A Quick Report on the Skinny on Moisturizers

Authors

  • Sreeja R. Kuppam grade The School for the Talented and Gifted (TAG) Magnet School Dallas,TX 75203, USA

Keywords:

Moisturizers, Dry skin, Different moisturizers, Skin lotions, Vaseline® effectiveness

Abstract

Objective
To compare the effectiveness of 5 different skin moisturizers using JELL-O® as a model for the human skin.
Methods
In this study five different moisturizers (Equate®, Burt’s Bees®, Suave®, Aveeno® and Vaseline®) were applied to equivalent samples of JELL-O®. Observations were made over a 12-day period and data was collected at 15 different time intervals. The primary outcome was the height (cm) and weight (g) of the JELL-O® sample at each time interval. The study was an ex vivo experiment conducted in a home laboratory. No Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was required since the research does not involve living organisms.
Results
Overall, the JELL-O® sample that had the Vaseline® applied on it had the lowest loss of height and weight. The height stayed at 100% of its original value and the weight only decreased to 97.2% of the original value by the end of the observation period. In contrast, the sample which had Suave® applied to the surface its height and weight decrease the most (42% and 28% respectively). The other moisturizers had effects intermediate between these two extremes.
Conclusion
Based on this ex vivo head to head study using JELL-O® as a model for the human skin the 5 moisturizers examined had widely differing levels of effectiveness with Vaseline® appearing to be the most protective against evaporative losses and Suave® appearing to be the least.

References

Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008; 17(12): 1063-1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0625.2008.00786.x

Lee T, Friedman A. Skin barrier health: Regulation and repair of the stratum corneum and the role of over-the-counter skin care. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016; 15(9): 1047-1051.

Nolan K, Marmur E. Moisturizers: Reality and the skin ben-efits. Dermatol Ther. 2012; 25(3): 229-233. doi: 10.1111/j.1529- 8019.2012.01504.x

Madison KC. Barrier function of the skin: “la raison d’etre” of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2003; 121(2): 231-241. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x

Kraft JN, Lynde CW. Moisturizers: What they are and a practical approach to product selection. Skin Therapy Lett. 2005; 10(5): 1-8.

Ghadially R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias PM. Effects of petrola-tum on stratum corneum structure and function. J Am Acad Derma-tol. 1992; 26(3 Pt 2): 387-396. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70060-s

Crowther JM, Sieg A, Blenkiron P, et al. Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159(3): 567-577. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08703.x

Downloads

Published

2024-03-04

How to Cite

Sreeja R. Kuppam. (2024). A Quick Report on the Skinny on Moisturizers. Dermatology, 9(1), 1–5. Retrieved from https://openventio.us/index.php/DER/article/view/2254