A Research Study Framework Proposal on Multi-Level Group Selection and Its Relation to Empathetic, Community-Driven Pedagogy

Authors

  • Micah J. Fleck MIDAS Multiple Intelligence Research, Inc., Kent, OH, USA

Keywords:

Multi-Level, Group selection, Kin selection, Empathy, Pedagogy, Pedagogical practice, Evolution, Natural selection, Classrooms, Education

Abstract

Background
Multi-level group selection theory is a presently rejuvenated framework for explaining the empathic tendencies of group culture and behavior as means of beneficial natural selection utility.
Purpose
The purpose here is to simply articulate the ways in which the anthropological theory of multi-level group selection overlaps with the latest psychological research on child conceptualization of equity and empathy so that a focused line of thought can be followed in subsequent research on how childhood psychology interacts with classroom environs moving forward.
Conclusion
The impact these studies stand to have on the broader culture of education would be largely equitable, ensuring that all students from all demographics would be encouraged by like-minded teachers to further propagate their applied learning for mutual advantage and benefit while also exciting each other about what they learn by finding shared relevant experiences and desires to make relevant connections too.

 

References

Egonu-Obanye D. Watch out for the invisible child: Mak-ing your class Truly Inclusive. Support the Guardian. 2013. Web site. https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2013/jun/27/invisible-child-class-truly-inclusive. Accessed May 28, 2021.

Richards BA, Frankland PW. The persistence and transience of memory. Neuron. 2017; 94(6): 1071-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.neu-ron.2017.04.037

Bahrick HP. Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984; 113(1): 1-29. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.1.1

Bacon DR, Stewart KA. How fast do students forget what they learn in consumer behavior? A longitudinal study. Journal of Market-ing Education. 2006; 28(3): 181-192. doi: 10.1177/0273475306291463

Owen L. Empathy in the Classroom: Why Should I Care? Web site. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/empathy-classroom-why-should-i-care-lauren-owen. Accessed May 28, 2021.

Gerdemann S, McAuliffe K, Blake PR, Haun DBM, Hepach R. The.ontogeny of children’s social emotions in response to (Un) fairness. Royal Society Open. 2020; 8: 1-31.

Ridley M. The Origins of Virtue. New York, USA: Viking Books; 1996: 38.

Williams G, ed. Group Selection. Abingdon-on-Thames: England, UK: Routledge Publishing; 1971.

Wilson DS, Wilson EO. Evolution: Survival of the self-less. NewScientist. 2007; 196(2628): 42-46. doi: 10.1016/S0262- 4079(07)62792-4

Sapolsky R. Behavioral Evolution. Paper presented at: Stanford University; April 2nd, 2012. Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/

Gonzolez G, Blake P, Dunham Y, McAuliffe K. Ingroup bias does not influence inequality aversion in children. Developmental Psy-chology. 2020; 56(6): 1080-1091. doi: 10.1037/dev0000924

Weissberg R. Why Social and Emotional Learning is Essen-tial for Students. 2016. Web site. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/ why-sel-essential-for-students-weissberg-durlak-domitrovich-gullotta. Accessed May 28, 2021.

Blad E. There’s Pushback to Social-Emotional Learning. Here’s What Happened in One State. Web site. https://www.edweek.org/ education/theres-pushback-to-social-emotional-learning-heres-what-happened-in-one-state/2020/02. Accessed May 28, 2021.

Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 1970; 81.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-23

How to Cite

Micah J. Fleck. (2025). A Research Study Framework Proposal on Multi-Level Group Selection and Its Relation to Empathetic, Community-Driven Pedagogy. Anthropology , 8(1), 1–6. Retrieved from https://openventio.us/index.php/Anthropology/article/view/1764