Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment: A Continuous Challenge

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Ahmed M. F. El-Angbawi Barts and The Royal London Dental Hospital, Queen Mary University, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent University Hospitals, 4 Newark Street London E1 2AT, England, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-2-118

Abstract

Every clinician will always aim for providing effective treatment, this can be accomplished by delivering the planned treatment goals over the shortest time possible, with minimal biological side effects and high levels of patient satisfaction. Unlike most of the dental specialities, orthodontic treatment tends to take relatively longer duration; this can range from as short as a several months to as long as several years (representative average 24 months).1 This can be explained by the conservative nature of orthodontic treatment that mainly depends on the dento-alveolar response to gentle orthodontic forces

References

El-Angbawi A, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR, Fleming PS. Non-surgical patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10.1002/14651858.CD010887

Al-Omiri MK, Alhaija ESA. Factors affecting patient satisfaction 422-431.

Uribe F, Padala S, Allareddy V, Nanda R. Patients’, parents’, ditional procedures to reduce treatment time. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. ajodo.2013.12.015

Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontics. 2008; 30: 386-395.

Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N. ment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 6: CD010572.

Leethanakul C, Kanokkulchai S, Pongpanich S, Leepong N, Charoemratrote canine retraction. Angle Orthodontist. 2014; 84(5): 839-845. doi:

Aboul-Ela SMBE, El-Beialy AR, El-Sayed KMF, Selim EMN, maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated cial Orthopedics. 2011; 139(2): 252-259.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-07

How to Cite

Ahmed M. F. El-Angbawi. (2015). Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment: A Continuous Challenge. Dentistry, 2(3), 98–99. https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-2-118