Public Health · Vol. 11, No. 1 · 2026 · pp. 380–384 · e-ISSN 2472-3878

Microbiome Management: Transitioning from Chemical Inputs to Biological Soil Fertility for Sustainable Agriculture

Diksha Vishwakarma, Shashi S Yadav, Subhash Chandra Gupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.380 · Published 2026-05-04 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2026 The Author(s)

Abstract

The growing concern over declining soil health under intensive agricultural systems has necessitated a shift toward biologically driven fertility management approaches. Excessive reliance on synthetic fertilizers has been associated with nutrient imbalances, reduced microbial diversity, and environmental degradation. Recent research highlights the soil microbiome as a critical determinant of nutrient cycling and plant productivity. Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and archaea regulate key processes including nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and organic matter decomposition. This review synthesizes findings from recent empirical studies to evaluate the role of microbiome management in enhancing soil fertility. Evidence suggests that integrating microbial inoculants, organic amendments, and precision microbiome interventions can improve nutrient use efficiency and crop yield. However, variability in field performance and limited understanding of microbial interactions remain major challenges. The review concludes that microbiome-based strategies provide a viable pathway for sustainable agriculture, but require further refinement for large-scale application.

Keywords: Biological fertility; microbial inoculants; microbiome engineering; nutrient cycling; rhizosphere; soil health; sustainable agriculture; Biologicalfertility; microbialinoculants; microbiomeengineering; nutrientcycling; soilhealth; sustainableagriculture 1.Introduction rhizosphereinteractions; organicamendments; and microbiomeengineering[9].Datasynthesisinvolved

sustainableagriculture 1.Introduction rhizosphereinteractions,organicamendments,and microbiomeengineering[9].Datasynthesisinvolved Thesustainabilityofmodernagricultureisincreasingly qualitativeanalysisofexperimentalfindingstoidentify threatenedbysoildegradationanddecliningfertility commontrendsanddiscrepanciesacrossstudies[20]. causedbyexcessivechemicalinputuse[1].Long-term applicationofsyntheticfertilizershasresultedinsoil acidification,nutrientimbalance,andreducedbiologi- 3.MechanisticInsightsintoSoilMicrobiome- calactivity[2]. Soilisnowrecognizedasacomplex MediatedFertilityEnhancement living ecosystem where microorganisms play a fun- 3.1 SoilMicrobiomeandNutrientCycling damentalroleinmaintainingfertilityandecosystem stability[20].Thesoilmicrobiomecomprisesdiverse Soilmicroorganismsarecentraltonutrientcyclingpro- communities of bacteria, fungi, archaea, and proto- cesses that sustain plant productivity[17]. Nitrogen zoathatregulatebiochemicalprocessesessentialfor fixationbydiazotrophicbacteriaconvertsatmospheric plantgrowth[6]. Recentstudiesemphasizethatnu- nitrogenintoformsaccessibletoplants[10]. Thisbi- trientavailabilityinsoilislargelymediatedbymicro- ologicalprocessreducesdependenceonsyntheticni- bialtransformationsratherthandirectchemicalinputs trogenfertilizersandenhancessustainability[2].Phos- [17]. Nitrogenfixation, mineralization, andnutrient phorusavailabilityinsoilisoftenlimitedduetofixa- solubilizationaredrivenbymicrobialenzymaticactivi- tionininsolubleforms,butphosphate-solubilizingmi- tiesthatenhancenutrientaccessibilitytoplants[2].Ad- croorganismsreleaseorganicacidsthatmobilizephos- ditionally, microbial interactions in the rhizosphere phorus[16].Similarly,potassium-solubilizingbacteria influenceplanthealthbypromotinggrowthandsup- contributetonutrientavailabilitybyreleasingbound pressingpathogens[3]. Theconceptofmicrobiome potassiumfromsoilminerals[7].Decompositionofor- managementhasemergedasasustainablealterna- ganicmatterbymicrobialcommunitiesleadstothere- tive to conventional fertilization strategies [9]. This leaseofessentialnutrientsandimprovessoilstructure approachinvolvesmanipulatingsoilmicrobialcommu- [12].Fungalcommunitiesplayaparticularlyimportant nitiesthroughorganicamendments,biofertilizers,and roleinlignindegradationandcarboncycling[6]. Re- advancedbiotechnologicaltools[7].Unlikechemical searchindicatesthatmicrobialdiversityispositively fertilizers,microbiome-basedstrategiesaimtorestore correlatedwithnutrientcyclingefficiencyandsoilfer- naturalsoilprocessesandimprovelong-termfertility tility[20].Enhancedmicrobialactivityincreasesnutri- [18].Theobjectiveofthisreviewistosynthesizecur- entturnoverratesandreduceslossesthroughleaching rentresearchonmicrobiome-drivensoilfertilityand [18](Table3)(Figure2).

evaluateitspotentialasasustainableagriculturalprac- tice[20].Thereviewalsoidentifieskeychallengesand 3.2 Plant–MicrobeInteractionsintheRhizosphere futureresearchdirectionsforeffectiveimplementation Therhizosphereisahighlydynamiczonewhereplant [6].

roots interact with diverse microbial communities [3]. Rootexudatesprovidecarbonsourcesthatstim- 2.Methodology ulatemicrobialgrowthandactivity[6].Plantgrowth- promotingrhizobacteriaenhanceplantgrowthbypro- Thisreviewisbasedonasystematicanalysisofrecent ducingphytohormonessuchasauxinsandcytokinins literaturefocusingonsoilmicrobiomeandbiological [21]. Thesehormonesstimulaterootelongationand fertility [13]. Research articles were collected from improve nutrient uptake efficiency [10]. Arbuscular databasesincludingScopus,WebofScience,andRe- mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with searchGateusingkeywordssuchas“soilmicrobiome,” plantroots,increasingphosphorusuptakeandimprov- “biological soil fertility,” and “microbial inoculants” ingdroughttolerance[14].Thesefungiextendhyphal [20].Studiespublishedbetween2018and2025were networksintothesoil,enhancingnutrientacquisition prioritizedtoensureinclusionofrecentadvancements beyondrootzones[17]. Microbialcommunitiesalso inthefield[17]. Inclusioncriteriaconsistedofpeer- contributetoplantdefencebyinducingsystemicre- reviewedoriginalresearcharticleswithexperimental sistanceagainstpathogens[15].Thisreducesreliance validationunderfieldorcontrolledconditions[7].Stud- onchemicalpesticidesandpromotessustainablecrop iesfocusingsolelyontheoreticalmodelsorlackingem- protection[18].

piricalevidencewereexcluded[6].Atotalof60studies wereinitiallyidentified,outofwhich20high-quality paperswereselectedbasedonrelevanceandmethod- 3.3 OrganicAmendmentsandMicrobialDiversity ologicalrigor[13]. Theselectedstudieswerecatego- Organicamendmentssuchascompostandbiochar rized into thematic areas including nutrient cycling, significantlyinfluencesoilmicrobialcommunities[7]. Theseinputsprovidesubstratesthatenhancemicro- mediatedprocessessuchasnitrogenfixationandphos- bialgrowthandenzymaticactivity[5].Applicationof phorussolubilizationsignificantlyreducedependency organic matter increases microbial biomass carbon onchemicalfertilizers.However,variabilityinresults andimprovessoilfertility[12](Table1)(Figure2& highlightsthecomplexityofsoilecosystemsandthein- 3).Biochar,inparticular,enhancesmicrobialhabitat fluenceofenvironmentalconditions.Differencesinsoil and nutrient retention capacity [17]. Integrated nu- type,climate,andcroppingsystemsoftenleadtoincon- trientmanagementcombiningorganicandinorganic sistentperformanceofmicrobialinterventions.Some inputshasbeenshowntoimprovesoilhealthandcrop studiesreportlimitedeffectivenessofbiofertilizersdue productivity[22]. Thisapproachmaintainsmicrobial topoorestablishmentofintroducedmicroorganisms diversitywhileensuringadequatenutrientsupply[18]. andcompetitionwithnativemicrobialcommunities. Long-termstudiesindicatethatorganicamendments Despite these challenges, the overall evidence sup- improvesoilstructureandwaterretention,contribut- portsthepotentialofmicrobiome-basedapproaches ingtosustainableagriculture[7].

toimprovesustainability.Integratingbiologicalinputs withexistingagriculturalpracticesappearstobethe 3.4 MicrobialInoculantsandBiofertilizers most effective strategy for maintaining productivity Biofertilizers are gaining popularity as eco-friendly whilereducingenvironmentalimpacts.

alternativestochemicalfertilizers[4].Theseformula- tionscontainbeneficialmicroorganismsthatenhance 5.FutureChallengesandDirections nutrient availability andplant growth [9]. Nitrogen- Futureresearchshouldfocusonunderstandingmicro- fixingbiofertilizersreducetheneedforsyntheticnitro- bialinteractionsatthecommunitylevel[20].Long-term geninputs[10].Phosphate-solubilizingandpotassium- fieldstudiesareneededtoevaluatethesustainabil- mobilizingmicrobesfurtherimprovenutrientuptake ityofmicrobiome-basedinterventions[17].Advance- efficiency[16]. Despitetheirpotential,theeffective- mentsinomicstechnologiescanprovidedeeperin- nessofmicrobialinoculantsvariesunderfieldcondi- sights into microbial functions [1]. Development of tions[8]. Factorssuchassoiltype, climate, andmi- location-specificmicrobialconsortiawillimprovefield crobialcompetitioninfluencetheirperformance[6]. performance[9].Policysupportandfarmerawareness Advancesinformulationtechnologies, includingen- areessentialforlarge-scaleadoption[18]. capsulation,areimprovingthestabilityandefficacyof biofertilizers[9](Table2).

6.Conclusions 3.5 MicrobiomeEngineeringandPrecisionAgricul- Microbiomemanagementrepresentsapromisingshift ture toward sustainable soil fertility by emphasizing bi- Microbiomeengineeringinvolvesmanipulatingmicro- ological processes over chemical dependency. The bialcommunitiestoenhancesoilfertility[1].Advances approachenhancesnutrientcycling,supportsplant inmetagenomicsallowidentificationofbeneficialmi- growth,andcontributestolong-termsoilhealth. Al- crobialtaxaandtheirfunctions[20].Syntheticmicro- thoughchallengessuchasfieldvariabilityandscala- bialconsortiaarebeingdevelopedtoimprovenutrient bilityremain,ongoingadvancementsinmicrobialre- cyclingandplantgrowth[1].Theseconsortiaarede- searchandagriculturaltechnologiesarelikelytoim- signedtofunctionsynergisticallyunderspecificenvi- prove effectiveness. Integrating microbiome-based ronmentalconditions[9]. Precisionagriculturetech- strategieswithconventionalpracticescanprovidea nologiesenablesite-specificmicrobiomemanagement balancedandresilientapproachtofutureagricultural throughdata-drivenapproaches[19].Sensorsandre- systems.

motesensingtoolsprovidereal-timeinformationon soilconditions[18]. Integrationofmicrobiomeengi-

References

  1. Basu,A.,Prasad,P.,Das,S.N.,Kalam,S.,Sayyed, useandimprovesustainability[20]. R.Z.,Reddy,M.S.,&Enshasy,H.E.(2021). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) 4.ResultsandDiscussion as green bioinoculants:Recent developments, Thereviewedstudiesconsistentlydemonstratethat constraints,andprospects.Sustainability,13(3), microbiomemanagementenhancessoilfertilityand 1140.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140 cropproductivity.Increasedmicrobialdiversityisas- https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140
  2. Bender, S. F., Wagg, C., & van der sociated with improved nutrient availability, better Heijden, M. G. A. (2016). An undergroundrevsoilstructure,andenhancedplantgrowth.Microbialolution: Biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainabilanalyses. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. ity.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(6), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 440–452.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016 14. Patel, D., Thakur, M., amp; Singh, R https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  3. Berendsen,R.L.,Pieterse,C.M.J.,&Bakker, (2020). Role of mycorrhiza in nutri- P.A.H.M.(2018).Therhizospheremicrobiome ent uptake and plant growth. Journal andplanthealth.NatureReviewsMicrobiology, of Plant Nutrition, 43(10), 1456–1468. 16(10),523–536.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1739292 018-0049-7 15. Rao,D.L.N.,Giller,K.E.,amp;Yadav,S.(2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1739292
  4. Choudhary, M., Jat, S. L., & Singh, Microbialinducedsystemicresistanceincrops. R. K. (2022). Role of biofertilizers in sus-Agriculture,Ecosystemsamp;Environment,307, tainable crop production: A review. Jour- 107235.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107235 nal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 16. Sharma,S.B.,Sayyed,R.Z.,Trivedi,M.H.,amp; 22(2),1234–1248.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-Gobi, T. A. (2013). Phosphate solubilizing mi- 021-00685-3 crobes:Sustainableapproach.SpringerPlus,2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107235
  5. Das, S., Jeong, S. T., Das, S., amp; Kim, P. J. 587https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587 (2017). Composted cattle manure increases 17. Singh,J.S.,Pandey,V.C.,amp;Singh,D.P.(2011). microbial activity and soil fertility. Agron-Efficient soil microorganisms for nutrient cyomyforSustainableDevelopment,37(4),1–10. cling.EcologicalEngineering,37(12),2082–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0443-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.017 https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
  6. FiererN.. (2017).Embracingtheunknown:Disen- 18. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., amp; Befort, B. tanglingthecomplexitiesofthesoilmicrobiome. L. (2011). Global food demand and sustain-NatureReviewsMicrobiology,15(10),579–590. ableintensification.ProceedingsoftheNational https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20260–2026410.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87
  7. Gupta, V. V. S. R., Germida, J. J., amp; Farhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108 rell, M. (2022). Soil microbial community 19. Tripathi, R., Nayak, A. K., Mohanty, S., amp; structure and function under organic amend-Shahid, M. (2023). Precision agriculture for ments. Applied Soil Ecology, 176,104482. sustainable soil management. Computers https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104482 and Electronics in Agriculture, 198,107085 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
  8. Joshi, D., Pathak, H., amp; Kumar, A. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107085 Constraints and opportunities in biofertilizer 20. Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., application. Indian Journal of Microbiology, amp; Singh, B. K. (2020).Plant–microbiome 61(4),512–520.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088interactions for sustainable agriculture. Na- 021-00965-3 ture Reviews Microbiology, 18(11), 607–621 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107085
  9. Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., Wani, P. A., amp; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 Oves, M. (2023). Role of microbial in- 21. Verma, J. P., Jaiswal, D. K., amp; Sagar, oculants in sustainable agriculture. R. (2019). Plant growth promoting rhi-Biotechnology Advances, 61, 108042. zobacteria: Mechanisms and applicahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108042 tions. Microbiological Research, 219 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
  10. Kumar, V., Singh, S., amp; Meena, R. (2021). 50–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.002 Nitrogen fixation and its role in sustain- 22. Yadav, R. L., Dwivedi, B. S., amp; Pandey, P. able agriculture. Plant and Soil, 463, 1–15. S. (2021). Integrated nutrient management in https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04884-3 agriculture. FieldCropsResearch,267,108161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.002
  11. LalR.. (2020). Soilhealthandcarbonmanagehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108161 ment. Soil and Tillage Research, 199,104563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.10456310.1016/j.fcr.2021.108161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108161
  12. Meena, R. S., Yadav, G. S., Bohra, J. S., amp; Lal, R. (2021). Soil carbon sequestrationandmicrobialactivityunderconservation agriculture. EcologicalIndicators, 125,107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107559 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107559
  13. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., amp; Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-