Public Health · Vol. 11, No. 1 · 2026 · pp. 434–409 · e-ISSN 2472-3878

Effectiveness of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of respectful childbirth in undergraduate nursing students

Yadira Santillán Escamilla, Guillermina Arenas Montaño, Aldo Pelcastre Neri, Olga Rocío Flores Chávez, David Pérez Becker, Jesús Carlos Ruvalcaba Ledezma, Miguel Ángel Serna Martinez, Josefina Reynoso Vázquez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/phoj.11.01.435 · Published 2026-06-04 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2026 The Author(s)

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of Respectful Childbirth among undergraduate nursing students. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with second- to sixth-semester undergraduate nursing students. Sociodemographic data were collected, and three theoretical-practical sessions were held. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA; descriptive statistics included means and percentages, and inferential statistics included the chi-square. Results: 50% of the students are dedicated to studying and 50% of them to studying and work. The pretest showed a score of 5.26 with SD 20.4, the posttest 9.46, SD 9.1. Regarding respectful childbirth, the score was 3.8 SD 2.6 with a posttest 9.6 SD 1.09. In the area of pregnancy, the initial score was 7.9 SD 2.11 and the final score 9 with SD 1.68. In labor, the scores were 7.8 and 9.6 respectively with SD 2.57 at the beginning and SD 1.01 at the end. In breastfeeding, the scores were 7.1 and 9.4 SD of 3.4 and 1.3 respectively, for postpartum 4.6 and 9.4, SD 3.4 and 1.3 respectively, and finally, perinatal psychoprophylaxis 0.36 and 9.68 SD of 0.87 and 0.84 respectively. This indicates a significant difference in each of the assessments, as well as in knowledge. Conclusions: The educational intervention showed a significant difference and increased students' knowledge, as well as their concern for respecting women during childbirth, the implementation of dynamic and interactive strategies for students, and the restructuring of academic programs for nursing professionals.

Keywords: Childbirth; Respectful Childbirth; Pregnancy; Perinatal Psychoprophylaxis; Breastfeeding; RespectfulChildbirth; PerinatalPsychoprophylaxis

Introduction

Formanyyears,childbirthhasbeenmanagedaccordingtoestablishedprotocolsinhospitals.Womenhave beenviewedaspatientswhomustbecaredforina singleposition,withactionsthatmightfacilitatethe descentofthefetusorthebondbetweenmotherand childbeingdiscouraged,whilecesareansectionshave been prioritized and adopted as routine practice in childbirthcare.Asmentioned,itrepresentsanormalized exercise of obstetric violence. The testimonies in her article highlight a cycle of medicalizing interventionsandvariousformsofabusethatamounttoa systematicviolationofwomen’shumanrights.Prado notesthatobstetricviolenceislinkedtostrategiesof powerandcontroloverwomen’sbodies,groundedin biomedicalthinkingthatframeschildbirthasapathological,risky,anduncontrollableevent[1]. However,althoughsexualandreproductiverightsare recognizedbytheInter-AmericanCommissiononHumanRights,obstetricviolencepersists,alongwithan increaseincesareansectionsandafailuretorespect thedecisionofthewomanandherpartnerregarding howtogivebirth,providedthatthepregnancyiswithoutrisk.

Internationally,attentionhasbeendrawntotheimportanceofrespectingsexualandreproductiverights,recognizingsexualandreproductivehealthasanintegral partofhumanrights;however,therecontinuestobe atendencytowardpracticesthatcontributetoobstetricviolenceandmisinformationregardingrespectful childbirthcare[2].

Initsrecommendationsonchildbirthcare,theWHO statesthatduringchildbirth,thewomanisthecentral figureandthathercaremustberespectful, emphasizingfreedomofmovementduringlabor,painmanagementusingnon-invasivetechniques,allowingthe womantochoosethepositioninwhichshefeelsmost comfortableandsafetogivebirthtoherchild,andensuringsheisaccompaniedatalltimesbyatrustedpersonsoshefeelssecure,amongmanyothermeasures. However,whileforsomewomenandtheirpartners, motherhoodisauniqueandunparalleledexperience, formanyothersitisasourceofobstetricviolence[3]. Ontheotherhand,patriarchalsocietyhasestablished aseriesofnormsandexpectationsbetweenmenand womenthathavecreatedakindofsubordinationin whichallmannerofviolentpracticesarecarriedout, rangingfromverbalabusetophysicalabuse,normalizedbyaseriesofinstitutionalizedpracticesthatstrip womenofcontrolovertheirownbodies, transforming them into scientific subjects that construct new discourseswhichcommunicativelyencouragegender- Ingeneralterms,variousacademicstudiesinMexico highlighttheexistenceofapathologizingformofobstetriccarewithintheMexicanhealthcaresystem;but thefailuretorecognizewomen’srightsandthelackof empathyhaveledthesystemtoincreaseunnecessary cesareansections,routineepisiotomies,restrictions onmobility,andtherequirementtoremaininasingle positionalljustifiedbasedonknowledgeofinsufficient scientificvalue[5].

Therefore,theimportanceofprovidingdignifiedcare andtreatmentduringchildbirthliesinthebenefitsthat boththewoman,herchild,andherpartnerwillderive fromit;consequently,since2000,publicpolicieshave beendevelopedtopromotehumanizedchildbirth.In Brazil, the Prenatal Humanization Program was created,whosepoliciespromoteaccesstoobstetricand gynecological care, as well as the reorganization of healthdepartmentstooffermothersmultidisciplinary childbirth support that addresses any need. [6] AnotherexampleisEcuador,whichhasestablishedthe MaCFHF(MotherandChild-FriendlyHealthFacilities) regulations,settingguidelinesforthecertificationof healthfacilitiesprovidingmaternalandneonatalcare. The goal is to improve the quality of care, promote humanizedchildbirth,andencouragebreastfeeding, therebycontributingtothereductionofmaternaland neonatalmorbidityandmortality.[7] Similarly, in Mexico, models of care for women duringpregnancy,childbirth,andthepostpartumperiod weredeveloped,aswellashumanizedchildbirth,the modelofobstetricpsychoprophylaxiseducation,and the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, among others. Effortshavebeenmadetoincorporatethesemodels into hospitals, and they have received favorable responsesfromhealthcarepersonnel;however,establishingthistypeofcarehasnotbeeneasy,asunnecessarycesareansectionscontinuetobeperformed[8]. TheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)definesRespectfulChildbirthascareorganizedtoprovideallwomen withservicesthatupholdtheirdignity, privacy, and confidentiality;arefreefromharmandabuse;andallowforinformedchoiceandcontinuousemotionalsupportfromacompanionoftheirchoiceduringlaborand delivery[9].

RespectfulChildbirthalsoreferstotherecognitionof therightsthatwomenandnewbornshaveatbirth,includingduringpregnancyandthepostpartumperiod, andhumanizationreferstotheprocessofre-examining and restoring the principles and values inherent to humanbeingssimplybyvirtueofbeingpeople,and puttingthemintopracticeduringchildbirthcare[9]. With regard to humanized or respectful care during childbirth,itisdescribedasamodelofchildbirthcare thattakesintoaccounttheopinions,needs,andemotionalwell-beingofthewomanandherfamily,placing heratthecenterofherownchildbirthexperience.[9]. Fromtheglobaltothelocallevel,thereisalegalframework that supports humanized childbirth, as establishedinthefirstarticleoftheUniversalDeclaration ofHumanRights,whichstates:“Allhumanbeingsare born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowedwithreasonandconscienceandshouldact towardsoneanotherinaspiritofbrotherhood.”Inthis context,humanizedchildbirthoffersthetoolstofoster fraternalbehavioramongthemother,herfamily,and thenursingstaff.[10] TheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)emphasizesthat thisshouldbean“experienceofcare”;forthisreason, itsuggestsensuringqualitycareduringlabor, delivery,andthepostpartumperiod,therebyachievingbetteroutcomescenteredonthewomanandherfamily. Thisincludesgivingbirthtoahealthybabyinasafe clinicalandpsychologicalenvironment,withtheemotionalsupportofapartnerandkind,technicallycompetentclinicalstaff. Thisconcepttakesintoaccount thatmostwomendesireaphysiologicallabor,tofeel capableofbringingtheirchildintotheworld,andto havecontrolovertheirbodiesthroughparticipation indecision-making,includingwhenmedicalinterventionsareneededordesired,sotheycanbeactiveparticipantsinthatmoment[11].

Inlightoftheseobservations,inFebruary2018,the WHOissuedfifty-sixrecommendationsforRespectful Childbirth care, which are aimed not only at reducingunnecessaryinterventionsbutalsoatimproving women’sexperiences,empoweringthemtomakedecisionsduringlaboranddelivery,andhumanizingthe process.[11].

Therefore, Respectful Childbirth recognizes that all women have the right to experience childbirth as a personalandpositiveevent. Forthisreason,several hospitalsinsomecountriesareimplementingthepracticeofRespectfulChildbirth,asitispartofthelaws concerningwomen’srighttodignifiedandrespectful care during pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and newborncare,intendingtostandardizethismodelof careinallhospitalsworldwide.[12].

Forthisreason,thegoalisforstudentstogainknowledgeaboutRespectfulChildbirthintheirclassrooms andthroughtheireducationalprograms.Thiscaresystemaimstosupportthewoman,herchild,and/orher partneratalltimestoachieveasuccessfulchildbirthexperienceandpromotethebenefitsoftheparent-child bond;Therefore,theaimistoanalyzetheeffectiveness ofaneducationalinterventiontoincreaseknowledge ofRespectfulChildbirthamongundergraduatenursing students.

MaterialsandMethods

A quantitative study was conducted using a quasiexperimentaldesignwith50studentsintheirsecond throughsixthsemestersoftheBachelorofNursingprogram. locatedinPachuca,Hidalgo,amongstudents intheir2nd,3rd,5th,and6thsemestersoftheBachelorofNursingprogramin2024. Thesamplingwas non-probabilisticandbasedontheinclusioncharacteristics...

Samplingmethod

Thesamplingwasnon-probabilisticandbasedonthe inclusionofconsecutivecases,asthestudentsselected werethosewhowereavailableatthetimetoparticipateinthisresearchstudy.

Statisticalanalysis

DatawereenteredintothestatisticalsoftwareSTATA 18.Fordescriptivestatistics,meansandpercentages wereused,andforinferentialstatistics,thechi-square testwasusedtocomparetheresultsobtained.

Inclusioncriteria

• RegularstudentsenrolledatATENEOUniversity inHumanitiesandHealthSciences,Pachuca,Hidalgo.

• Studentsarecurrentlyenrolledinthe2nd,3rd, 5th,or6thsemesteroftheBachelorofNursing program.

• Studentswhohavesignedtheinformedconsent form.

• Nogenderdistinction

Exclusioncriteria

• Studentswhohavepreviouslyattendedacourse onrespectfulchildbirth.

• Students are currently enrolled in a different semester.

Eliminationcriteria

• Incompletepre-testinformation.

• Studentswhodonotattendatleast90%ofthe educationalprogram’ssessions.

• Studentswhodecidetowithdrawfromtheprogram.

ThestudywassubmittedforreviewtotheEthics and Research Committee of the Institute of

Features

Survey population

Age 25.5SD:6.3 23.4SD:3.9

Women 40(80%) 14(93.3%) Men 10(20%) 1(6.67%)

Single 39(78%) 11(73.33%) Married 9(18%) 3(20%) Cohabitation 2(4%) 1(6.67%)

Study 25(50%) 8(53.33%)

Studyand work Priortraining 0 0

Health Sciences, UAEH, which issued a favorableopinionunderofficialdocumentnumber 226/2024.

Evaluationmethod

The study was approved by the Nursing CoordinationOfficeatATENEOUniversity. Beforeimplementingtheinterventionprogram,aninitialmeetingwas heldwiththeCoordinatoroftheBachelorofNursing program, followed by meetings with students from eachsemester.Duringthesemeetings,theobjectives, methodology, and benefits of the project were explainedtothestudents,whothensignedtheinformed consentformalongwiththeirwitnesses.Inaddition, duringthesamemeeting,thesociodemographicdata collectionform—whichispartofthepretestadministeredbeforetheintervention—wasadministeredtothe students.SeeAppendix3.

Assessmenttool

ToassessthelevelofknowledgeregardingRespectful Childbirth,aquestionnairewasdesignedandevaluatedbyexperts.ItutilizedaLikertscale,whichensured thatstudentsprovidedresponsesreflectingtheirunderstandingofthetopic.Toassessthevalidityoftheinstrument,anexpertreviewwasconductedtoevaluate itsrelevance,determiningwhetherthequestionnaire isappropriateforthestudy’sobjective,aswellasits wording,toassessthequalityofthequestions’phrasing,language,whichincludesassessingthecomprehensibilityofthequestions;facevalidity,todetermine whetherthequestionnairemeasureswhatitsresearch objective actually intends to measure; and content, whichinvolvesevaluatingallelementsincludedinthe questionnairetoensuretheyfallwithinthescopeof thesubjectunderstudy.Correctionsweremadebased

General Semester Semester Semester Semester population 2 3 5 6

50(100%) 15(30%) 14(28%) 10(20%) 11(22%) 23.2SD:4.5 27.3SD:7.8 29.8SD:7.3

Sex

9(64.29%) 7(70%) 10(90.9%) 5(35.71%) 3(30%) 1(9.09%)

Maritalstatus

12(85.71%) 8(80%) 8(72.73%) 2(14.29%) 2(20%) 2(18.18%) 0 0 1(9.09%)

Ocupación

9(64.29%) 3(30%) 5(45.45%) 25(50%) 7(46.67%) 5(35.71%) 7(70%) 6(54.55%) 0 0 0

ontheevaluationoftheinstrumentandthescientificallygroundedobservationsprovidedbytheexpert panel;Theprofessionalswhoevaluatedtheinstrument heldaBachelor’sdegreeinNursingastheirprimary qualification,withspecializationsinPerinatalNursing attheMaster’sandDoctorallevels;theyareconsidered expertsinthefieldastheyhavededicatedtheirstudiesandworktoRespectfulChildbirthcare, prenatal education,andnursinginstruction.

Theinstrumentwasdividedintotwodimensions.The firstdimensionincludedpersonalinformation, with sevenitemstobeanswered,suchasname,student age,gender,maritalstatus,semester,phonenumber, andwhetherthestudenthadreceivedtrainingonHumanizedChildbirth.Theseconddimensionassessed thestudent’slevelofknowledgeregardingRespectful Childbirth, which consisted of six categories and 19 questionsclassifiedaccordingtoeachcategory:background,respectfulchildbirth,pregnancy,labor,breastfeeding,postpartumperiod,andperinatalpsychoprophylaxis.

Subsequently,apilotstudywasconducted,whichinvolvedadministeringthequestionnairetonursingstudents,withauthorizationobtainedfromthenursing departmentofanotheruniversity.

Educationalintervention

Acourseworkprogramwasdesignedusingaconstructivist approach and divided into six thematic areas. Threevirtualeducationalsessionswereheld,eachlasting480minutes,whichweredeliveredtostudentsin their2nd, 3rd, 5th, and6thsemestersoftheBachelorofNursingprogramatUniversityofHidalgoMexico. Thesestudentstookapretestbeforethesessionsbegan;duringthesessions,studentswereassessedon sixkeypointsandcompletedapost-testquestionnaire toevaluatetheirlevelofknowledgeregardingRespectfulChildbirth.Thescoreforeachquestionallowsfor theclassificationofthestudent’sknowledgeregarding RespectfulChildbirthcare.

Results

The student population at this institution consisted of56studentsenrolledinthe2nd,3rd,5th,and6th semestersoftheBachelorofScienceinNursingprogram;however,50studentsmettheinclusioncriteria. Thefollowingtableshowsthedemographiccharacteristicsoftheparticipants.

Itshouldbenotedthatatotalof56studentsparticipated,2ofwhomdroppedoutduetoworkcommitments,3didnotachieve90%attendance,and1had alreadybeenexposedtoinformationaboutRespectful ChildbirthataclinicinMexicoCity. Therefore, they wereexcludedfromthestudyinaccordancewiththe exclusionandeliminationcriteria.The50studentsin thestudyhadnopriorknowledgeofthesubjectand werethereforeadmittedtotheeducationalintervention.

The following table shows the results of the participants’pre-andpost-tests:

Table 2. Pre-andpost-testevaluationinthestudy population.

Diagnosis Rating

Pre-exam 5.26 20.4 Post-exam 9.46 9.1 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05

In the analysis of student assessment, the first test yieldedascoreof5.26withastandarddeviationof20.4, whilethefinaltestyieldedascoreof9.46withastandarddeviationof9.1.Therefore,thereisstatisticalsignificanceineachofthetwopre-andpost-intervention assessmentsregardingknowledgeofRespectfulChildbirth.

Belowisacomparisonofthetestsadministeredbyarea ofknowledgeaccordingtotheassessmentinstrument: Thefollowingtableshowstheresultsbysemesterand subjectareainthecategoryofhistoricalbackground ofchildbirth: Thefollowingtableshowsacomparisonofpre-and post-testsonknowledgeofthetopicof“Pregnancy”by gradelevel: Thefollowingtableshowsacomparisonofpre-and post-testscoresbygradelevelandsubjectareaforthe topic“Labor”: Thefollowingtableshowsthepre-andpost-testcomparisonbygradelevelandsubjectareaforthetopic “Breastfeeding”: Thefollowingtableshowsacomparisonofpre-and post-testscoresbygradelevelandsubjectareaforthe topic“PostpartumPeriod”:

Standard deviation

Table 3. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testsbysubjectarea.

Medical Examination History Rating

Initial 3.8DE:2.6 7.93De:2.11 7.8DE:2.57 7.1DE:3.4 4.6DE:5.03 .36DE:.87 Final 9.6DE:1.09 9DE:1.68 9.6DE:1.01 9.4DE:1.3 9.4DE:2.39 9.68DE:.84 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05

Table 4. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testresultsfromtheeducationalinterventiononknowledge,byschool yearandsubjectarea,inthecategoryofhistoricalbackgroundofchildbirth

Backgroundrating

Initial 4.7De:2.25 1.42De:1.71 4De:1.4 3.06De:2.3 Final 8.5De:1.38 9.76De:.89 9.6De:1.05 9.6De:1.0 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05

Table 5. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testsbyschooltermandsubjectareainthepregnancycategory.

Pregnancy Semester Semester Semester Semester Rating 2 3 5 6

Initial 7.5SD:1.97 6.1SD:1.78 9.3SD:1.40 9.3SD:1.34 Final 8.6SD:2.10 8.8SD:1.65 9.3SD:1.40 9.3SD:1.34 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05

Table 6. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testscoresbygradelevelandsubjectareainthe“Labor”category.

Gradelabor

Initial 6SD:2.87 7.14SD:2.20 9.6SD:1.05 9.3SD:1.34 Final 9.55SD:1.17 9.5SD:1.21 10SD:0 9.6SD:1.00 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05

Table 7. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testscoresbygradelevelandsubjectareainthebreastfeedingcategory.

Breastfeedinggrade

Initial 5.5SD:3.43 4.6SD:2.91 10SD:0 9.7SD:0.75 Final 9.5SD:1.40 9.2SD:1.52 9.5SD:1.58 9.5SD:1.01 Significance P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05

Prenatal Breastf- Post- Pregnancy Labor Psycho- -eeding -partum Rating Rating -prophylaxis

Rating Rating Rating

Semester Semester Semester Semester 2 3 5 6

Semester Semester Semester Semester 2 3 5 6

Semester Semester Semester Semester 2 3 5 6

TherehavebeensignificantimprovementsinknowledgeregardingthesubjectareainthePostpartumcategory.

Thefollowingtableshowsacomparisonofpre-and post-courseknowledgelevelsforthesubjectarea“PerinatalPsychoprophylaxis”:

Itwasobservedthatthestudentslackedknowledgeregardingprenataleducationforchildbirthpreparation, andthatthiswastakenintoaccount.

Discussion

Giventheneedforpregnantwomenandtheirfamilies toexperiencearespectfulchildbirthandfortheirrights tobeupheld,itisnecessarytodiscusskeyaspectsregardingstudents’knowledgeofrespectfulchildbirth. First,thestudydesignimplementedaimstoincrease students’knowledgeofthesubject. In2023, Cárdenasdemonstratedthatattentionshouldbefocused oneducatingstudentsaboutRespectfulChildbirth,as wellasontheirlearningtobringaboutachangeinpatientcare. Thesefindingssupportthesituationthat motivatesnursingstudentstobringaboutchangeand providecareinanempatheticandrespectfulmanner byaddressingwomenbyname,supportinglaborwith wordsofencouragement,andemployingvariouspain managementtechniques[13].

Therefore,thefindingsregardingtheimplementation ofaneducationalinterventionconfirmthatitisofutmostimportanceforstudentstoincreasetheirknowledgeofrespectfulchildbirthandadapttheirclinical practice accordingly [14] [15]. This underscores the importanceofdevelopinganeducationalintervention fornursingstaff,ensuringthatpregnantwomenare caredforbynurseswithknowledgeofrespectfulchildbirth to provide better care [16] [17]. Similarly, it is recognizedthataneducationalinterventionisthecornerstoneofgoodnursingcarepractice; researchon childbirthknowledgefocusesonstudentstoensure theyprovidequalitycare[18][19].Itwasalsodemonstratedthatstudents’knowledgeincreasesbasedon a sound educational framework, such as an educational intervention, although it is true that ongoing trainingcontributestotheincreaseinstudents’knowledge,abilities,andskills.Therefore,aperinataleducationprogramdemonstratedthatitisnecessarytoimprovestudents’attitudestowardchildbirthtoenhance women’sexperiencesandpreventchildbirth-related trauma;currenttraininginperinatalcarelacksacomprehensiveandbiopsychosocialperspectivethatimprovesthequalityofclinicalpracticeduringchildbirth [20].Basedontheresultsofpre-andpost-testsadministeredtoassesstheknowledgelevelofundergraduatenursingstudents,aswellastheimplementation ofaworkshopcourse,itisevidentthatthestudents increasedtheirunderstandingofRespectfulChildbirth, leadingthemtochangetheirperspectivesregarding respectfulcareforwomenandtheirpartnersand/or families.Followingthislineofreasoning,asignificant effectwasevidentinincreasingthelevelofknowledge amonghealthcarepersonnel, indicatingthateducationalinterventionsareeffectivenotonlybecauseof thebodyofknowledgeprovidedbythetrainerbutalso becauseofthecollectivelearningcontributedbyeach participant.Inthisstudy,theactivitiesgeneratedapositivechangeintheparticipants,whichwillbeshared amongprofessionals,fosteringacceptanceandimprovingthequalityofcarefornewbornsinneonatalintensivecareunits[21]

Conclusion

Theeducationalinterventiondemonstratedasignificantdifferenceandincreasedstudents’knowledge, aswellastheircommitmenttorespectingwomenin labor,implementingdynamicandinteractivestrategies,andrestructuringacademicprogramsfornursing professionals.

Withintheframeworkofrespectfulchildbirth,therole ofregisterednursesisessential, particularlyinpublic clinical settings where negligence or a lack of respect for the labor process may occur, which could constituteaviolationofhuman,sexual,andreproductiverights.Therefore,registerednursesmusteducate womenthroughouttheirpregnancy,childbirth,and postpartumperiod,specifyingtheprocedurestobefollowedandprovidingrelaxationtechniquestoalleviate pain,therebypromotingrelaxationforpainrelief.This helpsmaintainfreedomofmovement,encouragesthe presenceofasupportperson,facilitatesfindingthe bestpositionfordelivery,monitorstheconditionof category.

Postpartumgrade

Initial 1.3SD:3.51 Final 8.6SD:3.51 9.2SD:2.67 10SD:0 10SD:0 Significance P<0.05

Table 9. Comparisonofpre-andpost-testsbyschooltermandsubjectareaintheperinatalpsychoprophylaxis category.

PerinatalPsychoprophylaxis Semester Semester Semester Semester Grade 2

Initial 0DE:0 Final 10DE:0 Significance P<0.05

themotherandbaby,thecouple,andthefamily,promotesinterdisciplinarycollaboration,andstreamlines proceduresincaseofcomplications.EducationonRespectfulChildbirthrepresentsacost-effectivetoolfor preventingcomplicationsduringchildbirth,thereby contributingtothereductionofmaternalandperinatal mortalityinthecountryandworldwide;italsooffers benefitsinlaborcare,improvingthequalityoflifefor themother,father,andtheirfamily.

Acknowledgments

Toeachmemberofmyadvisorycommitteeforthedevelopmentofthiswork,aswellastotheprofessorswho promotethistypeofscientificresearch.Specialthanks to the unwavering support of Dr. Josefina Reynoso VázquezandDr.JesúsCarlosRuvalcabaLedezma.

ConflictofInterest

Theauthorsdeclarethatthereisnoconflictofinterestregardingthepublicationofthisarticle.

ArtificialIntelligence

Theauthorsdeclarethatnoartificialintelligencewasusedinanyofthesections.

References

  1. Prado Murrieta A. La cesárea rutinaria como unaformadeviolenciaobstétrica:Experiencias de mujeres y médicos de un hospital público en la Ciudad de México. Musas [Internet]. 2021;6(1):59–76. Disponibleen: http://dx.d oi.org/10.1344/musas2021.vol6.num1.4 https://doi.org/10.1344/musas2021.vol6.num1.4
  2. Ramírez Saucedo MD, Hernández Mier C, Ceballos García GY. La violencia obstétrica en la vulneración de los derechos humanos Semester Semester Semester Semester 2 3 5 6 0SD:0 10SD:0 10SD:0 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 3 5 6 0DE:0 1.4DE:1.34 0.36DE:0.80 9.4DE:1.22 9.8DE:.63 9.4DE:0.93 P<0.05 P<0.05 P<0.05 de las mujeres. Revista CONAMED [Internet]. 2021;26(3):149–55. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.35366/101680 https://doi.org/10.35366/101680
  3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la OMS: Cuidados durante el parto [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2024 Jul 18]. Disponibleen: https://iris.paho.org/bi tstream/handle/10665.2/51552/978927532 1027_spa.pdf
  4. De la Guardia Gutiérrez MA, Ledezma RJC. La salud y sus determinantes, promoción de la salud y educación sanitaria. JONNPR. 2020;5(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.192 30/jonnpr.3215
  5. NigendaG,ZárateGrajalesRA. Experienciasde. México: UNFPA; parto humanizado en México 2023
  6. Brasil–ProgramadeHumanizaçãonoPré-natal eNascimento–ObservatorioIberoaméricanode HumanizacióndelaSalud[Internet]. Oiss.org. Disponibleen: https://observatoriohumani zacion.oiss.org/planes-humanizacion/ brasil/
  7. EstablecimientosdeSaludAmigosdelaMadrey delNiño(ESAMyN)–MinisteriodeSaludPública [Internet].Gob.ec.Disponibleen: https://www. salud.gob.ec/establecimientos-de-sal ud-amigos-de-la-madre-y-del-nino-esa myn/
  8. AlmaguerGonzálezJA,GarcíaRamírezHJ,VargasViteV.Nacimientohumanizado.Apoyosde laatencióninterculturalalasmujeresenelembarazo,partoypuerperio. GéneroSaludCifras. 2012;10(2-3).Disponibleen: https://www.gob. mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/245170/ Nacimientohumanizado.pdf
  9. Benavidez Serralde JA, Martínez Buitrago DM, BuenoLindoS. Principiosdelpartohumanizado yrespetado [Internet]. 2022. Disponibleen: ht tps://fecolsog.org/wp-content/uploads /2022/06/Principios-del-parto-humaniz ado-y-respetado.pdf
  10. ¿Cuáles son los derechos de la mujer embarazada?[Internet].eAcnur.2016.Disponible en: https://eacnur.org/es/blog/cuales-s on-los-derechos-de-la-mujer-embarazad a
  11. AndrómacoL. Recomendaciones de la OMS para un parto humanizado [Internet]. 2022. Disponibleen: https://www.andromaco.co m/publicaciones/revista-conexion/arti culo/134-recomendaciones-de-la-oms-p ara-un-parto-humanizado
  12. Servicio Autónomo Hospital Universitario de Maracaibo, Colmenares J, Ramírez B. Let’s go backtohumanizedchildbirth. RevObstetGinecol Venez [Internet].2024;84(03):316–28.Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.51288/00840313 https://doi.org/10.51288/00840313
  13. Amézquita-CárdenasLF.ActuardeEnfermeríaen elparto:dilemasdeldeberseryhacer. RevCienc Cuid [Internet].2023;20(2):87–95.Disponibleen: http://dx.doi.org/10.22463/17949831.3 https://doi.org/10.22463/17949831.3
  14. AveigaMV,ChamarroPM,VillarrealMC.Roldela enfermeraenelpartointerculturaldemujeres embarazadasenHospitalSanLuisdeOtavalo. Dilemascontemp.educ.políticavalores [online]. 2021;9[citado2026-04-15], 00121. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php ?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-7890202 1000800121&lng=es&nrm=iso. Epub31-Ene- 2022.ISSN2007-7890. https://doi.org/10.4 6377/dilemas.v9i.3034
  15. UwamahoroV,SengomaJP,NdagijimanaA,HumuzaJ.Perceptionsandattitudesofmidwives onrespectfulmaternitycareduringchildbirth: aqualitativestudyinthreedistricthospitalsof KigaliCityofRwanda. PanAfrMedJ.2023Dec 19;46:110.doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.110. 40764 del Rosario Félix-Gaspar M, Espinoza JBR, Martínez-Talavera BE, Calderón-Miranda M. Propuesta de intervención educativa para brindar cuidado humanizado durante el trabajo de parto. Enfermería Comunitaria [Internet].2024;e14612–e14612.Disponibleen: https://ciberindex.com/c/ec/e14612 https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2023.46.110.40764
  16. CortezNE,AvendañoR,MendozaA,Retamales A,SotoJ.Experienciasobreimplementaciónde prácticasintegralesdepartorespetuosoenun hospitalpúblicodeChile. Medwave.2025;2. ht tp://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.S3. OB22 https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.s3.ob22
  17. CleetonER. Attitudes and beliefs about childbirth among college students: results of an educational intervention. Birth [Internet]. 2001;28(3):192–200. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x. 2001.00192.x10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00192.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00192.x
  18. BorgesDamasL,SánchezMachadoR,González PortalesA.Indicadoresdecalidadparaevaluarla atenciónalpartoconenfoquerespetuosoenserviciosobstétricos. Rev.cuba.obstet.ginecol. [Internet].2024[citado16deabrilde2026];50:e446. Disponibleen: https://revginecobstetrici a.sld.cu/index.php/gin/article/view/44
  19. González-MesaE,Cazorla-GranadosO,Blasco-AlonsoM,SabonetL,Jiménez-LópezJS,Rengel-DíazC.Educatingfutureprofessionalsinperinatalmedicine:theattitudeofmedicalandnursing studentstowardschildbirth. JPerinatMed [Internet].2021;49(4):485–95.Disponibleen: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0395 https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0395
  20. Ortiz-MendozaLUBaltazar-TéllezRMBTapia-GarcíaABLópez-EscuderoABArias-RicoJ. Efectodeunaintervencióneducativaenenfermería sobre el nivel de conocimiento del programaNIDCAP. ESASaludEduc.2021;10(19):132–135.Disponibleen: https://repository.uae h.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/ICSA/issue /archive