Social Behavior Research and Practice · Vol. 5, No. 1 · 2020 · pp. e1–e3 · e-ISSN 2474-8927

Globalization, Identity and World-minded Values

Aghop Der-Karabetian

Psychology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, University of La Verne, 1950 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750, USAUnited States

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/sbrpoj-5-e006 · Published 2020-04-13 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2020 The Author(s)

Abstract

The recent pandemic of the novel corona virus (Covid-19) drives home this realization quite powerfully. The nation-state-centric view of the world originated by the treaty of Westphalia in 1648 after the Thirty-year war no longer accurately and adequately describes the workings of an increasingly interdependent and interconnected global system.

Keywords: novel corona virus; Covid-19; Globalization; World-minded

SOCIAL BEHAVIOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE ISSN 2474-8927 Open Journal PUBLISHERS Aghop Der-Karabetian, PhD* Psychology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, University of La Verne, 1950 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750, USA *Corresponding author Aghop Der-Karabetian, PhD Editor in Chief (Social Behavior Research and Practice), Professor Emeritus, Psychology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, University of La Verne, 1950 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750, USA; E-mail: ader-karabetian@laverne.edu Article Information Received: March 14th, 2020; Accepted: March 17th, 2020; Published: April 13th, 2020 Cite this article Der-Karabetian A. Globalization, identity and world-minded values. Soc Behav Res Pract Open J. 2020; 5(1): e1-e3. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-5-e006 Globalization, Identity and World-minded Values Editorial Editorial | Volume 5 | Number 1| e1 Copyright 2020 by Der-Karabetian A. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc T he “Global Village” is upon us, if anybody is still in doubt! The recent pandemic of the novel corona virus (Cov- id-19) drives home this realization quite powerfully. The na- tion-state-centric view of the world originated by the treaty of Westphalia in 1648 after the Thirty-year war no longer accurately and adequately describes the workings of an increasingly interde- pendent and interconnected global system.1-4 According to Boulding 5 globalization is a total system composed of physical, biological, social, economic, political and communication system.Lifton6 envisioned it as a technologically imposed and fostered unity of humankind, and Mackay7 saw it as the growing worldwide interconnections between societies. The globalizing forces of the interdependence of na- tions, countries and states have been around for some time.8,9 Just to name a few: (a) The global spread of scientific-intellectual cul- ture; (b) The emergence of English as an international language of commerce and communication; (c) An increasingly sophisti- cated worldwide communication networks like social media; (d) Increasing means and opportunities for travel for business and leisure across national boundaries; (e) The establishment of highly integrated global system of finance and exchange; (f) Growing trend in resource interdependence such as oil and rare elements; (g) and, a growing number of international governmental and non-governmental organizations addressing global issues such as poverty, climate change and environmental degradation.10-17 The possible positive and negative impact of globaliza - tion around the world continues to be a topic of scholarly and popular discourse.18-22 Regardless of the controversies and depth of analysis surrounding the globalization phenomenon its poten- tial psychosocial impact is inevitable. One of the key manifest associations of globalization relates to the enhanced sense of belonging to the larger global community, and the accompany- ing shift in value orientation that shapes the way people view the world and treat each other as individuals and as groups. In a seminal work titled, “The Psychology of Global Citi- zenship: A Review of Theory and Research ” Reysen et al23 layout how globalization is reflected in an enlarged sense of belonging to an inclusive global community, and its links to pro-social values such as diversity, empathy, altruism and environmental sustainability. In a similar vein, McFarland et al24 review and expand on the research and theory of the notion of global-human identity. They identify its negative links to anti-social views and behaviors such as eth - nocentrism, social dominance and self-centeredness, and positive links to pro-social values of universalism, care, and justice. Also, they addressed how child reading and educational practices can foster and nurture global-human identity and accompanying val- ues. Additionally, the authors present and review different empir- ical measures and instruments to promote further research and theory development.

There is growing empirical evidence to suggest that global-human identity does not have to be polarized with national identity. They could be co-extensive in the sphere of ones social identity.25-29 A notion that encompasses both the sense of global be- longing and pro-social values is the concept of world-mindedness. It is conceptualized as a value orientation that allows someone to go beyond local, regional and national concerns to perceive the world as a total interdependent system as well as feel a sense of affiliation with the whole of humanity.30-32 Soc Behav Res Pract Open J. 2020; 5(1): e1-e3. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-5-e006 Der-Karabetian A e2 Early empirical studies dealing with the concept of world-mindedness have been reported by Fisher 33 and Statten 34. Mead35 and Bogardus36 have explored the sociological significance in international-mindedness and world-mindedness, respectively. Ideas consistent with the notion of world-mindedness may be seen in Whitehead’s37 process philosophy and his concept of the relat- edness of all entities in the universe. Similarly, Cobb et al38 indicate in process theology the notion of God as the unifying experience of all things that could incorporate world-mindedness as one man- ifestation of the experiencing of God. de Chardin’s39 notion of the “noosphere” that reflects the planetary consciousness emerging from the interpenetration of culture further reinforces the concept of world-mindedness. World-mindedness as a value orientation is also consistent with the conceptual underpinnings and fundamen- tal values of peace, economic welfare, social justice and ecological balance espoused by the World Order Models Project.40 Continuing study of the relationships between globali- zation, identity and world-minded values and behaviors, using in- terdisciplinary, global and cross-cultural methods and perspectives, provides fertile ground for the development and advancement of knowledge that may do some good.

The “Global Village” is upon us. Let us work to under - stand the workings of the “Village” more, and make it a better place to thrive.41,42 I call upon scholars, researchers and their students in the social, behavioral and pedagogical sciences around the world to engage in collaborative scholarship examining such a vital area of inquiry. Moreover, I would like to invite my colleagues and their students around the globe to share their opinions as well as re- search on the open-access- cyber-pages of this journal.

References

  1. GrossL. The peace of Westphalia, 1648-1948. The American Journal of International Law. 1948; 42: 20-41. doi: 10.2307/219356010.2307/2193560 https://doi.org/10.2307/2193560
  2. MillerLH. Global Order: Values and Power in International Politics. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press; 1985
  3. Lechner FJ, Boli J, eds. Globalization Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2000
  4. PieterseJN. Globalization and Culture: Global Melange. 4th ed. New York, USA: Rowman& Littlefield; 2020
  5. BouldingKE. The interplay of technology and values: The emerging superstructure. In: Baier K, Rescher N, eds. Values and the Future. New York, USA: Free Press; 1969: 336-350
  6. LiftonRJ. Toward a nuclear age ethos. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist. 1985; 41: 168-171. doi: 10.1080/00963402.1985.1145602310.1080/00963402.1985.11456023 https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1985.11456023
  7. MackayH. Globalization of culture. In: Held D, ed. In a Globalized World? Culture, Economics, Politics, 2 nd ed. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2004
  8. StegerM. Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009
  9. HirstPThompsonGBromleyS. Globalization in Question, 3rd ed. Maiden, MA, USA: Polity Press; 2015
  10. BellD. Toward the Year 2000: Work in Progress. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton, Mifflin; 1968
  11. BrownLR. World Without Borders. New York, USA: Random House; 1972
  12. Parson J, ed. Politics and Social Structure. New York, USA: The Free Press; 1969
  13. Welch S, Miewald R, eds. Scarce National Resources: The Challenge to Public Policymakers. Beverly Hill, CA, USA: Sage Publications; 1983
  14. YigitMFTarmanB. The impact of social media on globalization, democratization, and participative citizenship. Journal of Social Science Education. 2013; 12(1): 75-80. doi: 10.4119/jsse-63710.4119/jsse-637 https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-637
  15. Bu M, Lin C-T, Zhang B. Globalization and climate change: New empirical panel data evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2016; 30(3): 577-595. doi: 10.1111/joes.12162 https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12162
  16. IsardP. Globalization and International Financial System. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2005
  17. Gupta SD, ed. The Political Economy of Globalization. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012
  18. GrunigJ. Decline of the Global Village: How Specialization is Changing the Mass Media. New York, USA: General Hall; 1976
  19. HughBB. World Futures: A Critical Analysis of Alternatives. Baltimore, MD, USA: John Hopkins University Press; 1985
  20. Featherone M, ed. Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications; 1991
  21. PerronsD. Globalization and Social Change: People and Places in a Divided World. New York, USA: Routledge; 2004
  22. TeitelS. Globalization and its discontents. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2005; 34(4): 444-470. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.01610.1016/j.socec.2005.07.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.016
  23. ReysenSKatzarska-MillerI. The Psychology of Global Citizenship: A Review of Theory and Research. New York, USA: Lexington Books; 2018
  24. McFarlandSHackettJHamerK. Global human identification and citizenship: A review of psychological studies. Political Psychology. 2019; 40 (Supplement 1): 141-171. doi: 10.1111/ pops.12572 Editorial | Volume 5 | Number 1| Soc Behav Res Pract Open J. 2020; 5(1): e1-e3. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-5-e006 Der-Karabetian A10.17140/sbrpoj-5-e006 https://doi.org/10.17140/sbrpoj-5-e006
  25. Der-KarabetianARuizY. Affective bicultural and global-human identity scales for Mexican-American adolescents. Psychological Reports. 1997; 80: 1027-1039. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3.102710.2466/pr0.1997.80.3.1027 https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3.1027
  26. ArrowHSundbergND. International identity: Definition, development, and some implications for global conflict and piece. In: Setiadi BN, Supratikna A, Lonner WJ, Poortinga YH, eds. Ongoing Themes in Psychology and Culture. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology; 2004
  27. Der-Karabetian A, CaoY, Alfaro M. Sustainable behavior, perceived globalization impact, world-mindedness, identity, and perceived risk in college samples from the United States, Chi na, and Taiwan. Ecopsychology. 2014; 6(4): 218-233. doi: 10.1089/ eco.2014.0035
  28. Der-KarabetianAAlfaroMCaoY. Relationship of sustainable behavior, world-mindedness, national and global identities, perceived environmental risk and globalization impact among college students in the United States. Psychol Cogn Sci Open J. 2018; 4(1): 8-13. doi: 10.17140/PCSOJ-4-13810.17140/pcsoj-4-138 https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-4-138
  29. Der-KarabetianALopezMOsegueraMAlfaroM. Nest ed, place and relational multiple social identities among Latinx and White college students in California, USA. Soc Behav Res Pract Open J. 2019; 4(1): 8-14. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-4-11510.17140/sbrpoj-4-115 https://doi.org/10.17140/sbrpoj-4-115
  30. SampsonDSmithKP. A scale to measure world-minded attitudes. J Soc Psychol. 1957; 45: 99-106. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1957.971429010.1080/00224545.1957.9714290 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1957.9714290
  31. GlickEL. Toward a comprehensive definition of world-mindedness. Dissertation Abstracts International. 1975; 38: 6436-A
  32. SilvernailDL. Validation study of a teacher’s global perspective values scale. ERIC Document Reproduction. 1979; 193: 315
  33. FisherGM. Does the Christian movement promote world-mindedness abroad? Journal Religious Education. 1926; 21: 179-187. doi: 10.1080/003440826021021110.1080/0034408260210211 https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408260210211
  34. StattenTC. Experiments in creating world-mindedness in Canadian boys. Journal Religious Education. 1926; 21: 214-216. doi: 10.1080/003440826021021910.1080/0034408260210219 https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408260210219
  35. MeadGH. National-mindedness and international mindedness. International Journal of Ethics. 1929; 39: 385-407
  36. BogardusES. Concept of world-mindedness. Sociology and Social Research. 1948; 32: 960-966
  37. WhiteheadAN. Modes of Thought. New York, USA: Macmillan; 1938
  38. CobbJBGriffinD. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Westminister Press; 1976
  39. Teilhard de Chardin P. “My Universe”, in Science and Christ. New York, USA: Harper and Raw; 1968
  40. Mendlovitz SH, ed. On the Creation of a Just World Order. New York, USA: The Free Press; 1975
  41. Der-KarabetianA. The global village: Is its realization closer than we think? Japan Times, 1983; 11-12
  42. Der-KarabetianA. World-mindedness and the nuclear threat: A multinational study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1992; 7: 293-308. e3Editorial | Volume 5 | Number 1| Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/