Caesarean Operation in Cow due to Prolonged Pregnancy

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Haben Fesseha Department of Veterinary Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine,Wolaita Sodo University, P. O. Box 138,Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
  • Guesh Negash College of Veterinary Science, Mekelle University, P. O. Box 2084, Mekelle, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-5-141

Keywords:

Dairy cow; Caesarean section; Prolonged pregnancy.

Abstract

Prolonged pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that lasts for more than 294-days compared with term gestation which is between
260 and 293-days. This case report was prepared with the aim of describing and documenting the surgical procedures, techniques
of cesarean section and its outcome on eight-years-old crossbred cow that was referred to the veterinary hospital, Mekelle University from a field; Edaga Hamus Veterinary Clinic. According to the owner’s history, the cow was presented to the clinic with an
extended gestational period over 345-days than anticipated according to their own record. Thus, based on the history and clinical
findings, the case was diagnosed as prolonged pregnancy. After aseptic preparation of the surgical site, stabilizing the animal and
locally desensitizing the incision area; a vertical skin incision with a distance of approximately (~40 cm wide) on the left flank
region approximately (~10 cm) below the lumbar transverse process. After the incision of the abdominal muscles and uterus, the
non-viable and abnormally oversized calf was taken out with the help of an assistant. Moreover, the uterus was filled with excess
and abnormal dark brown colored blood and was properly drained, washed with sterile isotonic saline solution. The uterus was
closed using a double layer of Utrecht suturing pattern whereas the peritoneum and abdominal muscles were separately closed
with a continuous lockstitch pattern and simple interrupted pattern using 2-0 size sterile absorbable polyglycolic acid, respectively.
After that, the skin was closed using silk 2-0 size in a horizontal interrupted mattress. Lastly, with proper antibiotic follow-up,
dressing and cleaning of the surgical site, the cow was successfully recovered after two months.

References

Breukelman S, Mulder EJ, van Oord R, Jonker H, van der Weijden BC, Taverne MA. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring during late gestation in cattle by means of Doppler ultrasonography: Ref-erence values obtained by computer-assisted analysis. Theriogenology. 2006; 65(3): 486-498. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.046

Foote RH. Factors affecting gestation length in dairy cattle. The-riogenology. 1981; 15: 553-559. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(81)90058-3

Norman H, Wright J, Kuhn M, Hubbard S, Cole J, VanRaden P. Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92(5): 2259-2269. doi: 10.3168/ jds.2007-0982 Case Report | Volume 5 | Issue 1 |

Buczinski S, Bélanger AM, Fecteau G, Roy JP. Prolonged ges-tation in two Holstein cows: Transabdominal ultrasonographic findings in late pregnancy and pathologic findings in the fetuses. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2007; 54(10): 624-626. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00985.x

Divers TJ, Peek SF. Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.

Reef VB. Late term pregnancy monitoring. In: Current Therapy in Equine Reproduction. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier; 2007: 410- 416.

Blood D, Hutchins D, Jubb K, Whittem J. Prolonged gestation of Jersey cows. Australian Vet J. 1957; 33(12): 329-329.

Wilson A, Young G. Prolonged gestation in an Ayrshire herd. Vet Rec. 1958; 70: 73.

Heyman Y, Chavatte-Palmer P, LeBourhis D, Camous S, Vignon X, Renard J. Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol Reprod. 2002; 66(1): 6-13. doi:

1095/biolreprod66.1.6 10. Matthijsen H, Borst G. A cow with an extremely prolonged gestation period. Tijdschr Diergeneeskund. 1983; 108(21): 829-830.

Kornmatitsuk B, Veronesi M, Madej A, et al. Hormonal mea-surements in late pregnancy and parturition in dairy cows—pos-sible tools to monitor foetal well being. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002; 72(3-4): 153-164. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(02)00092-1

Newman KD. Bovine cesarean section in the field. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2008; 24(2): 273-293. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | Fesseha H et al doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.02.009

Schultz LG, Tyler JW, Moll HD, Constantinescu GM. Surgi-cal approaches for cesarean section in cattle. Can Vet J. 2008; 49: 565-568.

Buczinski S, Fecteau G, Lefebvre R, Smith L. Ultrasonographic assessment of bovine fetal well being during late pregnancy in nor-mal, compromised and cloned pregnancies. J Vet Int Med. 2006; 20(3): 722-723.

Buczinski SM, Fecteau G, Lefebvre RC, Smith LC. Fetal well-being assessment in bovine near-term gestations: Current knowl-edge and future perspectives arising from comparative medicine. Can Vet J. 2007; 48(2): 178-183.

Fubini SL, Ducharme N. Farm Animal Surgery-E-Book. Amster-dam, Netherland: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Newman KD, Anderson DE. Cesarean section in cows. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2005; 21(1): 73-100. doi: 10.1016/j. cvfa.2004.12.001

Singh G, Pandey A, Agnihotri D, Chander S, Chandolia R, Dutt R. Survival and fertility rate in buffaloes following caesarean sec-tion and mutation with/without partial fetotomy. Indian J Anim Sci. 2013; 83(3): 251-253.

Cattell J, Dobson H. A survey of caesarean operations on cattle in general veterinary practice. Vet Rec. 1990; 127(16): 395-399.

Dehghani S. Cesarean-section in cattle-complications. Com-pendium on continuing education for the practicing veterinarian. 1982; 4(9): S387-S392.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-02

How to Cite

Haben Fesseha, & Guesh Negash. (2020). Caesarean Operation in Cow due to Prolonged Pregnancy. Veterinary  Medicine, 5(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-5-141

Issue

Section

Articles