A Crohn’s Conundrum: Can the Faecal Calprotectin Level Act as a Sensitive Cut-off to Prevent Unnecessary MRI Small Bowel Scans?

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Faraz Hosseini-Ardehali BPharm, MBBS, MRCP, MD Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK
  • Kapila Jain BPharm, MBBS, MRCP, MD Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK
  • Rob Mead, BPharm BPharm, MBBS, MRCP, MD Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-2-117

Keywords:

Crohn’s disease, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);, Faecal calprotectin

Abstract

Background: Current gastroenterology practice in evaluating those with diarrhoeal symptoms
and a positive faecal calprotectin (CP) is to perform colonoscopy. Colonoscopy however is
limited, in that it cannot exclude disease proximal to the terminal ileum. Therefore, for many
patients not known to have Crohn’s disease, gastroenterologists are often concerned about the
possibility of more proximal small bowel Crohn’s and request an magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) small bowel scan.
Aims: This is the first study to investigate whether patients with a clinical suspicion of Crohn’s
but with a normal colonoscopy will benefit from MRI in terms of diagnostic evaluation if they
have a CP below the cut-off.
Method: MRI small bowel reports, CP levels and colonoscopy reports were analysed (where
obtainable) from 422 scans at a district general hospital in Stevenage, between 02/04/2015 and
21/07/2017. Eighty-five patients had features suggestive of Crohn’s but had normal colonoscopy
findings. These were divided into those who had a CP above or below 600.
Results: Within 55 patients who had a calprotectin below 600, we report that none (0%) of
these patients were found to have significantly positive findings for Crohn’s on subsequent
MRI. Amongst 30 patients with a positive CP, 8 (26.6%) were found to have active disease on
MRI. The sensitivity of calprotectin was therefore identified to be 100% (95% CI 63.06% to
100%) and the specificity of the test was 71.43 % (95% CI 60% to 81.15%). Negative predictive
value (NPV) was 1.00 and positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.27.
Conclusion: Our study is the first to suggest that in patients with features of Crohn’s who have
a normal colonoscopy, calprotectin performs impressively as a sensitive marker of the presence
of small bowel inflammation on subsequent MRI. Further prospective studies would be needed
to validate a potential approach of using the biomarker as a cut-off to reduce unnecessary MRI
small bowel scans.

References

Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, et al. 3rd European evi-dence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of crohn’s disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and medical manage-ment. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2017; 11(1): 3-25. doi: 10.1093/ec-co-jcc/jjw168

Sempere GAJ, Martinez Sanjuan V, Medina Chulia E, et al. MRI evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(6): 1829-1835. doi: 10.2214/ ajr.184.6.01841829

Tolan DJM, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, Halligan S, Taylor SA. MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2010; 30(2): 367-384. doi: 10.1148/ rg.302095028

Del Vescovo R, Sansoni I, Caviglia R, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum: Differentiation of activity of Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging. 2008; 33(4): 417-424. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9267-4

Lescut D, Vanco D, Bonnière P, et al. Perioperative endoscopy of the whole small bowel in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1993; 34(5): 647-649. doi: 10.1136/GUT.34.5.647

Tibble JJ, Teahon KK, Thjodleifsson BB, et al. A simple meth-od for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2000; 47(4): 506-513. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.4.506

Kawashima K, Ishihara S, Yuki T, et al. Fecal calprotectin more accurately predicts endoscopic remission of Crohnʼs dis-ease than serological biomarkers evaluated using balloon-as-sisted enteroscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017: 1. doi: 10.1097/ MIB.0000000000001202

van Rheenen PF, Van de Vijver E, Fidler V. Faecal calprotec-tin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010; 341: c3369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3369

Summerton CB, Longlands MG, Wiener K, Shreeve DR. Fae-cal calprotectin: A marker of inflammation throughout the intes-tinal tract. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 14(8): 841-845. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200208000-00005

von Roon AC, Karamountzos L, Purkayastha S, et al. Diag-nostic Precision of Fecal Calprotectin for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(4): 803-813. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01126.x

Røseth AG, Aadland E, Grzyb K. Normalization of faecal calprotectin: A predictor of mucosal healing in patients with in-flammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004; 39(10): 1017-1020. doi: 10.1080/00365520410007971

Costa F, Mumolo MG, Bellini M, et al. Role of faecal cal-protectin as non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation. Dig Liver Dis. 2003; 35(9): 642-647. doi: 10.1016/S1590- 8658(03)00381-5

Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnet-ic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011; 17(5): 1073-1080. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21533

Yoon K, Chang KT, Lee HJ. MRI for Crohn’s dis-ease: Present and future. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/786802

Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in il-eocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009; 58(8): 1113-1120. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.167957

Samuel S, Bruining DH, Loftus E V, et al. Endoscopic skip-ping of the distal terminal ileum in Crohn’s disease can lead to negative results from ileocolonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepa-tol. 2012; 10(11): 1253-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.026

Lalkhen AG, McCluskey A. Clinical tests: Sensitivity and specificity. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008; 8(6): 221-223. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041

RCR. RCR Submission to HEE workforce planning round 2015-16. 2015. Web site. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/ files/documents/hee_evidence_2015-16_clinical_radiology.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2017.

Ma C, Fedorak RN, Kaplan GG, et al. Clinical, endoscopic and radiographic outcomes with ustekinumab in medically-re-fractory Crohn’s disease: Real world experience from a mul-ticentre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 45(9): 1232- 1243. doi: 10.1111/apt.14016

Published

2017-11-08

How to Cite

Faraz Hosseini-Ardehali, Kapila Jain, & Rob Mead, BPharm. (2017). A Crohn’s Conundrum: Can the Faecal Calprotectin Level Act as a Sensitive Cut-off to Prevent Unnecessary MRI Small Bowel Scans?. Radiology, 2(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-2-117