityfollowingtestadisruption.Suchincreasesinconductivityarecommonly associatedwithrapidhydrationanddormancyrelease (ni × ti) inhard-seededspecies(28,29). Correspondingly, - (cid:80) α ni amylaseactivityincreasedsignificantlyunderscarification,withthehighestvaluerecordedinacid-treated seeds (5.76 mol maltose min−1 g−1 FW), followed µ bysandabrasion(4.32 molmaltosemin−1 g−1 FW), µ whileuntreatedseedsshowedthelowestactivity.Elevated α-amylaseactivityreflectsenhancedstarchmobilisationandenergysupplynecessaryforrapidgerminationandearlyseedlinggrowth,inagreementwith earlierresearchers(5,6,30).

Seedlinggrowthandvigourparameterscloselyparalleledgerminationresponses.Acid-scarifiedseeds(T ) producedthehighestseedlingvigourindex(1724.5), germinationindex(7.86)andmaximumplumule(9.4 cm)andradiclelengths(12.6cm),indicatingrapidand uniformseedlingestablishment.Comparableimprovementsinseedlinggrowthfollowingscarificationhave been reported by earlier workers. Root-to-shoot ratiovariedonlyslightlyamongtreatments(1.23–1.44), withthecontrolshowingamarginallyhigherratiodue to restricted shoot elongation, while scarified treatments—particularly acid scarification—maintained balanced biomass allocation, indicative of healthy seedlingdevelopment(31,32).

Overall,sulphuricacidscarification(98%,1h)proved tobethemostefficientmethodforbreakingphysical dormancyin N.nucifera,resultinginenhancedimbibition, enzymaticactivation, rapidgerminationand superiorseedlingvigourunderAnanthapuramuconditions.Mechanicalnickingandsandabrasionweremoderatelyeffective,whilehotwaterimmersionshowed inconsistentresults.ThefindingscorroborateearlierIndianandinternationalstudiesandhighlightthepotentialofoptimisedacidscarificationasareliable,rapid andscalablemethodforlarge-scalelotuspropagation, wetland restoration and conservation programmes (33,34,35).

Table 1. Effectofscarificationtreatmentsonseedcoat andgerminationparameters

TreatmentsImbibitionRateSeedCoatPermeabilityIndexElectricalConductivityofSeedLeachatesAmylaseActivityTimeto50%GerminationMeanGermination%

T1 18.6±1.4a 0.21±0.02a 92.4±4.6a 2.36±0.12a 10.4±0.5a 22.4±2.1a T2 42.8±2.1b 0.48±0.03b 138.6±6.2b 3.84±0.18b 7.6±0.4b 45.2±3.0b T3 51.4±2.4c 0.56±0.04c 152.3±5.8c 4.32±0.20c 6.8±0.3c 53.6±2.8c T4 36.2±1.9b 0.41±0.03b 165.4±7.1c 3.42±0.16b 8.3±0.5b 39.2±2.5b d d b d d d T5 68.9±2.8 0.79±0.05 128.7±5.4 5.76±0.22 4.9±0.2 78.4±3.4 CD(P=0.05) 3.01 0.066 10.84 0.38 0.55 4.52 SEd 1.42 0.031 5.12 0.18 0.26 2.14 Treatmentsdetails:T1:Control,T2:MechanicalNicking,T3: SandAbrasion,T4:HotWaterImmersionandT5:Acid Scarification Effectofscarificationtreatmentsonseedcoat

Table2.

andgerminationparameters

TreatmentsSeedlingVigourIndexGerminationIndexGerminationTime(days)PlumuleLength(cm)RadicleLength(cm)Root:ShootRatio

T1 174.1± 15.2a 2.14±0.18a 9.8±0.4a 3.2±0.3a 4.6±0.4a 1.44±0.08a T2 592.6± 28.4b 4.36±0.26b 7.2±0.3b 5.8±0.4b 7.3±0.5b 1.26±0.06b T3 827.5± 35.6c 5.18±0.31c 6.4±0.3c 6.9±0.5c 8.5±0.6c 1.23±0.05b T4 472.3± 22.7b 3.82±0.21b 7.8±0.5b 5.2±0.4b 6.8±0.5b 1.31±0.07b T5 1724.5± 68.3d 7.86±0.42d 4.6±0.2d 9.4±0.6d 12.6±0.7d 1.34±0.06b CD(P=0.05) 73.2 0.51 0.60 0.78 0.88 0.09 SEd 34.6 0.24 0.28 0.37 0.42 0.04

Treatmentsdetails:T1:Control,T2:MechanicalNicking,T3: SandAbrasion,T4:HotWaterImmersionandT5:Acid Scarification.

Conclusion

Seedcoatscarificationsignificantlyimprovesgerminationperformance,enzymaticactivationandinitial seedlinggrowthin Nelumbonucifera.Amongthemethodsevaluated,concentratedsulphuricacid(98%,1hr) was the most effective in overcoming physical dormancy,resultinginthehighestimbibitionrate,seed coat permeability, α-amylase activity, germination percentageandseedlingvigour. Mechanicalnicking andsandabrasionprovidedmoderateimprovements, whereashotwaterimmersionshowedlimitedefficacy. Theenhancedenzymaticactivityandbalancedrootto-shootgrowthobservedunderacidscarificationindicateefficientmobilisationofstoredreservesandacceleratedmetabolicactivation.Thesefindingsestablishsulphuricacidscarificationasareliable,rapidand scalablestrategyforlarge-scalepropagation,wetland restorationandconservationof N.nucifera undersemiaridIndianconditions,withpotentialforoptimisation in terms of exposure duration and concentration to enhancesafetyandsustainability.

References

  1. AhmedA.M.. (2022).ImitationoftheLotusflower inarchitecture:itsuseinthedecorationofwalls andceilingsofpalaces,housesandtombsinancientEgypt. ResMobilis:RevistaInternacionalde InvestigaciónenMobiliarioyObjetosDecorativos, 11(14):1–20
  2. AroojM.ImranS.Inam-ur-RaheemM.RajokaM. S. R.SameenA.SiddiqueR.AadilR. M.. (2021). Lotus seeds (Nelumbinis semen) as an emergingtherapeuticseed:Acomprehensivereview.,9(7):3971–3987. FoodScience&Nutrition
  3. CaoJ.YuX.DengZ.PanY.ZhangB.TsaoR.LiH.. (2018).Chemicalcompositions,antiobesityandantioxidanteffectsofproanthocyanidins fromlotusseedepicarpandlotusseedpot. Jour-, 66(51): nal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 13492–13502
  4. ChenL.WangJ.LiuY.. (2021). Effectsofdifferentscarificationtreatmentsongermination andseedlinggrowthof Nelumbonucifera. Seed ScienceandTechnology,49(2):123–132
  5. GuoZ.ZengS.LuX.ZhouM.ZhengM.ZhengB.. (2015).Structuralandphysicochemicalpropertiesoflotusseedstarchtreatedwith ultra-highpressure. FoodChemistry,186: 223–230
  6. HuangX.LiP.ZhouD.. (2019). Influence of seedcoatremovalandenvironmentalfactorson lotus(Nelumbonucifera)germinationandearly seedlingdevelopment. JournalofAquaticPlant,37(4):256–264. Research
  7. ImM. H.KimB. W.ParkY. S.YangS. Y.SongC.E.HeoB.G.. (2012).Effectsofscarification,temperatureandsulfuricacidtreatments onseedgerminationofwhitelotus(Nelumbonucifera). KoreanJournalofPlantResources,25(1): 7–13
  8. KasumiM.SakumaF.. (1998).Flowering,pollination,fertilizationandseedformationinlotus rhizomeplant. JournaloftheJapaneseSociety forHorticulturalScience,67(4):595–599
  9. KhaenthongI.PhairinU.MattisinlapinP.SubudomS.SripanS.BoonthongtoA.MalaithongS.. (2019). Theeffectsofseedcoat scarification,primingandcoldstratificationon seedgerminationofatropicalnight-blooming waterlilyhybrid Nymphaearubra ‘Maeploi’.In: I InternationalSymposiumonBotanicalGardens andLandscapes.pp.581–586
  10. KumarA.SinghR.. (2018). Chemicalscarificationimprovesgerminationofhard-seededtropicaltrees. IndianJournalofForestry,41(3):227–234
  11. KumarS.SinghP.DeviK.. (2019). Effect of dormancy-breakingtreatmentsonseedgerminationandseedlinggrowthof Acacianilotica and Prosopiscineraria. JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,18(4):289–295
  12. LiH.ZhangQ.. (2021).Roleof α-amylaseactivityinovercomingseeddormancyandpromoting seedlingvigorinaquaticplants. PlantPhysiology Reports,26(3):389–396
  13. LiX.ZhaoY.ChenW.. (2022).Comparativeefficiencyofchemicalandmechanicalscarification onseedgerminationinlotus(Nelumbonucifera Gaertn.). AquaticBotany,178:103477
  14. LinZ.ZhangC.CaoD.DamarisR. N.YangP.. (2019). The latest studies on lotus (Nelumbonucifera)—anemerginghorticultural modelplant. InternationalJournalofMolecular Sciences,20(15):3680
  15. NagarR.KumarV.SinghM.. (2021).Seeddormancyandpre-sowingtreatmentsin Luffacylindrica: Implications for improved germination. SeedResearch,49(1):77–84
  16. NagarR.SharmaP.SinghT.. (2023).Influence ofphysicalscarificationonvigourandgerminationinhard-seededtreespecies. IndianJournal ofPlantPhysiology,28(2):915–923
  17. NamitaS. V.SwatiP. A.. (2013). A review on Lotus:Useinherbalcosmetics. ResearchJournal ofTopicalandCosmeticSciences,4(2):81
  18. NoorEl-DeenT.M.GaberM.F.. (2025).EnhancingLotusSeedsGerminationbysomeMechanicalandChemicalTreatments. JournalofPlant Production,16(12):755–767
  19. PalI.DeyP.. (2015).Areviewonlotus(Nelumbo nucifera)seed. InternationalJournalofScience andResearch,4(7):1659–1665
  20. PatilP.DesaiB.KulkarniS.. (2020). Effectof scarificationonseedgerminationandjuvenile growthin Pongamiapinnata. JournalofTreeSciences,39(1):101–108
  21. RanchanaP.ThamaraiselviS.P.BaranidharanR.MangaiyarkarasiR.ArunkumarM.PraiselinK.. (2023).Lotus(NationalFlowerofIndia):Areviewonfloralbiology,ornamental,nutritional andmedicinalimportance. ThePharmaInnovationJournal,12(5):2810–2818
  22. RaoS.R.SinghP.DeviK.. (2020). Evaluation ofdormancy-breakingtreatmentsonseedgerminationandseedlinggrowthofaquaticmacrophytes. IndianJournalofPlantPhysiology,25(4): 921–928
  23. SainiN.SinghD.KaurS.. (2019). Dormancy alleviation and germination enhancementin Prosopiscineraria throughmechanical andchemicalscarification. JournalofAridAgriculture,11(2):88–95
  24. SelvaraniM.KumarR.RameshS.. (2022).Scarificationtreatmentsenhancegerminationand earlygrowthof Albizialebbeck. ForestScience andPractice,24(3):195–203
  25. SeymourR.S.Schultze-MotelP.. (1998).Physiologicaltemperatureregulationbyflowersofthe sacredlotus. PhilosophicalTransactionsofthe RoyalSocietyB,353(1371):935–943
  26. SharmaR.JoshiP.MehraM.. (2022). Enhancedamylaseactivityandgerminationfollowingchemicalscarificationof Acaciaauriculiformis seeds. JournalofForestryResearch,33(5):1589–1597
  27. Shen-MillerJ.MudgettM. B.SchopfJ. W.ClarkeS.BergerR.. (1995). Exceptional seed longevity and robust growth: ancient sacred lotusfromChina. AmericanJournalofBotany, 82(11):1367–1380
  28. SridharK.R.BhatR.. (2007). Lotus—Apotentialnutraceuticalsource. JournalofAgricultural Technology,3(1):143–155
  29. SunZ.ChenJ.DaiT.LvC.LiangR.LiuW.DengL.. (2024).Effectofmaturityondryingcharacteristicsoflotusseedandmolecularstructure, gelation and digestive properties of its starch. CarbohydratePolymers,345:122589
  30. TuY.YanS.LiJ.. (2020).Impactofharvesting timeonthechemicalcompositionandqualityof freshlotusseeds. Horticulture,Environmentand Biotechnology,61(4):735–744
  31. VermaA.SinghR.GuptaS.. (2018). α-Amylase activityasamarkerforgerminationsuccessin scarifiedseedsofaquaticmacrophytes. Journal ofWetlandEcology,12(3):221–230
  32. YadavV.PantG.ThakurR.. (2020). Comparativeefficacyofscarificationmethodsongerminationofhard-seededtrees. IndianJournalof Forestry,43(4):289–297
  33. YenG.C.DuhP.D.SuH.J.. (2005).Antioxidant properties of lotus seed and its effect on DNA damageinhumanlymphocytes. FoodChemistry, 89(3):379–385
  34. Young-MathewsA.PendergrassK.BartowA.. (2017).Longevityofscarifiedseedofthreenative legumesunderdifferentseedstorageconditions
  35. ZhuM.LiuT.GuoM.. (2016).Currentadvances inthemetabolomicsstudyonlotusseeds. FrontiersinPlantScience,7:891