The Spectrum of Malignant Solid Childhood Tumors in the Age Group of 0-12 Years

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Gite Vandana Department of Lab Services, Apollo Hospitals, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Dhakane Maruti Seth GS Medical College and KEMH Parel, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/PNNOJ-2-114

Keywords:

Neuroblastoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, EWS/PNET

Abstract

Objective: To document general baseline data on the patterns of childhood malignant tumors in
a surgical pathology department.
Design, Setting and Participants: This is a retrospective analysis of 35 cases of pediatric tumors
in surgical pathology department of tertiary care hospital excluding neurosurgery, cardiothoracic
and haemato-lymphoid malignancies. (Age group 0-12 years) encountered over a period
of 5 years.
Results: 35 children were diagnosed with malignant tumors. The commonest tumor was wilms
tumor (9 out of 35 cases) followed by neuroblastoma (4 out of 35 cases). The common age of
presentation was 1-5 years with male predominance. In the renal tumors only wilms tumors
(9 cases) was seen, with classical triphasic tumors were more common. The mean age of presentation
was 3 year with commonest age group of presentation (8 cases out of 9) in the age
group 1-5 years. Three of them had showed unfavorable histology. In the adrenal gland, adrenal
medullary tumors were more common than adrenal cortex with neuroblastoma (4 of 6 cases)
as common individual tumor. Immunohistochemistry performed on 10 of 11 round cell tumors
revealed five cases of lymphoma, three cases of Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) & two cases of
Ewing sarcoma-primitive neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/PNET).
Conclusion: Histological type is important for understanding etiology and progression of disease.
The likelihood of a given type of tumor being present in a particular age or sex group or
particular site may heighten the index of suspicion and ultimately influences etiology, biology,
and natural history, relative incidence and distribution frequency, clinical presentation and
manifestations, and response to therapy and outcome.

References

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. Can-0-1yr 1-5 yrs 5-10 yrs 10-12 yrs Total 1 1 1 2 3 1 8 9 1 1 1 2 6 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 3 3 1 1 4 18 8 5 35 Male (M) Female (F) Total M: F 7 2 9 3.5:1 1 1 1(M) 1 1 1(F) 1 2 3 1:02 9 2 11 4.5:1 1 1 1(F) 1 1 1(M) 2 2 4 1:1 2 1 3 2:1 1 1 1(M) 24 11 35 2.2:1 cer J Clin. 2006; 56: 106-130. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106 th

Paul V, Bagga A. Ghai Essential paediatrics, 8 ed, CBS pub-lishers, 2013.

Kusumakumary P, Rojimon J, Jothirmayi R, Nair M. Profile of pediatric malignancies: a ten-year study. Indian Pediatrics. 2000; 37: 1234-1238.

Audrey E, Giulio J. Age at diagnosis and prognosis in chil-dren with neuroblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23(27): 6443-6444. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.005

Joshi D, Anderson J, Paidas C, Breneman J, Parham D, Crist W. Age is an independent prognostic factor in rhabdomyosar-coma: a report from the soft tissue sarcoma committee of the children’s oncology group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004; 42(1): 64-73. doi: 10.1002/pbc.10441

Sebastian O, Hyginus E, Boniface I, et al. The burden of pe-diatric malignant solid tumors in a developing country. J Trop Pediatr. 2010; 56(2): 111-114. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmp075

Louisa P, Durrane T, Suhail M, Irshad N, Zafar N, Sheema H. Clinicopathological profile of Wilms tumor. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2000; 67(10): 765-767. doi: 10.1007/BF02723937

Stocker JT, Dehner LP. Pediatric Pathology, 2nd edition. Phila-delphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

Breslow NE, Beckwith JB. Epidemiological features of Wilms tumor: results of the National Wilms tumor study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1982; 68 (3): 429-436.

Patel A, Patel K, Shah S, et al. Three years experience of in-fantile Wilms tumor at a single institute in a developing country. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007; 25(18S): 20028.

London W, Castleberry R, Matthay K, et al. Evidence for an age cut-off greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 (27): 6459-6465. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.571

Audrey E, Giulio J. Age at diagnosis and prognosis in chil-dren with neuroblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23(27): 6443-6444. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.005

Ng L, Libertino JM. Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. J Urol. 2003; 169: 5-11. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5347(05)64023-2

Potter EL, Gilbert-Barness E. Potter’s atlas of fetal and in-fant Pathology. Mosby; 1998.

Published

2015-10-29

How to Cite

Gite Vandana, & Dhakane Maruti. (2015). The Spectrum of Malignant Solid Childhood Tumors in the Age Group of 0-12 Years. Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing, 2(3), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.17140/PNNOJ-2-114