Public Health · Vol. 11, No. 1 · 2026 · pp. 124–132 · e-ISSN 2472-3878

Perceived Competencies and Self-Reported Practices on Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) During Childbirth Among Midwives in Health Facilities. A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study from Kerala

Shiny.M. Jose, Namitha Subrahmanyam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.124 · Published 2026-04-10 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2026 The Author(s)

Abstract

Background The perceptions of midwives regarding Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) significantly influence the quality of care provided. This research aimed to investigate the level of perceived competencies and self-reported implementation of RMC among Kerala midwives during the childbirth process. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and June 2025, focusing on perceived competencies and self-reported practice on RMC among 146 midwives selected by convenience sampling from the different units of two hospitals in Kerala. The participants were midwives with at least one year of experience in their roles. To evaluate their perceived competencies and self-reported practice, assessed by the Midwives' Knowledge and Practice Scale, was administered with Cronbach's Alpha reliability of 0.86 and 0.829, respectively, on Respectful Maternity Care. A chi-square was employed to examine the association between the midwives' age, educational background, and work experience with their perceived competencies and self-reported practice on RMC. Result: The findings indicated that midwives in Kerala exhibited strong perceived competencies and self-reported practices of RMC in their care approach. The average scores for overall perceived competencies and self-reported practices of RMC were 110. 4±6.2 and 109.8 ±6.37, respectively. Midwives recorded overall good perceived competencies and self -reported practices on Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) during Childbirth. The analysis revealed that a positive correlation between the perceived competencies and self-reported practices of RMC among midwives is significant at the 0.01 level (p<0.05; 2-tailed). There is a significant association between research variables and education at the (p<0.05)0.01 level. Conclusions The study highlights strong perceived competencies and self-reported practices of RMC among midwives in Kerala, with education playing a significant role in these outcomes. Enhancing respectful maternity care necessitates the development of practical skills with adequate cognitive empowerment among midwives work in the maternal care unit

Keywords: Perceived competencies; self-reported practices; Respectful Maternity Care; Midwives; Health Facilities; Perceivedcompetencies; self-reportedpractices; RespectfulMaternityCare

Introduction

Giving birth is a significant moment in a woman’s life,andeverywomandeservestoreceiverespectful treatmentduringlaboranddelivery.NumerousmidwivesunderstandtheideaofRespectfulMaternityCare (RMC),yettherecanbeadisparitybetweentheirunderstandingandactualimplementationinfacility-based environments.Maternalcarevariesbasedonfactors suchasinstitutionalbacking,personalattitudes,and theparticularchildbirthsetting.KeyelementsofRMC thatmidwivesshouldrecognizeandactivelytrytoincorporateinclude:encouraginginformedchoice,honoringwomen’sautonomy,deliveringcontinuoussupport,upholdingprivacyandconfidentiality,employing respectfullanguage,permittingthepresenceofcompanions,andtailoringcaretoindividualpreferences andculturalpractices[1]. Trainingforhealthprofessionalsandchangesatthesystemlevelcanassistin closingthegapbetweenknowledgeandthereliable applicationofRMCinhospitalenvironments.[2]The WorldHealthOrganizationendorsescompetencyasessentialformidwivestorendersafeanddignifiedcare. Onein5About20%ofwomenreportedmistreatment whilereceivingmaternitycare,and45%almosthalf (45%)ofwomen,heldbackfromaskingquestionsor sharingconcernsduringtheirmaternitycare[3].The studyexploredthatthefactorsinfluencingtheclinical decision-makingofmidwivesfindingthatmidwives’ knowledgeisgroundedinbasiceducationandtraining,useofguidelinesandprotocols,in-servicetraining,andcontinuousprofessionaldevelopment,readingjournalsaconsultationwithcolleagues[2]. Midwiveshavetheabilitytocreateandsustainasecureand welcomingbirthingatmosphereforwomenthrough practicesthatrecognizeandsupporttheirneeds.3Care providersemphasizedtheimportanceofunderstandingrespectfulmaternitycaretoensureoptimaloutcomesforwomen,families,andcommunities. However,giventhecomplexityofmaternitycare,itiscrucialforpolicymakers,administrators,andmidwivesto comprehendandappreciatethevariouselementsthat definerespectfulcare,asthisunderstandingcansignificantlyenhanceitssuccessfulimplementation[4].Addressingtheidentifiedcomponentsandfosteringacultureofrespectandcompassionwithinhealthcaresettingscangreatlyenhancecarequality,ensuringthatit isresponsivetotheneedsofwomenandrelatedpeople [4].Womenwhoexperiencerespectfulmaternitycare tendtohaveagreaterlikelihoodofdeliveringvaginally, feelingsatisfied,andhavingshorterlabordurations [5].Thisisduetothecontinuoussupportprovidedby midwivesduringchildbirth,whichformsacriticalelementofrespectfulmaternitycare.[6].andknowledge wives’associationsglobally[7].TheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)highlightedin2018theimportanceof the quality of communication between women and their healthcare providers, viewing positive interactions as essential for favorable childbirth outcomes [8].Theresearchinvestigateshowmidwivesperceive andimplementrespectfulmaternitycarethroughout laborandchildbirth[9].Overall,midwivesareaware ofthesevenrightsofmothersandmaintainafavorable perspective on delivering respectful maternity care(RMC).Nonetheless,certainabusivebehaviorspersistamongmidwiveswhenofferingRMC,accompanied bysignificantchallengessuchasoverloadandinsufficientlabormonitoringsupplies.Itisrecommended tomodifythemidwife-to-clientratioandensurethe availabilityofnecessarymaterialsforlabormonitoring [10]. and should ensure logistics for alternative birthingpositionsandmaintainprivacy.Additionally, allmidwivesandhospitalstaffshouldparticipateinthe RMCtrainingprogramtopromotegoodpractices[11]. Encouragingrespectfulmaternitycarenecessitatesvitalinterpersonalandcommunicationskills,alongwith supportiveattitudesfrommidwives.Suchsupportencompassesemotionalassistancesuchascontinuous presence,physicaltouch,empathy,reassurance,positivereinforcement,andinformationregardinglabor progress.Itmayalsoinvolveguidanceoncopingstrategiesandprovidingcomfort[12].Trainingfocusedon evidence-basedpractices,supportandtrainingformidwivesonRMC,sufficientsuppliesandequipment,and redesigningthewardtoincludeprivatedeliverysuites forbirthcompanionsandprivacyarealsonecessary [13]. Policiesandattitudeseitherhavethepotential tosupportorobstructRMC[14].Theseinsightsmight contributetoanationwidemidwiferysurvey,educationalcurricula,andreformsinhealthsystemstofacilitatelessrestrictivepoliciesandenvironments.Incidentsofdisrespectfulcareduringchildbirthhavebeen notedbyhealthcareworkers,[15,16]thisleadstovaryingpracticesdependingonindividualmidwivesand thespecifichospitalcontext,withsomemidwiveseffectivelyemployingpatient-centeredmethods,while othersmayencounterdifficultiesinfullyadoptingRMC practicesduetosystemiclimitations. Thestronginitiatives to enhance institutional policies, resources, training,andsupervisionofhealthcareprofessionals regardingwomen’srightsduringchildbirthtoimprove thequalityofcareandfosterpositivebirthexperiences [17]. Measuring the RMC during childbirth can be a powerfultooltohelpendtheabuse. ThestudyhighlightsalldomainsofRMCfromthemidwives’viewpoint andtheirpractices. Improvingtheinstitutionalpolicies,resources,andtrainingofhealthcareprofessionalsaboutwomen’srightsduringchildbirthwouldhelp strengthenthequalityofcaresothatwomenreceive evidence-basedcareandensurepositivebirthexperiences[16].Disrespectandabuseperceivedbymothers admittedinmaternityareas,harshandannoyingmaternitycarebehaviorintermsofphysical,verbaland emotionalaspectwhichhasbeendefinedinvarious formsandthereisgapinknowledgeandpracticeof RMCamonghealthworkers[17]. Designingtailored interventions, policiesandprogramsforvariousdynamicsystemsandregularmonitoringandevaluation willhelpinachievingRMCatthenationallevel[18]. Thiswillnotonlyaddressmaternalmortalitythrough thedeliveryofcarebutalsofocusonthequalityofcare withamoredefinedandstandardizedapproach[19]. Sometimes,healthcareprovidersmaynormalizedisrespectfultreatmentduringchildbirth,whichintrudes onbasichumanrights.Immediateactionisneededto improveandsupportRMCasacriticalcomponentof maternalcarebyadoptingstandardizedmeasures,and traininghealthcareproviderstopracticethecodeof ethicsasacorecomponentofRMC[20,21].Thepresent studyemphasizestheassessmentofmidwives’awarenessandpracticeonRMCduringinstitutionaldelivery. Thereisaneedofbettertrainingprogramsforhealth professionalstoimplementRMCtofillthegapinknowledgeandpracticeofRMCamongHealthworkerssoas toeventuallyimprovethemidwives’competenciesand practiceaboutRMC,anditmaycontributetobettermaternalhealthoutcomes.

Materialsandmethods

ResearchApproachandDesign:

Aquantitativeapproachwasadoptedforthisdescriptiveresearch.Thiscross-sectionalstudywasaimedto assesstheperceivedcompetenciesandself-reported practiceofmidwivesregardingRespectfulMaternity Care(RMC)duringchildbirth,conductedfromMayto June2025attwoprivateteachinghospitalsinIdukki andKannurdistrictsofKerala.

ResearchPopulation:

The study population comprised all midwives employedinthetwohospitals,totaling146participants. Allmidwivesfromtheselectedhospitalswereinvited totakepartinthesurvey.Thosewhoconsentedand signedtheinformedconsentformparticipatedinthe study.Participantshadtomeettheinclusioncriteriaof beingmidwivesemployedinthelaborunit,havingobtainedamidwiferyacademicdegreeordiploma,and possessingatleastoneyearofworkexperienceorhavingpreviouslyworkedinthesameunit.

Sampleandsamplingtechnique

The total accessible population was utilized for the study.Datafromthebothhospitalsshowsthatthere arecurrentlyonehundredandninety-seven(197)midwives in the selected hospitals. Midwives with less thanoneyearofexperienceornoexperienceanduninterestedwereexcluded,totaling51midwives. The selectionofmidwiveswasdoneusingaconsecutive samplingmethod,resultingin146midwivesincluded fromatotalof197workingatthehospitals,while51 wereexcludedfromthestudy.Interviewstookplace inconvenientlocationslikethenurses’stationorthe classroom within the hospitals. For data collection tools included a questionnaire for demographic informationandanopen-accessstandardizedversion of 5-point Likert scale on the Midwives’ Knowledge andPracticeScaleonRespectfulMaternityCare(MKP- RMC),[27,28,34]whichwasusedtoevaluatemidwives’ perceivedcompetenciesandself-reportedpracticeon RMC.Reliabilityofthetoolsis0.86and0.829respectively.

DetailsofthedatacollectionTool

The questionnaire on demographic data consists of 6items,RespectfulMaternityCare(RMC)perception andpractice,eachsectionwith23items,theseencompassedvariousaspectsofRMCtoexecutecareduring laboranddelivery. Foreachitem,theresponsewas scoredasstronglyagree(5),agree(4),don’tknow(3), disagree(2),andstronglydisagree(1)ontheawareness sectionandalways(5),often(4),sometimes(3)rarely (2)never(1)onpracticeofRMC.Totalscorewas115in eachsection.Ascoreofmorethan90%wasperceived asgoodcompetenciesandself-reportedpracticeon RMC,70%to90%averageRMC,andlessthan70%poor RMC.ThecontentvalidityindexoftheRMCknowledge andpracticequestionnairewas0.85.Thereliabilitywas establishedbyCronbach’salpha,whichwas0.86and .829respectively.Theperceivedcompetenciesandself -reportedpracticeofRMCwereassessedusingastructuredquestionnairewith46itemsoftwoaspects.The pilotstudywasconductedwith15memberstofindout thefeasibilityofthestudy.

DataCollectionProcedure:

Thedatacollectionofthisstudywasconductedafter gettingethicalclearancefromtheethicalcommittee andwrittenpermissionfromtheauthorityconcerned thedatawascollectedfromselectedmidwivesofassignedhospitals.Sampleselectionwasdonebyusinga non-probabilityconsecutivesamplingtechnique,data collectedfrom1stMay1sttoJune30th2025. Allthe selectedparticipantswereaskedtogatherintheirrespectivenurses’stationorclassroom.Thenexplained thepurposeofthestudyandrequestedtoinformed consentandmaximumcooperationwithhonestyin fillinginquestions. Afterclarifyingtheirdoubtsand gettingalltheneededinformation,datawascollected fromeachsample.

DataAnalysisandinterpretation

ThecollecteddatawereenteredintoaMicrosoftexcel datasheetafterbeingreviewedforconsistencyand completeness. TheIBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows, version30.0,wasusedtoanalyzethedata,thatwasdescriptivestatisticsoffrequencies,percentages,graphs andtables.Dataonmidwives’perceivedcompetencies andself-reportedpracticeofRMCwasassessedusinga 5-pointLikertscalewhichwasconsideredasaninterval scale.Acompositescorewascomputedforallrespondentsusingtheirresponsestothe46items,assuming equalweightingoftheitems.Ascoreofonewasgiven fortheleastcorrectanswerandascoreof5wasgiven forthemostcorrectanswergivingaminimumscore of23andamaximumscoreof115forsection. Ininstanceswherethenegativeresponsewasthemostcorrectanswer,thereversewasthecase.Fortheproposed studythedataanalysismethodsare;Descriptivestatistics:Mean,percentage,andstandarddeviation,Kaul Pearson’scorrelationtestandchi-squaretestusedfor inferentialstatisticsassesstheawarenessandpractice forprovidingRMCbymidwivesinhealthfacilities.Participantsallprovidedwritteninformedconsentinan Englishlanguageoftheirpreferencepriortoadministeringsurveyquestionnaire.Allstudydocumentswere reviewedandapprovedbytheethicsreviewboardof institution.

Results

DemographiccharacteristicsofParticipants

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distributionofsampleaccordingtoage n=146 According to the graphic, 10 (14.6%) samples were olderthan45,whereas56(38.4%)sampleswerebe- tweentheagesof36and45.

Thetableaboveindicatesthatthemajorityofparticipantswerepermanentemployees,comprising63%, whiletheremainingwasontemporarycontracts. A notablepercentageofparticipantshadlessthanfive years(61%)ofexperienceinintra-partumcareunits. ThemajorityofmidwiveshadachievedaB.Sc.innursing(45.9%),withonly12.3%possessingaM.Sc.degree. Asignificantportionofthem(68.5%)weremarried,and 26%hadtwochildren.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Perceivedcompetenciesofmidwiveson respectfulmaternitycare n=146

Perceivedcompetencies

Thehistogrampresentedaboveindicatesthat137midwives,accountingfor93.82%,wereratedashavinga goodlevelofperceivedcompetencies.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Self-reportedpracticeofmidwiveson respectfulmaternitycare n=146

Self-reportedpractice

Thehistogrampresentedaboveindicatesthat136midwives,accountingfor93.12%,wereratedashavinga goodlevelofself-reportedpractices.

Discussion

Thecross-sectionalstudyconductedbetweenMayand June 2025 among 146 midwives in two hospitals in Keralaprovidesvaluableinsightsintotheirperceived competencies and self-reported practices regarding RespectfulMaternityCare(RMC)duringchildbirth.The findingsarediscussedbelow,withcomparisonstoprevioussimilarstudiestocontextualizetheresultsand highlighttheirsignificance.Thesamplewaspredominantlymarried(68.5%),withmostmidwiveshaving lessthan5yearsofexperience(61%)andpermanent employmentstatus(63%).Thesecharacteristicsmay influenceRMCpractices, asstabilityinemployment SLNO Variables 1 a)Single b)Married a)ANM b)GNM c)Bachelorinnursing d)MScinnursing e)PhDinnursing Workexperienceinthebirthunit(years) a)<5 b)5–10 3 c)11–15 d)16–20 e)21–25 f)>25 a0 4 b1 c2 d>2 5 a)Permanent b)Temporary

Table 2. Totalmeansscoreofperceivedcompetenciesandself-reportedpracticesonrespectfulmaternitycare amongmidwives n=146

Sl.No Variables n Mean

1 Perceivedcompetencies 146 110.2808 2 Self-reportedpractices 146 109.8219

andpersonallifecouldcontributetobetterfocusand commitmenttoqualitycare.Notably,midwiveswith no children (37%) or two children (26%) were wellrepresented,whichmayreflectvaryinglevelsofempathyorunderstandingofmaternalneedsbasedon personalexperiences.However,thestudydidnotexplicitlyanalyzethisvariable’simpactonRMC.Thestudy foundthatmidwivesinKeralademonstratedstrong perceivedcompetencies(meanscore:110.4±6.21)and self-reportedpractices(meanscore: 109.8±6.37)in RMC.Thesehighscoresindicatethatmidwivesfeelconfidentintheirabilitytoproviderespectfulanddignified careduringchildbirthandreportconsistentapplicationofthesepractices.TheuseoftheMidwives’KnowledgeandPracticeScale,withCronbach’salphavalues of0.86forperceivedcompetenciesand0.829forselfreportedpractices,confirmsthereliabilityofthetool inassessingtheseconstructs.Thesevaluesalignwith standardsforacceptableinternalconsistency(0.7),suggestingrobustmeasurementquality.Similarstudies, suchasthosebyAfulanietal.(2019)inKenyaandTanzania,reportedmoderatetohighlevelsofperceived RMCcompetenciesamongmidwives,butself-reported Frequency Percentage

46 31.5 100 68.5

6 4.1 55 35.7 67 45.9 18 12.3 Nil Nil

89 61.0 29 19.9 17 11.6 9 6.2 1 .7 1 .7

54 37 28 19.2 38 26 26 17.8

92 63 54 37

Standarddeviation Std.Error Skewness

6.20205 .201 -2.558 6.37418 .201 -2.019

practices were often lower due to systemic barriers likeunderstaffingorresourceconstraints.Incontrast, theKeralastudy’shighscoresforbothcompetencies andpracticessuggestasupportiveenvironment,possiblyduetobettertrainingprogramsorinstitutional policiesintheselectedhospitals[24,35].A2020study in Ethiopia by Shiferaw et al. found that midwives’ RMCpracticeswereinfluencedbytheirknowledgeand training.TheKeralastudy’ssignificantcorrelationbetweencompetenciesandpracticessupportsthis,indicatingthattargetedtrainingcouldbridgegapsbetweenknowledgeandapplication[36].Astatistically significantpositivecorrelation(p<0.05,2-tailed)was observedbetweenperceivedcompetenciesandselfreportedpracticesofRMC.Thissuggeststhatmidwives whofeelcompetentinRMCaremorelikelytoreport implementingrespectfulcarepracticesintheirwork. ThisfindingisconsistentwiththeTheoryofPlanned Behavior,whichpositsthatperceivedself-efficacyinfluencesbehavioraloutcomes.[42,43,44].Thechi-square analysis revealed a significant association between educationallevelandbothperceivedcompetencies andself-reportedpractices(p<0.05). Midwiveswith maternitycare n=146

Table 4. Associationbetweenperceivedcompetenciesofmidwivesanddemographicvariables n=146

SLNO Variables Poor average Good df Pvalue

Age <25 1 25-35 1 36-45 >45 3 Single Married ANM 6 GNM 53 3 1 3 Bachelorinnursing 64 MScinnursing 12 PhDinnursing Workexperiencein thebirthunit(years) <5 9 85 5–10 1 48 4 1 11–15 0 1 16–20 0 1 21–25 >25 a0 5 b1 c2 d>2 Permanent 1 Temporary

Theabovetableshowsthatthereissignificantassociationbetweenperceivedcompetenciesofmidwivesandeducationat

highereducationalqualifications,suchasBachelor’s (45.9%)orMaster’sdegreesinnursing(12.3%),likely reportedhighercompetenciesandbetteradherenceto RMCpracticescomparedtothosewithAuxiliaryNurse Midwife(ANM)(4.1%)orGeneralNursingandMidwifery (GNM)(35.7%)qualifications.Thisalignswiththeidea thatadvancededucationenhancesknowledge,skills, andconfidenceinapplyingpatient-centeredcareprinciples.Thesignificantassociationbetweeneducation andRMCoutcomesalignswithfindingsfroma2023 study in Nigeria by Okonofua et al., which showed

SLNO VARIABLES rvalue pvalue

Perceivedcompetencies

.364** .000

Self-reportedpractices

Correlationissignificantatthe0.01level(2-tailed).

Levelofperceivedcompetencies Chi-square value <80 81-100 >100

0 25 3 52 3 5.422 .143 6 50 1 8

3 85 1 .002 .964 8 50

3 19.784a .000

3 1.621 .655

2 52 2 26 3 3.451a .327 2 35 4 21

6 85 1 .002 .965 4 50

0.01(p<0.000)level.

thatmidwiveswithhighereducationalqualifications weremorelikelytoimplementRMCprinciples. This maybeattributedtoadvancedcurriculathatemphasizepatient-centeredcare,communicationskills,and ethicalconsiderations,whicharecriticalforRMC[37]. WhiletheKeralastudydidnotexplicitlyreportasignificantassociationbetweenworkexperienceandRMC outcomes,thedistributionofexperience(61%with<5 years)suggestsarelativelyyoungworkforce. A2018 study in Ghana by Dzomeku et al. found that more experienced midwives were more confident in RMC

SLNO Variables Poor average Good df Chi-squrevalue Pvalue

Age <25 1 25-35 1 36-45 >45 3 Single 1 Married ANM GNM 3 1 Bachelorinnursing MScinnursing PhDinnursing Workexperienceinthebirthunit(years) <5 5–10 4 11–15 16–20 21–25 >25

5 1

>2 6 Permanent Temporary

Theabovetableshowsthatthereissignificantassociationbetweenperceivedcompetenciesofmidwivesandeducationat

practicesduetocumulativeexposuretodiversechildbirth scenarios. The Kerala findings may differ due to the predominance of less experienced midwives, yettheirhighscoressuggesteffectivetrainingormentorshipprogramsinthesehospitals[39,45].Thehigh RMC scores in Kerala may reflect the state’s strong healthcareinfrastructureandemphasisonmaternal health,asnotedinstudiescomparingKerala’shealth outcomestootherIndianstates(e.g.,Thankappanet al.,2019).Unlikestudiesinlow-resourcesettings(e.g., Bowser Hill,2010),wheredisrespectandabuseinmaternitycarewereprevalent,theKeralamidwives’performancesuggestsaculturalorsystemicinclination towardrespectfulcare, possiblyreinforcedbystatelevelpoliciesorcommunityexpectations[38,40]

Implications

• TrainingandEducation:Thesignificantassociationwitheducationunderscorestheneedfor

Levelof self-reportedpractices

<80 81-100 >100

0 25 3 52 6 9.583a .143 6 50 1 8

6 38 4 3.346a .502 8 93

1 5 1 54 6 16.921a .010 6 58 6 14

9 84 0 5 43 6 2.193a .901 1 1 1 1 1

1 6 46 0 2 26 6 7.322a .292 0 1 37 0 5 20

0 11 80 2 3.217a .200 1 5 49

0.01(p<0.010)level

continuousprofessionaldevelopment,particularlyformidwiveswithlowerqualifications(e.g., ANMorGNM).IncorporatingRMC-specificmodulesinnursingcurriculaandin-servicetraining couldfurtherenhancecompetenciesandpractices.

• PolicyandPractice:Thepositivecorrelationbetween perceived competencies and practices suggests that fostering midwives’ confidence through supportive supervision and feedback mechanismscouldimproveRMCimplementation. Hospitals should ensure resources and staffing levels support RMC practices, as systemicbarrierscouldundermineevencompetent midwives.

• Research Gaps: The study’s reliance on selfreported practices may introduce social desirabilitybias,asmidwivesmightoverreportadherencetoRMC.Futurestudiescouldincorporateobservationaldataorpatientperspectives tovalidatethesefindings. Additionally,exploringtheimpactofpersonalfactors(e.g.,number ofchildren)orworkplacecultureonRMCcould providedeeperinsights.

Limitations

• TheuseofconvenientsamplinglimitsgeneralizabilitybeyondthetwohospitalsinKerala. A broader,randomizedsamplecouldstrengthen thefindings.

• Thestudydidnotexplorepatientoutcomesor perspectives,whicharecriticalforassessingthe actualimpactofRMCpractices.

• Thelackofdetailedanalysisonhowspecificdemographicvariables(e.g.,maritalstatus,numberofchildren)influenceRMClimitsthedepth ofinterpretation.

Conclusion

Thestudyhighlightsstrongperceivedcompetencies andself-reportedpracticesofRMCamongmidwives inKerala,witheducationplayingasignificantrolein theseoutcomes. Comparedtopreviousstudies,the findingssuggestthatKerala’shealthcarecontextmay provideaconduciveenvironmentforRMC,possibly due to robust training and systemic support. However,furtherresearchisneededtovalidatetheseselfreportedpracticesandexplorepatientexperiencesto ensurethatRMCtranslatesintomeaningfulimprovementsinmaternalcarequality.

EthicalandAdministrativePermission

Ethical permission was taken from the Institutional EthicsCommitteeofInstitution.CN/A/35/2025dated on 09.09.2025, and required administrative permissionswerereceivedfromeverysingleauthoritywherever necessary. Informed consent from the respondentswascollectedbeforetheinterviewtookplace.

Funding: Nil Nil

CompetingInterest:

References

  1. WorldHealthOrganization.(2018).WHOrecommendationsonintrapartumcareforapositive childbirthexperience
  2. LundaP.MinnieC.S.LubbeW.. (2024).Perspectivesofmidwivesonrespectfulmaternity care. BMCPregnancyandChildbirth,24(1),72
  3. CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention.Respectfulmaternitycare. https://www.cdc.go v/vitalsigns/respectful-maternity-car e/index.html
  4. Daemers, D.O., vanLimbeek, E.B., Wijnen, H. A.,Nieuwenhuijze,M.J.,&deVries,R.G.(2017). Factorsinfluencingclinicaldecision-makingof midwives. BMCPregnancyandChildbirth,17,1–12
  5. MoridiM.PazandehF.PotrataB.. (2022).Midwives’knowledgeandpracticeofrespectfulmaternitycare. BMCPregnancyandChildbirth,22(1), 752
  6. WorldHealthOrganization. (2014). Prevention andeliminationofdisrespectandabuseduring childbirth
  7. WorldHealthOrganization.(2018).Intrapartum careforapositivechildbirthexperience. https: //www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/hand le/10665/272447/WHO-RHR-18.12-eng.pdf
  8. LukasseM.HenriksenL.. (2019). Midwives’ perceptions of practice environment. Nursing Open,6(4),1559–1570
  9. InternationalConfederationofMidwives.(2019). Competenciesofamidwife. https://www.in ternationalmidwives.org
  10. MoridiM.PazandehF.HajianS.PotrataB.. (2020). Midwives’perspectivesofrespectful maternitycare. PLOSOne,15(3),e0229941
  11. Ojong,I.N.,etal.(2022).Midwives’perception andpracticeofrespectfulmaternitycare. African JournalofBiomedicalResearch,25(2),135–141
  12. Uwamahoro,V.,etal.(2019).Perceptionsofmidwivesonrespectfulmaternitycare
  13. Dzomeku,V.M.,etal.(2021).Implementingrespectfulmaternitycarepractices. BMCNursing, 20,1–9
  14. HaghdoostS.AbdiF.AmirianA.. (2021). Awareness of respectful maternity care. EuropeanJournalofMidwifery,5
  15. IgeW.B.CeleW.B.. (2021). Provisionofrespectfulmaternalcare. InternationalJournalof AfricaNursingSciences,15,100354
  16. Wilson-Mitchell,K.,etal. (2018). Barrierstorespectfulmaternitycare. InternationalJournalof Childbirth,8(1),18–34
  17. Fachon,K.D.,etal. (2024). Providers’perceptionsofmaternitycare. ReproductiveMedicine, 5(4),231–242
  18. Yadav,P.,etal.(2022).Respectfulmaternitycare practicesinIndia. JournalofFamilyMedicineand PrimaryCare,11(12),7657–7663
  19. SangyM. T.. (2024). Attitudes toward midwife-led care. Women and Birth, 37(6), 101836
  20. VenkatesanL.KaurP.. (2022).Respectfulmaternitycare: Ascopingreview. JournalofComprehensiveNursingResearch,7(2),185
  21. AnsariH.YeravdekarR.. (2019). Respectful maternitycare:Anationalreview. NationalMedicalJournalofIndia,32(5),290–293
  22. AbuAlrub,S.,etal.(2023).Respectfulmaternity careinJordan. TheOpenNursingJournal,17(1)
  23. Jolivet,R.R.,etal. (2021). Operationalizingrespectfulmaternitycare. ReproductiveHealth,18, 1–15
  24. MgawadereF.ShuaibuU.. (2021).Barriersto respectfulmaternitycare. InternationalJournal ofClinicalMedicine,12(5),224–249
  25. ParmitaP.AcharyaN.JoshiK.. (2024). Respectfulmaternitycare:Narrativereview. JournalofClinicalandDiagnosticResearch,18(3)
  26. ChristeD.M.PadmanabanS.. (2022).Respectfulmaternitycareinitiative. JournalofObstetrics andGynecologyofIndia,72(1),32–37
  27. MCSP.Movingrespectfulmaternitycareintopractice
  28. ZondagD. C.. (2022). Clinical decisionmakinginchildbirth. EuropeanJournalofMidwifery,6
  29. Mlambo,S.Modelformidwives(Doctoraldissertation)
  30. Zondag,D.C.,etal.(2024).ValidationofBirthBeliefsScale. JournalofPsychosomaticObstetrics &Gynecology,45(1)
  31. Vogels-BroekeM.. (2022). Information sourcesduringpregnancy. BMCPregnancyand Childbirth,22(1),109
  32. Sakala,B.,etal.(2022).Clinicaldecision-making among students. African Journal of Midwifery, 16(1)
  33. DevassyD.SangeethaX.. (2023).Knowledge ofrespectfulmaternitycare. InternationalJournalofReproduction,12(6),1825
  34. KitiG.. (2022). Labor support and maternitycare. MaternalandChildHealthJournal, 26(1),205–216
  35. Asefa,A.,etal.(2020).Respectfulmaternitycare training. ReproductiveHealth,17(1),103
  36. Adetunji,A.,etal.Improvinghealthoutcomesin Nigeria
  37. ThankappanK.R.. (2020). KeralaCOVID-19response. InternationalJournalofNoncommunicableDiseases,5(2),36–42
  38. Dzomeku,V.M.,etal. (2022). Challengesinrespectful maternity care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,22(1),451
  39. BowserD.HillK.. (2010). Disrespect and abuseinchildbirth
  40. Muhayimana,A.,etal.(2024).RespectfulmaternitycareinRwanda. Midwifery,133,103996
  41. Athira,C.,etal.(2025).Determinantsofrespectful maternity care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,25(1),869
  42. Tallam,E.C.,etal.(2022).Competencyofmidwives. African Journal of Primary Health Care, 14(1)
  43. Fachon,K.D.,etal.(2025).Respectfulmaternity careglobally
  44. Hughes,C.S.,etal.(2022).Respectfulmaternity careinMalawi. Midwifery,112,103403