Effect of Low Carbohydrate Diet on Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Usefulness of M-Value

Authors

  • Hiroshi Bando Tokushima University and Kitajima Taoka Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
  • Koji Ebe Takao Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan
  • Tetsuo Muneta Muneta Maternity Clinic, Chiba, Japan
  • Masahiro Bando Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
  • Yoshikazu Yonei Anti-Aging Medical Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/DROJ-3-130

Keywords:

Low-carbohydrate diet (LCD), Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), Morbus value (M-value), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Abstract

Background: Debate between the Calorie Restriction (CR) and Low-Carbohydrate Diet (LCD) has been continued for several years. We have started LCD therapy for diabetic patients since 1999, and experienced good response to control hyperglycemia. Recently the risk of postprandial hyperglycemia for cardiovascular events is reported, and the range of glucose level is focused. Morbus (M) value is proposed to be a good index to show the range of glucose fluctuation. Usefulness of LCD and usefulness of M-value were shown by combined analysis. Methods: Twenty-six patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), who admitted to the Takao Hospital, were the subjects. They were 12 males and 14 females, and their age ranged from 38 to 78 years old. A few patients were new patients, but mostly referred from other hospitals to receive LCD treatment. All patients started from CR therapy with 60% carbohydrate for 2 days, and then carried out LCD dietary therapy with 12% carbohydrates for 10-12 days. On day 2 and 12, blood glucose level was measured at 7 points a day to see the fluctuation from morning to night. Blood and urinary samples were corrected on the same day to get ordinary biochemical data and metabolic marker. Results: To know the effect of LCD on different level of HbA1c, the patients were grouped to low (L; 6.1±0.5%), middle (M; 7.9±0.4%) and high (H; 9.2±0.7%) by HbA1c value. The M-values after 2 day CR were 26.1 (L), 94.1 (M) and 343 (H), respectively. The LCD therapy decreased M-value to 10.4 (L), 18.8 (M) and 84.2 (H), respectively. The significant reduction of M-values was a reflection of the improved postprandial glucose level. LCD was effective even in the bad controlled diabetic patients. In addition to the decreased triacylglycerol and 24 hr urinary C-peptide, uric acid increased in all patients. Conclusion: Ten to 12 day-dietary therapy with LCD was quite effective to improve blood glucose profile. Patients with high HbA1c could be safely treated by LCD. Blood glucose improvement was well correlated to the M-value.

References

Bernstein RK. Dr. Bernstein’s Diabetes Solution: The Com-plete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars. 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA. Little, Brown and Company; 2011.

Atkins RC. Dr Atkins’ New Diet Revolution. New York city, NY, USA: HarperCollins; 2001.

Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, et al. Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, mediterranean, or low-fat diet. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 229-241. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708681

Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153: 147-157. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00005

Schwarzfuchs D, Golan R, Shai I. Four-year follow-up after two-year dietary interventions. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1373- 1374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1204792

McVay MA, Voils CI, Coffman CJ, et al. Factors associated with choice of a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet during a be-havioral weight loss intervention. Appetite. 2014; 83: 117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.023

Atallah R, Filion KB, Wakil SM. Long-term effects of 4 popu-lar diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: A sys-tematic review of randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014; 7: 815-827. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUT-COMES.113.000723

Gow ML, Garnett SP, Baur LA, Lister NB. The effectiveness of different diet strategies to reduce type 2 diabetes risk in youth. Nutrients. 2016; 9: 8(8). pii: E486. doi: 10.3390/nu8080486

Ebe K, Ebe Y, Yokota S, et al. Low carbohydrate diet (LCD) treated for three cases as diabetic diet therapy. Kyoto Medical Association Journal. 2004; 51: 125-129.

Bando H, Nakamura T. Carbo-count therapy and low car-bohydrate diet (LCD). The Journal of the Therapy. 2008; 90: 3105-3111.

Bando H, Ebe K, Nakamura T. New era of low carbohydrate diet: Clinical efficacy with more than 2000 cases in Japan for the treatment of metabolic syndrome. 2014. World Organization of Family Doctors-19th Europe Conference. Lisbon, Portugal.

Bando H, Ebe K, Nakamura T, Bando M, Yonei Y. Low car-bohydrate diet (LCD): Long and short-term effects and hyperke-tonemia. Glycative Stress Research. 2016; 3 (4): 193-204. Web site. http://www.toukastress.jp/webj/article/2016/GS16-18.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2017.

Muneta T, Kawaguchi E, Nagai Y, et al. Ketone body eleva-tion in placenta, umbilical cord, newborn and mother in normal delivery. Glycative Stress Research. 2016; 3 (3): 133-140. Web site. http://www.toukastress.jp/webj/article/2016/GS16-10.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2017.

Schlichtkrull J, Munck O, Jersild M. The M-value, an index of blood sugar control in diabetics. Acta Med Scand. 1965; 177: 95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1965.tb01810.x

Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gate-wood LC, Taylor WF. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes. 1970; 19: 644-655. doi: 10.2337/diab.19.9.644

Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JBL, Devries JH. Glu-cose variability; Does it matter? Endocrine Reviews. 2010; 31(2): 171-182. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0021

Moberg E, Kollind M, Lins PE, Adamson U. Estimation of blood-glucose variability in patients with insulin-dependent dia-betes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1993; 53: 507-514

Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contribution of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall di-urnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: Variations with increasing levels of HbA1c. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 881-885. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.881

Service FJ. Glucose variability. Diabetes. 2013; 62(5): 1398- 1404. doi: 10.2337/db12-1396

Monnier L, Colette C. Glycemic Variability: Can We Bridge the Divide Between Controversies? Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(4): 1058-1059. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0071

Monnier L, Colette C, Owens DR. Glycemic variability: The third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008; 2(6):1094- 1100. Web site. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC2769808/pdf/dst-02-1094.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2017.

McDonnell CM, Donath SM, Vidmar SI, Werther GA, Cam-eron FJ. A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utiliz-ing glycemic variation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005; 7: 253- 263. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.253

Molnar GD, Taylor WF, Ho MM. Day-to-day variation of continuously monitored glycaemia: A further measure of diabet-ic instability. Diabetologia. 1972; 8(5): 342-348. doi: 10.1007/ BF01218495

Rodbard D. New and improved methods to characterize gly-cemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11(9): 551-565. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0015

Baghurst P. Calculating the mean amplitude of glycemic ex-cursion fromcontinuous glucose monitoring data: An automated algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011; 13(3): 296-302. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0090

Borg R, Kuenen JC, Carstensen B, et al. ADAG Study Group. HbA1(c) andmean blood glucose show stronger associa-tions with cardiovascular disease risk factors than do postprandi-al glycaemia or glucose variability in persons with diabetes: The A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study. Diabetologia. 2011; 54(1): 69-72. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1918-2

Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, He-ine RJ. The A1c- derived average glucose (ADAG) study group translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: 1473-1478. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0545

Rizzo MR, Marfella R, Barbieri M, et al. Relationships between daily acute glucose fluctuations and cognitive perfor-mance among aged type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(10): 2169-2174. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0389

Caminhotto R, Fonseca FL, Castro NC, Arantes JP, Sertié RA. Atkins diet program rapidly decreases atherogenic index of plas-ma in trained adapted overweight men. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 59(6): 568-571. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000106

Vuorinen-Markkola H, Yki-Jarvinen H. Hyperuricemia and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994; 78: 25-29. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.1.8288709

Davidson MB. Clinical implications of insulin resistance syndrome. Am J Med. 1995; 99: 420-426. doi: 10.1016/S0002- 9343(99)80191-0

Jeppesen J, Facchini FS, Reaven GM. Individuals with high total cholesterol/HDL ratios are insulin resistant. J Intern Med. 1998; 243: 293-298. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1998.00301.x

Friedman AN, Ogden LG, Foster GD, et al. Comparative effects of low-carbohydrate high-protein versus low-fat diets on the kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7(7): 1103-1111. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11741111

Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, et al. Dietary carbo-hydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: Critical review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015; 31: 1-13.doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.06.011

Downloads

Published

2017-02-13

How to Cite

Hiroshi Bando, Koji Ebe, Tetsuo Muneta, Masahiro Bando, & Yoshikazu Yonei. (2017). Effect of Low Carbohydrate Diet on Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Usefulness of M-Value. Diabetes Research, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.17140/DROJ-3-130

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>