Personality Traits as Predictors of Leadership Style Preferences: Investigating the Relationship Between Social Dominance Orientation and Attitudes Towards Authentic Leaders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/SBRPOJ-3-110Keywords:
Authentic leadership, Daoist leadership, Alpha male leadership, Social dominance orientation, MulticulturalismAbstract
Background and Purpose
The purpose of the current study was to assess the degree to which followers view authentic leadership as viable. Prior research has suggested that authentic leaders are multiculturally competent and effective in the workplace. For authentic leadership to thrive, it will help to better understand followers’ attitudes towards it. We investigated followers’ attitudes towards authentic leaders along with other influential leadership styles. Additionally, we sought to further an individual difference perspective concerning how followers view their leaders. We examined the relationship between followers’ level of social dominance orientation and their attitudes towards authentic leaders.
Materials and Methods
We recruited 117 United States participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants read three prototypical descriptions of alpha male, Daoist (an Eastern style), and authentic leaders. They provided likability and competence ratings for each leader and then completed a measure of social dominance orientation.
Results
We assessed whether participants found the authentic leader viable compared to the Daoist and alpha male leaders. The data indicated that the authentic leader was more preferred than the alpha male leader but less preferred than the Daoist leader. We found that authentic leaders were rated most competent and more likable than alpha male leaders, but just as likable as Daoist leaders. Additionally, the higher a participant’s level of social dominance orientation the less positive their attitudes towards communal leaders.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that followers view authentic leadership as a viable alternative to existing paradigms of leadership. Followers appear to find authentic leadership and Daoist leadership, both communal styles, more preferable than alpha male leadership. We argue that followers with a general desire for inequality between social groups will tend to have more negative attitudes towards authentic and Daoist leadership. Our results contribute to the field of leadership psychology by expanding our knowledge of the personal characteristics predicting leadership preferences.
References
Ludeman K, Erlandson E. Coaching the alpha male. Harvard Business Review. Web site. https://hbr.org/2004/05/coaching-the-alpha-male. Published May 2004. Accessed June 13, 2017.
Schein VE. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J Appl Psychol. 1973; 57(2): 95-100. doi: 10.1037/h0037128
Schein, VE. A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. J Soc Issues. 2001; 57(4): 675-688. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00235
Kouzes JM, Posner BZ. The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
Brown ME, TreviñoLK, Harrison DA. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2005; 97(2): 117-134. doi: 10.1016/j. obhdp.2005.03.002
Yukl G. Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2012; 26(4): 66-85. doi: 10.5465/amp.2012.0088
Burns JM. Leadership. New York, USA: Harper & Row; 1978.
Piccolo RF, Bono JE, Heinitz JR, Rowold J, Duehr E, Judge TA. The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? Leadersh Q. 2012; 23(3): 567-581. doi: 10.1016/j. leaqua.2011.12.008
Bono JE, Judge TA. Personality and transformational and trans-actional leadership: A meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004; 89(5): 901-910. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
Chin JL, Trimble JE. Diversity and Leadership. Los Angeles, CA, USA: SAGE; 2015.
Bass BM. Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. 3rd ed. New York, USA: Free Press; 1990.
Chin JL. Diversity leadership: Influence of ethnicity, gender, and minority status. Open Journal of Leadership. 2013; 2(1): 1-10. doi: 10.4236/ojl.2013.21001
Schwartz P. Inevitable strategies. In: Hickman GR, ed. Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE; 2010: 4-13.
Colby SL, Ortman, JM. Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. 2014; 1-13. https://www.cen-sus.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/ p25-1143.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2017.
Connerley ML, Pederson PB. Leadership in a Diverse and Multicultural Environment: Developing Awareness, Knowledge, and Skills. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE; 2005.
Avolio BJ. Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. Am Psychol. 2007; 62(1): 25-33. doi: 10.1037/0003- 066X.62.1.25
Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsin TS, Peterson SJ. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management. 2008; 34(1), 89-126.
Goffee R, Jones G. Why Should Anyone Be Led by You? Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Publishing; 2000: 62-70.
Helland MR, Winston BE. Towards a deeper understanding of hope and leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2005; 12(2): 42-54. doi: 10.1177/107179190501200204
Spreier SW, Fontaine MH, Malloy RL. Leadership run amok. Harvard Business Review. 2006; 84(6): 72-82.
Olaniyan OS, Hystad SW. Employees’ psychological capital, job satisfaction, insecurity, and intentions to quit: The direct and indi-8 Trimble JE, et al rect effects of authentic leadership. Journal of Work and Organiza-tional Psychology. 2016; 32: 163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.rpto.2016.09.003
Ma L, Tsui AS. Traditional Chinese philosophies and contem-porary leadership. Leadership Q. 2015; 26(1): 13-24. doi: 10.1016/j. leaqua.2014.11.008
Bass BM. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, USA: Free Press; 1985.
Judge TA, Piccolo, RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psy-chol. 2004; 89(5): 755-768.
Lee YT. What can chairs learn from Daoistic/Taoistic leader-ship? An Eastern perspective. The Department Chair. 2004; 14(4): 25-32.
Hastings M. History as written by the victor. The Telegraph. Web site. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/3626376/His-tory-as-written-by-the-victor.html. Published November 2, 2004. Accessed June 13, 2017.
Zaccaro SJ. Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist. 2007; 62(1): 6-16.
Galton F. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Conse-quences. Cleveland, OH, USA: Meridian Books; 1862.
Carlyle T. On Heroes and Hero Worship and the Heroic in History. London, UK and New York, USA: Ward, Lock, & Bowden; 1849.
Chin JL, Sanchez-Hucles J. Diversity and leadership. American Psychologist. 2007; 62(6, Special Issue: Leadership): 608-609.
Eagly AH, Carli LL. Women and men as leaders. In: Antonakis J, Ciancolo AT, Sternberg RJ, eds. The Nature of Leadership. Thou-sand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE; 2004: 279-301.
Kanter RM. Rosabeth Moss Kanter on the Frontiers of Management. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.
Triandis HC. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press; 1995.
Duckitt J, Sibley CG. Personality, ideology, prejudice, and poli-tics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality. 2010; 78(6): 1861-1894. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
Ho AK, Sidanius J, Kteily N, et al. The nature of social domi-nance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for inter-group inequality using the new SDO scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 109(6): 1003-1028. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033
Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 67(4): 741-763. Original Research | Volume 3 | Number 1|
Peer E, Vosgerau J, Acquisti A. Reputation as a sufficient con-dition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 46(4): 1023-1031. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
Hayes A. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Pro-cess Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach [e-book]. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press; 2013.
Cohen F, Solomon S, Maxfield M, Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J. Fatal attraction: The effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship-oriented leaders. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(12): 846-851. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00765.x
Hoyt C, Simon S, Reid L. Choosing the best (wo)man for the job: The effects of mortality salience, sex, and gender stereotypes on leader evaluations. Leadership Q. 2009; 20(2): 233-246. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.016
Hoyt C, Simon S. The role of social dominance orientation and patriotism in the evaluation of racial minority and female leaders. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2016; 46(9): 518-528. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12380
Cheung C, Chan A. Benefits of Hong Kong Chinese CEO’s Confucian and Daoist leadership styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2008; 29(6): 474-503. doi: 10.1108/01437730810894159
Gottfredson RK, Aguinis H. Leadership behaviors and fol-lower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theo-retical rationales and underlying mechanisms. J Organ Behav. 2016; 38(4): 558-591. doi: 10.1002/job.2152 Original Research | Volume 3 | Number 1| Trimble JE, et al
Guenter H, Schreurs B, van Emmerik IJH. What does it take to break the silence in teams: Authentic leadership and/or proactive followership? Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2017; 66(1): 49-77. doi: 10.1111/apps.12076
Kotzé M, Nel P. Personal factor effects on authentic leadership. J Psychol Afr.2017; 27(1): 47-53. doi:10.1080/14330237.2016.1268291
Pratto F, Sidanius J, Levin S. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2006; 17(1): 271-320. doi: 10.1080/10463280601055772
Batalha L, Reynolds KJ, Newbigin CA. All else being equal: Are men always higher in social dominance orientation than women? Eur J Soc Psychol. 2011; 41(6): 796-806. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.829
Huang L, Liu J. Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation.Pers Individ Dif. 2005; 38(2): 267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.006
Howden LM, Meyer JA. Age and sex composition: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. 2010. Web site. https://www.census.gov/content/ dam/Census/library/publications/2011/dec/c2010br-03.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2017
Ryan CL, Bauman K. Educational attainment in the United States: 2015. United States Census Bureau. 2016. Web site. https:// www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/ 2016/demo/p20-578.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Social Behavior Research and Practice (SBRP) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.