Cleaning of Dental Handpieces: A Method to Test its Efficiency, and its Evaluation With a Washer-Disinfector- Lubricator-Dryer

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Damien Offner Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 place de l’Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité Mixte de Recherche 1109, Faculté de Médecine, 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Lucien Brisset Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 place de l’Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
  • Anne-Marie Musset Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 place de l’Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-3-129

Keywords:

Dentistry, Infection control, Sterilization

Abstract

Objectives: When using dental handpieces (HP), a phenomenon of backflow leads to an external and internal soiling and contamination of HP, especially in their narrow air/water pipes. To prevent any cross-infection, HP need to be sterilized after a thorough cleaning. This work aims to establish and assess a method for testing their cleaning. Indeed, there is a methodological gap
concerning its validation because of their complex architecture. Materials and Methods: This method is declined into a protocol using artificial soilings and ninhydrin tests. Its evaluation with a washer-disinfector-lubricator-dryer (WDLD) within 2
cleaning cycles with each 6 HP and after control tests, heads to validate its relevance and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the cleaning provided. Results: After each cycle, all HP were externally clean. Our method also showed an internal cleanliness except for 2 HP whose engines in the automaton were defective. Conclusion: This work fits with the improvement of infection control in dental practices. It is the first method developed to control the internal cleaning of HP without having to break them, and it demonstrates the need for HP to be put into an internal rotation during their cleaning. It fills the methodological gaps concerning their cleaning and allows assessing HP cleaning from dedicated WDLD. According to standard NF EN ISO15883, the method could be used for initial
steps of operational or performances qualifications concerning HP cleaning.

References

Société Française de l’Histoire de l’Art Dentaire (SFHAD), Histoire de l’aménagement opératoire du cabinet dentaire, on-line information. Web site. www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/sf-had. Accessed May 4, 2015.

Brisset L, Lécolier MD. Hygiène et asepsie au cabinet den-taire [In French]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Masson; 1997: 198.

Ministère de la Santé, DGS. Guide de prévention des infec-tions liées aux soins en chirurgie dentaire et en stomatologie [In French]. 2006. Web site. http://social-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/ pdf/Guide_de_prevention_des_infections_liees_aux_soins_en_ chirurgie_dentaire_et_en_stomatologie.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

Association Dentaire Française (ADF). Grille technique d’évaluation pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins [In French]. 2013. Web site. http://www.fncs.org/sites/ default/files/pdf/GRILLE_DEVALUAT_DES_CAB_DEN-TAIRES_oct_2011.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

Pankhurst CL, Johnson NW, Woods RG, Microbial contami-nation of dental unit waterlines: The scientific argument. Int Dent J. 1998; 48: 359-368. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.1998.tb00697.x

Sacchetti R, Baldissarri A, De Luca G, Lucca P, Stampi S, Zanetti F. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines: comparison between Er: Yag laser and turbine lines. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2006; 13: 275-279.

Petti S, Moroni C, Messano GA, Polimeni A. Detection of oral streptococci in dental unit water lines after therapy with air turbine handpiece: Biological fluid retraction more frequent than expected. Future Microbiol. 2013; 8(3): 413-421. doi: 10.2217/ fmb.12.151

Chin JR, Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Internal contamination of air-driven low-speed handpieces and attached prophy angles. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(9): 1275-1280. doi: 10.14219/jada. archive.2006.0386

Chin JR, Westerman AE, Palenik CJ, Eckert SG. Contamina-tion of handpieces during pulpotomy therapy on primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2009; 31(1): 71-75. Web site. http://www.ingen-taconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2009/00000031/00000001/ art00011. Accessed May 4, 2016.

Checchi L, Montebugnoli L, Samaritani S. Contamination of the turbine air chambre: A risk of cross-infection. J Clin Peri-odontol. 1998; 25(8): 607-611. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998. tb02495.x

Institut de Veille Sanitaire (INVS). Analyse du risqué infec-tieux lié à la non-stérilisation entre chaque patient des porte-instruments rotatifs en chirurgie dentaire [In French]. 2009. Web site. http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/publications/2009/ risques_chirurgie_dentaire/index.html. Accessed May 4, 2016.

Hu T, Meng X, Zuo Y, Zhou X. A study on bacterial contami-nation of dental handpieces. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001; 19(2): 93-4, 98.

Deng XH, Sun Z, Qiao H, Deng HY, Xiao X, Su J. The pos-sibility of hepatitis B virus transmission through dental hand-pieces. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005; 39(3): 199-202.

Larsen T, Andersen HK, Fiehn NE. Evaluation of a new device for sterilizing dental high-speed handpieces. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997; 84(5): 513- 516. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90268-7

Ojajärvi J. Prevention of microbial contamination of the den-tal unit caused by suction into the turbine drive air lines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 81: 50- 52. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80147-8

Smith A, Smith G, Lappin DF, Baxter HC, Jones A, Bax-ter RL. Dental handpiece contamination: A proteomics and surface analysis approach. Biofouling. 2014; 30(1): 29-39. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.839782

Herd S, Chin J, Palenik CJ, Ofner S. The in-vivo contamina-tion of air-driven low-speed handpieces with prophylaxis angles. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138(10): 1360-1365. doi: 10.14219/ jada.archive.2007.0053

Dreyer AG, Hauman CH. Bacterial contamination of den-tal handpieces. SADJ. 2001; 56(11): 510-512. Web site. http:// europepmc.org/abstract/med/11885426. Accessed May 4, 2016.

Smith G, Smith A. Microbial contamination of used dental handpieces. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42(9): 1019-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.008

Lewis DL, Boe RK. Cross infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces. J Clin Microbiol. 1992; 30(2): 401-406.

Ricci ML, Fontana S, Pinci F, et al. Pneumonia associated with a dental unit waterline. Lancet. 2012; 379(9816): 684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60074-9

Weightman NC, Lines LD. Problems with the decontamina-tion of dental handpieces and other intra-oral dental equipment in hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2004; 56(1): 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j. jhin.2003.09.006

Offner D. Motiver et remotiver l’équipe soignante d’un cab-inet dentaire à l’application des mesures d’hygiène par une ex-périence de pensée éthique [In French]. Ethique et Santé. 2013; 10: 18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.etiqe.2012.11.001

Hauman CH. Crossinfection risks associated with high-speed dental handpieces. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1993; 48(7): 389-391.

Samaranayake L. Handpiece and water line decontamination and HIV transmission: A critique. Dent Update. 1993; 20(2): 53- 4, 56.

Deng XH, Sun Z, Su J. Current status of disinfection and sterilization for dental handpieces in the hospitals. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004; 38(6): 365-368.

Young JM. Keys to successful handpiece maintenance. Tex Dent J. 1997; 114(12): 15-19.

Perrin D. Les Instruments Dynamiques. Clinic. 1999; 20(7).

Thiveaud D. Du nettoyage à la stérilisation. Le lavage: l’étape essentielle [In French]. Hygienes. 2: 27-34.

Arbeitskreis Instrumentenaufbereitung. Traitement correct des instruments de chirurgie [In French]. 8th ed. 2004. Web site. www.a-k-i.org. Accessed January 2015.

Zhou X, Huang H, He X, Chen H, Zhou X. Effect of manual cleaning and machine cleaning for dental handpieces. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013; 31(4): 369-371.

Chassot E. Le nettoyage en priorité, 3ème symposium inter-national de Bâle [In French]. 2006. Web site. www.sssh.ch. Ac-cessed January 2015.

Smith GW, Smith AJ, Creanor S, Hurrell D, Bagg J, Lappin DF. Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2009; 207(4): 160-161. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.761

Musso P. Le lavage des dispositifs médicaux en stérilisation dans les établissements de santé: évolution, aspects techniques et réglementaires [In French]. IRBM News. 2007; 28(4): 24-31.

Kudhail R. Can oil lubricated dental handpiece be steril-ized ?: part 2. Literature review. Dent Update. 2013; 40(8) : 630-632.

Arbeitskreis Instrumentenaufbereitung. Traitement correct des instruments dans les cabinets dentaires [In French]. 3rd ed. 2005. Web site. www.a-k-i.org. Accessed January 2015.

Walker J, Kingston R, Chell K. Evaluation of washer disin-fector for use in dental practices. The preliminary program for IADR General Session – poster. 2010.

Simonetti D'Arca AS, Petti S, Tomassini E, Polimeni A. A new device for the disinfection of handpieces and turbines. Mi-nerva Stomatol. 1995; 44(7-8): 369-375.

Norme NF EN ISO 15883 parties 1 et 2 relatives aux exi-gences générales des performances des laveurs-désinfecteurs [In French]. 2009.

Association Française de Stérilisation (AFS). Qualification et requalification des laveurs-désinfecteurs [In French]. 2009. Web site. www.afs.asso.fr. Accessed January 2015.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-18

How to Cite

Damien Offner, Lucien Brisset, & Anne-Marie Musset. (2016). Cleaning of Dental Handpieces: A Method to Test its Efficiency, and its Evaluation With a Washer-Disinfector- Lubricator-Dryer. Dentistry, 3(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-3-129