Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care · Vol. 1, No. 2 · 2015 · pp. e1–e3 · e-ISSN 2377-8393

Challenges in Palliative Care Research: Experience from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Refractory Cancer Cachexia

Joanne Reid, David Scott, Sam Porter

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Block 97 Health Sciences, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; All Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care, Ireland There is a paucity of research studies in palliative care with less than 1% of clinical trials being relevant to the hospice and palliative care setting.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Block 97 Health Sciences, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UKUnited Kingdom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/pmhcoj-1-e001 · Published 2015-04-06 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2015 The Author(s)

Abstract

There is a paucity of research studies in palliative care with less than 1% of clinical trials being relevant to the hospice and palliative care setting.1 Difficulties in conducting studies with this client group such as recruitment, retention, methodological and ethical issues are well documented within the literature.

Editorial Challenges in Palliative Care Research: * *Corresponding author Experience from a Randomized Joanne Reid Lecturer in Cancer Nursing School of Nursing and Midwifery Controlled Trial in Refractory Cancer Queen’s University Belfast Room 06.312, Medical Biology Centre Cachexia Block 97 Health Sciences 97 Lisburn Road Belfast BT9 7BL, UK 1,2* 1 1,2 Tel. 00442890972459 Joanne Reid , David Scott and Sam Porter E-mail: j.reid@qub.ac.uk 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Block Volume 1 : Issue 2 97 Health Sciences, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK Article Ref. #: 1000PMHCOJ1e001 2All Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care, Ireland Article History nd Received: April 2nd, 2015 rd Accepted: April 3rd, 2015 There is a paucity of research studies in palliative care with less than 1% of clinical th Published: April 6th, 2015 trials being relevant to the hospice and palliative care setting.1 Difficulties in conducting studies with this client group such as recruitment, retention, methodological and ethical issues are well 1,2-6 documented within the literature. Nonetheless, conducting research with palliative popula- Citation Reid J, Scott D, Porter S. Chal- tions is necessary to ensure the development of evidence based policies and services which lenges in palliative care research: reflect and respond to the needs of this vulnerable and often underserved population. Previous experience from a randomized 7,8 9 research has demonstrated that palliative care patients and their families are willing to be controlled trial in refractory can- cer cachexia. Palliat Med Hosp involved in palliative care research and the onus to conduct high quality rigorous research with Care Open J. 2015; 1(2): e1-e3.

this client group lies with researchers. It is only through actively engaging in research with the doi: 10.17140/PMHCOJ-1-e001 palliative population that we can build an evidence base that will contribute to the development of evidence based policies, protocols and treatments and allow health care professionals to consistently respond to palliative patients and their families in order to maximise their quality of life as they approach the end of their lives.

One of the areas in which this paucity of systematic research has had a detrimental effect on the care of palliative patients is cachexia. The European Palliative Care Research Col- laborative’s (EPCRC) guidelines11 on cancer cachexia define it as a multi-factorial syndrome characterised “by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support” (p. 8). Refractory cachexia11 refers to the ‘stage where reversal of weight loss seems no longer possible’ (p. 8) and the major- ity of patients at this stage will be receiving palliative care. Previous research in this area has 12-15 demonstrated the holistic impact of the syndrome.

Research in palliative care, has been dogged by recruitment problems.1 Our own re- search has faced similar problems. In the absence of a recognized treatment solution, an ev- idence-based psycho-educational health care intervention has been developed for this patient cohort and their family members by a team of researchers and healthcare staff in Northern Ireland. This DVD intervention has been funded by the All Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care and will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial with a palliative cancer population who have refractory cachexia.16 The team’s experience thus far highlights the inher- ent difficulties in conducting research with this client group.

Copyright ©2015 Reid J. This is an open ac- cess article distributed under the Members of our team have worked closely alongside multidisciplinary clinical col- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 leagues and have engaged in Patient Public Involvement (PPI) from the early stages of the de- International License (CC BY 4.0), velopment of the intervention. Their insights were instrumental in: developing the intervention which permits unrestricted use, and study information sheets; and ensuring the clinical soundness and practical utility of the distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original psycho-educational intervention. However, our problems with recruitment lie in the fact that 17 11 refractory cancer cachexia, while characterized17 and documented in the EPCRC’s guidelines11 is rarely acknowledged or diagnosed due to a lack of clear clinical diagnostic guidelines and local protocols for clinical management. This reluctance to recognise and diagnose cancer cachexia among the myriad of potential co-morbidities found in end-of-life care has hindered identification of po- tential participants. Indeed previous research has demonstrated the lack of clinical awareness of this syndrome among health care professionals.18 While the authors have taken the initiative by: conducting educational sessions on refractory cachexia with health care staff at each clinical site; have harnessed clinical support for the study; and have worked at length with both clinical and PPI colleagues, recruitment into this study has been disappointing.

In order to positively influence clinical practice in palliative care, health care professionals need access to ‘best available evidence’. As this and as other studies in palliative care demonstrate, acquiring evidence from this client group presents a great challenge. There is a clear need for the urgent development of evidence based guidelines to aid in the education, diagnosis and man- agement of refractory cancer cachexia. Such guidelines will undoubtedly provide the clinical diagnostic criteria necessary to assist healthcare professionals in identifying refractory cachexia and allow them to respond appropriately. This in turn will make it easier to identify and recruit appropriate patients for future studies in palliative care.

References

  1. HansonLCBullJWessellK. Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: The palliative care research cooperative group. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2014; 48(6): 1021-1030. doi: 10.1016/j. jpainsymman.2014.04.00810.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008
  2. ChenERiffinKReidCM. Why is high-quality research on palliative care so hard to do? barriers to improved research from a survey of palliative care researchers. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2014; 17(7): 782-787. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.058910.1089/jpm.2013.0589 https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0589
  3. HudsonPArandaSMcMurrayN. Randomized controlled trials in palliative care: Overcoming the obstacles. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2001; 7(9): 427-434. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2001.7.9.930110.12968/ijpn.2001.7.9.9301 https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2001.7.9.9301
  4. LingJReesEHardyJ. What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre? European journal of cancer. 2000; 36: 621-626
  5. GyselsMShipmanCHigginsonI. “I will do it if it will help others:” Motivations among patients taking part in qualitative studies in palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2008; 35: 347-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.01210.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.012
  6. AounSMNekolaichukC. Improving the evidence based in palliative care to inform practice and policy: Thinking outside the box. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2014; 48(6): 1222-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.00710.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.007
  7. HendersonMAddington-HallJMHotopfM. The willingness of palliative care patients to participate in research. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2005; 29: 116-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.12.00110.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.12.001
  8. RossCCornbleetM. Attitudes of patients and staff to research in a specialist palliative care unit. Palliative Medicine. 2003; 17: 491-497. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm785oa10.1191/0269216303pm785oa https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216303pm785oa
  9. EmanuelEJFaircloughDLWolfePEmanuelLL. Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: Is it stressful? Is it helpful? Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004; 164: 1999-2004. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.18.199910.1001/archinte.164.18.1999 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.18.1999
  10. ReidJ. Conducting qualitative research with advanced cancer patients and their families: ethical considerations. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2009; 15(1): 30-33. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.1.3795010.12968/ijpn.2009.15.1.37950 https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.1.37950
  11. RadbruchLElsnerFTrottenbergPStrasserFFearonK. Clinical practice guidelines on cancer cachexia in advanced cancer patients. Aachen, Department of Palliative Medicinen/ European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. 2010
  12. ReidJMcKennaHFitzsimonsDMcCanceT. Living with cancer cachexia: Exploring the perspectives of patients and their significant others. Palliative Medicine. 2008; 22(4): 595-596
  13. ReidJMcKennaHPFitzsimonsDMcCanceTV. An exploration of the experience of cancer cachexia: What patients and their families want from health care professionals. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2010; 19(5): 682-689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2354.2009.01124.x10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01124.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01124.x
  14. ReidJMcKennaHFitzsimonsDMcCanceT. Fighting over food: Patient and family understanding of cancer cachexia. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2009; 36(4): 439-445. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.439-44510.1188/09.onf.439-445 https://doi.org/10.1188/09.onf.439-445
  15. PorterSMillarCReidJ. Cancer Cachexia Care: The Contribution of Qualitative Research to Evidence-Based Practice. Cancer Nursing. 2012; 35(6): E30-E38. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31823d52b710.1097/ncc.0b013e31823d52b7 https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0b013e31823d52b7
  16. ReidJScottDSantinO. Evaluation of a Psychoeducational intervention for patients with Advanced Cancer who have Cachexia and their lay Carers (EPACaCC): Study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014; 70(5): 1174-1183. doi: 10.1111/ jan.12268
  17. FearonKStrasserFAnkerSD. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncology. 2011; 12(5): 489-495. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-710.1016/s1470-2045(10)70218-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70218-7
  18. MillarCPorterSReidJ. Healthcare professionals’ response to cachexia in advanced cancer: A qualitative study. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2013; 40(6): E393-E402. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E393-E40210.1188/13.onf.e393-e402 https://doi.org/10.1188/13.onf.e393-e402