A Case of Dimethoate Poisoning Requiring Prolonged Skin Decontamination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/TFMOJ-5-132Keywords:
Contaminated casualty, Decontamination, Dimethoate, Poisoning, Hazardous material incident, Organophosphorus compoundsAbstract
Background
Decontamination is a critical medical counter measure in reducing toxic exposure following poisoning. Little is known on the effectiveness of this procedure and its impact in the context of preventing secondary exposure of healthcare workers and secondary contamination of facilities. Presented here is a case of dimethoate poisoning that required a prolonged period of skin decontamination to remove residual skin contamination.
Case Report
A young gardener consumed dimethoate at the workplace witnessed by a colleague who called the emergency services immediately. Paramedics noted the patient to be drowsy with stable vital signs and 100% oxygen saturation. En-route to the hospital the patient vomited multiple times and was drenched in vomitus with a pungent odour. Upon arrival at the emergency department (ED), vital signs remained stable with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 10. Due to gross external contamination from the vomitu and pungent odours emanating suggestive of chemical fumes off-gassing, the hospital decontamination shower was activated for patient decontamination. Staff donned protective suits and proceeded to disrobe and bag all the patient’s clothing before showering the patient for 10-minutes using soap and water. Post-decontamination a chemical agent monitor (CAM) were used to screen for residual chemicals following the hospital’s decontamination protocol. The chemical alarm was triggered twice, first around the left mastoid region and again just below the left breast. This required targeted re-showering for a further 10-minutes before patient was finally cleared of contamination. Subsequently, the patient was given atropine (2.4 mg) and pralidoxime (1 g) followed by an infusion at the intensive care unit (ICU). The patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged 5-days later.
Conclusion
This case of dimethoate poisoning is notable for the prolonged period of skin decontamination to remove residual skin contamination and illustrates potential implications to patient and health care worker safety. Past mass casualty incidents involving chemicals, such as the sarin attack in Tokyo, highlight the high incidence of secondary exposures amongst healthcare workers due to the lack of casualty decontamination. As a result, many hospitals have developed capacity to conduct rapid and timely decontamination at their premises to prevent further complications from secondary chemical exposure. However, the effectiveness of this process of decontamination needs further evaluation.
References
Okumura T, Takasu N, Ishimatsu S, Miyanoki S, Mitsuhashi A, Kumada K, et al. Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28(2): 129-135. doi: 10.1016/s0196- 0644(96)70052-5
Okumura T, Suzuki K, Fukuda A, Kohama A, Takasu N, Ishi-matsu S, et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster manage-ment, Part 2: Hospital response. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5(6): 618- 624. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02471.x
Nozaki H, Hori S, Shinozawa Y, Fujishima S, Takuma K, Sagoh M, et al. Secondary exposure of medical staff to sarin vapor in the emergency room. Intensive Care Med. 1995; 21(12): 1032-1035. doi: 10.1007/BF01700667
Nishiwaki Y, Maekawa K, Ogawa Y, Asukai N, Minami M, Omae K, et al. Effects of sarin on the nervous system in rescue team staff members and police officers 3 years after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 109(11): 1169-1173. doi: 10.1289/ehp.011091169
Miyaki K, Nishiwaki Y, Maekawa K, Ogawa Y, Asukai N, Yo-shimura K, et al. Effects of sarin on the nervous system of subway workers seven years after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. J Occup Health. 2005; 47(4): 299-304. doi: 10.1539/joh.47.299
Larson TC, Orr MF, Auf der Heide E, Wu J, Mukhopadhyay S, Horton DK. Threat of secondary chemical contamination of emergency departments and personnel: An uncommon but recur-rent problem. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016; 10(2): 199-202. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.127
Melnikova N, Wu J, Yang A, Orr M. Acute chemical incidents with injured first responders, 2002-2012. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018; 12(2): 211-221. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.50
Ponampalam R, Leong KF, Lim SH. Are we prepared to deal with hazardous material incidents? – An SGH perspective. SGH Proceedings. 2002; 11(4): 238-241.
Ngo A, Ponampalam R, Leong M, Han LS. Chlorine and its impact on an emergency department. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007; 22(2): 136-139. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00004519
Note by the Technical Secretariat. Organisation for the Prohi-bition of Chemical Weapons. Report of the opcw fact-finding mission in syria regarding alleged incidents in ltamenah, the Syrian Arab Republic. 24 and 25 March 2017. 2018; 1636.
Vale JA, Marrs TC OBE, Maynard RL CBE. Novichok: a mur-derous nerve agent attack in the UK. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018; 56(11): 1093-1097. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1469759
Okumura T, Hisaoka T, Yamada A, et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack--lessons learned. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207(2 Suppl): 471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.032
Johnston GM, Wills BK. Chemical decontamination. In: Stat-Pearls. Treasure Island (FL), USA: Stat Pearls Publishing; 2020.
Razak S, Hignett S, Barnes J. Emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive events: A systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018; 33(5): 543-549. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000900
Chilcott RP, Larner J, Matar H. UK's initial operational re-sponse and specialist operational response to CBRN and HazMat incidents: A primer on decontamination protocols for healthcare professionals. Emerg Med J. 2019; 36(2): 117-123. doi: 10.1136/ emermed-2018-207562
Holland MG, Cawthon D. Personal protective equipment and decontamination of adults and children. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015; 33(1): 51-68. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2014.09.006
Ponampalam R. A novel hospital-based mass casualty decon-tamination facility for hazardous material disasters. Toxicol Forensic Med Open J. 2019; 4(1): 18-23. doi: 10.17140/TFMOJ-4-129
Ponampalam R. Decontamination – Rationale and Step-By-Step Procedure. SGH Proceedings. 2003; 12(4): 213-221.
Aprea C, Terenzoni B, De Angelis V, Sciarra G, Lunghini L, Borzacchi G, et al. Evaluation of skin and respiratory doses and urinary excretion of alkylphosphates in workers exposed to di-methoate during treatment of olive trees. Arch Environ ContamToxi-col. 2005; 48(1): 127-134. doi: 10.1007/s00244-004-0073-5
Joosen MJ, van der Schans MJ, Kuijpers WC, van Helden HP, Noort D. Timing of decontamination and treatment in case of percutaneous VX poisoning: A mini review. Chem Biol Interact. 2013; 203(1): 149-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2012.10.002
HHS. Guidelines for mass casualty decontamination dur-ing a hazmat/weapons of mass destruction incident. Volumes I 14 Ponampalam R and II. Web site. https://asprtracie.hhs.gov/technical-resources/ resource/1807/guidelines-for-mass-casualty-decontamination-during-a-hazmat-weapon-of-mass-destruction-incident-volumes-i-and-ii. Accessed August 31, 2020.
Home Office. Guidance for the United Kingdom emergen-cy services on decontamination of people exposed to hazardous chemical, biological or radiological substances, Home Office, Lon-don, 2013.
Primary Response Incident Scene Management (PRISM). Guidance for chemical. Incidents. Volume 1: strategic guidance for. Mass casualty disrobe and decontamination. Chilcott RP, Amlôt R, eds. Web site. https://www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/me-dia/36872/prism-volume-1.pdf. Accessed August 31, 2020.
Okumura S, Okumura T, Ishimatsu S, Miura K, Maekawa H, Naito T. Clinical review: Tokyo - protecting the health care work-er during a chemical mass casualty event: an important issue of continuing relevance. Crit Care. 2005; 9(4): 397-400. doi: 10.1186/ cc3062
Worek F, Wille T, Koller M, Thiermann H. Toxicology of or-ganophosphorus compounds in view of an increasing terrorist threat. Arch Toxicol. 2016; 90(9): 2131-2145. doi: 10.1007/s00204- 016-1772-1
Chai PR, Boyer EW, Al-Nahhas H, Erickson TB. Tox-ic chemical weapons of assassination and warfare: Nerve agents VX and sarin. Toxicol Commun. 2017; 1(1): 21-23. doi: 10.1080/24734306.2017.1373503
Franca TCC, Kitagawa DAS, Cavalcante SFA, da Silva JAV, Nepovimova E, Kuca K. Novichoks: The dangerous fourth gen-eration of chemical weapons. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(5): 1222. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051222
Okudera H, Morita H, Iwashita T, Shibata T, Otagiri T, Ko-bayashi S, et al. Unexpected nerve gas exposure in the city of Matsumoto: Report of rescue activity in the first sarin gas terror-ism. Am J Emerg Med. 1997; 15(5): 527-528. doi: 10.1016/s0735- 6757(97)90201-1
The Technical Secretariat, Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. #Summary of the #report on activities carried out in support of a request for technical assistance by the #UK [#Salisbury Incident] (OPCW, Apr. 12 ’18). Web site. https://hygimia69.blogspot.com/2018/04/summary-of-report-on-activities-carried.html. 2018; 1612. Accessed August 31, 2020.
Thompson J, Rehn M, Lossius HM, Lockey D. Risks to emer-gency medical responders at terrorist incidents: A narrative review of the medical literature. Crit Care. 2014; 18(5): 521. doi: 10.1186/ s13054-014-0521-1
Geller RJ, Singleton KL, Tarantino ML, Drenzek CL, Toomey KE. Nosocomial poisoning associated with emergency department Case Report | Volume 5 | Number 1| treatment of organophosphate toxicity--Georgia, 2000. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001; 39(1): 109-111. doi: 10.1081/clt-100102889
Stacey R, Morfey D, Payne S. Secondary contamination in or-ganophosphate poisoning: Analysis of an incident. QJM. 2004; Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Case Report | Volume 5 | Number 1| Ponampalam R 97(2): 75-80. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hch020
Kenar L, Karayilanoglu T. Prehospital management and medi-cal intervention after a chemical attack. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21(1): 84-88. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005488
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Toxicology and Forensic Medicine (TFM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
