Review on Current Diagnostic Methods of Bovine Mastitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-8-178Keywords:
Bovine; Diagnostic method; MastitisAbstract
Based on the source, it can be either contagious or environmental; on the other hand, clinical and subclinical mastitis are based on
their severity. The most important step between disease etiology and cure is accurate disease diagnosis. A cost-effective, dependable, and quick diagnostic instrument is essential for udder health management. Therefore, the objective of this article is to review
current diagnostic methods for bovine mastitis. The diagnostic methods include clinical diagnosis, microscopically examined specimens, conventional methods, power of hydrogen (pH) tests, microbial culture, molecular methods, and those based on emerging
technology. Conventional methods like the strip cup test, California mastitis test, Wisconsin mastitis test, somatic cell count test,
and electrical conductivity test are used as screening tests that are not specific to any pathogen. Microbial culture-based methods are
the gold standard for identifying mastitis pathogens and are frequently used, but they have some drawbacks. Advanced molecular
methods such as polymerase chain reaction and its version, loop-mediated amplification, are used for the identification of causative
agents at the strain level. Emerging technologies such as infrared thermography and biosensors have the potential to match or
surpass the diagnostic methods mentioned above concerning sensitivity, selectivity, accuracy, and realism. Emerging technologies
are growing at a fast pace to diagnose human cases, but applications for the veterinary market, and specifically, for the diagnosis of
mastitis, remain limited. Both specializations in training and experience in the interpretation of results are needed for implementing
advanced technologies for efficient mastitis diagnosis and improving udder health management. It should be better to adopt and
employ advanced diagnostic methods, such as advanced molecular tests and emerging technology.
References
Fesseha H, Mathewos M, Aliye S, Wolde A. Study on the preva-lence of bovine mastitis and associated risk factors in dairy farms of Modjo town and suburbs, central Oromia, Ethiopia. Vet Med (Auckl). 2021; 12: 271-283. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S323460
Ababu A, Endashaw D, Fesseha H. Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from raw milk of dairy cattle in Holeta district, Central Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2020; 2020: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2020/6626488
Maity S, Ambatipudi K. Targeting the zoonotic potential of bo-vine mastitis by an integrated one-health approach. Authorea Pre-prints. 2020. doi: 10.22541/au.158949020.01154128
Klaas IC, Zadoks RN. An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018; 65: 166-185. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12704
Kibebew K. Bovine mastitis: A review of causes and epide-miological point of view. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health-care. 2017; 7(2): 1-4. Website. https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/234662234.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2023.
Radinovic MZ, Davidov I, Kovacevic Z, Stojanovic D, Vukoma-novic AG, Erdeljan M. Basic principles of mastitis therapy. Veteri-nary Journal of Republic of Srpska (Banja Luka). 2019; 19(1): 110-114. doi: 10.7251/VETJEN1901110R
Scott P, Penny CD, Macrae A. Cattle Medicine. FL,USA: CRC Press; 2011.
Egyedy AF, Ametaj BN. Mastitis: Impact of dry period, patho-gens, and immune responses on etiopathogenesis of disease and its association with periparturient diseases. Dairy. 2022; 3(4): 881-906. doi: 10.3390/dairy3040061
Ashraf A, Imran M. Diagnosis of bovine mastitis: from labo-ratory to farm. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018; 50: 1193-1202. doi:
1007/s11250-018-1629-0 10. Girma A, Tamir D. Prevalence of bovine mastitis and its asso-ciated risk factors among dairy cows in Ethiopia during 2005-2022: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Med Int. 2022; 2022: 7775197. doi: 10.1155/2022/7775197
Mahmood Y. The future of PCR technologies in the diagnosis of bovine mastitis pathogens. Adv Dairy Res. 2013; 2(1): 1. doi: 10.4172/2329-888X.1000e106
Malcata FB, Pepler PT, O’Reilly EL, et al. Point-of-care tests for bovine clinical mastitis: what do we have and what do we need? J Dairy Res. 2020; 87(S1): 60-66. doi: 10.1017/S002202992000062X
Godden SM, Royster E, Timmerman J, Rapnicki P, Green H. Evaluation of an automated milk leukocyte differential test and the California Mastitis Test for detecting intramammary infection in early-and late-lactation quarters and cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(8): 6527-6544. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12548 63 Kebede IA, et al
Gurjar A, Gioia G, Schukken Y, Welcome F, Zadoks R, Mo-roni P. Molecular diagnostics applied to mastitis problems on dairy farms. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012; 28(3): 565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.07.011
Steele NM. Mastitis Pathogen Identification using Polymerase Chain Reaction in New Zealand Milk Samples. [dissertation]. New Zealand: Massey University; 2015.
Duarte CM, Freitas PP, Bexiga R. Technological advances in bovine mastitis diagnosis: An overview. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015; 27(6): 665-672. doi: 10.1177/1040638715603087
Adkins PR, Middleton JR, Fox L, Pighetti K, Petersson-Wolfe C. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Madison, WI, USA: Na-tional Mastitis Council. Inc.; 2017.
Nyman AK, Waller KP, Emanuelson U, Frössling J. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR analysis and bacteriological culture of milk samples for identification of intramammary infections in dairy cows using latent class analysis. Prev Vet Med. 2016; 135: 123-131 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.009
Pérez-López B, Merkoçi A. Nanomaterials based biosensors for food analysis applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2011; 22(11): 625-639. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.04.001
Martins SA, Martins VC, Cardoso FA, et al. Biosensors for on-farm diagnosis of mastitis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019; 7: 186. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00186
Sepúlveda-Varas P, Proudfoot KL, Weary DM, von Keyser-lingk MA. Changes in behaviour of dairy cows with clinical masti-tis. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2016; 175: 8-13. doi: 10.1016/j. applanim.2014.09.022
Rees A, Fischer-Tenhagen C, Heuwieser W. Udder firmness as a possible indicator for clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(3): 2170-2183. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11940
Pal M, Regasa A, Gizaw F. Etiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis and management of bovine mastitis: A comprehensive review. International Journal. 2019; 6: 40-55.
Suzuki N, Kaneko S, Isobe N. Rapid determination of patho-gens in mastitic milk of dairy cows using Gram staining. J Vet Med Sci. 2022; 84(3): 325-329. doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0631
Vidlund J, Gelalcha BD, Swanson S, et al. Pathogenesis, diag-nosis, control, and prevention of bovine staphylococcal mastitis. Mastitis in Dairy Cattle, Sheep and Goats. 2022; 35: 35. doi: 10.5772/ intechopen.101596
Ferronatto JA, Ferronatto TC, Schneider M, et al. Diagnosing mastitis in early lactation: Use of Somaticell®, California mastitis test, and somatic cell count. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2018; 17(3): 723-729. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2018.1426394
Deb R, Kumar A, Chakraborty S, et al. Trends in diagnosis and control of bovine mastitis: A review. Pak J Biol Sci. 2013; 16(23): 1653-1661. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1653.1661
Audarya SD, Chhabra D, Sharda R, et al. Epidemiology of bo-vine mastitis and its diagnosis, prevention, and control. In: Mastitis in Dairy Cattle, Sheep and Goats. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.100582
Fulasa TT, Deressa FB. Bovine Mastitis in Ethiopia. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.100582
Zumba O, Nathaly M. Derivation of economic values of bo-vine milk production in the Joseguango Bajo parish using benefit functions. Latacunga, Ecuador: Technical University of Cotopaxi (UTC); 2022; 75.
Rossi RS, Amarante AF, Correia LB, et al. Diagnostic accu-racy of Somaticell, California Mastitis Test, and microbiological examination of composite milk to detect Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101(11): 10220-10229. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14753
Chakraborty S, Dhama K, Tiwari R, et al. Technological inter-ventions and advances in the diagnosis of intramammary infec-tions in animals with emphasis on bovine population—a review. Vet Q. 2019; 39(1): 76-94. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2019.1642546
Narváez-Semanate JL, Daza-Bolaños CA, Valencia-Hoyos CE, Hurtado-Garzón DT, Acosta-Jurado DC. Diagnostic methods of subclinical mastitis in bovine milk: An overview. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín. 2022; 75(3): 10077-10088. doi: 10.15446/rfnam. v75n3.100520
Riveros-Galán DS, Obando-Chaves M. Mastitis, somatic cell count, and its impact on the quality of dairy-products… An omis-sion in Colombia?: A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2021; 34(4): 241-253. doi: 10.17533/udea.rccp.v34n4a01
Zhu Z, Lin B, Zhu X, Guo W. A rapid method of identify-ing mastitis degrees of bovines based on dielectric spectra of raw milk. Food Quality and Safety. 2023; 7: fyad014. doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/ fyad014
Adkins PR, Middleton JR. Methods for diagnosing masti-tis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018; 34(3): 479-491. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.07.003
Halasa T, Kirkeby C. Differential somatic cell count: Value for udder health management. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7: 609055. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.609055
Inzaghi V, Zucali M, Thompson PD, Penry JF, Reine-mann DJ. Changes in electrical conductivity, milk produc-tion rate, and milk flow rate prior to clinical mastitis confirma-tion. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2021; 20(1): 1554-1561. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984852 Review | Volume 8 | Issue 2 | Kebede IA, et al
Ganguly S, Shoukat S, Wani H, Ali U, Ali M. Mastitis and its diagnosis: A review. 2018. doi: 10.22271/ed.book01.a06
Duarte CMPC. Portable “lab-on-chip” Platform for Bovine Mastitis Diagnosis in Raw Milk. [dissertation]. Portugal; Universidade de Lis-boa. 2016: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/12011. Accessed Octo-ber 16, 2023.
Abdel-maged AD, El Sheita WA, Abdelwahab MG. Biochemi-cal study of DNA markers for bacterial infection in bovine mastitis. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2016; 31(2): 93-100. doi: 10.21608/ bvmj.2016.31275
Kandeel SA, Megahed AA, Ebeid MH, Constable PD. The abil-ity of milk pH to predict subclinical mastitis and intramammary infection in quarters from lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102(2): 1417-1427. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14993
Mahapatra A, Panigrahi S, Patra RC, Rout M, Ganguly S. A study on bovine mastitis related oxidative stress along with thera-peutic regimen. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018; 7: 247-256. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.027
Cork SC, Halliwell RW, eds. The Veterinary Laboratory and Field Manual. 3rd ed. Essex CM6 2HH, England: 5m Books Ltd; 2019.
Neculai-Valeanu AS, Ariton AM. Udder health monitoring for prevention of bovine mastitis and improvement of milk quality. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(11): 608. doi: 10.3390/bioengineer-ing9110608
Viora L, Graham EM, Mellor DJ, Reynolds K, Simoes PB, Ger-aghty TE. Evaluation of a culture-based pathogen identification kit for bacterial causes of bovine mastitis. Vet Rec. 2014; 175(4): 89. doi: 10.1136/vr.102499
Murphy SC, Martin NH, Barbano DM, Wiedmann M. Influ-ence of raw milk quality on processed dairy products: How do raw milk quality test results relate to product quality and yield? J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(12): 10128-10149. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11172
Royster E, Godden S, Goulart D, Dahlke A, Rapnicki P, Tim-merman J. Evaluation of the Minnesota Easy Culture System II Bi-Plate and Tri-Plate for identification of common mastitis patho-gens in milk. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 97(6): 3648-3659. doi: 10.3168/ jds.2013-7748
Huma ZI, Sharma N, Kour S, Lee SJ. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of bovine mastitis milk origin bacteria and linkage of intramammary infection with milk quality. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9: 885134. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.885134
Lago A, Godden SM. Use of rapid culture systems to guide clinical mastitis treatment decisions. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018; 34(3): 389-412. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.06.001
Lavaee, M., Eidi, S. and Khoramian, B. High prevalence of Prototheca spp. and isolation of fungal species in milk samples from cows suffering from mastitis in Mashhad city, northeast Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 2019; 11(2): 2126. doi: 10.22067/veterinary.v11i2.81838
Jones G, Bork O, Ferguson SA, Bates A. Comparison of an on-farm point-of-care diagnostic with conventional culture in analyz-ing bovine mastitis samples. J Dairy Res. 2019; 86(2): 222-225. doi: 10.1017/S0022029919000177
Mengistie D. PCR-based detection and identification of masti-tis-causing bacteria: A review. Archives of Infect Diseases & Therapy. 2022; 6(2): 163-168.
El-Sayed A, Awad W, Abdou NE, Vázquez HC. Molecu-lar biological tools applied for identification of mastitis-causing pathogens. Int J Vet Sci Med. 2017; 5(2): 89-97. doi: 10.1016/j. ijvsm.2017.08.002
Pokorska J, Kułaj D, Dusza M, Żychlińska-Buczek J, Makulska J. New rapid method of DNA isolation from milk somatic cells. Anim Biotechnol. 2016; 27(2): 113-117. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2015.1116446
Neculai-Valeanu AS, Ariton AM. Udder health monitor-ing for prevention of bovine mastitis and improvement of milk quality. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(11): 608. doi: 10.3390/bioengineer-ing9110608
Salisu IB, Amin AB, Ibrahim AA, Abdurrahman SL, Ali Q. Molecular techniques for rapid diagnosis of infectious livestock diseases. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science and Technology (NJAST). 2019; 2(1): 121-130.
Koskinen MT, Holopainen J, Pyörälä S, et al. Analytical speci-ficity and sensitivity of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of bovine mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92(3): 952-959. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1549
Koskinen MT, Wellenberg GJ, Sampimon OC, et al. Field com-parison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and bacterial cul-ture for identification of bovine mastitis bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(12): 5707-5715. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3167
Penry J, Malmo J, Mein G, Morton J. Molecular testing of Milk: Interpretation and application in Australian dairy herds. Paper pre-sented at: National Mastitis Council 54th Annual Meeting. NMC, Fort Worth, TX 2014. https://www.harrisparkgroup.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Countdown-2012-Mastitis-molecular-tests-Symposium-JPenry.pdf. Accessed , 2023.
Cantekin Z, Ergün Y, Doğruer G, MK S, Solmaz H. Com-parison of PCR and culture methods for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 21(2). doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.12309
Boonyayatra S, Fox LK, Gay JM, Sawant A, Besser TE. Dis-65 Kebede IA, et al crimination between Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species of bovine origin using digitonin disc diffusion assay, nisin disc diffu-sion assay, and conventional polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012; 24(1): 7-13. doi: 10.1177/1040638711425936
Mahmmod YS, Klaas IC, Enevoldsen C. DNA carryover in milk samples from routine milk recording used for PCR-based di-agnosis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(7): 5709-5716. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12330
McDougall S, Williamson J, Gohary K, Lacy-Hulbert J. Detect-ing intramammary infection at the end of lactation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2021; 104(9): 10232-10249. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-20036
Taponen S, Pyörälä S. Coagulase-negative staphylococci as a cause of bovine mastitis—Not so different from Staphylococcus aureus? Vet Microbiol. 2009; 134(1-2): 29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.vet-mic.2008.09.011
Amin AS, Hamouda RH, Abdel-All AA. PCR assays for detect-ing major pathogens of mastitis in milk samples. World J Dairy Food Sci. 2011; 6(2): 199-206.
Artika IM, Wiyatno A, Ma'roef CN. Pathogenic viruses: Mo-lecular detection and characterization. Infect Genet Evol. 2020; 81: 104215. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104215
Koskinen MT, Wellenberg GJ, Sampimon OC, et al. Field com-parison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and bacterial cul-ture for identification of bovine mastitis bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(12): 5707-5715. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3167
Keane OM, Budd KE, Flynn J, McCoy F. Increased detection of mastitis pathogens by real-time PCR compared to bacterial cul-ture. Vet Rec. 2013; 173(11): 268. doi: 10.1136/vr.101598
Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63
Bora M, Mathew DD, Das H, Bora DP, Barman NN. Point of care diagnostics and non-invasive sampling strategy: A review on major advances in veterinary diagnostics. Acta Vet. 2022; 91(1): 17- 34. doi: 10.2754/avb202291010017
Kawai K, Inada M, Ito K, et al. Detection of bovine mastitis pathogens by loop-mediated isothermal amplification and an elec-trochemical DNA chip. J Vet Med Sci. 2017; 79(12): 1973-1977. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0263
Lee PLM. DNA amplification in the field: Move over PCR, here comes LAMP. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017; 17(2): 138-141. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12548
Parida M, Sannarangaiah S, Dash PK, Rao PV, Morita K. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A new generation of innovative gene amplification technique; perspectives in clinical di-agnosis of infectious diseases. Rev Med Virol. 2008; 18(6): 407-421. doi: 10.1002/rmv.593
Soroka M, Wasowicz B, Rymaszewska A. Loop-mediated iso-thermal amplification (LAMP): The better sibling of PCR? Cells. 2021; 10(8): 1931. doi: 10.3390/cells10081931
Griffioen K, Cornelissen J, Heuvelink A, et al. Development and evaluation of 4 loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays to detect mastitis-causing bacteria in bovine milk samples. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(9): 8407-8420. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18035
Metzner M, Sauter-Louis C, Seemueller A, Petzl W, Klee W. Infrared thermography of the udder surface of dairy cattle: Char-acteristics, methods, and correlation with rectal temperature. Vet J. 2014; 199(1): 57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.030
Sathiyabarathi M, Jeyakumar S, Manimaran A, et al. Infra-red thermography: A potential non-invasive tool to monitor ud-der health status in dairy cows. Vet World. 2016; 9(10): 1075. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1075-1081
Sinha R, Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, et al. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive technique for early detection of mastitis in dairy animals-A review. Asian Journal of Dairy & Food Research. 2018; 37(1). doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.R-1746
Silva RA, Pandorfi H, Almeida GL, Silva MV. Exploratory data inference for detecting mastitis in dairy cattle. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 2020; 42: doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.46394 Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ Review | Volume 8 | Issue 2 | Kebede IA, et al
Du X, Zhou J. Application of biosensors to detection of ep-idemic diseases in animals. Res Vet Sci. 2018; 118: 444-448. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.04.011
Zhu C, Yang G, Li H, Du D, Lin Y. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures. Anal Chem. 2015; 87(1): 230-249. doi: 10.1021/ac5039863
Alhadrami HA. Biosensors: Classifications, medical applica-tions, and future prospective. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2018; 65(3): 497-508. doi: 10.1002/bab.1621
Vidic J, Manzano M, Chang CM, Jaffrezic-Renault N. Ad-vanced biosensors for detection of pathogens related to livestock and poultry. Vet Res. 2017; 48(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017- 0418-5
Mortari A, Lorenzelli L. Recent sensing technologies for patho-gen detection in milk: A review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014; 60: 8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.03.063
Länge K. Bulk and surface acoustic wave biosensors for milk analysis. Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(8): 602. doi: 10.3390/ bios12080602
Duarte CM, Carneiro C, Cardoso S, Freitas PP, Bexiga R. Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magnetic detec-tion in raw milk. J Dairy Res. 2017; 84(1): 80-88. doi: 10.1017/ S0022029916000741
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Veterinary Medicine (VM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.