Pulmonary Research and Respiratory Medicine · Vol. 2, No. 1 · 2015 · pp. 52–62 · e-ISSN 2377-1658

Role of MicroRNAs in Progression and Recurrence of Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

Rama K. Singh, Drew C. Bethune, Zhaolin Xu, Susan E. Douglas

National Research Council Halifax, 1411 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 3Z1, CanadaCanada
Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, 1278 Tower Rd., Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, CanadaCanada
Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie Univer- sity, 5788 University Ave., Halifax, NS, B3H 1V8, CanadaCanada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/prrmoj-2-108 · Published 2015-02-18 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2015 The Author(s)

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the majority of cases (77%) are not diagnosed until the disease has spread to regional lymph nodes or distant sites. Even among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) adenocarcinoma patients who have been diagnosed early and where there has been no spread to lymph nodes, recurrence after surgical intervention is high. Improved understanding of the molecular alterations involved in aggressivity and recurrence of these tumors may provide better biomarkers for the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. By comparing the expression of microRNAs in advanced Stage II/III tumors with those expressed in earlier Stage I tumors, we aimed to identify differentially expressed molecular biomarkers that could underly progression and recurrence of Stage I tumors. This pilot study utilized TaqMan qPCR assays to assess the expression of microRNAs in tumor tissue, matched normal tissue and plasma samples from Stage I and Stage II/III lung adenocarcinoma patients. Seven microRNAs were identified from plasma that could distinguish between patients with Stage I and Stage II/III adenocarcinoma. The up-regulation of miR-29a in plasma of patients with later-stage adenocarcinoma would result in enhanced expression of several molecules involved in integrin signaling, migration and proliferation. Analysis of differential expression of microRNAs in later-stage compared to early-stage lung adenocarcinoma implicates focal adhesion and ECM-receptor pathways in progression and recurrence. Plasma miR-29a is a promising biomarker that can be assessed non-invasively and whose clinical utility should be pursued.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; Biomarker; microRNAs; Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Recurrence; Transcriptome; Recur- rence

Introduction

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for 1.59 million of the 8.2 million total cancer deaths each year.1 NSCLC accounts for ~80% of all lung cancers, and adenocarcinoma is the main histological subtype. Smoking is responsible for 87% of lung cancers in the United States, and the majority of NSCLC adenocarcinomas. While historically, cigarette smoking was associated with NSCLC squamous cell lung cancer, since the transition to filtered cigarettes there has been a rise in the number of adeocarcinomas among smokers. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage that is associated with high recurrence and less than 15% survival over 5 years. Even for patients with Stage I disease who have had a complete surgical resection, the 5-year survival is only 52%,2 mostly because of recurrence. This suggests that Stage I tumors can be misclassified, especially when lymph node metastases are small and escape detection. Furthermore, intratumor heterogeneity may not be detected by standard singlesite biopsy, leading to inaccurate classification and prognosis.3,4 Classification and staging by Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM)5 have only modest prognostic utility and patients with resected Stage IA tumors of identical histology, differentiation, vascular invasion, and margins may differ widely in their survival time and response to therapy. The use of alternative sources of biopsy material that reflect tumor heterogeneity, such as readily available blood or plasma, may provide valuable information.

Cells and cellular nucleic acids in sputum, bronchial biopsies, brushing specimens, bronchial lavage fluid, blood, pleural effusions and solid tumor biopsies provide material for classification, diagnosis and prognosis of NSCLC. Several cellular tumor markers have been shown to be useful in prognosis of lung cancer including positive immunohistochemical staining of mTOR in early stage NSCLC,7 overexpression of Apolipoprotein E in lung adenocarcinomas with malignant pleural effusion,8 and overexpression of SOX2 in Stage I adenocarcinomas, especially those with pleural invasion.9 Recently, a 14-gene expression assay has been developed to examine recurrence risk in early-stage NSCLC.

Small non-coding RNAs such as snoRNAs11 and microRNAs (“oncomirs”)12 are a promising class of cancer biomarkers. The expression profiles of these highly stable molecules in tumor tissue and/or plasma have been associated with occurrence of NSCLC, tumor tissue type, stage of differentiation, and prognosis (for review see ). microRNAs are generally down-regulated in tumor tissue compared to matched normal tissue. However, tumor-derived microRNAs are found within exosomes or in free circulation in the plasma of cancer patients14 and have been shown to be generally up-regulated compared to plasma from normal donors.15 A panel of four plasma microR- NAs (mir-486, -30d, -1 and -499) was recently shown to discriminate between NSCLC patients with good and poor prognosis.15 Serum levels of miR-142-3p and miR-29b were elevated months.16

There is an urgent need for better understanding of the molecular alterations that occur during progression of earlystage lung adenocarcinoma, and more reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Such biomarkers could improve survival by identifying patients at high risk for recurrence who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report a pilot study that determines microRNA profiles in tumors and plasma from patients with Stage I and Stage II/III adenocarcinoma, the most common form of NSCLC, and relate these findings to the biological processes that may be involved in early recurrence.

Materials And Methods

Study population

Patient biopsy samples (frozen tumor and plasma) from Stage I (with no lymph node involvement) and Stage II/III (with 3,4 lymph node involvement) were selected from the Lung Cancer Tumor Bank at Capital District Health Authority (CDHA; Halifax, NS, Canada). In order to limit the clinical variability as much as possible, a uniform study population was used based on the following criteria: adenocarcinoma, age >45 years; all but one were current or past smokers (Table 1).

Smoking Recurrence ID Stage Age Gender Status (months)

L202 IB 76 Male Current 6 L218 IA 65 Male Past L247 IB 77 Male Past L252 IA 81 Male Past L272 IA 79 Female Past L278 IA 69 Male Past

L194 IIA 53 Male Past 12.8 L212 IIA 71 Male Current L229 IIA 66 Male Past 8.9 L240 IIA 74 Male Past L258 IIIA 45 Male Never L262 IIA 76 Female Past a L300a IIB 54 Female Past 13 aremoved from analyses due to high hemolysis in plasma samples.

Table 1. Patient characteristics and samples used for microRNA analysis.

Most cases of adenocarcinoma are associated with smoking, and these were highly represented in the Tumor Bank. Recurrence is the time in months from surgery until detection of recurrence. Control plasma (Precision Biologics, Dartmouth, NS, Canada) contained pooled plasma from 20 healthy subjects. This study was approved by the Capital Health Research Ethics Board (CDHA-RS/2004-336), and all participating individuals

RNA extraction

Approximately 50 mg of frozen lung tissue was pulverized in a MultiSample BioPulverizer (BioSpec, Bartlesville, OK, USA) and homogenized in 1 mL TRIZOL® (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) using a FastPrep®-24 (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol and treated with TURBO DNase (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) prior to further purification with the Total RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotech Corp., Thorold, ON, Canada). RNA was purified from 300 μL of plasma using the Total RNA Purification Kit and both preparations were enriched for small RNAs using the PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada). The RNA was quantified on the NanoDrop-1000 (NanoDrop Products, Wilmington, DE, USA) and RNA quality was determined on the Bioanalyzer-2100 (Agilent, Wilmington, DE, USA).

MicroRNA assay of tissue and plasma

The miRNA PCR Array for Cancer (MAH-102F; SA Biosciences, Burlington, ON, Canada) containing 88 cancerrelevant microRNA-probes and 8 controls in a 96-well plate was employed to assess expression of microRNAs in pooled plasma samples of five Stage I (L202, 218, 247, 252 and 278) and five Stage II (194, 212, 229, 240 and 262) lung adenocarcinoma patients compared to pooled normal plasma (Precision Biologics). RNA was purified from 300 μL of plasma (60 μL each of five individual samples from each stage). 200 ng enriched small RNA was reverse-transcribed using the RT² First Strand Kit (SA Biosciences, Burlington, ON, Canada) and qPCR was performed on a Light Cycler-480 (Roche Applied Science, Laval, QC, Canada) using conditions specified by the manufacturer. Fold regulation was calculated from 2nd derivative Cp values using the SA Biosciences web-based qPCR analysis software (http:// pcrdataanalysis.sabiosciences.com/pcr/arrayanalysis.php) and SNORD48 was used as a reference.

Based on the results of the PCR array (Supp Table 1) and literature survey, a multiplex TaqMan® microRNA Assay (Applied Biosystems) was designed for 31 microRNAs that were at least two-fold up-regulated in cancer relative to control (Supp Table 2). RNU48 was used as a reference, allowing all 32 reactions to be performed in triplicate in 96-well plates. Expression was evaluated in an expanded group of six Stage I and seven Stage II/III tissue and plasma samples. Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the TaqMan® microRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) and qPCR reactions were cycled on a LightCycler-480 once at 95 °C for 10 min; 45 times at 95 °C for 15 sec, 60 °C for 60 sec; and once at 40 °C for 30 sec. Individual samples contained 1 μL cDNA, 5 μL of 2X qPCR mix and 1 μL of microRNA-specific TaqMan Probe/Primer mix in a 10 μL total reaction volume. For tumor samples, matched normal tissue samples in triplicate were used as controls and for plasma, pooled normal samples were used.

dently in triplicate reactions and the average was used.

Normalized data was analyzed by Student’s t-test and nd p-values were based on replicate 2nd derivative Cp values for ® each microRNA in the control group and patient group. Those ® microRNAs that were associated with high p-values (>0.05) were assigned as missing values. The Student’s t-test and SAM modules of MeV17 were then used to identify microRNAs that were significantly differentially expressed between the Stage I and Stage II/III samples. MicroRNA expression was analyzed nd from 2nd derivative Cp values using SA Bioscience web-based PCR data analysis software (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and the stably expressed RNU48 and miR-210 to normalize for tissue and plasma samples, respectively. Targets for microRNAs were identified by searching miRDB (www.mirDB.org). The list of microRNA targets with a score greater than 80 was used to identify KEGG pathways potentially involved in progression using gene enrichment analysis in WebGestalt (http://bioinfo. vanderbilt.edu/webgestalt).

Results

In order to identify clinically relevant microRNA biomarkers, we screened 88 cancer-relevant microRNAs by array. We selected those that were up-regulated at least two-fold in plasma of lung adenocarcinoma patients relative to plasma from pooled normal subjects as these would be most easily detectable in a clinical assay. Sixty-eight microRNAs were up-regulated in plasma of NSCLC patients relative to normal subjects. Of these 44 microRNAs showed a higher level in Stage II/III vs. Stage I, 17 showed a lower level in Stage II/III vs. Stage I, and 7 did not differ between Stage II/III and Stage I (Table 2).

nd Of these, 20 for which there was corroborating evidence in the literature were chosen for TaqMan assays along with 11 other well-supported microRNAs from the literature (miR-17- 3p, 34a, 92a, 106a, 141, 182, 201, 218, 221, 451 and 486-5p; Supp Table 2).

® Expression data for these 31 microRNAs were obtained using TaqMan assays for all tissue/matched normal samples and all but one plasma sample (L300 plasma was unusable due to a high level of lysed erythrocytes and was excluded from analysis). Several microRNAs (miR-17-3p, 141, 143, 205 and 218) exhibited inconsistent, often low, signal intensities in most plasma samples (grey boxes, Figure 1).

® microRNAs were mostly down-regulated in tumor samples relative to normal adjacent tissue but up-regulated in plasma relative to control pooled plasma from normal subjects (Figure 1, Supp Table 3) . The single Stage IIIA sample (L258) exhibited generally higher, but not statistically significant, upregulation of plasma microRNAs than the other samples.

There were no statistically significant differences in

Up-regulated in plasma of patients relative to normal Down-regulated or same relative to normal

Up Stg II/III vs. Stg I Down StgII/III vs. StgI Same Stg2II/III vs. StgI

let-7g let-7i let-7b miR-124 miR-125a-5p miR-1 let-7c miR-127-5p miR-125b miR-100 let-7e miR-146b-5p miR-133b miR-126 let-7f miR-23b miR-134 miR-130a miR-10a miR-25 miR-135b miR-132 miR-10b miR-373 miR-149 miR-140-5p miR-128 miR-142-5p miR-138 miR-143 miR-155 miR-144 miR-15b miR-146a miR-183 miR-148a miR-199a-3p miR-148b miR-200c miR-15a miR-21 miR-16 miR-7 miR-17 miR-98 miR-181a miR-181b miR-181c miR-181d miR-18a miR-191 miR-193a-5p miR-19a miR-203 miR-205 miR-20a miR-20b miR-214 miR-215 miR-222 miR-27a miR-27b miR-29a miR-29b miR-301a miR-30c miR-32 miR-335 miR-363 miR-372 miR-378 miR-96

let-7d miR-122

miR-150 miR-184 miR-18b miR-193b miR-196a miR-196a miR-206 miR-210 miR-212 miR-218 miR-34c-5p miR-9 miR-92a

However, SAM analysis identified seven plasma microRNAs that could distinguish between patients with Stage I and Stage II/III lung adenocarcinoma (Figure 2).

Four of these (miR-25, 32, 142-5p, and 148a) approached significance (p<0.1) and miR-29a was identified at p<0.01 by t-test (Table 3).

Expression of 31 miRNAs in tumor relative to matched normal tissue and patient plasma relative to pooled control plasma from six patients each with StageI and Stage II/III NSCLC adenocarcinoma. Red, up-regulated; green, down-regulated; grey, high p-values (>0.05) were

Figure 1. Heat map of miRNA expression in tumor tissue. Significantly differentially expressed plasma miRNAs identified by SAM analysis. Those marked with a single asterisk or double asterisk were also identified as significant by t-test (p<0.1 and p<0.01, respectively). Red, up-regulated; green, down-regulated; grey, high p-values (>0.05) were assigned as missing data. Log2 ratios are presented.

Searching miRDB for targets of these seven microRNAs that were up-regulated in Stage II/III compared to Stage I patients resulted in 416 unique targets with a score greater than 80 in the human genome (Supp Table 4). Enrichment analysis of these targets identified five major KEGG pathways: cancer, focal adhesion, ECM-receptor, p53 signalling, and MAPK signaling pathway (Supp Table 5). The highest-scoring cancer-relevant targets are shown in Table 3.

assigned as missing data. Log2 ratios are presented.

microRNA Score Gene

miR-29a** 100 TET3 Tet oncogene family member 3 n/a 99 COL3A1 98 HBP1 HMG-box transcription factor Invasion 95 TET2 Tet oncogene family member 2 n/a 93 IGF1 91 COL11A1 91 FBN1 89 COL4A5 88 COL4A4

miR-32* 100 CD69 96 FBXW7 F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 Proliferation 95 RAB23 RAB23, RAS oncogene family Invasion 93 MYO1B

miR-25* 98 CD69 97 RAB23 RAB23, RAS oncogene family Invasion 92 MYO1B 90 FBXW7 F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 Proliferation

miR-142-5p* 100 MEGF1 Multiple EGF-like domains 10 (FAT2) Invasion 100 ITGAV 98 BAI3 Brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 3 n/a 96 CHSY3 96 PSAT1 Phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 Proliferation 93 IGF2BP3

miR-148a* 96 EIF2C4 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2C, 4 Invasion 96 YWHAB Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase activation protein beta Proliferation 91 FLT1 Fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 Invasion

miR-27a 100 GXYLT1 Glucoside xylosyltransferase 1 Cell communication 99 PLK2 96 SNAP25 Synaptosomal-associated protein, 25 n/a 96 FBXW7 F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 Proliferation 96 PPARG Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Proliferation 95 ST6GAL ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltrans- Invasion, proliferation

93 GALNT7 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D galactosamine:polypeptide N Invasion, proliferation

miR-140-5p 97 FGF9 91 SEPT2 89 FBN1

Table 3. Cancer-relevant targets of plasma microRNAs that distinguish between Stage I and Stage II/III tumors. microRNAs were identified using SAM and those marked with a single or double asterisk were significant by t-Test (p<0.1 and p<0.01, respectively). Targets were identified by searching miRDB. n/a, no direct role in NSCLC.

Description Function in Cancer Name

Collagen, type III, alpha 1 Invasion

Insulin-like growth factor 1 Proliferation Collagen, type XI, alpha 1 Invasion Fibrillin 1 Invasion Collagen, type IV, alpha 5 Invasion Collagen, type IV, alpha 4 Invasion

CD69 receptor for NK cells Anti-tumor immunity

Myosin 1B Invasion

CD69 receptor for NK cells Anti-tumor immunity

Myosin 1B Invasion

Integrin alpha V Invasion

Chondroitin sulfate synthase Proliferation

IGF2 mRNA binding protein Proliferation

Polo-like kinase 2 Proliferation

NAC3 ferase 3

acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 7

Fibroblast growth factor 9 Proliferation Septin2 Invasion Fibrillin 1 Invasion

Discussion

In this study, we found a consistent down-regulation of microRNAs in tumor compared to adjacent normal tissue and up-regulation of plasma microRNAs from lung cancer patients relative to normal controls. Of the 31 microRNAs included in the TaqMan assay, most were consistently detectable; however five microRNAs had highly variable, often low, values between triplicates, giving a low p-value. Two of these, miR-17-3p and 205, have been reported to have very weak intensities in plasma and serum.18 There was a slightly lower overall expression of tumor microRNAs and corresponding higher overall expression of plasma microRNAs for the youngest patient (L258), but this was not statistically significant. This patient was also the only non-smoker and had the most advanced stage (IIIA). Although biological features of the patient can impact microRNA levels, it would be difficult to draw any valid conclusions concerning microRNA dysregulation based on these features from the results of a single patient.

We were unable to detect any statistically significant changes in tumor tissue microRNAs between Stage I and Stage II/III patients. However, patient plasma did exhibit several microRNAs (miR-25, 27, 29a, 32, 140-5p, 142-5p, and 148a) that could distinguish between patients with Stage I and Stage II/III lung adenocarcinoma, with miR-29a being the most statistically significant (p<0.01). Since plasma is a more easily accessible biopsy material, plasma profiles rather than tissue profiles were used to investigate alterations in cancer pathways.

There is limited information on the expression of these

microRNA Gene target Function

miR-29a nd Invasion

miR-142-5p MEGF (FAT2) Invasion

miR-148a MMP7 Invasion

miR-27a GALNT7* Invasion, proliferation Cervical 44 miR-140-5p SEPT2 Proliferation Liver 47

Table 4. microRNAs dysregulated in this study that have been reported to be prognostic or have targets that function in other cancer types. Only in the case of miR-29a and MMP2 (shaded) have the microRNA and target gene been demonstrated to be co-regulated in the other tumor types. *GALNT7 regulation in cervical cancer is associated with miR-214 expression. nd, not determined.

microRNAs and their target genes in other solid tumor types. There have, however, been some studies describing these microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers and others describing the same genes targeted by the dysregulated microRNAs we have identified. These studies mainly include tumors associated with the digestive system (particularly colorectal) and lend support to our findings (Table 4).

Similar to lung adenocarcinoma, expression of miR-29a is also down-regulated in gastric tumors19 and oral squamous carcinoma,20 resulting in increased expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase2 (MMP2) in the latter case. MMP2 degrades extracellular matrix and promotes tumor invasiveness. In Stage II colorectal cancer, down-regulated tissue miR-29a is associated with high recurrence21 and elevated plasma levels are associated with advanced stage.22 Consistent with our results, the miR-29 family has been reported to be down-regulated in NSCLC tu- 23,24 mors relative to normal tissue and up-regulated in serum of early stage lung adenocarcinoma patients who recurred within 24 months.16 We also found miR-142-5p to be up-regulated in plasma of later-stage patients. This microRNA is derived from the same precursor as miR-142-3p, which is significantly upregulated in serum of early stage lung adenocarcinoma patients who recurred within 24 months16 and in plasma of patients with aggressive NSCLC.25

Of the gene targets of differentially regulated microR- NAs listed in Table 3, several do not have a known direct role in NSCLC and are not discussed. These include Brain-specific Angiogenesis Inhibitor (BAI3), SNAP25 (involved in neurotransmitter release) and TET2 and TET3 oncogenes (epigenetic regu-

Tumor type Reference

Gastric 21 MMP2 Invasion, apoptosis Oral squamous 22 nd Prognosis Colorectal 23 nd Early detection Colorectal 24 COL11A1 Progression Gastric 28 COL11A1 Cancer-associated stromal cells Colorectal 29 Squamous carcinoma 35 PSAT Proliferation Colorectal 36 IGF2BP3 Prognosis Colorectal 38 IGF2BP3 Prognosis Pancreatic ductal 40 CHSY3 Invasion Colorectal 39 Gastric 21 EIF2C4 Metastasis Colorectal 42

lators in malignant hematopoiesis).26

The remaining gene targets have roles in ECM-receptor interactions, focal adhesion, cell motility and migration, angiogenesis, protein modification, invasion, proliferation, cell signalling and NK-cell anti-tumor immunity (Figure 3).

This is in agreement with a recent microarray study we performed on the same tumor biopsies27 in which ECM-receptor interactions and components of the focal adhesion pathway were the main elements differentially regulated between early and later-stage lung adenocarcinomas.

miR-29a targets collagens COL3A1, COL11A1, CO- L4A5, and COL4A4, and Fibrillin1 (FBN1), which participate in integrin signaling, focal adhesion and migration. In gastric cancer, transcripts for several collagens, including COLA11A1, are also up-regulated in malignant compared to pre-malignant tumors28 and COLA11A1 is also up-regulated in cancer-associated fibroblasts of colon adenocarcinomas.29 Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF1) is a key player in NSCLC tumorigenesis and metastasis,30 initiating cell signaling, promoting mitosis, proliferation and differentiation, and inhibiting apoptosis. HBP1 is a transcriptional repressor that plays a role in Wnt signaling and induces cellular transformation.31 Reduction in tumor tissue miR-29a would result in enhanced IGF-1 and Wnt signalling.

Interestingly, we found two microRNAs (miR-25 and miR-32) that both targeted the same four genes (CD69, FBXW7, RAB23 and MYO1B). As with any biomarker discovery, there is high potential for false positives due to the large number of variables relative to the number of patient samples. Therefore, Gene targets are represented by colored boxes with colors indicating microRNA involved. If the gene is targeted by more than one microRNA a gradient of the appropriate color is applied. The tumor cell membrane is intracellular or membrane-bound. Names of pathways are shown in bold italic font.

Figure 3. Cancer pathways affected by microRNAs differentially regulated this overlap in targets suggests that these microRNAs and their target transcripts warrant further investigation as biomarkers in early lung adenocarcinoma. Their higher expression in plasma and concomitant low expression in tumor tissue would promote translation of the hedgehog-signalling factor, RAB23 and the

cytoskeletal protein MYO1B, which are necessary for cell motility and metastasis.32 FBXW7 is part of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and targets cyclin E for degradation, thus impacting cell proliferation.

microRNAs in the plasma can affect immune cell function. CD69 is a marker of NK-cell activation and a positive regulator of anti-tumor activity.33 It has been shown that administration of several synthetic microRNAs or microRNAs in exosomes from healthy donors to NK-cells and mice bearing tumors resulted in TLR1 activation and increased NF-kB signaling. This resulted in increased NK-cell activation via upregulation of CD69 and increased anti-tumor immunity.34 However, high plasma levels of miR-32 and -25, which repress CD69 expression, would result in reduced NK-cell anti-tumor activity leading to tumor progression.

miR-142-5p targets MEGF1 (FAT2), which mediates migration of human cutaneous squamous carcinoma cells,35 and PSAT1, which has been shown to stimulate proliferation in colorectal cancer.36 miR-142-5p also targets ITGAV and its reduction in tumor tissue would result in an increase in ITGAV. Interestingly, miR-32 and miR-25 also target ITGAV37 and miR-32 is reported to be down-regulated in another lung cancer study.23 CHSY3 and IGF2BP3 are two other relevant targets of miR-142- -5p and both are over-expressed in colorectal cancer patients rel- 38,39 ative to healthy controls. CHSY3 is responsible for sulfation represented by a blue line and targets are shown as extracellular,

in NSCLC progression.

of glycosaminoglycans on the cell surface and shows elevated expression in colorectal cancer;39 IGF2BP3 has been suggested as a biomarker of poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.40

miR-148a, like miR-29a, is down-regulated in gastric cancer and has a major impact on the expression of MMP7 and invasiveness.19 miR-148a also targets FLT1, the receptor for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGFR1) and thus could play an important role in tumor angiogenesis. Decreased levels of tumor miR-148a would result in higher levels of FLT1 available for angiogenic signaling. NSCLC tumors expressing FLT1 are more malignant and associated with poorer outcomes.41 Similarly, higher levels of YWHAB, a 14-3-3 protein involved in cell cycle control and inhibition of apoptosis, would result in a more malignant phenotype. EIF2C4 is an argonaute protein in the RNA-induced silencing complex. Argonaute proteins are upregulated in colon cancer and higher levels are associated with distant metastasis.42

Two other microRNAs that showed statistically significant differential expression by SAM (but not t-test) target key genes of importance in cancer progression. miR-27a regulates expression of three enzymes that participate in post-secondary modification of important proteins (GXYLT1, GALNT7, ST6GALNAC3). GXYLT1 glycosylates NOTCH proteins and reduces cancer signalling43 whereas GALNT7 and ST6GAL- NAC3 glycosylate mucins, thus impacting proliferation, migration, and invasion. Oncogenesis in cervical cancer cells is effected through miR-214 regulation of GALNT7.44 PPAR-γ is a nuclear hormone receptor that is involved in cell proliferation and is over-expressed in many human cancers. It has recently been shown to prevent metastasis in lung cancer cells by inhibiting TGF-β induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.45 PLK2 is a serine-threonine protein kinase that is essential for cell division.46 miR-140-5p, like miR-29a, targets FBN1. SEPT2, which plays an important role regulation of cell proliferation through its effect on actin filament formation and has been suggested as a target for liver cancer therapy,47 is also a target of miR-140-5p. The growth factor FGF9 is also involved in cell proliferation and can synergize with the EGFR oncogenic pathway in lung adenocarcinoma48 leading to recurrence.49

The use of microRNAs as clinical biomarkers is increasingly being described in the literature.50 They are highly stable in circulating blood plasma and can be readily isolated. They are tissue-specific and their expression can be dysregulated in response to physiological changes such as disease. Furthermore, they play a key role in differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis making them ideal diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers in cancer. Although there are some published studies describing microRNA signatures associated with recurrence in lung cancer, they tend to include lung cancer patients with multiple NSCLC tumor types and from multiple stages. It is well known that different types of NSCLC (such as squamous

and adenocarcinoma) express different miRNAs. In our smallscale study, we have restricted our comparison to only adenocarcinomas of Stage I and Stage II/III in order to more accurately identify plasma microRNAs likely to be involved in recurrence in early-stage patients. Of the six Stage I and six Stage II/III patients studied, recurrences only occurred in two patients both of whom were Stage II.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study indicates that several micro- RNAs that distinguish between Stage I and Stage II/III patients are involved in the regulation of important pathways in cancer biology including focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interactions, p53 signalling, and MAPK signaling pathway. Because of the small number of samples in this study, their role in lung adenocarcinoma should be verified in a larger patient cohort. Their presence in plasma provides a readily accessible biofluid for clinical testing and the significant up-regulation of miR-29a indicates it could be a promising biomarker.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Jeffrey Gallant and Evelyn Teh, and bioinformatic analysis by Susanne Penny, National Research Council (NRC). We thank John Fris, database manager of the Lung Tumor Bank at Capital District Health Authority, for collating clinical annotations. Funding was provided by NRC and Dalhousie University Departments of Pathology and Surgery.

References

  1. WHO. Cancer Fact Sheet 297, 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ Accessed 2015
  2. ReedMFMolloyMDaltonELHowingtonJA. Survival after resection for lung cancer is the outcome that matters. Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 598-602. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. amjsurg.2004.07.03710.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.037
  3. ZhangJFujimotoJWedgeDC. Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing. Science. 2014; 346: 256-259. doi: 10.1126/ science.1256930
  4. SeoaneJDe Mattos-ArrudaL. The challenge of intratumour heterogeneity in precision medicine. J Intern Med. 2014; 276: 41-51. doi: 10.1111/joim.1224010.1111/joim.12240 https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12240
  5. TsimSO’DowdCAMilroyRDavidsonS. Staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A review. Respir. Med. 2010; 104: 1767-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.08.005 15,51,5210.1016/j.rmed.2010.08.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2010.08.005
  6. HoldenriederSStieberP. Circulating apoptotic markers in the management of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biomarkers. 2009; 6: 197-210. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2009-013010.3233/cbm-2009-0130 https://doi.org/10.3233/cbm-2009-0130
  7. DhillonTMauriFABellezzaG. Overexpression of the mammalian target of rapamycin: a novel biomarker for poor survival in resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5: 314-319. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ce660410.1097/jto.0b013e3181ce6604 https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181ce6604
  8. SuWPChenYTLaiWWLinCCYanJJSuWC. Apolipoprotein E expression promotes lung adenocarcinoma proliferation and migration and as a potential survival marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011; 71: 28-33. doi: 10.1016/j. lungcan.2010.04.00910.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.009
  9. ShollLMBarlettaJAYeapBYChirieacLRHornickJL. Sox2 protein expression is an independent poor prognostic indicator in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34: 1193-1198. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e5e02410.1097/pas.0b013e3181e5e024 https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e3181e5e024
  10. WoodardGAGubensMAJahanTM. Prognostic molecular assay might improve identification of patients at risk for recurrence in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014; 15: 426-432. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.07.00410.1016/j.cllc.2014.07.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2014.07.004
  11. LiaoJYuLMeiY. Small nucleolar RNA signatures as biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2010; 9: 198-208. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-19810.1186/1476-4598-9-198 https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-198
  12. Esquela-KerscherASlackFJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006; 6: 259-269. doi: 10.1038/nrc184010.1038/nrc1840 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1840
  13. ShenJJiangF. Applications of microRNAs in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. 2012; 6: 197-207
  14. OhshimaKInoueKFujiwaraA. Let-7 microRNA family is selectively secreted into the extracellular environment via exosomes in a metastatic gastric cancer cell line. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e13247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.001324710.1371/journal.pone.0013247 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013247
  15. HuZChenXZhaoY. Serum microRNA signatures identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiling predict survival of non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28: 1721-1726. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.934210.1200/jco.2009.24.9342 https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.24.9342
  16. KaduthanamSGadeSMeisterM. Serum miR-142- 3p is associated with early relapse in operable lung adenocarcinoma patients. Lung Cancer. 2013; 80: 223-227. doi: 10.1016/j. lungcan.2013.01.01310.1016/j.lungcan.2013.01.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.01.013