Do Hearing-Impaired People Have Better or Worse Vision?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/noj.2024.v10.i01.pp06-09.1857Keywords:
Hearing-impaired; Vision; Perceptual deficit; Perceptual compensation; Audition.Abstract
By definition, the hearing-impaired lack one functioning sensory channel that transmits information to the brain. What effect
does this have on the perceptual systems of the brain is the subject of the review. There are currently two hypotheses on this
matter: The perceptual deficit hypothesis that states that lack of a functioning sensory input affects the development and maturation of other sensory channels and results in the impaired functioning of our senses. The second is the perceptual compensation hypothesis which states that when one sensory system is affected, the processing resources within the brain are reallocated
to the other sensory system resulting in an enhancement of the other systems. This review is about both these hypotheses and
attempts to answer the question if the hearing-impaired can really “see “better. We highlight the important findings from both
these hypotheses and provide growing evidence for the perceptual compensation hypothesis.
References
Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998; 121(9): 1603-1630.
Webber AL, Wood J. Amblyopia: Prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment. Clin Exp Optom. 2005; 88(6): 365- 375.
Myklebust HH. The Psychology of Deafness: Sensory Deprivation, Learning, and Adjustment. Great Britain, USA: Grune & Stratton. 1964.
Furth HG. Thinking without Language: Psychological Implications of Deafness. New York, NY, USA: Collier-Macmillan. 1966.
Pollard G, Neumaier R. Vision characteristics of deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf. 1974: 740-746.
Mohindra I. Vision profile of deaf children. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1976; 53(8): 412-419.
Quittner AL, Leibach P, Marciel K. The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: New methods to assess cognitive and behavioral development. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130(5): 547-554. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.547
Neville HJ, Schmidt A, Kutas M. Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally hearing-impaired adults. Brain Res. 1983; 266(1): 127-132.
Neville HJ, Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event related potential and behavioral study: II. Congenitally hearing-impaired adults. Brain Res. 1987; 405(2): 268-283.
Finney EM, Dobkins KR. Visual contrast sensitivity in hearing-impaired versus hearing populations: Exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivationand experience with a visual language. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 11(1): 171-183.
Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, et al. Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally hearing-impaired individuals. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(17): RC93.
Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomman A, Mitchell T, Neville H, Liu GH. Impact of early hearing-impairedness and early exposure to Jayakumar J sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(22): 8931-8942.
Bross M. Response bias in hearing-impaired and hearing subjects as a function of motivational factors. Perceptual Motor Skills. 1979; 3: 779-782.
Bross M, Sauerwein H. Signal detection analysis of visual flicker in hearing-impaired and hearing individuals Perceptual Motor Skills. 1980; 51: 839-843.
Stevens C, Neville H. Neuroplasticity as a double-edged sword: deaf enhancements and dyslexic deficits in motion processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(5): 701-714. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.701
Bosworth RG, Dobkins KR. Left-hemisphere dominance for motion processing in hearing-impaired signers. Psycho Sci.1999; 10: 256-262. doi: 10.1111%2F1467-9280.00146
Bosworth RG, Dobkins KR. The effect of spatial attention on motion processing in hearing-impaired signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners. Brain Cogn. 2002; 49(1): 152-169. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1497
Brozinsky CJ, Bavelier D. Motion velocity thresholds in hearing-impaired signers: Changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity. Brain Res Cogni Brain Res. 2004; 21(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.002
Poizner H, Tallal P. Temporal processing in hearing-impaired signers. Brain Lang. 1987; 30(1): 52-62.
Nava E, Bottari D, Zampini M, Pavani F. Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly hearing-impaired individuals. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 190(2): 179-188. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1459-9
Heming JE, Brown LN. Sensory temporal processing in adults with early hearing loss. Brain Cogn. 2005; 59(2): 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.012
Loke WH, Song S. Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bull Psych Soc.1991; 29(5): 437- 440. doi: 10.3758/BF03333964
Reynolds HN. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in hearing-impaired and hearing subjects. Am J Psych. 1993; 106(4): 523-540.
Posner M. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980; 32(1): 3-25.
Parasnis I, Samar VJ. Parafoveal attention in congenitally hearing-impaired and hearing young adults. Brain Cogn. 1985; 4(3): 313-327.
Colmenero JM, Catena A, Fuentes LJ, Ramos MM. Mechanisms of visuo-spatial orienting in hearing-impairedness. Eur J Cogn. 2004; 16: 791-805. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000312
Klein RM. Inhibition of return. Trends Cogni Sci. 2000; 4: 138- 147. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2
Proksch J, Bavelier D. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early hearing-impairedness. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(5): 687-701. doi: 10.1162/08989290260138591
Sladen D, Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Grantham DW, Chun MM. Visual attention in hearing-impaired and normal hearing adults: Effects of stimulus compatibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005; 48(6): 1529-1537. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/106) Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ 9 Jayakumar J
Chen Q, Zhang M, Zhou X. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return IOR on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally hearing-impaired people. Brain Res. 2006; 1109(1): 117-127. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.043
Dye MWG, Baril DE, Bavelier D. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by hearing-impairedness? The case of the attentional network test. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(8): 1801-1811. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2006.12.019
Bavelier D, Dye MWG, Hauser PC. Do hearing-impaired individuals see better? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(11): 512-518. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.tics.2006.09.006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Neuro (NEURO) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.