Hysteroscopy Versus Laparoscopy in the Management of Isthmocele: A Review of the Literature

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Mohammad Jaffal, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon
  • Marco Mouanness, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon
  • Anastasia Salame, MD Fakih Fertility Center, Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Maelle Saliba, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon
  • Karine Azar, BS School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jbeil, Lebanon
  • Georges Rameh, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-5-130

Keywords:

Isthmocele; Uterine niche; Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean scar syndrome; Hysteroscopy; Laparoscopy

Abstract

Objective
Isthmocele is a pouch defect of the anterior uterine wall, detected at the site of the previous cesarean scar. It can be asymptomatic
or cause abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic discomfort and difficulty conceiving. The main objective of this review is to highlight
the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approaches in the management of this disorder.
Main Findings
During the hysteroscopic approach, the superior and inferior edges or just the superior edge of the defect are resected, removing
the fibrotic tissue and allowing renewal of the continuous canal between the cervix and the uterine cavity. Whereas, the laparoscopic approach consists of direct visualization and removal of the defect followed by re-approximation of the myometrium. Both
methods lead to significant improvement in symptoms and fertility.
Conclusion
While hysteroscopy is a quick non-morbid procedure that allows concurrent removal of other uterine pathology, laparoscopy is
characterized by improved visualization and decreased risk of complications with defects less than 3
mm as well as the possible correction of uterine retroversion. Definitely, randomized controlled trials are required in this field for
better guidance of the diagnosis and management

References

Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: An underrec-ognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(5): 562-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008 Review | Volume 5 | Number 1| Mouanness M, Rameh G, et al

Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, et al. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: Prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18(2): 234-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.011

Borges LM, Scapinelli A, de Baptista Depes D, Lippi UG, Coel-ho Lopes RG. Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior cesarean section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(3): 361-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.02.007

Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(1): 90-97. doi: 10.1002/uog.6395

Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, et al. Methods for myo-metrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesar-ean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultra-sonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85(4): 429-434. doi: 10.1080/00016340500430436

Park IY, Kim MR, Lee HN, Gen Y, Kim MJ. Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12884- 018-1821-2

Api M, Boza A, Gorgen H, Api O. Should cesarean scar de-fect be treated laparoscopically? A case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(7): 1145-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.013

Ludwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Evaluation of uterine niche by three-dimensional sonohysterography and volumetric quantifi-cation: techniques and scoring classification system. Ultrasound Ob-stet Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 139-143. doi: 10.1002/uog.19181

Nezhat C, Falik R, Li A. Surgical management of niche, isth-mocele, uteroperitoneal fistula, or cesarean scar defect: A critical rebirth in the medical literature. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(1): 69-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.017

Raimondo G, Grifone G, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Scambia G, Masciullo V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesare-an-induced isthmocele: A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gyne-col. 2015; 22(2): 297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.011

Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, MacKenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with in-termenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005; 12(1): 25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.023

Sanders AP, Murji A. Hysteroscopic repair of cesarean scar isthmocele. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(3): 555-556. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2018.05.032

Tsuji S, Kimura F, Yamanaka A, et al. Impact of hysteroscopic surgery for isthmocele associated with cesarean scar syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018; 44(1): 43-48. doi: 10.1111/jog.13464

Jastrow N, Demers S, Chaillet N, et al. Lower uterine segment thickness to prevent uterine rupture and adverse perinatal out-comes: A multicenter prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215(5): 604.e1-604.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.018

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perina-tal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(25): 2581-2589. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa040405

Muzii L, Domenici L, Lecce F, et al. Clinical outcomes after resectoscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele: A pro-spective case-control study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017; 21(15): 3341-3346.

Florio P, Gubbini G, Marra E, et al. A retrospective case-control study comparing hysteroscopic resection versus hormonal modu-lation in treating menstrual disorders due to isthmocele. Gynecol En-docrinol. 2011; 27(6): 434-438. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.495431

Tahara M, Shimizu T, Shimoura H. Preliminary report of treat-ment with oral contraceptive pills for intermenstrual vaginal bleed-ing secondary to a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(2): 477-479. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.020

Jacobson MT, Nezhat CR, Velasco A, Charles R. Laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula. Fertil Steril. 2002; 74(3): S200. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01308-x

Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, Dolmans MM. Gynecologi-cal and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(1): 289- 296.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.033

Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier RJ. Pre-diction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(3): 320. e1-320.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.014

Aimi G, Buggio L, Berlanda N, Vercellini P. Laparoscopic re-pair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: A video case report. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(6): e17-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2017.04.004

Sipahi S, Sasaki K, Miller CE. The minimally invasive approach to the symptomatic isthmocele-what does the literature say? A step-by-step primer on laparoscopic isthmocele-excision and re-pair. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 29(4): 257-265. doi: 10.1097/ GCO.0000000000000380

Suarez Salvador E, Haladjian MC, Bradbury M, et al. Laparo-scopic isthmocele repair with hysteroscopic assistance. J Minim In-vasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(4): 576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.005 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/

Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section. Fer-til Steril. 2008; 89(4): 974-980. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.024

Zhang Y. A comparative study of transvaginal repair and lapa-roscopic repair in the management of patients with previous cesar-ean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(4): 535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.007

Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, et al. New diagnostic cri-teria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscop-ic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015; 41(9): 1363-1369. doi: 10.1111/jog.12738

Marotta ML, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Don-nez O. Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defectsdiagnosed in nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(3): 386-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.006

Allornuvor GFN, Xue M, Zhu X, Xu D. The definition, aetiol-ogy, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesar-ean scar defects. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2013; 33(8): 759-763. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663

Xu D, He Y, Liu H, Wan Y, Xue M. Hysteroscopic treatment of women with previous cesarean scar defect. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010; 30(2): 394-396.

Fernandez E, Fernandez C, Fabres C, Alam V V. Hysteroscopic correction of cesarean section scars in women with abnormal uter-ine bleeding. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996; 3(4, Supplement): S13. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80170-8

Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Lin YP, Pan YJ, Horng SG. Chal-lenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleed-ing secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re-prod Biol. 2011; 154(2): 218-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.016

Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Pae-diatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21(2): 98-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3016.2007.00786.x

Wang CB, Chiu WWC, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: Correlation between cesarean section num-ber, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(1): 85-89. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405

Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K. In-complete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 124(1): 32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

Mohammad Jaffal, MD, Marco Mouanness, MD, Anastasia Salame, MD, Maelle Saliba, MD, Karine Azar, BS, & Georges Rameh, MD. (2019). Hysteroscopy Versus Laparoscopy in the Management of Isthmocele: A Review of the Literature. Women’s Health, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.17140/WHOJ-5-130

Issue

Volume 5 Issue 1 2019

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All content published in Women's Health (WH) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.

Most read articles by the same author(s)