Interoperability in Radiography Data: The Impossible Dream

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Anthony Todd Dotson Department of Kinesiology, Health & Imaging Sciences, Morehead University, Morehead, Ken- tucky 40351, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-1-102

Abstract

Background: Technology in healthcare is changing at a very rapid pace. To ensure that technology is used efficiently to combat rising healthcare costs and new federal policies and laws, all technology must be able to communicate with each other. Therefore, interoperability must be obtained. Radiography is no exception considering all the different types of equipment manufactured routinely used today. Some barriers need to be overcome to achieve interoperability within radiography departments.
Purpose: To review the literature on the interoperability of healthcare data to determine the barriers that Radiography departments would have to overcome to improve interoperability of their healthcare data.
Methods: The methodology of this literature review follows the fundamental principles of a systematic search, conducted in separate stages, but is not a comprehensive systematic review, which was not reasonable due to resource constraints. The stages of the literature search included defining the search strategy, identifying the inclusion criteria, assessing the relevance and validity of the studies retrieved, and data extraction and synthesis.
Results: There were attempts to ensure interoperability, such as the use of the Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN), but roadblocks such as financial incentives for physicians and costs of implantation have hindered the adoption of the NwHIN. Other barriers that limit interoperability exist. These obstacles included inconsistency of the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard for medical imaging departments and a complete lack of norms for certain data points such as the exposure index between different vendors.
Discussion: Multiple viable options for the improvement of interoperability are prevalent in radiography departments. One such option is cloud computing, which uses multiple various types of hardware and software as resources to help interoperability of healthcare data. Agent-based technologies, which can be used to distribute management of different standards, can also be utilized to communicate between standards. The largest need to ensure interoperability is standards that are well defined and stringent with an infrastructure to map different terminologies across different standards.
Conclusion: Various technological advances can be used to improve interoperability such as agent-based technology and cloud computing. However, until a standardization of terms within the DICOM protocol and a standard across vendors, and all data points standardized, it will be impossible to obtain true interoperability.

References

Huang HK. PACS and Imaging Informatics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Publishing; 2010.

Furman J. Third Estimate of GDP for the Second Quarter of 2014. Web site. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/09/26/ third-estimate-gdp-second-quarter-2014 Published. September 26, 2014. Accessed September 2, 2015.

Sidorov J. It Ain’t So: The Electronic Health Record and The Unlikely Prospect of Reducing Health Care Costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25(4): 1079-1085. doi: 10.1377/ hlthaff.25.4.1079

Box T, McDonell M, Helfrich C, Jesse R, Fihn SD, Rumsfeld JS. Strategies from a Nationwide Health Information Technolo-gy Implementation: The VA Cart Story. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25 Suppl 1: 72-76. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1130-6

HealthIT.gov. Interoperability Portfolio (Archive). Nation-wide Health Information Network (NwHIN). Web site. http:// www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/nationwide-health-information-network-nwhin. Updated. January 18, 2013. Accessed. August 12, 2015.

Kaushal R, Blumenthal D, Poon E, et al. of Cost of National Health Information Network Working Group. The costs of a national health information network. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143(3): 165-173. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020- 00002

Smith JB. What is Meaningful Use? AONE. 2013; doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2013.01.006

Kumar S, Aldrich K. Overcoming barriers to electronic medi-cal record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: A comparative study. Health Informatics J. 2010; 16(4): 306- 318. doi: 10.1177/1460458210380523

Koutelakis GV, Anastassopoulos GK, Lymberopoulos DK. Application of Multiprotocol Medical Imaging Communications and an Extended DICOM WADO Service in a Teleradiology Ar-chitecture. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applica-tions. 2012; 271758: 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2012/271758

Crane JC, Olson MP, Nelson SJ. SIVIC: Open-Source, Standards-Based Software for DICOM MR Spectroscopy Work-flows. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. 2013; 169526: 1-12. doi: 10.1155/2013/169526

Källman H-E, Halsius E, Folkesson M, Larsson Y, Stenström M, Båth M. Automated detection of changes in patient exposure in digital projection radiography using exposure index from DI-COM header metadata. Acta Oncol. 2011; 50(6): 960-965. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.579622

Shea CM, Reiter KL, Weaver MA, et al. Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014; 14: 119 doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0119-1

Chen Y, Paxson V, Katz R. What’s New about cloud com-puting security? EECS Department. University of California at Berkeley. Technical Report. 2010.

Urovi V, Olivieri AC, de la Torre AB, Bromuri S, Fornara N, Schumacher M. Secure P2P Cross-Community Health Record Exchange in IHE Compatible Systems. Int J Artif Intell Tools. 2014; 23: 1440006 doi: 10.1142/S0218213014400065

Chronaki C, Estelrich A, Cangioli G, et al. Interoperability standards enabling cross-border patient summary exchange. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 205: 256-260. doi: 10.3233/978- 1-61499-432-9-256

Beaty DL. Part One. Digital Healthcare Planning. ASHRAE J. 2014; 56(9): 84-90.

Published

2016-02-23

How to Cite

Anthony Todd Dotson. (2016). Interoperability in Radiography Data: The Impossible Dream. Radiology, 1(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-1-102

Most read articles by the same author(s)