The Impact of Carrying Heavy Loads on the Donkeys Health in Benadir Region Somalia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17140/VMOJ-8-171Keywords:
Animal welfare; Heavy load; Donkey; Lesion; Laceration; Shelter; Benadir Region Somalia.Abstract
Background
The number of donkeys worldwide has increased from 37 million in 1961 to an estimated 44 million. However, they are not
distributed evenly; the bulk of them reside in semi-arid and hilly areas. Most donkeys kept around the world are only utilized for
work or transportation.
Study
A descriptive design was used to perform the study. This method was employed by the researcher to describe and examine the
effects of carrying big loads on the health of donkeys in the Mogadishu, Somalia, Deynile neighborhood.
Objectives
The major goal of this study was to determine how large loads of donkeys affected their health in the Benadir region of Somalia.
Results
The study’s results showed that 160 (80%) of the respondents let the donkeys rest when they were ill, while 40 (20%) of the
respondents did not let the majority of the respondents rest. According to the results of the current survey, 188 respondents
(94%) believe that a donkey may experience pain, whereas 12 respondents (6%) disagree. This study found that the majority of
donkeys do not have shelter at night, with 38 (19%) of respondents stating as much. These results also showed that the owners
observed 146 (73%) lesions involving hair loss and 54 (27%) lesions involving minor abrasions in their heavily laden donkeys.
The results of the current study also suggest that using donkeys to haul high loads is bad for their health. Out of 158 owners
80% strongly disagreed and out of 12 owners 6% strongly agreed and out of 6 owners 3% agreed.
Conclusion
According to the current study, donkeys who pull carts in and around the Banadir region of Somalia experience health problems
as a result of carrying heavy loads. Health and welfare are complicated issues that we are addressing. The main causes of health
and welfare problems included poorly made wooden carts, a lack of standards for harnessing equipment, an unapproved policy
regarding working animals, a lack of knowledge regarding animal welfare, relying on cart work as a primary source of income,
overloading, overworking, and work types.
Recommendation
The findings of this study strongly advise the Ministry of Livestock to create laws and rules governing donkey maintenance,
health, and load-carrying capacity
References
Starkey P, Starkey M. Regional and world trends in donkey pop-ulations. In: Starkey P, Fielding D, eds. Donkeys, People and Devel-opment: A Resource Book of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Original Research | Volume 8 | Issue 1 | Mohamed MOS, et al ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA); 2004: 224.
Oudman L. Donkeys for traction and tillage. Digigrafi, Wagenin-gen, The Netherlands: Agrodok Series 35; 2002: 84.
Bougler J, Duplan, JM, Zongo D. Caractéristiques et répartition-mondiale des espècesanimalesexploitées par l’Homme. Manuel de Zootechniecomparee; 2005: 45-68.
Han L, Zhu S, Ning C, et al. Ancient DNA provides new insight into the maternal lineages and domestication of Chinese donkeys. BMC Evol Biol. 2014; 14: 246. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0246-4
Olsen SL. In: Zeder M, Bradley D, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, eds. Documenting Domestication. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of Cali-fornia Press; 2006: 245-369.
Wing ES. In: Vuilleumier F, Monasterio M, eds. High Altitude Tropical Biogeography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1986: 246-264.
Starkey P. In: McDonald KC, Blench RM, eds. The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography. London, UK: University College London Press; 2000: 478-502.
Smith DG, Pearson RA. A review of the factors affecting the survival of donkeys in semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2005; 37(Suppl 1): 1-19. doi: 10.1007/ s11250-005-9002-5
Gizaw Policy and Strategy Option towards rapid development ofthe Ethiopia livestock improvement conference. IAR. Ethiopia. 1987.
Biffa D, Woldemeskel M. Causes and factors associated with occurrence of external injuries in working equines in Ethiopia. Int J Appl Res Vet Med. 2006; 4: 1-7.
Fred O, Pascal K. Extension approaches to improving the wel-fare of working equines. Kenya Network for Dissemination of Ag-ricultural Technologies (KENDAT); Kenya, Nairobi; 2006; 1-28.
Pearson RA, Vall E. Performance and management of draught animals in agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1998; 30: 309-324. doi: 10.1023/a:1005059308088
Inns FM. Animal power in agricultural production systems with special reference to Tanzania. World Animal Review. 1980; 34: 2-10.
Pal Y, Kumar S, Gupta AK. Blood gases, acid-base and physi-ological indices in Donkeys as pack animals. Draught Anim News. 2002; 37: 27-33.
Martin CM, Smith DG. The impact of donkey ownership on livelihoods of female peri-urban dwellers in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2005; 37 Suppl 1: 67-86.
Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO). Na-tional Animal Health Research program strategy document. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1999: 1-46.
Astatke A, Saleem Md. Draught animal power for land-use in-tensification in the Ethiopian highlands. World Animal Review. 1996; 86: 3-11.
Usman S, Disassa H, Kabeta T, Zenebe T, Kebede G. Health and welfare related assessment of working equine in and Around Batu Town, East Shoa, Central Ethiopia. Nat Sci. 2015; 13(10): 1-8.
Solomon M, Matusala M, Rahmeto A. Management practices and welfare problems encountered on working equids in Hawassa town Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health. 2013; 5(9): 243-250. doi: 10.5897/JVMAH10.017
Pritchard JC, Lindberg AC, Main DC, Whay HR. Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/ and behavior parameters. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 69: 265-283.
Amante M, Hunde A, Endebu B, Hirpa E, Mamo B. Health and Welfare assessment of working equine in and around Nekemte Town, East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia. Amer-Euras J Sci Res. 2014; 9(6): 163-174. doi: 10.5829/idosi.aejsr.2014.9.6.86135
Panwar S, Tripathi H, Bhanja SK, Kumar S. Animal welfare practices followed by pack animal owners- an investigative study. Centaur. 2008; 25(1): 7-19.
Biswas P, Dutt T, Patel M, Kamal R, Bharti PK, Sahu S. Assess-ment of pack animal welfare in and around Bareilly city of India. Vet World. 2013; 6(6): 332-336. doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2013.332-336
Geiger M. Donkeys’ economic and social contribution is ur-gently undervalued in Ethiopia. Website. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ africaatlse/2020/02/14/donkeys-economic-social-contribution-development-policy-ethiopia/. Published February 14, 2020. Ac-cessed September 7, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in Veterinary Medicine (VM) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work — including for commercial purposes — provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
