A Case of Progestogen Hypersensitivity

Authors

  • Mai Hasegawa Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113 8421, Japan
  • Takasuke Ogawa Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113 8421, Japan
  • Tatsuo Fukai Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113 8421, Japan
  • Rie Ueki Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113 8421, Japan
  • Shigaku Ikeda Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113 8421, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/DRMTOJ-6-145

Keywords:

Progestogen hypersensitivity, Woman’s issues, Dermatitis, Diagnosis

Abstract

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a cyclical dermatosis that occurs in fertile women during the luteal phase of the menstrual
cycle. The clinical presentation is variable and non-specific. We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with a 10-year history of
itchy skin lesions that recurred monthly. Determined with her basal body temperature chart, her skin symptoms were related to
progesterone surges. Skin examinations revealed multiple and extensive monomorphic red papules, mainly on her arms and legs, as
well as on her chest and back. She had no history of associated fever or dyspnea. Her hair, nails and mucous membranes were normal.
A blood test at the time of the worst skin eruption revealed mild elevation of serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokines
and eosinophilia. Her total serum IgE level was normal. She showed a delayed skin reaction to progesterone. Ultra-low-dose
combined oral contraceptives (COCs) improved her symptoms by suppressing ovulation. Accordingly, a diagnosis of progestogen
hypersensitivity was made. A T-helper (Th)2 response rather than a Th1 response was suggested to be involved in this case. Atopic
dermatitis (AD) can be classified into the major extrinsic type with high serum IgE levels and the minor intrinsic type with normal
IgE levels. PH and AD share similarities in that they present with eczema, IgE-mediated sensitization and delayed hypersensitivity
responses, and their pathophysiology remains to be fully elucidated because of their heterogeneous aspects. The symptoms of this
case were in line with IgE-low AD rather than IgE-high AD, which implicates endogenous progesterone as a trigger.
 

References

Jonathan A. Bernstein. progestogen sensitization: A unique fe-male presentation of anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020; 20: 4. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-0900-4

Shelley WB, Preucel RW, Spoont SS. Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis. Cure by oophorectomy. JAMA. 1964; 190: 35-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.1964.03070140041004

Foer D, Buchheit KM, Gargiulo AR, Lynch DM, Castells M, Wickner PG. Progestogen hypersensitivity in 24 cases: Diag-nosis, management, and proposed renaming and classification. J Allergy ClinImmunol Pract. 2016; 4(4): 723-79. doi: 10.1016/j. jaip.2016.03.003

Tokura Y. Extrinsic and intrinsic types of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci. 2010; 58: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.02.008

Kabashima-Kubo R, Nakamura M, Sakabe J, Sugita K, Hino Case Report | Volume 6 | Number 1 | Dermatol Open J. 2021; 6(1): 15-17.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-23

How to Cite

Mai Hasegawa, Takasuke Ogawa, Tatsuo Fukai, Rie Ueki, & Shigaku Ikeda. (2021). A Case of Progestogen Hypersensitivity. Dermatology, 6(1), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.17140/DRMTOJ-6-145