Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Chelmsford, Essex, England, UKUnited Kingdom
Also available as PDF (figures and tables appear in the PDF).
Gastric cancer is still the second most common cancer worldwide.1 Perioperative com bination chemotherapy conveys a significant survival benefit and is a standard of care. How ever, surgery still remains the mainstay of treatment.
Keywords: Laparoscopic Gastrectomy; Gastric Cancer; surgery; chemotherapy
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Farhan Rashid, MBBS, DM, FRCS; Alexandros Charalabopoulos, MD, MSc, PhD, MRCS, FRCS* Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Chelmsford, Essex, England, UK *Corresponding author Alexandros Charalabopoulos, MD, MSc, PhD, MRCS, FRCS Consultant Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeon Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Broomfield Hospital Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust Court road, Chelmsford Essex, CM1 7ET, England, UK E-mail:acharalabopoulos@yahoo.com Article History Received: March 22nd, 2016 Accepted: March 29th, 2016 Published: March 29th, 2016 Citation Rashid F, Charalabopoulos A. Lapa- roscopic gastrectomy for gastric can- cer. Surg Res Open J. 2016; 3(1): e3-e5. doi: 10.17140/SROJ-3-e002 Copyright ©2016 Charalabopoulos A. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons At- tribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits un- restricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, pro- vided the original work is properly cited.
Volume 3 : Issue 1 Article Ref. #: 1000SROJ3e002 Editorial Page e3 Gastric cancer is still the second most common cancer worldwide.1 Perioperative com- bination chemotherapy conveys a significant survival benefit and is a standard of care. How- ever, surgery still remains the mainstay of treatment.
Gastrectomy is a complex operation and carries morbidity and mortality. Increased experience with laparoscopic surgery has shown improved benefits - Minimal post-op pain, quicker mobilisation and better cosmetic results have been shown from laparoscopic gastrec - tomies.2 These features are advantageous only when curability can be guaranteed as compared to that in open surgery and in some cases early gastric cancer is a good target for laparoscopic gastrectomy because the nodal metastasis is rather limited and serosal surface is intact. Recent- ly, laparoscopic gastrectomies have been suggested for prophylactic gastrectomy performed for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. 3 Recent meta-analysis of early gastric cancer showed a superior post-operative recovery in patients treated laparoscopically compared with those treat- ed using an open approach. 4-6 National oesophago-gastric cancer audit results in England and Wales between April 2011 and March 2013 showed 287 gastrectomies were performed with a minimally invasive approach (includes converted) out of a total of 1806 gastrectomies. It is still 15.9% of total procedures. 7 The latest National oesophago-gastric cancer audit results in England and Wales released in January 2016, are also supportive of the same findings where minimally invasive gastrectomies (including open conversions) represented only 14.5% (246 laparoscopic versus 1447 open gastrectomies). 8 The Korean laparoscopic gastrointestinal sur - gical society has conducted a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of early stage gastric cancer. 9 The long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer have been shown to be comparable to those of open gastrectomy in a large scale, multicentre clinical study.4 Increased overall survival rate for patients with stage IA cancer treated by laparoscopy (laparoscopy group; 95.3%, open group; 90.3%; p<0.001) has been shown by Kim et al.4 A meta-analysis of 1161 patients showed fewer overall complications following lapa- roscopic procedures (11%, 58/535) as compared to open gastrectomy (18%; 97/519) p<0.001.10 One non-randomised control trail by Adachi et al showed no significant difference in complica- tion rate between laparoscopic surgery (8%) and open surgery.11 Laparoscopic gastrectomy obviously has a steep learning curve and performing lapa - roscopic gastrectomies may initially take longer to do; one non-randomised control trial has shown that open procedure was 55 minutes shorter than laparoscopic. 12 In the UK, it will be challenging to perform randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open gastrec- tomies whilst, even today, only about 15% of gastrectomies are performed laparoscopically. 7,8 Lymph node dissection remains a challenge when it comes to laparoscopic procedures and must not be forgotten for the completeness of curative resection. Meta-analysis has shown fewer lymph nodes in laparoscopic surgery compared to open. Weighted mean difference; -4.35 nodes (95% CI -5.73 to -2.98 nodes) (p<0.001).10 From OG 2014 UK audit 15.9% of minimally inva- sive gastrectomies also included procedures converted to open and similarly conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery has been reported between 2-3% in other studies.7,10,12-14 Page e4 Length of hospital stay has been shown to be shortened by 5.5 days in laparoscopic gastrectomies compared to patients who underwent open gastrectomy in a meta-analysis.10
Intraoperative blood loss with subsequent blood transfusion has proven implication in the outcome, especially when it comes to cancer surgery and significantly lower blood loss has been shown in laparoscopic surgery as compared to open, with a weighted mean difference of 146 ml (p<0.001).10 Robotic surgery has recently been used in Upper GI surgery; limitations of laparoscopic approaches to gastrectomy can be explored using robotic approach to allow greater degree of freedom and hence improved dissection. As per NICE guidelines (NICE interventional procedure guidance [PG269]) the laparoscopic gastrectomy is a technically demanding operation; surgeons undertaking it should have specific training and special expertise in laparoscopic surgical techniques and should perform their initial procedures with an experienced mentor. As with any upper gastrointestinal cancer, these cases should be performed in high volume centres, where the appropriate experience is available. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.