Public Health · Vol. 11, No. 1 · 2026 · pp. 363–370 · e-ISSN 2472-3878

Metagenomic Analysis of Soil Microbial Communities under Regenerative and Conventional Agriculture

Rajen Chowdhury, Gautam Handique, Abhijit Debnath, Rajesh Ramasandra Venkataraja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.363 · Published 2026-04-25 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2026 The Author(s)

Abstract

Soil microbial communities are essential for maintaining ecosystem stability, nutrient cycling, agricultural productivity, and environmental sustainability. Metagenomic analysis has emerged as a powerful approach for investigating the diversity, structure, and functional potential of soil microorganisms under different agricultural systems. The present review evaluates the microbial dynamics associated with regenerative and conventional agriculture using advanced metagenomic tools including 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. Findings from recent studies indicate that regenerative agricultural practices such as cover cropping, crop rotation, reduced tillage, and organic amendments significantly enhance microbial diversity, beneficial taxa abundance, nutrient cycling efficiency, and soil ecological resilience. In contrast, conventional agriculture characterized by intensive tillage and excessive chemical inputs is associated with reduced microbial diversity, increased pathogen prevalence, and enrichment of antimicrobial resistance genes. These microbial alterations have important implications for soil health, food safety, environmental quality, and public health within the One Health framework. The review highlights the importance of integrating metagenomic approaches into sustainable agricultural management and public health policy development.

Keywords: Metagenomics; Soil Microbial Communities; Regenerative Agriculture; Conventional Agriculture; Soil Health; Microbial Diversity; One Health; Sustainable Agriculture; SoilMicrobialCommunities; RegenerativeAgriculture; ConventionalAgriculture; SoilHealth; MicrobialDiversity; OneHealth; SustainableAgriculture

Introduction

Soilmicrobialcommunitiesconstituteoneofthemost complex and functionally significant biological systemsonEarth,governingessentialecosystemservices suchasnutrientcycling,organicmatterdecomposition,soilstructureformation,andsuppressionofplant andhumanpathogens(1,2).Withadvancesinmolecularbiology,particularlymetagenomics,ithasbecome possibletocomprehensivelycharacterizethesemicrobialcommunitieswithoutthelimitationsofculturedependentmethods.Metagenomicanalysisenables thedirectextractionandsequencingofgeneticmaterialfromenvironmentalsamples,providinginsights intomicrobialdiversity,taxonomiccomposition,and functionalpotential(3, 4). Thishassignificantlyenhanced our understanding of how agricultural practicesinfluencesoilmicrobiomesandtheirdownstream impacts on environmental and public health. Agriculturalintensificationthroughconventionalfarming practices—characterizedbymonoculturesystems,excessive tillage, and heavy reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides—has led to substantial alterations in soil microbial diversity and ecological balance (5, 6). Metagenomic studies have consistently reportedadeclineinmicrobialrichnessandevenness inconventionallymanagedsoils,alongwithareductioninbeneficialmicrobialtaxainvolvedinnutrient cycling and plant growth promotion (7, 8). Furthermore,thesesystemsoftenshowanincreasedprevalence of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobialresistancegenes,raisingseriousconcernsregarding food safety, environmental contamination, and public health risks (9, 10). In contrast, regenerative agriculturehasemergedasasustainablelandmanagementapproachaimedatrestoringsoilhealthand enhancingbiodiversitythroughpracticessuchasreducedtillage, croprotation, covercropping, andorganicamendments.Metagenomicanalysesofregenerdrivenbylandmanagementpractices(13,14). Additionally, functionalmetagenomicsprovidesinsights intometabolicpathways,resistancegenedissemination, and microbial interactions that are critical for understanding ecosystem health and sustainability. The implications of soil microbial dynamics extend beyondagricultureintothedomainofpublichealth. Soilservesasareservoirforbothbeneficialmicrobes andpotentialpathogens,aswellasantimicrobialresistancegenesthatcanbetransferredacrossenvironmental,animal,andhumaninterfaces(15,16).Disruptions insoilmicrobialcommunities,particularlyunderconventionalagriculturalsystems,canfacilitatetheemergenceandspreadofzoonoticdiseases,contamination offoodandwaterresources,andincreasedexposure toharmfulmicrobialagents.Conversely,regenerative practicesthatpromotemicrobialdiversityandecologicalbalancecanhelpmitigatetheserisksandsupport theprinciplesoftheOneHealthapproach,whichintegrates human, animal, and environmental health. Despitegrowingevidencesupportingthebenefitsof regenerativeagriculture,thereremainsaneedforcomprehensivesynthesisofmetagenomicfindingstobetterunderstandtheextentandmechanismsthrough whichdifferentagriculturalpracticesinfluencesoilmicrobiomes.Thisreviewfocusesontheapplicationof metagenomicanalysistoevaluatesoilmicrobialcommunitiesunderregenerativeandconventionalagriculture,highlightingkeydifferencesinmicrobialdiversity, functionalpotential,andpublichealthimplications. Byintegratingfindingsfromrecentstudies,thiswork aimstocontributetothedevelopmentofsustainable agriculturalstrategiesthatpromoteecosystemhealth andsafeguardpublichealth.

Methodology

StudyDesignandLiteratureCollection

Thepresentreviewwasconductedusingacomprehensiveandsystematicevaluationofpublishedscientific literaturerelatedtometagenomicanalysisofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesunderregenerativeandconventional agriculturalsystems.Relevantpeer-reviewedarticles were retrieved from electronic databases including PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,andGoogleScholar usingkeywordssuchas“soilmetagenomics,”“regenerativeagriculturemicrobiome,”“conventionalfarmingsoilmicrobes,”“16SrRNAsequencing,”“shotgun metagenomics,”and“soilmicrobialdiversity”(17,18). Studiespublishedbetween2005and2025werepreferentiallyincludedtocapturerecentadvancementsin next-generationsequencingtechnologiesandmicrobialecology.Inclusioncriteriacomprisedstudiesinvestigatingsoilmicrobialdiversity,functionalgeneprofiling,microbialabundance,antimicrobialresistance genes, and ecological functions under regenerative andconventionalagriculturalpractices.Studiesbased solelyonculture-dependenttechniqueswereexcluded becauseoftheirinabilitytorepresentthetotalsoilmicrobialdiversity(19,20).

SoilSamplingandExperimentalDesign

Mostmetagenomicstudiesincludedinthisreviewemployedrandomizedfieldsamplingfromagricultural landsmanagedunderregenerativeandconventional systems. Soilsamplesweregenerallycollectedfrom therhizosphereandbulksoilatdepthsrangingfrom 0–15cmusingsterileaugersandstoredat20°Cor80°C priortoDNAextractiontopreservemicrobialintegrity (21,22).

Regenerativeagriculturalsystemsincludedpractices suchas: • Covercropping • Croprotation • Organicmanureapplication • Reducedorzerotillage • Compostamendments • Agroforestryintegration Conventionalsystemswerecharacterizedby: • Intensivetillage • Monoculturecropping • Syntheticfertilizerapplication • Chemicalpesticideusage • Herbicidedependency Replicatedsamplingdesignswithseasonalandspatial variationswereconsideredtoensurereproducibility andecologicalrepresentation(23,24).

DNAExtractionandMetagenomicSequencing

MicrobialDNAwasextractedfromsoilsamplesusing commerciallyavailablesoilDNAisolationkitssuchas: • QiagenDNeasyPowerSoilKit • MoBioPowerSoilDNAIsolationKit • NucleoSpinSoilKit Thesekitseffectivelyremovehumicacidcontaminants thatinterferewithdownstreamsequencingreactions (25). Afterextraction, DNAquantityandpuritywere assessedusingspectrophotometryandfluorometric quantificationmethodsincludingNanoDropandQubit fluorometeranalyses(26).High-qualityDNAsamples weresubjectedtometagenomicsequencingusingnextgenerationsequencing(NGS)platformssuchas:

• IlluminaMiSeq • IlluminaHiSeq • NovaSeq • OxfordNanopore • PacBioSMRTsequencing Twomajorsequencingapproacheswerecommonly employed: 1. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Used primarily forbacterialandarchaealtaxonomicprofiling throughamplificationofhypervariableregions suchasV3–V4andV4–V5(27).

2. ShotgunMetagenomicSequencingUsedforcomprehensivefunctionalandtaxonomicanalysisby sequencingtotalmicrobialDNAfromsoilsamples(28).

MetagenomicBioinformaticsPipeline

RawsequencingreadsobtainedfromNGSplatforms underwentqualityassessmentandpreprocessingusingstandardbioinformaticspipelines.

QualityControlandFiltering

Low-qualityreads,sequencingadapters,andchimeric sequenceswereremovedusingsoftwaresuchas: • FastQC • Trimmomatic • Cutadapt • DADA2(29,30)

TaxonomicandFunctionalAnalysis

OperationalTaxonomicUnit(OTU)Clustering

For16SrRNAsequencingdata,operationaltaxonomic units (OTUs) or amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) weregeneratedusing: • QIIME2 • Mothur

Figure 1
Figure 1. Metagenomicanalysisofsoilmicrobialcommunities • USEARCH(31) Taxonomicassignmentwasperformedagainstrefer- encedatabasesincluding: • SILVA • Greengenes

• RibosomalDatabaseProject(RDP)(32)

ShotgunMetagenomicFunctionalAnnotation

Functional gene annotation and pathway analyses wereconductedusingtoolssuchas: • MG-RAST • HUMAnN • MetaPhlAn • MEGAN • Kraken2(33,34) Functionalgenesrelatedto: • Nitrogencycling • Carbonmetabolism • Phosphorussolubilization • Antibioticresistance • Pathogenvirulence

MicrobialDiversityAnalysis

Alphadiversityindicesincluding:

• Shannondiversityindex • Simpsondiversityindex • Chao1richnessestimator were calculated to evaluate microbial richness and evennesswithinsoilsamples(35).BetadiversityanalysesbasedonBray–CurtisdissimilarityandPrincipal CoordinateAnalysis(PCoA)wereemployedtocompare microbialcommunitycompositionacrossagricultural systems(36).

MetagenomicWorkflowofSoilMicrobialCom- munityAnalysis

Table 1. ComparativeMicrobialCharacteristicsunder AgriculturalSystems

Regenerative Conventional Parameter Agriculture Agriculture

Microbial High Reduced Diversity Beneficial Increased Decreased Bacteria SoilOrganic Enhanced Declined Carbon Antibiotic Resistance Lower Higher Genes Pathogen Reduced Increased Abundance Nutrient Cycling Improved Impaired Efficiency

Authors Year MajorFindings

Caporasoetal. 2012 DevelopedQIIMEplatformforhigh-throughputmicrobialcommunityanalysis Knightetal. 2018 Advancedmicrobiomeanalyticalstandardsformetagenomics Venteretal. 2016 Regenerativesystemsshowedhighermicrobialrichness Banerjeeetal. 2019 Soilmicrobiomesinfluenceecosystemmultifunctionality Sunetal. 2015 Conventionalfarmingincreasedantibioticresistancegenes Schmidtetal. 2019 Covercroppingimprovedbeneficialmicrobialabundance

Figure 2. GeneralWorkflowofSoilMetagenomic Analysis

SoilSampling

↓

DNAExtraction

↓

DNAQualityAssessment

↓

NGSSequencing (16SrRNA/Shotgun)

↓

QualityFiltering

↓

BioinformaticsAnalysis

↓

TaxonomicClassification

↓

FunctionalGeneAnnotation

↓

Statistical&EcologicalAnalysis

↓

InterpretationofSoilMicrobialDynamics

Discussion

Metagenomicanalysishassignificantlytransformed the understanding of soil microbial ecology by enabling comprehensive characterization of microbial communitiesandtheirfunctionalcapacitiesunderdifferent agricultural systems. The findings reviewed in the present study demonstrate substantial differencesinmicrobialdiversity,abundance,andecologicalfunctionsbetweenregenerativeandconventional agriculturalpractices. Regenerativeagriculturalsys-

Figure 3
Figure 3. MajorBioinformaticsToolsUsedinSoil Metagenomics

SequencingData

↓

FastQC → QualityAssessment

↓

Trimmomatic → ReadFiltering

↓

QIIME2/DADA2 → OTU/ASVAnalysis

↓

Kraken2/MetaPhlAn → TaxonomicProfiling

↓

MG-RAST/HUMAnN → FunctionalAnnotation

↓

Rsoftware → StatisticalVisualization

temsconsistentlyexhibitedgreatermicrobialrichness, highertaxonomicdiversity,andimprovedfunctional geneabundancecomparedtoconventionalsystems (38,39).Theseobservationsindicatethatregenerative managementpracticessupporthealthierandmoreresilientsoilecosystems.Oneofthemajorfindingsfrom metagenomicstudiesistheincreasedabundanceof beneficialmicrobialtaxaunderregenerativeagriculture.SoilmicroorganismssuchasActinobacteria,Proteobacteria,Firmicutes,andarbuscularmycorrhizal fungiplayessentialrolesinnutrientcycling,nitrogen fixation,phosphorussolubilization,andsuppression ofsoil-bornepathogens(40, 41). Regenerativepracticesincludingcovercropping,croprotation,compost application,andreducedtillagecreatefavorableenvironmentalconditionsformicrobialproliferationbyincreasingsoilorganicmatterandreducingphysicaldisturbance(42).Enhancedmicrobialdiversityimproves soilaggregation,waterretention,andnutrientavailability, thereby promoting sustainable crop productionandecologicalstability.Conversely,conventional agriculturalsystemswereassociatedwithsignificant reductions in microbial diversity and functional stability.Intensivetillagedisruptssoilstructureandmicrobialhabitats,whileexcessiveuseofsyntheticfertilizersandpesticidesnegativelyaffectsbeneficialmicrobialpopulations(43,44). Metagenomicanalyses haveshownthatprolongedchemicalexposureleads tothedominanceofstress-tolerantandopportunistic microbialtaxawhilesuppressingecologicallybeneficialorganisms(45). Suchalterationscanimpairnutrient cycling efficiency, reduce soil fertility, and increase susceptibility to plant diseases. Another importantobservationistheincreasedprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenes(ARGs)andpathogenicmicroorganismsinconventionallymanagedsoils.Studieshavereportedthatexcessiveapplicationofagrochemicalsandanimalmanurecontainingantibiotic residuescontributestotheenrichmentanddisseminationofARGswithinsoilmicrobialcommunities(46, 47). Soilactsasamajorenvironmentalreservoirfor resistance genes, which may subsequently transfer tohumanandanimalpathogensthroughhorizontal gene transfer mechanisms. This poses serious publichealthconcernsduetotheincreasingglobalburdenofantimicrobialresistance. Metagenomicinvestigationsalsorevealedthatregenerativeagriculture contributestoenhancedecosystemmultifunctionalityandenvironmentalsustainability.Functionalgene profilingdemonstratedhigherabundanceofgenesassociatedwithcarbonsequestration,methaneoxidation,nitrogenmetabolism,andbiodegradationpathways in regenerative systems (48, 49). These microbial functions are critically important for mitigating greenhousegasemissionsandimprovingclimateresilience. Increased microbial-mediated carbon storageunderregenerativeagriculturefurthersupports globaleffortstowardclimatechangemitigationand sustainablelandmanagement.Fromtheperspective ofpublichealthandOneHealth,soilmicrobialdiversityiscloselylinkedwithfoodsafety,environmental quality, anddiseaseprevention. Healthysoilmicrobiomessuppresspathogenicorganismsthroughmicrobialcompetitionandproductionofantimicrobial compounds(50). Reducedmicrobialdiversityunder conventionalagriculturemayfacilitatepathogenemergence,contaminationofagriculturalproduce,andincreasedtransmissionofzoonoticdiseases.Regenerativesystems,bymaintainingecologicalbalanceand microbialresilience,maythereforecontributetoimprovedfoodqualityandreducedhealthrisks.Theapplicationofadvancedmetagenomictoolssuchasshotgunsequencing,metatranscriptomics,andfunctional genomicshasfurtherenhancedunderstandingofmicrobialinteractionsandecosystemprocesses. BioinformaticsplatformsincludingQIIME2,MG-RAST,HU- MAnN,andKraken2haveenabledlarge-scalecomparativeanalysesofmicrobialcommunitiesacrossdiverse agroecosystems(51,52).Thesetechnologiesallowpreciseidentificationofmicrobialbiomarkersassociated withsoilhealthandagriculturalsustainability.Despite significantadvancements,severalchallengesremain insoilmetagenomicresearch.Soilmicrobialcommunitiesarehighlyheterogeneousandinfluencedbyclimaticconditions,soiltype,cropspecies,andmanagementintensity(53). Variationsinsamplingmethods, sequencingdepth,andbioinformaticspipelinesmay alsoaffectreproducibilityandinterpretationofresults. Furthermore, many soil microorganisms remain unculturableandfunctionallyuncharacterized,limiting theunderstandingoftheirecologicalroles.Futureresearchintegratingmulti-omicsapproaches,long-term fieldexperiments,andmachinelearning-basedanalysesmayprovidedeeperinsightsintosoilmicrobiome dynamicsandtheirimplicationsforsustainableagricultureandpublichealth.Overall,thereviewedevidence stronglysupportsthehypothesisthatregenerativeagriculturalpracticesenhancesoilmicrobialdiversity,improveecologicalfunctioning,andreduceenvironmentalandpublichealthriskscomparedtoconventional farmingsystems. Metagenomicanalysisservesasa powerfulscientifictoolformonitoringsoilhealthand guidingevidence-basedagriculturalpoliciesaimedat achievingsustainabilityandOneHealthgoals.

Conclusion

Metagenomicanalysishasemergedasanadvanced andhighlyeffectiveapproachforunderstandingthe structure, diversity, and functional potential of soil microbial communities under different agricultural systems. Thefindingsreviewedinthisstudyclearly demonstratethatregenerativeagriculturepromotes greatermicrobialdiversity,improvedfunctionalgene abundance,enhancednutrientcycling,andincreased ecologicalresiliencecomparedtoconventionalagriculturalpractices.Incontrast,conventionalfarmingsystemscharacterizedbyintensivetillageandexcessive chemicalinputscontributetomicrobialimbalance,reducedsoilfertility,enrichmentofpathogenicmicroorganisms,andincreaseddisseminationofantimicrobial resistancegenes.Theapplicationofnext-generation sequencingtechnologiesandbioinformaticstoolshas providedvaluableinsightsintothecomplexinteractionsbetweensoilmicrobes,agriculturalmanagement, environmentalsustainability,andpublichealth. Regenerativeagriculturalpracticesnotonlyimprovesoil qualityandcropproductivitybutalsosupportclimate changemitigation,ecosystemstability,andfoodsafety withinthebroaderOneHealthframework.Therefore, integratingmetagenomicmonitoringintoagricultural managementandpublichealthpoliciescanplayacriticalroleinpromotingsustainablefoodsystemsand environmentalprotection. Futureresearchfocusing on long-term multi-omics studies and standardized metagenomicmethodologieswillfurtherstrengthen theunderstandingofsoilmicrobiomesandfacilitate thedevelopmentofresilientagriculturalecosystems forglobalhealthsustainability.

References

  1. FalkowskiPG,FenchelT,DelongEF. Themicrobial enginesthatdriveEarth’sbiogeochemicalcycles. Science.2008;320(5879):1034–1039. vanderHeijdenMGA,BardgettRD,vanStraalen NM. Theunseenmajority:soilmicrobesasdrivers ofplantdiversityandproductivityinterrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2008;11(3):296–310
  2. TilmanDCassmanKGMatsonPANaylorRPolaskyS. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature. 2002;418(6898):671–677
  3. MatsonPA,PartonWJ,PowerAG,SwiftMJ. Agriculturalintensificationandecosystemproperties. Science.1997;277(5325):504–509
  4. Zhu YG, Johnson TA, Su JQ, Qiao M, Guo GX, StedtfeldRD,etal. DiverseandabundantantibioticresistancegenesinChineseswinefarms.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences USA.2013;110(9):3435–3440
  5. SunR,DsouzaM,GilbertJA,GuoX,WangD,Guo Z,etal. Fungalcommunitycompositioninsoils hasstrongerlinkstoplantcommunitycompositionthanbacterialcommunitycompositionina restoredgrassland. SoilBiologyandBiochemistry.2015;90:1–9
  6. LalR. Regenerativeagricultureforfoodandclimate. JournalofSoilandWaterConservation. 2020;75(5):123A–124A
  7. RhodesCJ. Theimperativeforregenerativeagriculture.ScienceProgress.2017;100(1):80–129
  8. HandelsmanJ. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2004;68(4):669–685
  9. CaporasoJGLauberCLWaltersWABerg-LyonsDHuntleyJFiererN. Ultra-highthroughputmicrobialcommunityanalysisonthe IlluminaHiSeqandMiSeqplatforms.ISMEJournal.2012;6(8):1621–1624
  10. KnightR,VrbanacA,TaylorBC,AksenovA,Callewaert C, Debelius J, et al. Best practices for analysingmicrobiomes.NatureReviewsMicrobiology.2018;16(7):410–422
  11. SchmidtR,GravuerK,BossangeAV,MitchellJ, ScowK. Long-termuseofcovercropsandno-till shift soil microbial community life strategies in agriculturalsoil.PLoSOne.2018;13(2):e0192953
  12. VenterZS,JacobsK,HawkinsHJ. Theimpactof croprotationonsoilmicrobialdiversity:Ametaanalysis.Pedobiologia.2016;59(4):215–223
  13. BanerjeeS,SchlaeppiK,vanderHeijdenMGA. Keystonetaxaasdriversofmicrobiomestructure andfunctioning. NatureReviewsMicrobiology. 2018;16(9):567–576
  14. Berendonk TU, Manaia CM, Merlin C, Fatta-KassinosD,CytrynE,WalshF,etal. Tacklingantibioticresistance:theenvironmentalframework. NatureReviewsMicrobiology. 2015;13(5):310–317
  15. WallDH,NielsenUN,SixJ. Soilbiodiversityand humanhealth.Nature.2015;528(7580):69–76
  16. WoeseCR,FoxGE. Phylogeneticstructureofthe prokaryoticdomain:theprimarykingdoms.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences USA.1977;74(11):5088–5090
  17. RiesenfeldCSSchlossPDHandelsmanJ. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annual Review of Genetics. 2004;38:525–552
  18. SchlossPD,HandelsmanJ. Towardacensusof bacteria in soil. PLoS Computational Biology. 2006;2(7):e92
  19. FiererN,JacksonRB. Thediversityandbiogeography of soil bacterial communities. ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesUSA. 2006;103(3):626–631
  20. BardgettRD,vanderPuttenWH. Belowground biodiversityandecosystemfunctioning.Nature. 2014;515(7528):505–511
  21. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, TrivediP,OsanaiY,LiuYR,etal. Carboncontent and climate variability drive global soil bacterialdiversitypatterns. EcologicalMonographs. 2016;86(3):373–390
  22. HartmannM,FreyB,MayerJ,MäderP,WidmerF. Distinctsoilmicrobialdiversityunderlong-term organicandconventionalfarming.ISMEJournal. 2015;9(5):1177–1194
  23. TorsvikV,ØvreåsL. Microbialdiversityandfunctioninsoil: fromgenestoecosystems. Current OpinioninMicrobiology.2002;5(3):240–245
  24. NannipieriPAscherJCeccheriniMTLandiLPietramellaraGRenellaG. Microbial diversity andsoilfunctions.EuropeanJournalofSoilScience.2017;68(1):12–26
  25. ThompsonLR,SandersJG,McDonaldD,AmirA, LadauJ,LoceyKJ,etal. Acommunalcatalogue revealsEarth’smultiscalemicrobialdiversity.Nature.2017;551(7681):457–463
  26. QuinceCWalkerAWSimpsonJTLomanNJSegataN. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35(9):833–844
  27. SharptonTJ. An introduction to the analysis of shotgunmetagenomicdata. FrontiersinPlant Science.2014;5:209
  28. BolyenE,RideoutJR,DillonMR,BokulichNA,AbnetCC,Al-GhalithGA,etal. Reproducible,interactive,scalableandextensiblemicrobiomedata science using QIIME 2. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37(8):852–857
  29. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, JohnsonAJA,HolmesSP. DADA2:high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. NatureMethods.2016;13(7):581–583
  30. MeyerF,PaarmannD,D’SouzaM,OlsonR,Glass EM,KubalM,etal. ThemetagenomicsRASTserver–apublicresourcefortheautomaticphylogenetic andfunctionalanalysisofmetagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics.2008;9:386
  31. FranzosaEA,McIverLJ,RahnavardG,Thompson LR, Schirmer M, Weingart G, et al. Specieslevel functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nature Methods. 2018;15(11):962–968
  32. WoodDE,LuJ,LangmeadB. ImprovedmetagenomicanalysiswithKraken2.GenomeBiology. 2019;20(1):257
  33. HusonDHAuchAFQiJSchusterSC. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Research.2007;17(3):377–386
  34. ShannonCE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948;27(3):379–423
  35. BrayJR,CurtisJT. Anordinationofuplandforest communitiesofsouthernWisconsin. Ecological Monographs.1957;27(4):325–349
  36. AndersonMJ. Anewmethodfornon-parametric multivariateanalysisofvariance.AustralEcology. 2001;26(1):32–46
  37. SaleemM,HuJ,JoussetA. Morethanthesum ofitsparts: microbiomebiodiversityasadriver of plant growth and soil health. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2019;50:145–168
  38. TrivediPLeachJETringeSGSaTSinghBK. Plant–microbiomeinteractions:fromcommunity assemblytoplanthealth.NatureReviewsMicrobiology.2020;18(11):607–621
  39. MendesR,GarbevaP,RaaijmakersJM. Therhizospheremicrobiome:significanceofplantbeneficial, plantpathogenic, andhumanpathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2013;37(5):634–663
  40. PhilippotL,RaaijmakersJM,LemanceauP,van derPuttenWH. Goingbacktotheroots:themicrobialecologyoftherhizosphere.NatureReviews Microbiology.2013;11(11):789–799
  41. SixJ,ConantRT,PaulEA,PaustianK. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implicationsforC-saturationofsoils. PlantandSoil. 2002;241(2):155–176
  42. GeisselerD,ScowKM. Long-termeffectsofmineralfertilizersonsoilmicroorganisms–Areview. SoilBiologyandBiochemistry.2014;75:54–63
  43. LupwayiNZKennedyACChirwaRM. Grain legume impacts on soil biological processes in sub-SaharanAfrica.AfricanJournalofPlantScience.2011;5(1):1–7
  44. ChenQL,AnXL,LiH,SuJQ,MaYB,ZhuYG. Longtermfieldapplicationofsewagesludgeincreases theabundanceofantibioticresistancegenesin soil.EnvironmentalInternational.2016;92–93:1–10
  45. HeuerHSchmittHSmallaK. Antibiotic resistancegenespreadduetomanureapplicationon agriculturalfields.CurrentOpinioninMicrobiology.2011;14(3):236–243
  46. ZhuBChenQChenSZhuYG. Does organicallyproducedlettuceharborhigherabundance of antibiotic resistance genes than conventionally produced? Environmental International. 2017;98:152–159
  47. PaustianK,LehmannJ,OgleS,ReayD,Robertson GP, Smith P. Climate-smart soils. Nature. 2016;532(7597):49–57
  48. LehmannJ,KleberM. Thecontentiousnatureof soilorganicmatter.Nature.2015;528(7580):60–68
  49. BerendsenRL,PieterseCMJ,BakkerPAHM. The rhizospheremicrobiomeandplanthealth.Trends inPlantScience.2012;17(8):478–486