Analyzing Pregnancy Costs with Finite Mixture Models: An Opportunity to More Adequately Accommodate the Presence of Patient Data Heterogeneity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/GOROJ-2-115Keywords:
Maternal health care expenditures, Statistical model, Generalized linear model, Gamma distribution, Log link, Outlier, Residual, Finite mixture model, Akaike Information CriteriaAbstract
The choice of a model in the analysis of patient health care costs and utilization is critical for a clear understanding of the behavior and estimation of quantities like incremental costs or cost-effectiveness. In studying heath care claims related to pregnancy, it would not be surprising that a small portion of the women have costs associated with their care and treatment that might be extreme or outlying. Many strategies exist for accommodating outliers; however, is one approach superior to the others because it may be implemented over a broader set of conditions without making unreasonable assumptions about the prevailing data characteristics? In this study, the author will show an example of a data set based on the medical claims for over 300K pregnant women, aged 15-49, where the traditional, or widely used Generalized Linear Model (GLM) approach to modeling costs may be less than optimal due to the presence of patients with very large, or very small expenditure values. These values, in some sense “contaminate” the typically employed GLM and cause it to violate its underlying requisite statistical assumptions. Finite Mixture Models (FMMs) have been employed in other areas of clinical research to model health care utilization. The author will introduce FMMs as an alternative to the commonly used GLM model and show that in his example data set, the fit of the FMMs is superior for the modeling of maternity expenditures in the presence of extreme or outlying cost values.
References
Diehr P, Yanez D, Ash A, Hornbrook M, and Lin DY. Meth-ods for analyzing health care utilization and costs. Annual Rev Pub Health. 1999; 20: 125-144. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publ-health.20.1.125
Blough DK, Ramsey SD. Using generalized linear models to assess medical care costs. Health Services and Outcomes Res Method. 2000; 1(2):185-202. doi: 10.1023/A:1012597123667
Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to trans-form or not to transform? J Health Econ. 2001; 20: 461-494. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8
Buntin MB, Zaslavsky AM. Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? comparing methods of modeling medicare expenditures. J Health Econ. 2004; 23: 525-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005
Montez-Rath M, Christiansen CL, Ettner SL, Loveland S, Rosen AK. Performance of statistical models to predict mental health and substance abuse costs. BMC Medical Res Method. 2006; 6: 53 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-53
Mullahy M. Econometric modeling of health care costs and expenditures: a survey of analytical issues and related poli-cy considerations. Med Care. 2009; 47(7): S104-S108. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c9593
Mihaylova M, Briggs A, O’Hagan A, Thompson SG. Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare costs and resourc-es. Health Econ. 2010; 20(8): 897-916. doi: 10.1002/hec.1653
McCullagh P, Nelder, JA. Generalized linear models, 2/e. New York, NY USA: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Vining GC. Generalized linear models in engineering and the sciences. New York, NY USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
Williams MD, Braun LA, Cooper LM, et al. Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mor-tality, and associated costs of care. Critical Care. 2004; 8(5): R291-R298 doi: 10.1186/cc2893
Carls GS, Lee DW, Ozimnkowski RJ, Wang S, Gibson TB, Stewart E. What are the total costs of surgical treatment for uter-ine fibroids? J Women’s Health. 2008; 17(7): 1119-1132. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0456
Brem H, Maggi J, Nierman D, et al. High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers. Am J Surg. 2012; 200(4): 473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.021
Cardozo ER, Clark AD, Banks NK, Henne MB, Stegmann BJ, Segars JH. The estimated annual costs of uterine leiomyo-mata in the United States. Am J Obset Gynecol. 2012; 206(3): 211.e1-211.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002
Yeaw J, Halinan S, Hines D, et al. Direct medical costs for complications among children and adults with diabetes in the US commercial payer setting. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014; 12(2): 219-230. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0086-9
Barnet V, Lewis T. Outliers in statistical data. New York, NY USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1979.
Harris EK, Boyd JC. Statistical bases of reference values in laboratory medicine. New York, NY USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1995.
Kandel R. Our changing climate. New York, NY USA: Mc-Graw Hill; 1991.
Vitello P. Joseph Farman, 82 is dead; discovered ozone hole. New York Times. May 20, 2013: B9.
Maronna RA, Martin RD, Yohai VJ. Robust statistics: theory and methods. New York, NY USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
Rivest L-P. Statistical properties of winsorized means for skewed distributions. Biometrika. 1994; 81(2): 373-383.
Dunn G, Mirandola M, Amaddeo F, Tansella M. Describing, explaining or predicting mental health care costs: a guide to re-gression models: methodological review. British J Psych. 2003; 183: 398-404. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.5.398
Griswold M, Parmigiani G, Potsky R, Lipscomb J. Analyz-ing health care costs: a comparison of statistical methods moti-vated by medicare colorectal cancer charges. Biostatistics. 2004; 1(1): 1-23.
Başer O. Modeling transformed health care costs with un-known heteroskedasticity. App Econ Res Bull. 2007; 01: 1-6.
Kessler D, McDowell A. Introducing the FMM procedure for finite mixture models. https://support.sas.com/resources/pa-pers/proceedings12/328-2012.pdf ; Accessed July 9, 2015.
McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite mixture models. New York, NY USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
Deb P, Trivedi PK. Demand for medical care for the elderly: a finite mixture approach. J Appl Econometrics. 1997; 12: 313-336.
Deb P, Holmes AN. Estimates of use and cost of behavioral health care: a comparison of standard and finite mixture models. In: Jones A and O’Donnell O. ed. Econometric analysis of health data. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2002: 87-99.
Lourenço OD, Ferreira PL. Utilization of public health cen-tres in Portugal: effect of time costs and other determinants. fi-nite mixture models applied to truncated samples. Health Econ. 2005; 14: 939-953. doi: 10.1002/hec.1046
Rein DB. A matter of classes: stratifying health care pop-ulations to produce better estimates of inpatient costs. Health Serv Res. 2005; 40(4): 1217-1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1475- 6773.2005.00393.x
Pierce DA, Schafer DW. Residuals in generalized lin-ear models. J Amer Stat Assoc. 1986; 81(396): 977-986. doi: 10.2307/2289071
Dunteman GH. Introduction to generalized linear models. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2006.
Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals. Biometrics. 2002; 58: 1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00001.x
The GENMOD procedure. SAS/STAT user’s guide, 2/e. http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/ HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_genmod_sect060.htm; Ac-cessed July 9, 2015.
Akaike H. Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econometrics. 1981; 16: 3-14.
Bozdogan H. Akaike’s information criteria and recent devel-opments in information complexity. J Math Psychol. 2000; 44: 62-91. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1277
Anderson DR, Burnham KP, White GC. Comparison of akaike information criteria and consistent akaike information criteria for model selection and statistical inference from cap-ture-recapture studies. J App Stat. 1998; 25(2): 263-282. doi: 10.1080/02664769823250
Mutua FM. The use of akaike information criterion in the identification of an optimum flood frequency model. Hydrologi-cal Sciences J. 1994; 39(3): 235-244.
The FMM Procedure. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. 13.2. http:// support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/de-fault/viewer.htm#statug_fmm_overview.htm . Accessed July 9, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Gynecology and Obstetrics Research (GOR) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.