Nudge: Towards a Consensus View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-5-143Keywords:
Nudge, Rationality, Information, Behavioral science, Cognitive bias, Policy intervention;, Nudge effectiveness, Thaler, SunsteinAbstract
This article presents a particular viewpoint on how nudge should be understood. The concept of nudge has generated considerable
interest among academics and policymakers. However, ten years later, what is meant exactly by “nudge” is still a matter
of debate. In fact, there is a fundamental discrepancy between the (original) narrow definition of Thaler and Sunstein (nudge in
the narrow sense, NN) and the (later) broad definition of Sunstein (nudge in the broad sense, NB). These two definitions differ
regarding the instrumental use of rationality failures, and accordingly whether the provision or disclosure of information counts
as a nudge or not. From a pragmatic perspective, the paper argues for a position that consists of adopting the broad definition
of a nudge while acknowledging several types of nudges, which we provide in an integrative view. We suggest that future research
should assess the effectiveness of these different types of nudges separately.
References
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, Connecticut, USA: Yale Univer-sity Press. 2008.
ThalerRH,SunsteinCR.Libertarianpaternalism.TheAmericanEco-nomic Review. 2003; 93: 175-179. doi: 10.1257/000282803321947001
Hansen PG. The definition of nudge and libertarian paternal-ism: Does the hand fit the glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2016; 7: 155-174. doi: 10.1017/S1867299X00005468
Mongin P, Cozic M. Rethinking nudge: Not one but three concepts. Behavioural Public Policy. 2018; 2: 107-124. doi:10.1017/ bpp.2016.16
Hausman DM, Welch B. Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2010; 18: 123-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9760.2009.00351.x
Bonell C, McKee M, Fletcher A, Wilkinson P, Haines A. One nudge forward, two steps back. BMJ. 2011; 342: d401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d401
Saghai Y. Salvaging the concept of nudge. Journal of Medical Eth-ics. 2013; 39: 487-493. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100727
Baldwin R. From regulation to behaviour change: Giving nudge the third-degree. Modern Law Review. 2014; 77: 831-857. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12094
Barton A, Grüne-Yanoff T. From libertarian paternalism to nudging—and beyond. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2015; 6: 341-359. doi: 10.1007/s1316
Lin Y, Osman M, Ashcroft R. Nudge: Concept, effective-ness, andethics. Basic and Applied Psychology. 2017; 39: 293-306. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304
Sunstein CR. Nudges, agency, navigability, and abstraction: A reply to critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2015; 6: 511-529.
Sunstein CR. Misconceptions about nudges. Journal of Behavio-ral Economics for Policy. 2018; 2: 61-67. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3033101
Tor A. The critical and problematic role of bounded rationality in nudging. In: Mathis K, Tor A (Eds). Nudging. Possibilities, Limi-tations and Applications in European Law and Economics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2016.
Hansen PG, Jespersen AM. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge ap-proach to behavior change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2013; 1: 3-28.
Miller DT, Prentice D. Psychological levers of behavior change. In: Shafir E (Ed). The Behavioral Foundations of Policy. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 2013.
Bovens L. The ethics of nudge. In: Grüne-Yanoff T, Hansson SO (Eds). Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 2009.
Oliver A. From nudging to budging: Using behavioural eco-nomics to inform public sector policy. Journal of Social Policy. 2013; 42: 685-700. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000299
Schubert C. Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? Ecological Economics. 2017; 132: 329-342. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2729899
Grüne-Yanoff T, Hertwig R. Nudge versus boost: How coher-ent are policy and theory? Minds and Machines. 2016; 26: 149-183. doi: 10.1007/s1102
John P, Smith G, Stoker G. Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. Political Quarterly. 2009; 80: Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 5 | Number 1 | Berthet V, et al 361-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.x
Sunstein CR. People prefer system 2 nudges (kind of). Duke Law Journal. 2016; 66: 121-168. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2731868
Blumenthal-Barby JS, Burroughs H. Seeking better health car-eoutcomes: The ethics of using the “nudge”. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(2): 1-10. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634481
Ashcroft RE. Doing good by stealth: Comments on ‘salvaging the conceptof nudge’. J Med Ethics. 2013; 39(8): 494. doi: 10.1136/ medethics-2012-101109
Nys TRV, Engelen B. Judging nudging: Answering the ma-nipulation objection. Political Studies. 2017; 65,199-214. doi: 10.1177%2F0032321716629487
Smith NC, Goldstein DG, Johnson EJ. Choice without aware-ness: Ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 2013; 32: 159-172. doi: 10.1509/jppm.10.114
Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000; 23: 645-726. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
Münscher R, Vetter M, Scheuerle T. A review and taxonomy of choice architecture techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2015; 29: 511-524. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1897
Szaszi B, Palinkas A, Palfi B, Szollosi A, Aczel B. A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: Towards un-derstanding when and why nudges work. Journal of Behavioral Deci-sion Making. 2017; 31: 355-366. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2035
Congiu L, Moscati I. Message and environment: A framework for nudges and choice architecture. Behavioural Public Policy. 2018; 1-17. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2018.29
McKenzie CR, Liersch MJ, Finkelstein SR. Recommendation-simplicit in policy defaults. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(5): 414-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x
Benartzi S, Beshears J, Milkman KL, et al. Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(8): 1041-1055. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702501
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (PCS) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.