Relative Ratio of Coracohumeral Distance is Greater in Patients with Subcoracoid Impingement (SCI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-2-115Keywords:
Shoulder, Subcoracoid impingement (SCI), Ultrasound, Coracohumeral distance.Abstract
Purpose: No standard imaging diagnostic criteria have yet been established for subcoracoid
impingement (SCI) of the shoulder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate coracohumeral
distance (CHD) in patients with or without SCI with the hypothesis that patients with SCI
would have narrower CHD.
Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty patients with subacromial impingement (SAI) were
evaluated. The subjects with subcoracoid impingement which was affirmed clinically and confirmed
by ultrasound guided subcoracoid injection (n=39) was compared with patients with
SAI only (n=111). Patients with stiffness and rotator cuff tear were excluded. Absolute CHD
was measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial images and on ultrasound with
the humerus in neutral position and internal rotation. Also relative ratio of distance difference
(RRDD) defined as the difference of CHD in neutral position and internal rotation compared
with absolute CHD in neutral on ultrasound was also measured.
Results: The distance measured in neutral position was similar between ultrasound (US) imaging
and MRI (p>0.05) and both measurements did not have significant difference between the
two groups (p>0.05). On ultrasound, there was no significant difference in CHD in neutral and
the internal rotation position between the two groups. However, RRDD value was significantly
greater in SCI group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Although, the SCI group and the SAI group were not matched for age, sex, or
BMI, no significant difference in CHD was seen between the SCI and SAI groups. RRDD value
was greater in SCI group suggesting that individualized CHD in internal rotation should be
taken into account when assessing patients with subcoracoid impingement.
References
Ferrick MR. Coracoid impingement. A case report and re-view of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 117-119. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280010501
Gerber C, Terrier F, Ganz R. The role of the coracoid process in the chronic impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67: 703-708.
Dumontier C, Sautet A, Gagey O, Apoil A. Rotator interval lesions and their relation to coracoid impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 130-135. doi: 10.1016/S1058- 2746(99)90005-8
Lo IK, Parten PM, Burkhart SS. Combined subcoracoid and subacromial impingement in association with anterosuperior ro-tator cuff tears: An arthroscopic approach. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 1068-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.016
Nove-Josserand L, Edwards TB, O’Connor DP, Walch G. The acromiohumeral and coracohumeral intervals are ab-normal in rotator cuff tears with muscular fatty degenera-tion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005: 90-96. doi: 10.1097/01. blo.0000151441.05180.0e
Martetschläger F, Rios D, Boykin RE, Giphart JE, Waha A, Millett PJ. Coracoid impingement: Current concepts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. 20(11): 2148-2155. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2013-7
Park JY, Lhee SH, Oh KS, Kim NR, Hwang JT. Is arthroscop-ic coracoplasty necessary in subcoracoid impingement syn-drome? Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 1766-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.ar-thro.2012.06.013
Giaroli EL, Major NM, Lemley DE, Lee J. Coracohumeral interval imaging in subcoracoid impingement syndrome on MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186: 242-246. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.04.0830
Masala S, Fanucci E, Maiotti M, et al. Impingement syndrome of the shoulder. Clinical data and radiologic findings. Radiol Med. 1995; 89: 18-21.
Gerber C, Terrier F, Zehnder R, Ganz R. The subcoracoid space. An anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987: 132- 138.
Friedman RJ, Bonutti PM, Genez B. Cine magnetic reso-nance imaging of the subcoracoid region. Orthopedics. 1998; 21: 545-548. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19980501-07
Freehill MQ. Coracoid impingement: Diagnosis and treat-ment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19: 191-197.
Suenaga N, Minami A, Kaneda K. Postoperative sub-coracoid impingement syndrome in patients with rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9: 275-278. doi: 10.1067/ mse.2000.106084
Lo IK, Burkhart SS. The etiology and assessment of sub-scapularis tendon tears: A case for subcoracoid impingement, the roller-wringer effect, and TUFF lesions of the subscapu-laris. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 1142-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ar-thro.2003.10.024
Karnaugh RD, Sperling JW, Warren RF. Arthroscopic treat-ment of coracoid impingement. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 784-787. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.25269
Kragh JF, Jr., Doukas WC, Basamania CJ. Primary coracoid impingement syndrome. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004; 33: 229-232.
Bonutti PM, Norfray JF, Friedman RJ, Genez BM. Kine-matic MRI of the shoulder. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993; 17: 666-669.
Richards DP, Burkhart SS, Campbell SE. Relation be-tween narrowed coracohumeral distance and subscapularis tears. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1223-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.ar-thro.2005.06.015
Tracy MR, Trella TA, Nazarian LN, Tuohy CJ, Williams GR. Sonography of the coracohumeral interval: A potential technique for diagnosing coracoid impingement. J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29: 337-341. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.3.337
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Radiology (ROJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.