Overview of Methods Used in the Diagnosis of Infectious Bursal Disease
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-4-131Keywords:
Gross lesions; IBDV; Serology; Molecular techniques; Bursal disease; Gumboro diseaseAbstract
Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is an infectious viral disease of poultry. It is caused by infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) that
is a member of the genus Avibirnavirus of the family Birnaviridae. The virion is non-enveloped and consists of a bi-segmented
RNA molecule. The disease occurs in a clinical and subclinical form depending on age at infection. Only young chickens are clinically affected. Severe acute disease of 3-6 week old birds is associated with high mortality but a less acute or subclinical disease
is common in 0-3-week-old birds. This can cause secondary problems due to the effect of the virus on the bursa of Fabricius.
There are two serotypes of IBDV; These are serotype 1 which is pathogenic to chickens and commonly leads to the development
of the clinical form of the disease and serotype 2 is avirulent to chickens. Clinical IBD can be diagnosed by the combinations of
a characteristic sign and post-mortem lesions. Gross lesions are characterized by marked haemorrhages in the pectoral and thigh
muscles. At post-mortem examination bursa of Fabricius, thymus, spleen and kidneys are initially enlarged, however, bursa of Fabricius and thymus are later become atrophic. Histologic lesions showed marked edema, infiltration of heterophiles, hyperaemia
and lymphoid depletion and hyper plastic corticomedullary layer in the bursa of Fabricius. Serological diagnosis of IBD by agar
gel immunodiffusion (AGID), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), virus neutralization test (VNT) and agar gel precipitin test (AGPT) are also possible. Subclinical IBD can be confirmed in the laboratory by detecting viral antigens in tissues. In the
absence of such tests, histological examination of the bursa may be helpful.
References
Cosgrove AS. An apparently new disease of chickens: Avian nephrosis. Avian Diseases. 1962; 6: 385-387. doi: 10.2307/1587909
Hitchner SB. Infectivity of infectious bursal disease virus for embryonating eggs. Poult Sci. 1970; 49: 511-513. doi: 10.3382/ ps.0490511
Bidin Z, Lojkic I, Grce M, Cajavec S, Pokric B. Differentiation of infectious bursal disease virus strains at a genomic level. Veteri-narski Arhiv. 2001; 7: 325-336.
Hair-Bejo M, Ng MK, Ng HY. Day old vaccination against in-fectious bursal disease in broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci. 2004; 3: 124-128. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2004.124.128
Pankhurst RT. Avian nephrosis (Gumboro disease) in USA broilers: Treatment trials. World’s Poult Sci J. 1964; 20: 208-211. doi: 10.1079/WPS19640028
Mahgoub HA, Bailey M, Kaiser P. Erratum to: An overview of infectious bursal disease. Arch Virol. 2012; 12: 1377-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1505-6
Delmas B, Mundt E, Vakharia VN, Wu JL. Family birnaviridae. In: King AMQ, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB (eds). Virus Toxonomy Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press Inc. 2011. 507.
Berg TP. Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: A review. Avian Pathol. 2000; 29: 175-194. doi: 10.1080/03079450050045431
Silva JV, Arenhart S, Santos HF, et al. Efficient assembly of full-length infectious clone of Brazilian IBDV isolate by homologous recombination in yeast. Braz J Microbiol. 2015; 45: 1555-1563.
Hussain I, Rasool MH, Mahmood MS. Production of hyperim-mune serum against infectious bursal disease virus in rabbits. Pak Vet J. 2004; 24: 179-183.
Mahgoub HA. An overview of infectious bursal disease. Arch Virol. 2012; 157: 2047-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1505-6 Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1|
Tanimura N, Sharma JM. Appearance of T cells in the bursa of fabricius and caecal tonsils during the acute phase of infectious bursal disease virus infection in chickens. Avian Dis. 1997; 41: 638- 645. doi: 10.2307/1592155
Muller H, Islam MR, Raue R. Research on infectious bursal disease-the past, the present and the future. Vet Microbiol. 2003; 97: 153-165. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.005
McFerran JB, McNulty MS, McKillop ER, et al. Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease viruses from fowl, turkeys and ducks: Demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathol. 1980; 9: 395-400. doi: 10.1080/03079458008418423
Nwagbo IO, Shittu I, Nwosuh CI, et al. Molecular characteriza-tion of field infectious bursal disease virusisolates from Nigeria. Vet World. 2016; 9: 1420-1428. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1420-1428
Office International des Epizootics. Infectious bursal disease (gumboro disease). Rev Sci Tech. (Chap 2.3.12. 2016; 1). 2016; 551.
Lukert PD, Hitchner SB. Infectious bursal disease. In: Hofstad MS, Barnes HI, Calnek BW, Reid WM, Yoder HW (eds). Diseases of Poultry. 8th (edn). Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press. 1984. 566-576.
Tesfaheywet Z, Hair-Bejo M, Rasedee A. Hemorrhagic and clotting abnormalities in infectious bursal disease in specific-pathogen-free chicks. World Appl Sci J. 2012; 16: 1123-1130.
Lukert PD, Saif YM. Infectious bursal disease. In: Calnek BW (ed). Diseases of Poultry. 10th (edn), Ames, IOWA, USA: IOWA state university press. 1997. 721-738.
Hassan M, Al Natour MQ, Ward LA, Saif YM. Pathogenicity, attenuation, and immunogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 1996; 40: 567-571. doi: 10.2307/1592265
Eterradossi N, Saif Y.M. Infectious bursal disease. In: Swayne DE (ed). Diseases of Poultry, 13th (edn). Ames, Iowa, USA: John Wi-ley & Sons Inc. 2013. 219-246.
Kegne T, Chanie M. Review on the incidence and pathology of infectious bursal disease. British Journal of Poultry Sciences. 2014; 3: 68-77. doi: 10.5829/idosi.bjps.2014.3.3.8556
Banda A. Characterization of Field Strains of Infectious Bursal Dis-ease Virus (IBDV) Using Molecular Techniques [dissertation]. Athens, Georgia, USA: University of Georgia; 2002.
Jordan FTW, Pattison M. Poultry Diseases 4th (ed). Philadelphia, USA: Saunders. 1996. 202.
Minalu T, Tewodros F, Bemrew A. Infectious bursal disease (GUMBORO disease) in chickens. Br J of Polt Sci. 2015; 4: 22-28. doi: 10.5829/idosi.bjps.2015.4.1.95172 Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Sali K
Cosgrove AS. An apparently new disease of chickens: Avian nephrosis. Avian Diseases. 1962; 6: 388-389. doi: 10.2307/1587909
Islam MT, Samad MA. Clinico-pathological studies on natural and experimental infectious bursal disease in broiler chickens. Ban-gladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2014; 2: 31-35. doi: 10.3329/ bjvm.v2i1.1931
Kaufer I, Weiss E. Significance of bursa of Fabricius as target organ in infectious bursal disease of chickens. Infect Immun. 1980; 27: 364-367.
Lukert PD. Serotyping recent isolates of infectious bursal dis-ease virus. Paper presented at: 123rd Annual meeting of the ameri-can veterinary medical association; 1986; Kearney, NE, USA.
Swayne DE. A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens, 4th (edn), Kennett Square, PA, USA: the Ameri-can Association of Avian Pathologists. 1998.
Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC. Avian Biology. Cambridge, Mas-sachusetts, USA: Academic Press Inc. 1983. 7.
Ridell C. Avian Histopathology. 2nd (edn). Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Association of Avian Pathologists. University of Penn-sylvania. 1996
Saif YM. Infectious bursal disease and hemorrhagic enteritis. Poult Sci. 1998; 77: 1186-1189. doi: 10.1093/ps/77.8.1186
Van den Berg TP, Eterradossi N, Toquin D Meulemans G. In-fectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Rev sci tech Off int Epiz. 2000; 19: 527-543.
Skeeles JK, Slavik M, Beasley JN, et al. An age-related coagu-lation disorder associated with experimental infection with infec-tious bursal disease virus. Am J vet Res. 1980; 41: 1458-1461.
Nawzad AR, Nahla MS, Shilan FM, Zana H Mahmood. De-tection and identification of infectious bursal disease virus in broiler farms in sulaimani province. Int’l J of Advances in Chemi-cal Engg.,&BiolSci (IJACEBS). 2016; 3: 39-43. doi: 10.15242/ IJACEBS.A0316001
Tanimura N, Tsukamoto K, Nakamura K, Narita M, Maeda M. Association between pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus and viral antigen distribution detected by immunohistochem-istry. Avian Dis. 1995; 39: 9-20. doi: 10.2307/1591976
Sreedevi B, LeFever LJ, Sommer-Wagner SE, Jackwood DJ. Characterization of infectious bursal disease viruses from four layer flocks in United States. Avian Dis. 2007; 51: 845-850. doi: 10.1637/7923-020607-REGR1.1
Inoue M, Fujita A, Maeda K. Lysis of myelocytes in chickens infected with infectious bursal disease virus. Vet Pathol. 1999; 36: 146-151. doi: 10.1354/vp.36-2-146
Eterradossi N, Picault JP, Drouin P, Guittet M, L'Hospitalier R, Bennejean G. Pathogenicity and preliminary antigenic charac-terization of six infectious bursal disease vims strains isolated in France from acute outbreaks. J vet Med B. 1992; 39: 683-691. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1992.tb01222.x
Campbell TW, Coles EH. Avian clinical pathology. In: Coles EH (ed). Veterinary clinical pathology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders. 1986; 289-290.
Rosenberger JK, Cloud SS. Isolation and characterization of variant infectious bursal disease viruses. Paper presented at:. 123rd Annual meeting of the american veterinary medical association; 1986; Kearney, NE, USA.
Lee LH, Lukert PD. Adaptation and antigenic variation of in-fectious bursal disease virus. J. Chin. Soc. Vet. Sci. 1986; 12: 297-304.
McFerran JB, McNulty MS, McKillop ER, et al. Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease viruses from fowl, turkeys and ducks: Demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathol. 1980; 9: 401-400. doi: 10.1080/03079458008418423
Cowen BS, Braune MO. The propagation of avian viruses in a continuous cell line (QT35) of Japanese quail origin. Avian Dis. 1988; 32: 282-297. doi: 10.2307/1590815
Petek M, D’Aprile PN, Cancelloti F. Biological and physico-chemical properties of the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Avian Pathol. 1973; 2: 135-152. doi: 10.1080/03079457309353791
Lukert PD, Leonard J, Davis RB. Infectious bursal disease vi-rus: Antigen production and immunity. Am J Vet Res. 1975; 36: 539-540.
Jackwood DH, Saif YM, Hughes JH. Replication of infectious bursal disease virus in continuous cell lines. Avian Dis. 1987; 31: 370-375. doi: 10.2307/1590888
Kibenge FS, Dhillon AS, Russel RG. Growth of serotypes I and II and variant strains of infectious bursal disease virus in vero cells. Avian Dis. 1988; 32: 298-303. doi: 10.2307/1590816
Shaimaa I, Mohamed MH, Mohga FB, et al. Effect of infec-tious bursal disease field vaccines on avian influenza vaccination immunity. Alexandria J of Vet Sci. 2014; 43: 33-36. doi: 10.5455/ ajvs.162984
Office International des Epizooties. Infectious Bursal Disease (Gumboro disease). Chap 2.3.12. 2008; 549-565.
Office international des epizooties. Terrestrial manual list of tests for international trade. 2012; XI-XIV.
Chai YF. Biological and Molecular Characterisation and Crystallisation 16 Sali K of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus and Its Major Capsid Protein. [disserta-tion]. Palmerston north, New Zealand: Turitea University; 2001.
Weisman J, Hitchner SB. Virus-neutralization versus agar-gel precipitin tests for detecting serological response to infec-tious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 1978; 22: 598-603. doi: 10.2307/1589634
Wood GW, Muskett JC, Hebert CN, Thornton DH. Standard-ization of the quantitative agar gel precipitin test for antibodies to infectious bursal disease. J Biol Standard. 1979; 7: 89-96. doi: 10.1016/S0092-1157(79)80041-4
Wood GW, Muskett JC, Hebert CN, Thornton DH. The effect of antigen variation on the quantitative agar gel precipitin test for antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus. J Biol Stand., 1984; 12: 311-314. doi: 10.1016/S0092-1157(84)80011-6
Nicholas RAJ, Reed NE, Wood GW, Hebert CN, Muskett JC, Thornton DH. Detection ofantibodies against infectious bursal disease: a comparison of three serological methods. Res vet Sci. 1985; 38: 189-192. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31824-1
Van den Berg TP, Gonze M, Meulemans G. Acute infec-tious bursal disease in poultry: Isolation and characterisation of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathol. 1991; 20: 133-143. doi: 10.1080/03079459108418748
Cullen GA, Wyeth PJ. Quantitation of antibodies to infectious bursal disease. Vet Rec. 1975; 97: 315. doi: 10.1136/vr.97.16.315-a
Office international des epizootics. Infectious bursal disease (gumboro disease). Chap: 2.3.12. 2. 2016; 2. 2016; 552.
Lindahl J. Infectious bronchitis virus and infectious bursal dis-ease virus: A atudy performed at the universidad nacional of costa rica. 2004. 48.
Dinter Z. Diagnostic Virology. Moreno-Lopéz (ed). Uppsala, Sweden: University of agricultural sciences. 1989.
Stryer L. Biochemistry. 4th (ed). New York, NY, USA: WH Free-man and Company. 1995.
Lukert PD, Saif YM. Infectious bursal disease. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Fadly AM, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Swayne DE (eds). Diseases of Poultry. 11th (ed). Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State Press. 2003. 161-179.
Hitchner SB. Infectivity of infectious bursal disease virus for embryonating eggs. Poult Sci. 1970; 49: 514-516. doi: 10.3382/ ps.0490511
Jackwood DH, Saif YM. Antigenic diversity of infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Dis. 1987; 31: 766-770. doi: 10.2307/1591028
Skeeles JK, Lukert PD, Fletcher OJ, Leonard JD. Immunisation Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| studies with a cell-culture-adapted infectious bursal virus. Avian Dis. 1979; 23: 456-465. doi: 10.2307/1589576
Lin Z, Kato A, Otaki Y, Nakamura T, Sasmaz E, Ueda S. Se-quence comparisons of a highly virulent infectious bursal dis-ease virus prevalent in Japan. Avian Dis. 1993; 37: 315-323. doi: 10.2307/1591655
Office International des Epizooties. Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Chapter 2.3.12. In: OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Paris: Version adopted in May 2016. http://www.oie.int/en/internationalstandard-setting/ terrestrial-manual/accessonline/. 2016. 1-21.
Adamu JA, Owoade A, Abdu PA, Kazeem HM, Fatihu MY. () s. Characterization of field and vaccine infectious bursal disease vi-ruses from Nigeria revealing possible virulence and regional mark-ers in the VP2 minor hydrophilic peaks. Avian Pathol. 2013; 42: 420-433. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2013.822055
Rai Shafqat Ali Khan, Habib M, Muhammad Salah Ud Din Shah, et al. Molecular characterization of infectious bursal disease virus from commercial poultry in Pakistan. Matrix Science Medica. 2017; 1: 1-6. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 4 | Issue 1| Sali K
Bayliss CD, Shaw K, Peters RW, et al. A comparison of se-quences of segment A of four infectious bursal disease virus strains and identification of a variable region in VP2. J Gen Virol. 1990; 71: 1303-1312. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-6-1303
Kibenge FS, Jackwood DJ, Mercade CC. Nucleotide sequence analysis of genome segment A of infectious bursal disease virus. J Gen Virol. 1990; 71: 569-577. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-3-569
Escaffre O, Le Nouën C, Amelot M, et al. Both genome seg-ments contribute to the pathogenicity of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol. 2013; 87: 2767-2780. doi: 10.1128/ JVI.02360-12
Brown MD, Green P, Skinner MA. VP2 sequences of recent European ‘very virulent’ isolates of infectious bursal disease vims are closely related to each other but are distinct from those of ‘classical’ strains. J gen Virol. 1994; 75: 675-680. doi: 10.1099/0022- 1317-75-3-675
Cao YC, Yeung WS, Law M, Bi YZ, Leung FC, Lim BL. Molec-ular characterization of seven Chinese isolates of infectious bursal disease vims: Classical,very virulent, and variant strains. Avian Dis. 1998; 42: 340-351.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Veterinary Medicine (VM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.