Also available as PDF (figures and tables appear in the PDF).
It has now been over 10 years that I started my journey as a researcher in Bangladesh. Coming from a Medical and a Public health background, I thought I was prepared for how re-search should work. Ten years later, I admit that my academic knowledge would have remained sorely limited had I not been a part of this exciting journey of field research. Through my ex-posure in the field – I realised how much one fails to absorb, see and understand if they are not close to the field. I would like to share what I learned with you in this editorial.
Keywords: Field Research
PUBLIC HEALTH Open Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/PHOJ-1-e001 Public Health Open J ISSN 2472-3878 Nadira Sultana Kakoly* Faculty, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh *Corresponding author Nadira Sultana Kakoly, MPH, MBBS Faculty Department of Public Health School of Public Health BRAC University Dhaka, Bangladesh E-mail: nadira@bracu.ac.bd Article History Received: November 16th, 2015 Accepted: November 17th, 2015 Published: November 18th, 2015 Citation Kakoly NS. Importance of field re- search. Public Health Open J. 2015; 1(1): e1. doi: 10.17140/PHOJ-1-e001 Copyright ©2015 Kakoly NS. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Volume 1 : Issue 1 Article Ref. #: 1000PHOJ1e001 Importance of Field Research Page e1 Editorial It has now been over 10 years that I started my journey as a researcher in Bangladesh. Coming from a Medical and a Public health background, I thought I was prepared for how re- search should work. Ten years later, I admit that my academic knowledge would have remained sorely limited had I not been a part of this exciting journey of field research. Through my ex- posure in the field – I realised how much one fails to absorb, see and understand if they are not close to the field. I would like to share what I learned with you in this editorial. Frequently researchers like to get others to collect data and work with these inanimate numbers to come up with theories and prove hypotheses. What we fail to comprehend is that each faceless number represents one human being who has given the time to respond to our questions with some hope that his response may provide an answer to their suffering. Giving these numbers a human face instils the true meaning of being a researcher. There is great enthusiasm for community participation among scientist and policy makers with regard to action research. How often do we consider what participation actually means to those for whom we conduct our research? Do we actually value their opinion enough to create an enabling environment for them to voice their opinion in a manner that enables actual participation? I bring up the topic of community mobilization because this is one area of research where one needs to understand ones participants and let them guide the research agenda to a certain extent. I began to work in this area about three years back. Through my work I observed that community knowledge, while ill-defined, gave insights into complex ar - eas of societal hierarchy that would be impossible to appreciate through the eyes of an external observer.
Another example I would like to cite is the Public Health students that we take to the field for conducting research who come to Bangladesh from a wide range of countries across the world. Their first exposure of working in the field amidst language difficulties is one of curiosity and amazement. I relish the expressions on their face as they go through the stages of realization of what their research questions actually mean to the lives of their respondents. I then see them working not to find an answer for that one research question which they thought up by toiling many hours over literature but working for those people who shared with them their problems, their thoughts and their sufferings.
In conclusion, I may have spoken little about the importance of Meta-analysis and re- view papers; but my aim was to suggest the importance of field exposure in research and not to suggest that one is necessarily better than the other. There may well be differences of opinion, but I strongly believe that my research agendas are many a times shaped by what I observe and see in the field.