Inverted Periosteal Technique – A Solution to Multiple Teeth Recession

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Neetha J. Shetty Department of Periodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal University, Mangalore 575001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-1-103

Keywords:

Gingival recession, Inverted periosteal technique, Periosteum

Abstract

Background: The periosteum being a highly cellular connective tissue also has a good regenerative
potential. This quality makes it a suitable for use as autogenous graft. Here, is technique,
the inverted periosteal technique that utilizes this property of the periosteum and is used for
root.
Method: Four patients with Miller Class I and II recessions ≥3 mm were treated utilizing the
inverted periosteal technique.
Results: At the end of 6 months, satisfactory results were achieved.
Conclusion: The inverted periosteal technique can be used for the treatment of gingival recession
defects in multiple teeth successfully.

References

Bouchard P, Maiet J, Borghetti A. Decision making in aesthet-ics: Root coverage revisited. Periodontol. 2000; 2001: 97-120. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001097.x

Struck JT. Methods and devices for the prevention and of gin-gival recession. US20060068364. 2006; 74-81.

Mahajan A, Karol S, Kashyap D, Kumar A, Mahajan P. Effec-tive management of gingival recession defects using periosteal pedicle grafts. E-Journal of Dentistry. 2012; 2(3): 193 -199.

Provenza DV, Seibel W. Basic tissues. In: Provenza DV eds. Oral histology inheritance and development. 2nd ed. MD, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1986: 59-63.

Lekovic V, Kenny EB, Carranza FA, Martignoni M. Autog-enous periosteal grafts as barriers for the treatment of Class II furcation involvements in lower molars. J Periodontol. 1991; 61: 775-780. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.775

Lekovic V, Klokkevold PR, Camargo PM, Kenney EB, Nedic M, Weinlaender M. Evaluation of periosteal membranes and coronally positioned flaps in the treatment of Class II furcation defects: A comparative clinical study in humans. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 1050-1055. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1050

Sakata Y, Ueno T, Kagawa T, et al. Osteogenic potential of cultured human periosteum-derived cells: A pilot study of hu-man cell transplantation into a rat calvarial defect model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006; 34: 461-465. doi: 10.1016/j. jcms.2006.07.861

Mizuno H, Hata KI, Kojima K, Bonassar LJ, Vacanti CA, Ueda M. A novel approach to regenerating periodontal tissue by grafting autologous cultured periosteum. Tissue Engineering. 2006; 12: 1227-1335. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1227

Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root cov-erage: A systematic review. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1625-1634. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060107

Bourke HE, Sandison A, Hughes SPF, Reichert ILH. Vas-cular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human periosteum normal expression and response to fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85-B(Suppl 1): 4.

Santarelli GAE, Ciancaglini R, Campanari F, Dinoi C, Fer-raris S. Connective tissue grafting employing the tunnel tech-nique: A case report of complete root coverage in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 77-83.

Published

2014-11-17

How to Cite

Neetha J. Shetty. (2014). Inverted Periosteal Technique – A Solution to Multiple Teeth Recession. Dentistry, 1(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-1-103