Role of Digital Assessment in Wound Management

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Jacob A. Chakiath Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Ravi K. Chittoria Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Nishad Kerakada Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Neljo Thomas Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Barathkumar S. Parthiban Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Adithyakevin James Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Perumal Chakkravarthy Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
  • Varun Rajanna Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-6-136

Keywords:

Digital planimetry, Image, Wound

Abstract

Aim
The aim of this study was to assess the role of digital planimetry in accurate measurement of wound size and guide in wound bed
preparation in our patient. The calculation of wound surface area was done by using ImageJ software.
Methods
In our study, digital planimetry was used to measure the wound size using ImageJ software.
Results
In our study, digital planimetry helped inaccurate measurement of wound and helped to plan measures to decrease the wound size.
Conclusion
Digital assessment and ImageJ is a simple, easy, cost-effective technique of accurate wound measurement for wound management.

References

Haghpanah S, Bogie K, Wang X, Banks PG, Ho CH. Reliability of electronic versus manual measurement techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1396-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.014

Chitoria RK, Kumar P, Baljaj SP, Singh AK, Gupta DK. General clinical guidelines for wound management: Redefining acronym SWCR. Journal of SWCR. 2014; 7(1): 2-7.

Shetty R, Sreekar H, Lamba S, Gupta AK. A novel and accu-rate technique of photographic wound measurement. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012; 45(2): 425-429. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.101333

Majeske C. Reliability of wound surface area measurement. Phy Ther. 1992; 72: 138-141. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.2.138

Mayrovitz HN, Soontupe LB. Wound area by computerized pla-nimetry of digital images. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009; 22: 222-229. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000350839.19477.ce

Wang Y, Liu G, Nanbing, et al. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi. Chin. J. Reparative Reconstr. Surg. 2008; 22(5): 563-566.

Rishi, Rana N. Particle size and shape analysis using imagej with customized tools for segmentation of particle. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT). 2002; 4(11): 2278- 0818.

Pandey S, Chitoria RK, Mohapatra DP, et al. Application of digital planimetry: A novel technique of wound measurement in diabetic foot ulcer. Dermatology International. 2016; 21: 343-331.

Published

2022-05-16

How to Cite

Jacob A. Chakiath, Ravi K. Chittoria, Nishad Kerakada, Neljo Thomas, Barathkumar S. Parthiban, Adithyakevin James, … Varun Rajanna. (2022). Role of Digital Assessment in Wound Management. Radiology, 6(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.17140/ROJ-6-136

Most read articles by the same author(s)