Women's Health · Vol. 4, No. 1 · 2018 · pp. 11–14 · e-ISSN 2380-3940

Granuloma Annulare in Women: Evaluating the Annular Configuration in the Context of Germline Repair

Colleen Reisz, MD, Jeena Sandhu, BA

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USAUnited States

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17140/whoj-4-127 · Published 2018-12-18 · Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · © 2018 The Author(s)

Abstract

Granuloma annulare (GA) can be seen in both genders and all age groups, but is most commonly seen in women between the ages of 30-60 years. GA has a striking geometric presentation, with near perfect circles and ovals, a central clear zone and a pinwheel configured peripheral rim. We designed a retrospective case series comparing biometric and pharmaceutical data in middle aged women with and without GA to ascertain correlates of the disease. Women with GA were heavier and took more drugs. The use of statins, proton pump inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors were seen more commonly among the cases but the differences were not statistically significant. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) was seen more commonly in the control group. We propose that the key features of granuloma annulare (female predominance, annular morphology with central clearing, and abrupt onset in the later reproductive years) may relate to events in the fertility cycle that change with age and could be altered by medications

Keywords: Granuloma annulare; Microtubules; Aneuploidy; Polypharmacy

Introduction

G ranuloma annulare (GA) is characterized by the abrupt onset of annular plaques with central clearing in the skin.1 GA commonly occurs in the skin around joints in women in their later reproductive years.2,3 Diseases that occur more commonly in women have been associated with sex-related immune differences, non-hormonal factors on X and Y chromosomes, and pregnancy related changes in immune and metabolic function. 4-8 Cell biolo gists have outlined the mechanisms of organelle movement during cell stress. Microtubules and actin, which form the internal struc ture and lattice like transport system within the cell, are continually reorienting in response to cellular need. These needs may present internally, as a response to aneuploidy, or externally, in response to an allergen or infectious agent.

The process of germ line duplication is dynamic, staged, and has distinct architecture and polarity during meiosis. 9-14 The process is error prone and aneuploidy is common. Aneuploidy increases with age, and is much less tolerated in women due to the additional maternal responsibilities for growth in the early embryo.15-17 Aneuploidy activates a pause mechanism that stops cell division to allow time for the microtubules to capture and correct the attachments between chromosomes and the central spindle.18,19 Correctly attached chromosomes confer stability and allow the development of a pulling force between the poles. The generation of force pulls the spindle apart and cell division is completed.20,21 The cytoskeletal elements required in germline duplication and division are also utilized in other cellular stress responses, such as formation of an immune synapse in response to infec tion or allergen or in epithelial migration for wound repair.22,23 Microtubules and actin filaments rapidly depolymerize and reorient near the cell wall closest to changing physiologic demands. 24-26 It ABSTRACT Granuloma annulare (GA) can be seen in both genders and all age groups, but is most commonly seen in women between the ages of 30-60 years. GA has a striking geometric presentation, with near perfect circles and ovals, a central clear zone and a pinwheel configured peripheral rim. We designed a retrospective case series comparing biometric and pharmaceutical data in middle aged women with and without GA to ascertain correlates of the disease. Women with GA were heavier and took more drugs. The use of statins, proton pump inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors were seen more commonly among the cases but the differences were not statistically significant. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) was seen more commonly in the control group. We pro pose that the key features of granuloma annulare (female predominance, annular morphology with central clearing, and abrupt onset in the later reproductive years) may relate to events in the fertility cycle that change with age and could be altered by medications.

Keywords

Granuloma annulare; Microtubules; Aneuploidy; Polypharmacy.

Keypoints • Granuloma annulare has a striking architectural presentation and occurs more commonly in women in their later reproductive years.

• Diseases that occur more commonly in women have been associated with physiologic changes across the fertility cycle. • Granuloma annulare may be a cutaneous manifestation of a stressed response to adaptive changes in cell physiology. is possible that the stress provoked responses of the intracellu lar cytoskeleton may underlie what clinicians see in patients with granuloma annulare.

Medication intake was included for several reasons. Sev eral drug classes, taxanes, colchicine, chloroquine, and others, specifically target structure/function relationships in the intracellular cytoskeleton for therapeutic use in cancer, gout and other conditions. Drug lists can also provide additional information on underlying health issues and access to care. Drug metabolism competes with cholesterol catabolism and the bile salt pathways that contain the nuclear receptors involved in steroidogenesis and protection of the endocrine system.27 Twenty three percent of patients in this study believed that a change in medication, whether an addition or removal, was related to the skin eruption (Figures 1 and 2).

Methods

This retrospective case series was conducted out of a general dermatology clinic in the Midwest. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Missouri-Kansas City and documented assent was obtained. Forty eight female patients with GA were compared to an age matched control group of women without granuloma annulare. The data collection included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Fitzpatrick photo typing, laterality and drug lists. The drug categories measured were oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), statins, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), anti-hypertensives and antidepressants. Fitzpatrick photo typing was included as a potential biomarker of genetic variation in aromatase.

Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed with SPSS software, Chicago, USA.

Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous parameters. Unpaired t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare quantitative variables. Fisher’s Exact Test was utilized to assess statistical significance and a p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Forty eight female patients were identified. 22/48 (46%) noted the onset of disease between ages 40-70 years. Within this older group of women aged 40-70 years, 15/22 (65%) had a BMI>25 versus 35% of the control group (p-value=0.020).

Eleven (23%) of the female GA patients believed that a drug change precipitated the skin eruption. Comparison of drug utilization between cases and controls revealed that statins, proton pump inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors were seen more commonly among the patients over controls but the differences were not statistically significant. HRT was seen more commonly in the control group. In the group with recorded Fitzpatrick photo typing, 44/46 (96%) had a Fitzpatrick score of 1-3 suggesting that women of Northern European ancestry may be more vulnerable (Tables 1 and 2).

Case Series | Volume 4 | Number 1|

Figure 1. Mitotic Spindle in a Human Cell; Microtubules in Green, Chromosomes in Blue and Kinetochores in Pink (Wikipedia). Microtubule Orienting Centers, Pictured at Opposite Poles, can Rapidly Re-orient to Establish Immune Platforms Near the Edge of the Cell

Figure 2. Granuloma Annulare on the Ventral Forearms of a 56-Year-Old Female T able 1. Incidence of Granuloma Annulare Along the Growth and Development Continuum

Discussion

Our results are consistent with other studies that show that granuloma annulare (GA) occurs more commonly in females in their mid to later reproductive years. In this study, patients with GA were heavier and on more medications than those without the disease. Eleven of the patients thought a drug change caused GA.

This number may be low, as some patients were seen long after the onset of GA and could not remember the sequence of events. The use of statins, proton pump inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors were seen more commonly among the cases but the differences were not statistically significant. HRT was seen more commonly in the control group. Drugs may affect the presentation of GA by different mechanisms. Drug metabolism competes with the nuclear receptors utilzed in cholesterol catabolism.28 The competition between drug and cholesterol catabolism may be further complicated due to common drug classes that are specifically targeting this important pathway for glucose and metabolic reasons.29-31 Fitzpatrick phototyping, a clinical rating of pigment level in the skin, was included as a potential marker of vitamin D metabolism and genetic variance in aromatase. In this study, GA was primarily seen in women with Fitzpatrick 1-3 phototypes, suggesting a genotypic vulnerability in women of northern European ancestry.

Conclusion

We conclude that the key features of granuloma annulare (fe male predominance, annular morphology with central clearing, and abrupt onset in the later reproductive years) may be related to events in the cell cycle that change with age and can be altered by medications. Granuloma annulare could be an in vivo model for disruption of microtubule movement required for a variety of cellular needs, such as aneuploidy, immune surveillance and wound repair. The initial evaluation of patients presenting with granuloma annulare should include a complete drug and supplement history. In addition, the evaluation of female patients presenting with GA should include specifics about their reproductive history and metabolic response to pregnancy. The information from this study could expand our understanding of a common skin disease that occurs more frequently in women.

Institutional Review Board

The above referenced study was reviewed and determined to be exempt from IRB review and approval in accordance with the Federal Regulations 45 CFR Part 46.101(b).

This study was classified as exempt in accordance with exemption criteria #4 in the Federal Guidelines 45 CFR Part 46 as follows: “Research involving the collection or study of exist ing data, documents, records, pathological specimens or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the Investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to subjects.”

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Consent

The authors have received written informed consent from the patient.

References

  1. Thornsberry LA, English JC 3 rd. Etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of granuloma annulare: An update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013; 14 (4): 279-290. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0029-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-013-0029-5
  2. KolliparaRAroraCReiszC. The phenotype of hormonerelated allergic and autoimmune diseases in the skin: Annular le sions that lateralize. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012; 2012: 604854. doi: 10.1155/2012/60485410.1155/2012/604854 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/604854
  3. PietteEWRosenbachM. Granuloma annulare: Pathogenesis, disease associations and triggers, and therapeutic options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75(3): 467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.05510.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.055 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.055
  4. SelmiCBrunettaERaimondoMGMeroniPL. The X chro mosome and the sex ratio of autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. (2012); 11(6-7): A531-A537. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.02410.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.024
  5. Munoz-CruzSTogno-PierceCMorales-MontorJ. Nonreproductive effects of sex steroids: Their immunoregulatory role. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011; 11(13): 1714-1727. doi: 10.2174/15680261179611763010.2174/156802611796117630 https://doi.org/10.2174/156802611796117630
  6. GhazeeriGAbdullahLAbbasO. Immunological differences in women compared with men: Overview and contributing factors. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011; 66(3): 163-169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0897.2011.01052.x10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01052.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01052.x
  7. RubtsovAVRubtsovaKKapplerJWMarrackP. Genetic and hormonal factors in female-biased autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2010; 9(7): 494-498. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.02.00810.1016/j.autrev.2010.02.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2010.02.008
  8. NicklasRB. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 1997; 275(5300): 632-637. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5300.63210.1126/science.275.5300.632 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5300.632
  9. LoncarekJKisurina-EvgenievaOVinogradovaT. The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature. 2007; 450(7170): 745-749. doi: 10.1038/nature0634410.1038/nature06344 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06344
  10. HaufSWatanabeY. Kinetochore orientation in mitosis and meiosis. Cell. 2004; 119(3): 317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.01410.1016/j.cell.2004.10.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.014
  11. HiranoT. Chromosome cohesion, condensation, and separa tion. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 69: 115-144. doi: 10.1146/annurev. biochem.69.1.11510.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.115 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.115
  12. Di PietroFEchardAMorinX. Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: An integrated view. EMBO Rep. 2016; 17(8): 1106- 1130. doi: 10.15252/embr.20164229210.15252/embr.201642292 https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642292
  13. StinchcombeJCGriffithsGM. Communication, the centro some and the immunological synapse. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1650): 20130463. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.046310.1098/rstb.2013.0463 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0463
  14. DesaiAMitchisonTJ. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997; 13: 83-117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.8310.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83
  15. JoglekarAPKukrejaAA. How kinetochore architecture shapes the mechanisms of its function. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(6): R816-R824. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.01210.1016/j.cub.2017.06.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.012
  16. LampsonMAGrishchukEL. Mechanisms to avoid and cor rect erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Biology (Basel). 2017; 6(1): pii: E1. doi: 10.3390/biology601000110.3390/biology6010001 https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010001
  17. SarangapaniKKAsburyCL. Catch and release: How do kinetochores hook the right microtubules during mitosis?. Trends Genet. 2014; 30(4): 150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.02.00410.1016/j.tig.2014.02.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2014.02.004
  18. MénézoYDaleBCohenM. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: A review. Zygote. 2010; 18(4): 357-365. doi: 10.1017/S096719941000028610.1017/s0967199410000286 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199410000286
  19. Lara-GonzalezPWesthorpeFGTaylorS. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(22): R966-980. doi: 10.1016/j. cub.2012.10.00610.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006
  20. WangRHYuHDengCX. A requirement for breast-can cer associated gene 1 (BRCA1) in the spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(49): 17108-17113. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0407585101
  21. ChaoHXPooveyCEPrivetteAA. Orchestration of DNA damage checkpoint dynamics across the human cell cycle. Cell Syst. 2017; 5(5): 445-459. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.01510.1016/j.cels.2017.09.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.015
  22. KrämerALukasJBartekJ. Checking out the centrosome. Cell Cycle. 2004; 3(11): 1390-3. doi: 10.4161/cc.3.11.125210.4161/cc.3.11.1252 https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.3.11.1252
  23. PoenieMChristianLTanSSykulevY. Role of the MTOC in T Cell Effector Functions. In: Schatten H. (eds) The Centrosome. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 2012
  24. Bustos-MoránEBlas-RusNMartín-CófrecesNSánchez-MadridF. Orchestrating lymphocyte polarity in cognate immune cell-cell interactions. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2016; 327: 195-261. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.06.00410.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.06.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.06.004
  25. VertiiAIvshinaMZimmermanWHehnlyHKantSDoxseyS. The centrosome undergoes Plk1-independent interphase maturation during inflammation and mediates cytokine release. Dev Cell. 2016; 37(4): 377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.02310.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.023
  26. DumontetCSikicB. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: Microtubule dynamics, drug transport, and cell death. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(3): 1061-1070. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.1999.17.3.1061
  27. De Aguiar Vallim TQ, Tarling EJ, Edwards PA. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab. 2013; 17(5): 657-669. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013
  28. LindenthalBHolleranALAldaghlasTA. Progestins block cholesterol synthesis to produce meiosis-activating sterols. FASEB J. 2001; 15(3): 775-784. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0214com10.1096/fj.00-0214com https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.00-0214com
  29. XuCLiCYKongAN. Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Arch Pharm Res. 2005; 28(3): 249-68
  30. SoldinOPMattisonDR. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009; 48(3): 143-157. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 14 Case Series | Volume 4 | Number 1|10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001 https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001