Nested, Place and Relational Multiple Social Identities among Latinx and White College Students in California, USA

Crossmark: check for updates

Authors

  • Aghop Der-Karabetian Emeritus Professor of Psychology, University of La Verne, CA 91750, USA
  • Mark Lopez Student in the Psychology Department, University of La Verne, CA 91750, USA
  • Melissa Oseguera Student in the Psychology Department, University of La Verne, CA 91750, USA
  • Michelle Alfaro Adjunct Psychology Professor, University of La Verne, CA 91750, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-4-115

Keywords:

Social Identities, Nested identities, Place identities, Relational identities, Nested concentricity model

Abstract

Aim
The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the relationships of nested concentrically enlarged social identities of family (most proximal), neighborhood, cognitive-ethnic, affective-ethnic, state (California), national (American), and global-human (most distal) identities among a diverse group of American undergraduate college students in California, as well as within groups of self-designated Latinx (instead of Latino/a to replace gender notation) and White students.
Method
Participants were 256 ethnically diverse college undergraduate students in a long-established non-profit private university in California (179 women and 77 men). Each social identity was measured using established scales that showed good internal consistencies for the current sample with Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.89.
Results
The results showed that in the overall sample, the relative strength (rank) of the social identities going from most proximal (strongest) to the most distal (weakest) are as follows: Family, national (American), cognitive-ethnic, State (California), global-human, affective-ethnic, and neighborhood. The rankings (relative strength) based on the mean identity scores were somewhat different for Latinx and White samples but significantly correlated. Also, for the Latinx sample family identity and ethnic identity appear to have both relational and place attributes. For the White sample, family and global-human identities were polarized.

Conclusion

The findings suggest the complexity of the ways nested identities may be related rather than being related in a concentrically linear fashion, and may be different for different groups and collectives.

References

Jenkins R. Social Identity (Key Ideas) (3rd ed). New York, USA: Rou-tledge. 2014.

Stets JE, Serpe RT. Identity theory. In: Delamater J, Ward A, (eds). Handbook of Social Psychology. New York, USA: Springer. 2013. 31-60. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0

Styker S, Burke PJ. The past, present and future of identi-ty theory. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2000; 63(4): 284-297. doi: 10.2307/2695840

Mead M. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, USA: University of Chi-cago Press. 1934.

Erikson EH. Youth and Crisis. New York, NY, USA: W. W. Nor-ton & Company. 1968.

Tajfel H. Human Groups and Social Categories. England, UK: Cam-bridge University Press. 1981.

Brewer MB. The Social Self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1991; 17(5): 475-482. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001

Capozza D, Brown R, (eds). Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage. 2000.

Gamst GC, Liang CTH, Der-Karabetian A. Handbook of Multi-cultural Measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2011. 13 Der-Karabetian A, et al

Herb GH, Kaplan DH, eds. Nested Identities: Nationalism, Terri-tory, and Scale. New York, NY, USA: Rowman and Littlefield. 1999.

Leary MR, Tangney JP, (eds). Handbook of Self and Identity. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press. 2003.

Phinney JS. Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychol Bull. 1990; 108: 499-514. doi: 10.1037/0033- 2909.108.3.499

Sue DW, Sue D. Counseling the Culturally Different: Theory and Practice, 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Feldman SD. Nested identities. Studies in Symbolic Interaction. 1979; 2: 399-418.

Pollman A. National and European identities: Notions of recon-cilability and inclusiveness in a case study of German trainee teach-ers. Compare. 2007; 37(1): 89-104. doi: 10.1080/03057920601061844

Spinner-Halev J. Education, reconciliation and nested iden-tities. Theory and Research in Education. 2003; 1(1): 51-72. doi: 10.1177/1477878503001001004

Goyder J. Measuring collective identities of Canadians: A nest-ed concentricity model. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique. 1998; 58: 48-67. doi: 10.1177/075910639805800106

Medrano JD, Gutierrez P. Nested identities: National and Eu-ropean identity in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2001; 24: 753-778. doi: 10.1080/01419870120063963

Kalin R, Berry JW. Social ecology of ethnic attitudes in Can-ada. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 1982; 14(2): 97-109. doi: 10.1037/h0081246

Kalin R, Berry JW. Ethnic and civic self-identity in Canada: Analysis of 1974 and 1991 national survey. Canadian Ethnic Stud-ies. 1995; 27(2): 1-15. doi: 10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.301

Laczko LS. National and local attachments in a changing world system: Evidence form an international survey. International Journal of Sociology. 2005; 15(3): 517-528. doi: 10.1080/03906700500272525

De Frederico del la Rua A. Networks and identification: A relational approach to social identities. International Sociology. 2007; 22(6): 683-699. doi: 10.1177/0268580907082247

Lee S, Adair WL, Mannix EA, Kim J. The relative versus col-lective ‘we’ and intergroup allocation: The role of nested group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012; 48(5): 1132-1138.

Dixon J, Durrheim K. Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psycholo-gy. 2010; 39(1): 27-44. doi: 10.1348/014466600164318 Original Research | Volume 4 | Number 1|

Andreouli E, Howarth C. National identity, citizenship and immigration: Putting identity in context. Journal for The Theory of Social Behaviour. 2012; 43(3): 361-382. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 5914.2012.00501.x

Der-Karabetian A. Armenian Ethnic Identity in Context: Empirical and Psychosocial Perspective. Beirut, Lebanon, Arabic: Haigazian Uni-versity Press. 2018.

Kiang L, Fuligni AJ. Ethnic identity in context: Variations in ethnic exploration and belonging within parent, same-ethnic peer, and different-ethnic peer relations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2009; 38: 732-743. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9278-7

Vazsonyi AT, Trejos-Castillo E, Young MA. Rural and non-ru-ral African American youth: Does context matter in the etiology of problem behavior? Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2008; 37(7): 798-811. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9239-6

Phinney JS, Ong AD. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2007; 54(3): 271-281. doi: 10.1037/0022- 0167.54.3.271

Der-Karabetian A, Ruiz Y. Affective bicultural and global-hu-man identity scales for Mexican American adolescents. Psychological Reports. 1997; 80(3): 1027-1039.

Der-Karabetian A, Cao Y, Alfaro M. Sustainable behavior, perceived globalization impact, world-mindedness, identity, and perceived risk in college samples from the United States, Chi-na, and Taiwan. Ecopsychology. 2014; 6(4): 218-233. doi: 10.1089/ eco.2014.0035

Kaplan DH. Territorial identity and geographic scale. In: Herb GH, Kaplan DH. (eds). Nested Identities: Nationalism, Territory and Scale. Lanaham, MD, USA: Rowman and Littlefield. 1999: 31-48.

Newman D. From national to post-national territorial iden-tities in Israel-Palestine. Geo Journal. 2001; 53(3): 235-246. doi: Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Original Research | Volume 4 | Number 1| Der-Karabetian A, et al 10.1023/A:1019529827735

Kang SK, Bodenhausen GV. Multiple identities in social per-ception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. In: Fiske ST, Schacter, DL, Taylor SE. (eds). Annual Review of Psychology. 2015; 6: 547-574.

Sherif M. Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan. 1966.

Tajfel H. The Achievement of Group Differentiation: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London, UK: London Aca-demic Press. 1978.

Brewer MB. Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group ho-mogeneity. Social Cognition. 1993; 11(1): 150-164. doi: 10.1521/ soco.1993.11.1.150

McKeown S. Perception of a superordinate identity in North-ern Ireland. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 2014; 20(4): 505-515.

de Rivera J, Carson HA. Cultivating global identity. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 2015; 3(2): 310-330. doi: 10.5964/jspp. v3i2.507

Yip T. Sources of situational variation in ethnic identity and psychological well-being: A palm pilot study of Chinese American students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005; 31(12): 1603- 1616. doi: 10.1177/0146167205277094

Jackson JW, Smith ER. Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999; 25(1): 120-135. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025001010

Harwood RL, Handwerker WP, Schoelmerich A, Leyendeck-er B. Ethnic category labels, parental beliefs, and the contex-tualized individual: An exploration of the individualism-soci-ocentrism debate. Parenting. 2001; 1(3): 217-236. doi: 10.1207/ S15327922PAR0103_03

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

Aghop Der-Karabetian, Mark Lopez, Melissa Oseguera, & Michelle Alfaro. (2019). Nested, Place and Relational Multiple Social Identities among Latinx and White College Students in California, USA. Social Behavior Research and Practice, 4(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-4-115