Toxicology and Forensic Medicine · Vol. 2, No. 1 · 2017 · pp. 26–35 · e-ISSN 2474-8978

Cadmium Induced Oxidative Stress in Wistar Rats: Ameliorative Effect of Quercetin and Embilica Officinalis Plant Extracts

Madduru Renuka, Yeguvapalli Suneetha, Motireddy Srinivasulu Reddy

Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, AP, IndiaIndia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/tfmoj-2-114 · Published 2017-04-18 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2017 The Author(s)

Abstract

Background: Cadmium is a naturally occurring metal that is widely distributed throughout the biosphere. The present investigation is aimed to assess the antioxidant potential of Quercitin and Embilica officinalis (amla) extracts, which are reported to have a wide range of pharmacological properties including the efficacy of these selected substances on antioxidants and lipid peroxidation status in the liver tissue of rats during cadmium intoxication. Methods: After three weeks of cadmium oral administration, certain specific enzymes of the hepatic tissue of Wistar rats were assayed. Results: After three weeks of cadmium oral administration, certain specific enzymes of the hepatic tissue including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), acid phosphatase (ACP), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were significantly elevated, thus indicating cellular damage. The concentration of lipid peroxidation markers represented by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), lipid hydroperoxides and protein carbonyl contents of the liver tissue were significantly elevated, whereas vitamin C and E levels were found to be significantly reduced. But the activity of the antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidise (GPx) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities were found to be significantly inhibited. Conclusion: The results obtained in the present investigation clearly demonstrates the antioxidant potential of Quercetin and E. officinalis extract, by ways of decreasing lipid peroxidation against cadmium induced oxidative stress in rats.

Keywords: Quercetin; Embilica officinalis; Antioxidant enzymes; Oxidative stress

Introduction

Heavy metals are the most dangerous group of anthropogenic environmental pollutants which are highly toxic and persistent in the environment. The major anthropogenic sources of environmental pollution include smelting operations, phosphate fertilizers, pigments, cigarette smoke, automobiles, etc., which constitutes almost 90% of cadmium levels in the environment leading to its bioaccumulation in humans and animals. Cadmium has been reported to exert deleterious effects in organisms at low levels of exposure, 1 which are nephrotoxic, cytotoxic, genotoxic and carcinogenic.2-4

The literature is replete with the reports on metal induced oxidative stress that has been recently implicated in the pathogenesis of metal toxicities. It is established that metals Page 27 can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn overwhelms the cell’s innate antioxidant defences leading to oxidative stress. Studies have demonstrated that cadmium stimulates free radical production, resulting in oxidative damage to lipids, proteins and DNA, eventually resulting in membrane damage, protein dysfunction and DNA damage. These conditions can further culminate into pathological conditions both in humans and animals,4,5 including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, etc. Antioxidants are compounds that mop up the free radicals and prevent cellular damage. 6-11 Although, several chelating agents and antagonistic compounds are available which helps to reduce cadmium toxicity, some of them are burnt with undesir able side effects. Due to the intrinsic limitations and variability of the effectiveness of heavy metal chelating agents, research is being undertaken to apply cadmium intoxication therapy with the development of new therapeutic agents especially from flavonoids and other related phytometerials. In the recent years, phytometerials have been addressed as potent free radical scavengers and have attracted tremendous interest as possible thera peutics, against free radical material diseases.12,13 The efficacy of a wide variety of phytocompounds has been reported to have a wide spectrum of pharmacological properties including anti-in flammatory,14 anti-allergic,9 anti-tumour3 and anti-oxidant char acteristics.15-17 With this premise, the present investigation was designed to study the ameliorative effect of phytocompounds like Quercetin and Embilica officinalis (amla) extracts on Cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Wistar rats.

Materials And Methods

Quercetin (C15H14O9; MW 338.27; 2-(3,4-dihydrophenyl)-3,5,7trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one; a plant derivative of Rutin) and shade dried amla fruit were obtained from the local market. Ten grams of dried amla fruits were ground to powder form in an electric grinder and is dissolved in 50 ml of distilled water and was room evaporated for further use in experimentation.

Experimental Animals

Male albino rats weighing 100±5 g were used for the present investigation. The animals were fed with commercial standard pellet diet (Lipton India Ltd, Mumbai, MH, India) and had free access to water under well ventilated conditions of 12 h (day :night). The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions prior to the experiment under standard laboratory conditions (temperature 24±2 °C) for at least one week before the experi ments, were performed, maintained on standard diet, and given free access to food and water. The animals were housed in specially designed plastic rodent cages in the animal house in Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. This study and all procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Bioethical Committee. Cadmium chloride was dissolved in distilled water and administered orally to rats. The animals were divided into six groups each comprising of six rats. The experimental period was three weeks (21 days) and the group were as follows: Group 1: Control group (kept under standard laboratory conditions); Group 2: Received cadmium chloride (5 mg/kg Body weight/ day); Group 3: Received cadmium chloride (5 mg/kg Body weight/ day) along with Quercetin (100 mg/kg Body Weight/day orally) prior to the administration of CdCl2; Group 4: Received Quercetin (100 mg/kg Body weight/day orally) alone for 21 days; Group 5: Received cadmium chloride (5 mg/kg Body weight/ day) along with E. officinalis extract (150 mg/Kg Body weight/ day); Group 6: Received E. officinalis extract (150 mg/kg Body weight/day orally) alone for 21 days.

At the end of the experimental period, all the animals were starved overnight and then they were killed by cervical decapitation with mild ether anaesthesia. The liver tissue was dissected out, weighted and washed using chilled saline solution. For all the enzyme assays, the liver tissue was preserved at -800C till further analysis was performed.

Biochemical Analysis

Liver tissue homogenates from each experimental group were prepared in accordance with the standardized protocols. The methodologies adopted in the present investigation have been presented in the following tablulation:

All the chemicals and reagents used in the present study were analytical grade and were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company, Himedia Laboratories and local firms.

1 Lipid peroxidation (Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances TBARS) Fraga et al18 2 Lipid hydroperoxides Jiang et al19 3 Protein carbonyl content Levine et al20 4 Reduced Glutathione (GSH) Ellman21 5 Vitamin C Omaye et al22 6 Vitamin E Desai23 7 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) Kakkar et al24 8 Catalase (CAT) Sinha25 9 Glutathione peroxidise (GPx) Rotruck et al26 10 Glutathione S-transferase (GST) Habig et al27 11 Aspartate amino transferase (AST) Reitman & Frankel28 12 Alanine amino transferase (ALT) Reitman & Frankel28 13 Reduced GSH assay Moron et al29 14 Alkaline phosphatise (ALP) Bodansky30 15 Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) Srikanthan & Krishnamoorthy31 16 γ-Glutamyl transferase (GGT) Spectrophotometrically 17 MDA Ohkawa et al32 18 Protein Lowry et al33 Page 28 Statistical Analysis The results were expressed as the Mean±SD of six individual observations. The data was subjected to statistical analysis by ANOV A by using Statistical Packages (SPSS) Program.

Results

The results presented in Table 1, indicate that the body weight of the wistar rats was increased during the three weeks of experimental period in both control and experimentally treated rats of all groups. The liver tissue weights were also shown to be increased, both in control and experimentally treated rats of all groups. Table 2, presents the changes in the level of lipid peroxidation products including thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), lipid hydroperoxides and protein carbonyl contents were significantly higher, whereas the levels of vitamin C and vitamin E were significantly lower in both control and experimentally treated rats (Figure 1). The administration of Quer cetin and E. officinalis plant extracts significantly decreased the levels of lipid peroxidation products, lipid hydroperoxides and protein carbonyl contents in liver tissue of experimentally treated rats. Table 3, shows the levels of serum hepatic marker enzymes in control and experimentally treated rats of all groups. The oral administration of cadmium for 21 days induced several abnormalities in the levels of serum hepatic marker enzymes. The levels of serum hepatic marker enzymes such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were found to be significantly increased in cadmium treated rats. Consequently, the administra tion of quercetin and plant extract of E. officinalis significantly decreased the activity levels of serum hepatic marker enzymes compared to cadmium treated rats (Table 3). Table 4, presents changes in hepatic antioxidants including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxide (GPx), glutathione s-transferase (GST) and reduced glutathione (GSH) which were found to be increased significantly with the administration of Quercetin and E. officinalis plant extract to the cadmium-treated experimental rats (Figures 2 and 3).

Discussion

Cadmium is one of the main environmental and occupational pollutants in the industrialized countries. Exposure to cadmium is linked with serious health hazards and unlike other heavy metals, is unable to generate free radicals by itself; however, reports have indicated that the superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical and nitric oxide radicals could be generated indirectly. 34 A study by Watnabe et al10 showed the generation of non-radical hydrogen Table 1: Changes in Body Weight (g) and Liver Tissue (g) During Cadmium Induced Toxicity in Rats.

Groups

Body weight (g) Liver weight (g)

Initial Final Initial Final

Group-I 100.25±2.88 PDC

122.45±3.12 (+22) p<0.05 6.45±0.28 PDC 7.08±0.31 (+9.8) p<0.05 100.08±2.84 PDC p>0.05 120.12±2.75 (+20) 6.45±0.24 PDC p>0.05 6.59±0.28 p<0.05 Group-III

100.49±2.72 PDC p>0.05 122.58±3.15 (+22) p>0.05 6.45±0.25 PDC p>0.05 6.89±0.29 (+6.8) p>0.05 Group-IV 100.54±2.59 PDC p>0.05 123.19±3.42 (+ 23) p>0.05 6.45±0.26 PDC p>0.05 7.13±0.24 (+10.5) p>0.05 Group-V 100.72±2.89 PDC p>0.05 120.13±2.82(+19) p>0.05 6.45 ±0.27 PDC p>0.05 6.94±0.28 (+8) p>0.05 100.45±2.85 PDC p>0.05 123.34±3015 (+23) p>0.05 6.45±0.26 PDC p>0.05 7.15±0.26 (+11) p>0.05 PDC: Percent Deviation over Control Group-V : Received Cadmium Chloride 5 mg/Kg Body weight/day along with Embilika officinalis extract (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day) Group-VI : Received Embilika officinalis extract alone for 21 days.(150 mg/Kg Body weight/day orally Page 29

Table 2. Changes in the Lipid Peroxidation levels in the Tissue of Rats in Different Treatments.

Groups TBARSa Hydroperoxidea Protein Carbonylsb VitaminCc VitamiEc Group-I 2.88±0.12 114.42±6.13 204.18±10.12 2.48±0.12 2.13±0.14

6.13±0.34 (+112) p<0.001 274.14±10.12 (+90) p<0.001 415.42±15.44 (+103) p<0.001 0.94±0.05 (+163) p>0.05 1.11±0.10 (+92) p<0.001 Group-III 3.72±0.25 (+30) p>0.05 175.13±8.12 (+54) p<0.001 315.49±10.75 (+54) p<0.001 2.19±0.15 (+13) p>0.05 1.45±0.12 (+47) p<0.001 Group-IV 3.13±0.22 (+9) p>0.05 134.18±7.42 (+17) p<0.05 249.45±10.13 (+22) p<0.001 2.77±0.18 (+12) p>0.05 1.94±0.11 (+10) p<0.01 Group-V 4.13±0.28 (+43) p>0.05 163. 42±6.77 (+42) p<0.001 285.77±8.85 (+40) p<0.001 2.11±0.12 (+18) p>0.05 1.58±0.12 (+26) p<0.001 3.05±0.22 (+6) p>0.05 128.42±6.75 (+12) p>0.05 238.41±7.77 (+17) p<0.001 2.68±0.12 (+8) p>0.05 1.96±0.12 (+8) p<0.05 Values in parenthesis are Percent deviation over their respective Control Group-V : Received Cadmium Chloride 5 mg/Kg Body weight/day along with Embilika officinalis extract (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day) Group-VI : Received Embilika officinalis extract alone for 21 days. (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day orally) amM/100 g weight of tissue bnmoles/mg protein cµmoles/g weight of tissue Figure 1: Changes in Percent Deviation Over Control Values of Selected Antioxidant Substances in Different Groups of rats Treated with Cadmium.

Page 30

Table 3. Changes in the Activities of Hepatic Marker Enzymes during Cadmium Induced Toxicity.

Groups ASTa ALTa ACPb LDHc GGTd Group-I

65.72±2.45 39.42±1.94 102.45±3.78 145.44±6.42 102.41±6.75 Group-II 95.14±3.78 (+45) p<0.001 72.41±2.74 (+84) p<0.001 175.48±5.94 (+72) p<0.001 184.49±6.18 (+27) p<0.001 175.48±5.72 (+72) p<0.001 Group-III 175.48±5.72 (+72) p<0.001 46.43±1.78 (+18) p<0.001 159.42±5.12 (+56) p<0.001 174.58±5.13 (+21) p<0.001 168.41±5.15 (+65) p<0.001 Group-IV 68.49±2.75 (+5) p<0.001 42.49±2.05 (+8) p<0.001 128.49±4.75 (+26) p<0.001 155.45±4.88 (+7) p<0.001 142.41 ± 3.99 (+40) p<0.001 Group-V 76.74±3.49 (+17) p<0.001 42.74±2.05 (+9) p<0.001 165.48±5.15 (+62) p<0.001 165.48±5.15 (+62) p<0.001 172.43±5.42 (+69) p<0.001 70.43±3.45 (+8) p<0.001 40.11±1.42 (+2) p<0.05 125.44±5.12 (+23) p<0.001 150.42±4.88 (+4) p<0.001 138.74±4.88 (+36) p<0.001 Values in parenthesis are Percent deviation over their respective Control Group-V : Received Cadmium Chloride 5 mg/Kg Body weight/day along with Embilika officinalis extract (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day) Group-VI : Received Embilika officinalis extract alone for 21 days. (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day orally) aµmoles of Pyruvate liberated/mg protein/hr bµmoles of Pi liberated/mg protein/hr cµmoles of Formazon formed/mg protein/hr dunits/mg protein/hr Table 4: Changes in the Antioxidant Levels in the Liver Tissue of Control and Experimental Rats.

Groups SODa CATa GPxa GSTb GSHc MDAd LPOd Group-I 16.18±0.72 105.42±5.38 18.45±0.38 42.45±1.38 75.18±3.42 6.78±0.25 12.14±0.35

10.13±0.62 (+38) p<0.001 60.38±2.49 (+43) p>0.05 13.12±0.29 (+29) p<0.001 28.34±1.04 (+34) p<0.001 53.44±2.42 (+29) p>0.05 18.14±0.78 (+167) p>0.05 26.72±1.28 (+120) p<0.001 Group-III 12.42±0.58 (+24) p<0.001 70.13±2.84 (+34) p>0.05 14.15±0.32 (+24) p<0.001 32.41±1.04 (+24) p<0.001 60.13±2.41 (+20) p>0.05 13.19±0.68 (+94) p>0.05 16.42±0.72 (+36) p<0.001 Group-IV 14.18±0.59 (+13) p<0.001 88.42±3.49 (+17) p>0.05 16.89±0.34 (+9) p<0.05 40.78±1.19 (+4) p<0.001 74.79±2.55 (+05) p>0.05 10.45±0.66 (+55) p>0.05 13.77±0.58 (+14) p<0.01 Group-V 13.38±0.59 (+18) p<0.001 95.14±3.25 (+10) p>0.05 15.42±0.34 (+17) p<0.001 34.84±1.42 (+18) p<0.001 62.44±2.38 (+17) p>0.05 16.43±0.72 (+42) p>0.05 17.49±0.75 (+44) p<0.001 16.42±0.59 (+2) p>0.05 112.14±4.98 (+7) p>0.05 19.05±0.42 (+4) p>0.05 43.49±1.13 (+3) p<0.01 77.49±2.59 (+4) p>0.05 8.79±0.68 (+30) p>0.05 14.15±0.32 (+17) p<0.001 Values in parenthesis are Percent deviation over their respective Control Group-V : Received Cadmium Chloride 5 mg/Kg Body weight/day along with Embilika officinalis extract (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day) Group-VI : Received Embilika officinalis extract alone for 21 days. (150 mg/Kg Body weight/day orally) Page 31 peroxide, which by itself became a significant source of free radicals via the Fenton reaction. The replacement of iron and copper by cadmium from a number of cytoplasmic and membrane proteins like ferritin, in turn would release and increase the concentration of unbound iron or copper ions. These free ions participate in causing oxidative stress via the Fenton reactions.35 The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been attributed to cadmium induced pathotoxicity that leads to a disruption in the pro-oxidant/anti-oxidant balance, a condition coined as oxidative stress. A quest for safe phytoconstituents as antioxidants has been the main stay of recent research in phytotherapy to alleviate the pathologies that are associated with oxidative cellular damage. Studies have indicated that cadmium is an inducer of cell oxidative stress, either in a variety of cell culture systems36 or in vivo models through all routes of exposure.37 Lipid peroxidation is one of the consequences of oxidative damage and is found to play an important role in the toxicity of cadmium. 38-39 Cadmium-induced oxidative stress is caused due to the production of hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anions, nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide.40-42

The hepatic TBARS content was shown to be significantly increased in the cadmium-treated rats which may be attributed to excessive formation of free radicals which subsequently led to changes in the biological macromolecules. 4,5,37 Several authors reported that lipid peroxidation is a sensitive maker of cadmium hepatic toxicity in vertebrate species. 4,5 In the present study, cadmium treatment resulted in an excessive production of free radicals such as hydroxyl radical, superoxide radical, per oxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide. All the above mentioned radicals have a great potential to react rapidly with lipids, which in turn leads to lipid peroxidation. 4 Decomposition products of lipid hydroperoxide such as malanoldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal, can cause chaotic cross-linkage with proteins and nucleic acids, which plays an important role in the process of carcino genesis. In the present investigation, hepatic lipid peroxidation (LPO) activities show significant increase due to cadmium intoxication. Furthermore, extensive damage to tissues in a free radical mediated LPO results in membrane damage and subsequently decrease the membrane fluid content. Consequently, the treatment of cadmium exposed rats to both Quercetin and plant extract of E. officinalis resulted in a significant decrease in the levels of TBARS, hydroperoxides and protein carbonyl contents compared with cadmium treated rats. This observation clearly demonstrates that the free radical scavenging efficiency of both Quercetin and E. Officinalis extract may be associated with the presence of two hydroxyl groups in the β-ring of its molecule. 41 The presence of polyunsaturated substitution on the β-ring of Quercetin together with 2,3 double bond, a free 3-hydroxyl substitution and a 4-ketogroup confer potent anti-peroxidative properties of Quercetin.42 Several authors also reported that LPO was either blocked or prevented due to administration of Quercetin.43 Thus, Quercetin effectively quenches free radicals, inhibits LPO and protects the hepatic tissue from cadmium-induced oxidative damage. Literature has reported that the antioxidative potential of amla fruit has been attributed to its high vitamin C content. However, recent studies report the presence of bioactive tannoid principles in the fruit, comprising of emblicanin A, emblicanin B, punigluconin and pedunculagin, which have been shown to exhibit antioxidant activity in vitro and in vivo and are responsible for preventing the oxidation of ascorbic acid.44 The results obtained in the present investigation showed a marked increase in lipid peroxidation in the hepatic tissue of rats after cadmium treatment, which is in consensus with the previous reports on cadmium-induced oxidative stress in rats,45,46 in poultry47 and in fish.48 In addition to cellular lipids, studies have shown that cellular proteins may also be affected by radical accumulation. It is well established that cadmium does not directly generate free radicals like often heavy met als, but it is capable of generating non-radical hydrogen per oxide that eventually acts as a source of free radicals through the Fenton chemistry. The formation of carbonyl derivatives of proteins is suggested to be a useful measure of oxidative damage to proteins. The carbonyl derivatives of proteins may result from oxidative modification of amino acid side chains and reactive oxygen-mediated rapid cleavage.49 Stolis and Bagchi37 have reported that the primary target of the oxygen radical attack, Figure 2: Changes in Percent Deviation Over Control Values of Selected Enzymes in Different Groups of Rats Treated with Cadmium.

Figure 3: Changes in Percent Deviation Over Control Values of Selected Antioxidant

Enzymes in Different Groups of Rats Treated with Cadmium. Page 32 promoted by cadmium, is represented on cellular proteins. The results obtained in the present investigation also showed an increased protein carbonyl content in the cadmium treated rat liver tissue. When cadmium-exposed rats were subjected to treatment with both Quercetin and E.officinalis extracts, protein carbonyl contents were significantly decreased, which may be attributed to the antioxidant properties of the selected compounds in the present study. Both the compounds selected in the present study, by its free radical scavenging action, prevents the attack of free radicals on amino acids and this reduces the production of the protein carbonyl groups thus driving cadmium intoxication of rats.

GSH, is a tripeptide (L-αglutamylcysteinol glycine), an antioxidant and a powerful nucleotide, critical for cellular protection such as detoxification of ROS, conjugation with xenobiotics, excretion of toxic molecules and control of inflammatory cytokine cascade.50 General depletion of GSH in the tissues of animals leads to the impairment of cellular defence against ROS and may result in peroxidative tissue injury. In the present investigation, a significant reduction in the hepatic reduced glutathione (GSH) levels in the cadmium-treated rats and reduced levels of Vitamin C and Vitamin E in the liver tissue, portrays the implications of cadmium-induced stress condition in rats. Vitamin C is the most potent water soluble antioxidant that scavenges a wide variety of ROS and nitrogen, including superoxide radical.51 Vitamin E, is a major chain breaking antioxidant, found in the lipid phase of membrane, and acts as a powerful terminator of LPO. 52 In the present investigation, the non-enzymatic antioxidants levels were found to be significantly depleted in cadmium-intoxicated rats, signifying that increased levels of free radical generation by cadmium which is effectively managed by both Vitamin C and E, are considered as the most effective free radical scavengers. Several authors also reported reduced production of hepatic antioxidants including GSH, Vitamin C and Vitamin E during cadmium intoxication in rat.53 The results obtained in the present study demonstrated that cadmium exposure showed an increased activity level of markers such as ALT, AST, ALP in the liver tissue of rats. The increase in these enzymatic activities may be due to cellular necrosis of hepatocytes, which causes increase in the permeabil ity of the cell. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an index of cell damage including hepatotoxicity and the endothelial disruption in blood vessel. In the present study, increased level of LDH was substantially detected in all cadmium-treated rats, compared with the control group. This result is suggestive of the beginning of cytolysis, which is a possible indication of membrane damage including the endothelial membranes of blood vessels. This disruption of endothelial membrane, directly or indirectly, as reported earlier, includes the generation of reactive oxygen species in endothelial cells.

Generally under normal conditions, the animals tend to maintain a balance between generation and neutralization of ROS in the tissues. But, when the organisms are subjected to Xenobiotic stress, the rate of production of ROS including O2̅, H2O2, OHˉ, ROOˉˉ, exceeds their scavenging capacities. All the organisms have their own cellular antioxidant defence system composed of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic components. Enzymatic antioxidant pathway consists of SOD, CAT and GPx. Superoxide anion O 2̅ is dismutated by SOD to H 2O2, which is reduced to water and molecular oxygen by CAT or is neutral ized by GPx, that catalyses the reduction of H 2O2 to water and organic peroxide to alcohols using GSH as a source of reducing equivalent. GR regenerates GSH from oxidized glutathione (GSSG), which is a scavenger of ROS as well as a substrate for other enzymes. GST conjugates xenobiotics with GSH for exclusion. One non-enzymatic pathway components consists of small organic molecules such as β-carotene, GHS, Vitamin C and Vitamin E.54 Some of these parameters could serve as stress indicators in animals when exposed to environmental pollutants. Superoxide dismutase is considered to be its first line of defence against the deleterious effects of oxygen radicals in the cells and it scavenges ROS by catalysing the dismutation of superoxide to H2O2. Several authors also reported that SOD activities was considerably reduced during cadmium intoxication. 55 The inhibition of SOD activity may be associated with an increased flux of superoxide into the cellular compartments which may be the reason for decreased lipid peroxide indices in the present investigation. Catalase acts as a preventive antioxidant and plays an important role in protection against the deleterious effects of LPO, GPx and GST. Several authors have also reported that hepatic antioxidant enzyme activities were significantly reduced during cadmium intoxication, which may be due to excessive production of ROS. Glutathione peroxidase is also a first line of defence against oxidative damage due to H 2O2 or lipid hydroperoxides, thus protecting the membrane from oxidative damage. GST is considered to be the second line of defence against xenobiotics on account of its direct conjugation with the expense of GST, both being associated with glutathione dependent activities. In the present investigation, both GST and GPx activities were significantly reduced during cadmium intoxication due to excessive production of H2O2 by Cadmium. Thus, the analysis of antioxidant status in the present study, indicates that the levels of both non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants were significantly reduced due to cadmium reduced oxidative stress. Administration of both Quercetin and E.officinalis, extract significantly modulates the antioxidant status in the liver tissue of rats, suggesting the enhancing effect of the above substances on cellular antioxidant defences. The antioxidant role of the above selected substances may include the following interventions- scavenging of O2̅ OHˉ peroxyl radical and peroxynitrite. 4 Several authors also reported that the above substances were known to prevent DNA damage during cadmium intoxication, enhanced the GSH dependent protection and prevented the depletion of thiols dur ing oxidative stress. 5 Thus, it was indicated that both the substances selected might have played a role in quenching the free radicals, inhibiting LPO and ultimately reducing the build up of antioxidants during Cadmium intoxication.

Page 33

Conclusion

The results of the present study clearly indicate that heavy met al cadmium causes oxidative stress in rats and concluded that, Quercetin and phytonutrient rich plant extract from E.officinalis possess antioxidant property, which may be attributed to its protective action on lipid peroxidation and to the enhancing effect on cellular antioxidant defences which might be further impli cated in its protective role against the damage due to cadmium toxicity in rats. The plant extracts selected in the present investigation were known to contain rich phytocompounds that bring about free radical quenching effect. Thus, the use of Quercetin and phytonutrients to counter oxidative damage serves as a therapeutic approach to restore normal body function. The current results also contribute towards improving our knowledge on the possible development of oxidative stress induced by cadmium treatment in rats indicating a possible role of antioxidant systems in the prevention of induced damage in rats.

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. OjoOAAjiboyeBOOyinloyeBEOjoAB. Prophylactic effects of Ethanolic extracts of Lrvingia gobonensis stem bark against cadmium-induced toxicity in Albino Rats. Advances in Pharmaceutics. 2014; 2014: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/89461010.1155/2014/894610 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/894610
  2. El-RefaiyAIEissaFI. Histopathology and cytotoxicity as biomarker in treated rats with calcium and some therapeu tic agents. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2013; 20: 265-280. doi: 10.1016/j. sjbs.2013.02.00410.1016/j.sjbs.2013.02.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.02.004
  3. BertinGAverbeckD. Cadmium, cellular effects, modifica tions of biomolecules, modulation of DNA. Repair and genotoxic consequences (A review). Biochemie. 2006; 18: 1549-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.00110.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.001
  4. RaniAKumarALalAPantM. Cellular mechanisms of cadmium-induced toxicity: A review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2014; 24: 378-399. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2013.83503210.1080/09603123.2013.835032 https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2013.835032
  5. KumariKKhareADaugeS. The applicability of oxidative Stress biomarkers in assessing chromium induced toxicity in the Fish Labeo rohita. Biorad Research International. 2014; 2014: 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2014/78249310.1155/2014/782493 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/782493
  6. KarimaDSamirHInesG. Combined effects of Cd and Hg on liver and kidney histology and function in wister rats. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment. 2016; 5: 159-169. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2016.5401710.4236/jacen.2016.54017 https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2016.54017
  7. OganjanovicBIMarkovicSDPavlovicSZZikicRVStajnASSaicicZS. Effect of chronic cadmium exposure on Antioxidant defense system in some tissues of rats. Protective effect of selenium. Physiol Res. 2008; 57: 403-411. Web site. http://www. biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/57/57_403.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2017
  8. RikansLEYamanoT. Mechanisms of cadmium mediated active hepatotoxicity. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2000; 14: 110- 117. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0461(2000)14:2<110::AID-JBT7>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(sici)1099-0461(2000)14:2 https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0461(2000)14:2
  9. Haouem S, El Hani A. Effect of cadmium on lipid peroxidation and on some antioxidants in the liver, kidneys and testes of rats given diet containing cadmium polluted radish bulbs. J Toxicol Pathol. 2013; 26: 359-364. doi: 10.1293/tox.2013-0025 https://doi.org/10.1293/tox.2013-0025
  10. ValkoMMorvisH. Cronin MTD. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem. 2005; 12: 1101-1208
  11. WatanabeMHenmiKOgawaKSurukiT. Cadmium dependent generation of reactive oxygen species and mitochonondrial DNA breaks in photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic strains of Euglena gracilis. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003; 134: 227-234. doi: 10.1016/S1532-0456(02)00253-310.1016/s1532-0456(02)00253-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-0456(02)00253-3
  12. RenugadeviJPrabuSM. Ameliorative effect of quercetin against cadmium induced toxicity in liver of wistar rats. Cell Tissue Res. 2009; 9(1): 1665-1672
  13. RenugadeviJMiltonPS. Cadmium–induced hepatotoxic ity in rats and the protective effect of Naringenin. Experimental and Toxicological Pathology. 2010; 62: 171-181. doi: 10.1016/j. etp.2009.03.01010.1016/j.etp.2009.03.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etp.2009.03.010
  14. HaouemSCharguiINajarMFSrihaBFI-HaniA. Liver function and structure in rats treated simultaneously with cadmium and mercury. J Pathol. 2013; 3: 26-31. doi: 10.4236/ojpathology.2013.3100510.4236/ojpathology.2013.31005 https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2013.31005
  15. HicleakiSYasutakeAHirashimaT. Strain differ ences of cadmium accumulation by liver slices of inbred wistar–Imamichi and fiscer 344 rats. Toxicol in vitro. 2008; 22 : 338- 343. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.09.01310.1016/j.tiv.2007.09.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2007.09.013
  16. He X, Chen Mg, Ma Q. Activation of Nrf2 in defense against cadmium–induced oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008; 21: 1375-1385. doi: 10.1021/tx800019a https://doi.org/10.1021/tx800019a
  17. KumaraKKhareADangeS. The applicability of oxidative stress Biomarkers in assembling chromium induced toxicity in the fish Labeo rohita. Biomed Research International. 2014; 2014: 1-14. doi: 10.1155/2014/78249310.1155/2014/782493 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/782493
  18. FragaCGLeibovitzBEToppelAL. Lipid Peroxidation measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in tissue slices characterization and comparison with homogenate and microsomes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1988; 4: 155-161. doi: Page 34 10.1016/0891-5849(88)90023-810.1016/0891-5849(88)90023-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(88)90023-8
  19. JiangZYHuntJVWolffSD. Ferrous ion oxidation in the presence of xylenol orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxide in low-density lipoprotein. Anal Biochem. 1992; 202: 384-389. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90122-N10.1016/0003-2697(92)90122-n https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(92)90122-n
  20. LevineRLGarlandDOliverCN. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990; 186: 464-478. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-H10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-h https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-h
  21. EllmanGL. Tissue Sulphydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959; 82: 70-77. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-610.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6
  22. Onaye ST, Turbull TP, Saberchich. Selected methods for determination of Ascorbic acid in cells, tissues and fluids. Methods in Enzymology. 1979; 6: 3-11. doi: 10.1016/0076- 6879(79)62181-X https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(79)62181-x
  23. DesaiID. Vitamin E analysis method for animal tissues. Methods in Enzymology. 1984; 105: 138-143. doi: 10.1016/ S0076-6879(84)05019-9
  24. KakkarPDasBViswanathanPN. A modified Spectrophotometric assay of Superoxide dismutase. Ind J Biochem Biophys. 1984; 21: 130-132. Web site. http://hdl.handle. net/123456789/19932. Accessed January 31, 2017
  25. SinhaKA. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem. 1972; 47: 389-394. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-710.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7
  26. RotruckJPopeTALGautherHESwansonABHafemanDG. Selenium biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science. 1973; 179: 588-590. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4073.58810.1126/science.179.4073.588 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4073.588
  27. HabigWHMichaelJPJakobyWB. Glutathione S-Transferase: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974; 249(22): 7130-7139. Web site. http://www. jbc.org/content/249/22/7130.short. Accessed January 31, 2017
  28. ReitmanSFrankelSA. Colorimetric method for the deter mination of serum glutamic oxaloacetate and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Amer J Clin Pathol. 1957; 28: 56-63. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/28.1.5610.1093/ajcp/28.1.56 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56
  29. MoranMSDifierreJWMannervickB. Levels of glutathi one, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase activi ties in rat lung and liver. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1979; 582: 67- 68. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(79)90289-710.1016/0304-4165(79)90289-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(79)90289-7
  30. BodanskyAI. Determination of inorganic phospnate Beer’s law and interfering substances in the KuttnerLichtentein meth od. J Biol Chem. 1933; (99): 197-206
  31. SrikanthanTNKrishnamoorthyCR. Tetrazolium test for dehydrogenases activity. J Biol Chem. 1960; 235: 499-504
  32. OhkawaHOsishiNYagiK. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissue by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979; 95: 351-358. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-310.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3
  33. LowryOHRosebroughNJFarrALRandallRJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193: 265-275
  34. GalanAGarciaBLTroyanoA. The role of intracel lular oxidation in death induction (apoptosis and necrosis) in human promonocytic cells treated with stress inducers (cadmium, Heat, X-rays). Eur J Cell Biol. 2001; 80: 312-320. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-0015910.1078/0171-9335-00159 https://doi.org/10.1078/0171-9335-00159
  35. He X, Chen Mg, Ma Q. Activation of Nrf2 in defense against cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008; 21: 1375-1385. doi: 10.1021/tx800019 https://doi.org/10.1021/tx800019
  36. AmaraSAbdelmelekHGarrelC. Preventive effect of zinc against cadmium-induced oxidative stress. In the rat testis. J Reprod Dev. 2008; 54: 129-134. doi: 10.1262/jrd.1811010.1262/jrd.18110 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.18110
  37. StohsSJBagchiDHassounEBagchiM. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of chromium and cadmium ions. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2001; 20: 77-88. doi: 10.1615/JEnviron-PatholToxicolOncol.v20.i2.1010.1615/jenviron-patholtoxicoloncol.v20.i2.10 https://doi.org/10.1615/jenviron-patholtoxicoloncol.v20.i2.10
  38. CasalinoESblanoCLandriscinaC. Enzyme activity alteration by cadmium admistration to rats: The possibility of iron involvement in lipid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997; 346: 171-179. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1997.019710.1006/abbi.1997.0197 https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1997.0197
  39. WeberDDavisMJTilmanG. Determination of protein carbonyls in plasma, cell extracts, tissue homogenates, isolated proteins: Focus on sample preparation and derivatization conditions. Redox Biology. 2015; 5: 367-380. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.00510.1016/j.redox.2015.06.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.005
  40. WaisbergMJosephPHaleBBeyersmannD. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicology. 2003; 192: 95-117. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00305-610.1016/s0300-483x(03)00305-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00305-6
  41. NairARDegheselleOSmeetsKVan KerkhoveFCuypersA. Cadmium induced pathologics: Where is the oxidative balance lost (or not)? Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 6116-6143. doi: 10.3390/ijms1403611610.3390/ijms14036116 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14036116
  42. BootsAWDrentMde BoerVCBastAHaenenGR. Quercetin reduces markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in sarcoidosis. Clin Nutr. 2011; 30(4): 506-512. doi: 10.1016/j. clnu.2011.01.01010.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.010
  43. BootsAWHaenenGRBastA. Health effects of quercetin: From antioxidant to nutraceutical. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008; 585(2-3): 325-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.00810.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008
  44. ScurtezziniPAntognoniPRaggiMAPoliFSabbioniC. Vitamin C content and antioxidant activity of the fruit and of the ayurvedic preperation of Emblica officinalis gaertin. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006; 104: 113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.06510.1016/j.jep.2005.08.065 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.065
  45. ShaikhZAVuTTZamanK. Oxidative stress as a mecha nism of chronic cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity and protection by antioxidants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999; 154: 256-263. doi: 10.1006/taap.1998.858610.1006/taap.1998.8586 https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1998.8586
  46. OganjanovicBIMarkovicSDPavlovicSZZikicRVStajnASSaicicZS. Effect of chronic cadmium exposure on antioxi dant defence system in some tissues of rats. Protective effect of selenium. Physiol Res. 2008; 57: 403-411. Web site. http://www. biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/57/57_403.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2017
  47. KantVMehtaMVarshneyaCChauhanS. Induction of oxidative stress by sub acute oral exposure of cadmium sulphate in adult poultry. Braz J Vet Pathol. 2011; 4(2): 117-121. doi: http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/bjvp/article/view/36192. Accessed January 31, 2017
  48. KumarPPrasadYPatraAK. Ascorbic acid, garlic extract and taurine alleviate cadmium induced oxidative stress in freshwater cat fish Clarias batrachus. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407(18): 5024-5030. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.03010.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.030 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.030
  49. SakrSABayomyMFFI-MorsyAM. Rosemary extract ameliorates cadmium Induced histological changes and oxidative damage in the liver of albino rat. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology. 2015; 71: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jobaz.2015.01.00210.1016/j.jobaz.2015.01.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobaz.2015.01.002
  50. SharmaVJanmedaP. Protective assessment of euphor bia Neriitolia and its isolated aavonoid Against N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced hepatic carcinogenesis in male mice: A histopathological analysis. Toxicol Int. 2017; 21: 37-43. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.12879010.4103/0971-6580.128790 https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.128790
  51. VirkPElobeidMHamadS. Ameliorative effect of Embilica officinalis and Rosmarinus officinalis on cadmium induced oxidative stress in wistar rats. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research. 2013; 7(4): 805-818. doi: 10.5897/JMPR13.259310.5897/jmpr13.2593 https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr13.2593
  52. LippmannM. Human exposures and their health effects. In: Environmental Toxicants. 2nd ed. NJ, USA: Wiley Inter Sciences; 2000: 824-829
  53. RameshBSatakopanVN. Antioxidant activities of hydroalcoholic extract of Ocimum santum against cadmium induced toxicity. India J Clin Biochem. 2010; 25(3): 307-310. doi: 10.1007/s12291-010-0039-510.1007/s12291-010-0039-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-010-0039-5
  54. SabuMCKuttanR. Antibacterial activities of Embilica officinalis and Coriandrum sativus against gram negative urinary pathogens. Park J Pharm Sci. 2002; 20(1): 32-35
  55. HalliwellBGutterberidgeJMC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University; 2006. Page 35