The Ophthalmology Open Journal · Vol. 2, No. 2 · 2017 · pp. 32–37 · e-ISSN 2475-1278

Evidence-Based Practice in Irregular Cornea Patients’ Management With Contact Lenses

Raúl Martín Herranz

School of Optometry, Departamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica (TAO), IOBA Eye Institute, Paseo de Belén, 17-Campus Miguel Delibes 47011, Valladolid, SpainSpain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/ooj-2-111 · Published 2017-06-27 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2017 The Author(s)

Abstract

Contact lenses (CLs) are safe and commonly used method to correct the refractive errors. Rigid gas permeable (RGP) CLs are the first option in visual rehabilitation of patients with irregular cornea, helping to further delay surgical treatment and improve patients’ quality of life (QoL). Although, the practice of CLs in patients with irregular cornea must be based on evidence, there is a lack of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) developed and assessed under high standards as recommended by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) (http:// www.agreetrust.org/). Current fitting guidelines provided by researchers, practitioners, entities or manufacturers, are generally supported with relatively small clinical studies or cohort studies with owner-designs, providing no-objective pathways to conduct the CL fitting that generally require steep learning curve and practitioners with long experience in CL practice. These recommendations are usually not clinically validated to prove the quality and applicability in new clinical scenarios. CL practitioners require evidence-based guidelines and CPGs that include an objective pathway to choose the CL characteristics like design, geometry, material, etc., with clinically validated support of the recommendations to calculate lens parameters such as back optic zone radius, lens diameter and lens geometry. This practice should be based on clinical research with prospective, randomized and well-designed studies (case-control, cohort, or clinical trials studies) that have been developed and assessed under high standards (AGREE). These new evidence-based guidelines or CPGs will not only improve the safety and transparency of CL fitting procedures, but also guarantee the best patient care with less cost to patients with irregular cornea requiring RGP, improving their vision and QoL.

Keywords: Contact Lenses (CL); Rigid Gas Permeable Lenses (RGP); Irregular Cornea; Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs); Disposable Lenses; Frequent-Replacement Lenses; Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Lenses; Silicone Hydrogel CLs; Contact Lenses (CL); Rigid Gas Permeable Lenses (RGP); Irregular Cornea; Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs); Disposable Lenses; Frequent-Replacement Lenses; Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Lenses; Silicone Hydrogel CLs

Conclusion

In conclusion, CLs must always be fitted and prescribed by a qualified and competent practitioner after a careful fitting procedure that includes an eye examination to determine whether the CL is suitable for the patient. This will help in minimizing future risk of CL complications.28 It should be the practitioner’s responsibility to prescribe a CL made from a physiologically appropriate material that will induce minimal mechanical impact on the corneal surface while providing the required optical correction to improve the patient´s quality of vision and life. However, CL practitioners need to be completely aware of evidencebased guidelines and CPGs that include an objective pathway to choose CL characteristics (design, geometry, material, etc.), with clinically validated support of the recommendations to calculate lens parameters (BOZR, lens diameter and lens geometry), based on clinical research with prospective, randomized and well-designed studies (case-control, cohort, or clinical trials studies), that should be developed and assessed under high standards (AGREE). These new evidence-based guidelines or CPGs will not only improve the safety and transparency of CL fitting procedures, but also guarantee the best patient care with less cost to patients with irregular cornea requiring RGP, improving their vision and quality of life (QoL) significantly.

References

  1. StapletonFKeayLJalbertIColeN. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84: 257- 272. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180485d5f10.1097/opx.0b013e3180485d5f https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e3180485d5f
  2. MartinRRodriguezGde JuanV. Contact lenses definitions. In: Martin R, Corrales RM, eds. Ocular Surface: Anatomy and Physiology, Disorders and Therapeutic Care. 1st ed. Florida, USA: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group); 2012: 249-256
  3. GieddB. Understanding the nuances of contact lens materials. Contact Lens Spectr. 1999; 14: 21-28
  4. GuillonM. Are silicone hydrogel contact lenses more comfortable than hydrogel contact lenses? Eye Contact Lens. 2013; 39: 86-92. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827cb99f10.1097/icl.0b013e31827cb99f https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0b013e31827cb99f