Umbilical Cord Care After the First Day From Birth: A Case Control Study in a Northeastern Italian Hospital

Authors

  • Letizia Gallina School of Nursing, University of Udine, 50 Via Colugna, Udine, 33100, Italy
  • Anna Lisa De Tina Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, 15 P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, 33100, Italy
  • Tiziano Basso AASn4 “Alto Friuli-Collinare-Medio Friuli”, Hospital of Tolmezzo, 1 Via Papa Giovanni XXIII, Tolmezzo, 33028, Italy
  • Silvio Brusaferro Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, 50 Via Colugna, Udine, 33100, Italy
  • Rosanna Quattrin Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, 15 P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, 33100, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/PNNOJ-3-118

Keywords:

Umbilical cord care, Dry cord care, 70% alcohol, Cord separation time, Caregivers’ satisfaction

Abstract

Background: Recently the use of antibacterial agents to clean and dry the stump of the newborns’
umbilical cord (UC) after birth has been abandoned by many neonatal units. Aim of this study
was to compare the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), time to UC separation and caregivers’
satisfaction among newborns treated with dry cord care versus 70% alcohol after one day from
birth in an Italian Hospital.
Methods: From June 2014 to September 2014, 100 infants were enrolled for the study. Soon
after birth, all the newborns were treated in the same way: their UC was cleansed with 70%
alcohol, using a sterile gauze. One day after the birth, in the control group the UC was regularly
cleansed with 70% alcohol twice a day, while in the case group, from the first nappy change,
dry cord care was performed cleansing the UC with sterile saline solution (NaCl 90%), using
a sterile gauze twice a day. In all cases UC was left without any dressing upon it as well. The
time to UC separation and any AEs (local and systemic infections, haemorrhage, granuloma
formation) were reported by mothers. Carers’ perception regarding the two procedures were
collected by a questionnaire between 6 and 24 hours after birth, and 1 month later.
Results: We found a significant difference in the mean cord separation time between the two
groups [dry cord care: 9.1 days (standard deviation (SD)=3.1] versus 70% alcohol: 11.3 days
(SD=4.6); p<0.01], while no significant AEs and carers’ satisfaction on the procedures resulted.
Instead, change of treatment at home was more frequent in dry cord care group (23.9% versus
6.1%; p<0.01).
Conclusions: This study confirms that dry cord care is an easy, accepted and safe method of
handling the UC in healthy newborn infants born in a high-income hospital setting.
KEYWORDS: ; ; ; ;
.

References

Zupan J, Garner P, Omari AA. Topical umbilical cord care at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 3: CD001057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001057.pub2

Karumbi J, Mulaku M, Aluvaala J, English M, Opiyo N. Topical umbilical cord care for prevention of infection and neonatal mortality. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013; 32(1): 78-83. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182783dc3

Overturf GD, Muller M, Nizet V. Focal Bacterial Infections. In: Remington J, Klein J, Wilson C, et al., eds Remington & Klein’s Infectious Diseases of the Fetus & Newborn Infant. 8th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier; 2015: 319-349.

Bugaje M, Ameh E, McHoney M, Lakhoo K. Omphalitis. In: Ameh AE, Bickler SW, Lakhoo K, et al., eds. Paediatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Text for Africa. 2015: 120-128. Web site. http://www.global-help.org/publications/books/help_ pedsurgeryafricavolume01.pdf. Accessed May 05, 2016.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. Geneva, Switzerland: 2013. Web site. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream /10665/97603/1/9789241506649_eng.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2016

American Academy of Pediatrics. Infection control. In: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, eds Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1992: 141-175.

AWMP. Betreuung des gesunden Neugeborenen im Kreisssaal und wahrend des Wonchebettes der Mutter. AWMF - Leitlinien-Register nr 024/005. Web site. http://www.docs4you.at/Content. Node/OEGKJ/Konsensuspapiere/Leitlinien_Betreuung_ gesunder_Neugeborener_im_Kreissaal.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2016

Arifeen SE, Mullany LC, Shah R, et al. The effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9820): 1022-1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(11)61848-5

Soofi S, Cousens S, Imdad A, Bhutto N, Ali N, Bhutta ZA. Topical application of chlorhexidine to neonatal umbilical cords for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in a rural district of Pakistan: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9820): 1029-1036. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(11)61877-1

Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Katz J, Tielsch JM. Impact of umbilical cord cleansing with 4.0% chlorhexidine on time to cord separation among newborns in southern Nepal: a cluster-randomized, community-based trial. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(5): 1864-1871. Web site. http://pediatrics. aappublications.org/content/118/5/1864. Accessed May 5, 2016

Kapellen TM, Gebauer CM, Brosteanu O, Labitzke B, Vogtmann C, Kiess W. Higher rate of cord-related adverse events in neonates with dry umbilical cord care compared to chlorhexidine powder. Neonatology. 2009; 96(1): 13-18. doi: 10.1159/000200165

Verber IG, Pagan FS. What cord care – if any. Arch Dis Child. 1993; 68: 594-596.

Janssen PA, Selwood BL, Dobson SR, Peacock D, Thiessen PN. To dye or not to dye: a randomized, clinical trial of a triple dye/alcohol regime versus dry cord care. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(1): 15-20. Web site. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ content/111/1/15.long. Accessed May 5, 2016

Dore S, Buchan D, Coulas S, et al. Alcohol versus natural drying for newborn cord care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998; 27(6): 621-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02631.x

Bain J. Midwifery: umbilical cord care in pre-term babies. Nursing Standard. 1994; 8(15): 32-36.

Pezzati M, Biagioli EC, Martelli E, Gambi B, Biagiotti R, Rubaltelli FF. Umbilical cord care: the effect of eight different cord-care regimens on cord separation time and other outcomes. Biol Neonate. 2002; 81(15): 38-44. doi: 10.1159/000047182

Quattrin R, Iacobucci K, De Tina AL, Gallina L, Pittini C, Brusaferro S. 70% alcohol versus dry cord care in the umbilical cord care: a case-control study in Italy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(14): e3207. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003207

Mugford M, Somchiwong M, Waterhouse IL. Treatment of umbilical cords: a randomized trial to assess the effect of treatment methods on the work of midwives. Midwifery. 1986; 2(4): 177-186. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(86)80043-2

Pomeranz A. Anomalies, Abnormalities and Care of the umbilicus. Pediatric Clin North Am. 2004; 51(3): 819-827. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2004.01.010

Daniels J. Is silver nitrate the best agent for the management of umbilical granuloma? Arch Dis Child. 2001; 85(5): 431-434. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.5.431

Majjiga VS, Kumaresan P, Glass EJ. Silver nitrate burns following umbilical granuloma treatment. Archive of Disease in Childhood. 2005; 90(7): 674. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.067918

Downloads

Published

2016-05-13

How to Cite

Letizia Gallina, Anna Lisa De Tina, Tiziano Basso, Silvio Brusaferro, & Rosanna Quattrin. (2016). Umbilical Cord Care After the First Day From Birth: A Case Control Study in a Northeastern Italian Hospital. Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing, 3(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.17140/PNNOJ-3-118