Vaccination Research · Vol. 6, No. 1 · 2021 · pp. e1–e2 · e-ISSN 2771-750X

The Future Direction of Cancer Vaccines: An Editorial

Nemat Khansari, DVM

Department on Immunoloy, School of Medicine,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, IranIran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/vroj-6-e007 · Published 2021-09-28 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2021 The Author(s)

Abstract

In the past, vaccines were defined as prophylactic entities. Today, there are two types of vaccines: prophylactic for prevention, and therapeutic for the treatment of infections or cancers. Therapeutic cancer vaccine, in fact, represents an option for active immunotherapy for the treatment of late-stage and/or prevention of recurrent diseases.1 The function of a therapeutic cancer vaccine in patients is the eradication of cancer cells by strengthening the patient’s own immune response.2 This type of immunotherapy not only provides a new modality for cancer treatment but also paves the way for designing various therapeutic vaccines for chronic infections. 3 In spite of vast progress in this pathway, developing effective and safe therapeutic vaccines is still in its infancy when compared with prophylactic vaccines and immunotherapeutic agents.4 Before new technologies were applied for developing therapeutic vaccines, a few of them like bacilli galmette-guerrin (BCG) was used for the treatment of bladder, and prostate cancers.5,6 Recently, it has been reported successful use of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine for the treatment of multiple cutaneous malignancies. 7

VACCINATION RESEARCH Open Journal ISSN 2771-750X Nemat Khansari, DVM, PhD* Department on Immunoloy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran *Corresponding author Nemat Khansari, DVM, PhD Department on Immunoloy, School of Medicine, T ehran University of Medical Sciences, T ehran, Iran; T el. +989122126776; E-mail: nkhansari928@gmail.com Article Information Received: September 1st, 2022; Revised: September 15th, 2022; Accepted: September 23rd, 2022; Published: September 28th, 2022 Cite this article Khansari N. The future direction of cancer vaccines: An editorial. Vaccin Res Open J. 2022; 6(1): e1-e2. doi: 10.17140/VROJ-6-e007 The Future Direction of Cancer Vaccines: An Editorial Editorial | Volume 6 | Number 1| e1 Editorial Copyright 2022 by Khansari N. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc I n the past, vaccines were defined as prophylactic entities. Today, there are two types of vaccines: prophylactic for prevention, and therapeutic for the treatment of infections or cancers. Therapeu- tic cancer vaccine, in fact, represents an option for active immu- notherapy for the treatment of late-stage and/or prevention of recurrent diseases.1 The function of a therapeutic cancer vaccine in patients is the eradication of cancer cells by strengthening the patient’s own immune response.2 This type of immunotherapy not only provides a new modality for cancer treatment but also paves the way for designing various therapeutic vaccines for chronic in- fections.3 In spite of vast progress in this pathway, developing ef- fective and safe therapeutic vaccines is still in its infancy when com- pared with prophylactic vaccines and immunotherapeutic agents. 4 Before new technologies were applied for developing therapeutic vaccines, a few of them like bacilli galmette-guerrin (BCG) was used for the treatment of bladder, and prostate cancers.5,6 Recently, it has been reported successful use of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine for the treatment of multiple cutaneous malignan- cies.7 It should be noted that despite considerable advances in developing fairly effective and safer cancer vaccines like dendritic cell (DC) vaccine, 8 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell, 9 hu- man telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) derived vaccines, 10 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) vaccines,11 neoantigen vaccines,12 the clinical translation of cancer vaccines into clinically effective thera- pies has been quite challenging.13 Today, technological advances ac- celerated by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the emerging application of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology in developing vaccines.14 However, the recent approval of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, namely Dostar- limab, which is a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody used for the treatment of endometrial cancer. 15 There are a few others that have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for clinical use. Pembrolizumab binds to PD-1 proteins found on T-cells. This antibody blocks PD-1 and helps the im- mune system kill cancer cells.16 It is used to treat melanoma, Hodg- kin’s lymphoma, and several other types of cancer.17 Panitumumab is another engineered monoclonal antibody that targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for use in the treatment of co- lon cancer.18 Rituximab targets CD20 found on B-cells. It is used for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Trastuzumab targets the Her2/neu receptor expressed in some types of breast cancer. Ce- tuximab targets the EGFR. It has been used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.19,20 Bevacizumab targets circulating vascular endo- thelial growth factor (VEGF) ligand. It is approved for use in the treatment of colon cancer, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer.21 Mogamulizumab is another humanized monoclonal anti- body lacking fucose in the Fc region of the antibody molecule in order to enhance its antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity effect. The target of this antibody is chemokine receptor-4 (CC4) and it has been used for the treatment of relapsed and/or refrac- tory mycosis fungoides as well as cutaneous T-cell myeloma. 22 All these FDA-approved antibodies are developed based on targeted immunotherapy as major modalities of cancer treatment. Target- ed cancer therapies are expected to be more effective than other forms of therapies that are more harmful to normal cells as well as cancer cells.

It should be noted that continued advancement in the application of molecular technologies and the growing attention of scientists to targeted cancer therapies would lead us to apply more personalized cancer therapies which require the cooperation of laboratory scientists and clinicians. Consequently, in the near future, the distinction between therapeutic vaccines and medicines will fade away.

References

  1. PatilSUSchrefflerWG. Novel vaccine: Technology and development. J Arllergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 143: 844-851. doi: 10.1016/j. jaci.2018.05.02110.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.021
  2. LolliniPLCavalloFNanniPForniG. Vaccines for tumor prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6: 204-216. doi: 10.1038/nrc1815 Khansari N Vaccin Res Open J. 2022; 6(1): e1-e2. doi: 10.17140/VROJ-6-e007 Editorial | Volume 6 | Number 1|e210.1038/nrc1815 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1815
  3. BoukhebzaHBellonNLinhacherJCInchauspeN. Therapeutic vaccination to treat chronic infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012; 8: 1746-1757. doi: 10.4161/hv.2168910.4161/hv.21689 https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.21689
  4. GuoCManjiliMHSubjeckJRSarkarDFisherPBWangXY. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: Past, present and future. Adv Cancer Res. 2013; 119: 421-475. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407190-2.00007-110.1016/b978-0-12-407190-2.00007-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407190-2.00007-1
  5. VandeborneLPantziarkaPvan NuffelAMTBoucheG. Repurposing infectious disease vaccines against cancer. Front Oncol. 2021; 11: 688755. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.68875510.3389/fonc.2021.688755 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.688755
  6. MoralesA. Adjuvant immunotherapy in superficial bladder cancer. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1978; 49: 315-319
  7. GeizhalsSLebwolMG. Successful treatment of multiple cutaneous malignancies with HPV vaccination. Case report. SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine. 2020; 4: 148-155. doi: 10.25251/ skin.4.2.9
  8. KhansariN. Dendritic cell vaccine and its application in cancer therapy. Int J Vaccines Vaccin. 2015; 1: 1-5. doi: 10.15406/ ijvv.2015.01.00002
  9. SmithAJOertleJWarrenDPratoD. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for malignant cancers: Summary and perspective. J Cell Immunother. 2016; 6: 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jocit.2016.08.00110.1016/j.jocit.2016.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocit.2016.08.001
  10. KailshiyaCSharmaHBKailshiyaJ. Telomerase based anticancer immunotherapy and vaccines approaches. Vaccine. 2017; 35: 5768-5775. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.01110.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.011
  11. LiuMA. DNA vaccines: An historical perspective and view to the future. Immunol Rev. 2011; 239: 62-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 065X.2010.00980.x10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00980.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00980.x
  12. Farashi-BonabSKhansariN. Improving clinical efficacy of cancer vaccine using neoantigen identified in cancer patients. Vaccine & Vaccination Res. 2019; 4: 20-27
  13. JainSVenhataramanAWechslerMEPeppadNA. Messen ger RNA-based vaccines: Past, present, and future in the context of Covid-19 pandemic. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021; 179: 14000. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.11400010.1016/j.addr.2021.114000 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.114000
  14. KashermanLAhrariSLheureuxS. Dostarlimab in the treat ment of recurrent or primary advanced endometrial cancer. Future Oncol. 2021; 17: 877-892. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-065510.2217/fon-2020-0655 https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0655
  15. RedmanJMGibneyGTAtkineMB. Advances in immunotherapy for melanoma. BCM Med. 2016; 14: 20-31. doi: 10.1186/ s12916-016-0571-0
  16. KeatingGM. Panitumumab: A review of its use in meta static colorectal cancer. Drugs. 2010; 28: 1059-1078. doi: 10.2165/11205090-000000000-0000010.2165/11205090-000000000-00000 https://doi.org/10.2165/11205090-000000000-00000
  17. GregLBFiggittDP. Rituximab. Drugs. 2012; 63: 803-843
  18. McKeageKPeryCM. Trastuzumab: A review of its use in treatment of metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Drugs. 2002; 62: 209-243
  19. Galizia G, Lieto E, De vita F, et al. Cetuximab, a chimeric human mouse anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of human colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2007; 26: 3654-3660. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210381 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210381
  20. Kazazi-HyseniFBeijnenJHSchellensJHM. Bevacizumab. Oncologist. 2010; 15: 819-820. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-031710.1634/theoncologist.2009-0317 https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0317
  21. CordoVVan der ZwetJCCante-BarrettKPietersRMeijerinkJP. T- cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A road map to targeted therapies. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021; 2: 19-31. doi: 10.1158/2643- 3230.BCD-20-009310.1158/2643-3230.bcd-20-0093 https://doi.org/10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-20-0093
  22. BroccoliAArgnaniLZinzaniPL. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Focus on novel agents in relapsed and refractory disease. Cancer Treatment Rev. 2017; 60: 120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.002 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.002