Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture: An Approach to Rehabilitate Maxillary Kennedy Class I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/DOJ-7-142Keywords:
Dental implant, Distal extension removable partial denture, Kennedy Class I, Attachment dentureAbstract
Patients with maxillary Kennedy Class I are frequent visitors to the dental office, the missing of posterior teeth makes the control
of the movement of removable partial dentures difficult due to the axis of rotation and the different resiliencies between the
supporting structures. The use of implants in association to the conventional metal frame denture provides favorable long-term
stability and retention, good clinical outcomes in terms of occurrence of complications and maintenance. In this clinical case,
a patient with a maxillary Kennedy Class I was rehabilitated using a 3 implants to support metallic removable partial denture. A
three dimensional (3D) surgical guide was used for the well-placement of the strategic implants and ball attachments were tightened
as connectors between implant and denture. The patient was satisfied after 4-years of follow-up and reported good occlusal
stability, esthetic and functional satisfaction.
References
Ben-Ur Z, Aviv I, Maharshak B. Factors affecting displacement of free-end saddle removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22: 23-27.
Igarashi Y, Ogata A, Kuroiwa A. Stress distribution and abut-ment tooth mobility of distal-extension removable partial dentures with different retainers: An in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 111-116. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00345.x
Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 1095-1101.
Kaufmann R, Friedli M, Hug S. Removable dentures with im-plant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22: 233-241.
Kuboki T, Okamoto S, Suzuki H, Kanyama M, Arakawa H, Sonoyama W. Quality of life assessment of bone-anchored fi-xed partial denture patients unilateral mandibular distal-extension edentulism. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82(2): 182-187. doi: 10.1016/ s0022-3913(99)70154-x
Mijiritsky E, Ormianer Z, Klinger A, Mardinger O. Use of dental implants to improve unfavorable removable partial denture design. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005; 26(10): 744-6, 748, 750 passim.
Ramchandran A, Agrawal KK, Chand P, Ramashanker, Singh RD, Gupta A. Implant-assisted removable partial denture: An approach to switch Kennedy Class I to Kennedy Class III. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16(4): 408-411. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.179262
De Carvalho WR, Barboza EP, Caúla AL. Implant retained re-movable prosthesis with ball attachments in partially edentulous maxilla. Implant Dent. 2001; 10: 280-284. doi: 10.1097/00008505- 200110000-00012
Ohkubo C, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Suzuki Y, Kokubo Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: In vitro assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 52-56. doi:
1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01641.x 10. Maeda Y, Sogo M, Tsutsumi S. Efficacy of a posterior im-plant support for extra shortened dental arches: A biomechanical model analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32: 656-660. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2842.2005.01478.x
Cunha LD, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Pereira JA. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 278- 287. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818363b2
Grossmann Y, Levin L, Sadan A. A retrospective case series of implants used to restore partially edentulous patients with implant-supported removable partial dentures: 31-month mean follow-up results. Quintessence Int. 2008; 39: 665-671.
Verri FR, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, Pereira JA. Influence of len-gth and diameter of implants associated with distal extension re-movable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2007; 16(3): 270-279. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31805007aa
Chikunov I, Doan P, Vahidi F. Implant-retained partial over-denture with resilient attachments. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17: 141-148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00261.x Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/
Mensor MC. The rationale of resilient hinge-action stress-breakers. J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 20(3): 204-215. doi: 10.1016/0022- 3913(68)90116-9
Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM. Posterior implants for dis-tal extension removable prostheses: A retrospective study. Int J Pe-riodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 353-359.
Mijiritsky E. Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: A literature review. Implant Dent. 2007; 16(2): 146-154. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180500b2c
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Dentistry (DOJ) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.